RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Cirilli reports: "A Wisconsin judge ruled Friday that a controversial state law limiting unions' rights is unconstitutional. Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas struck down the law, which essentially eliminated collective bargaining rights for most public employees, as a violation of both the state and U.S. constitutions."

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. (photo: Getty Images)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. (photo: Getty Images)


Scott Walker's Anti-Union Law Struck Down in Wisconsin

By Kevin Cirilli, Politico

15 September 12

 

Wisconsin judge ruled Friday that a controversial state law limiting unions' rights is unconstitutional, a decision Gov. Scott Walker is “confident" will be overturned on appeal.

Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas struck down the law, which essentially eliminated collective bargaining rights for most public employees, as a violation of both the state and U.S. constitutions, according to The Associated Press.

Walker won a June recall election that was widely viewed as a referendum on the law, which he had proposed. After Friday's ruling, the governor called Colas “a liberal activist judge" who “wants to go backwards."

“The people of Wisconsin clearly spoke on June 5th. Now, they are ready to move on. Sadly a liberal activist judge in Dane County wants to go backwards and take away the law making responsibilities of the legislature and the governor," Walker said in a statement. “We are confident that the state will ultimately prevail in the appeals process."

The AP notes that it's “not clear if the ruling means the law is immediately suspended." But an attorney for Madison teachers and city of Milwaukee workers, who are plaintiffs in the case, said the ruling reverts unions' rights to 2011, before the law took effect.

“The decision essentially creates the [2011] status quo for municipal employees and school district employees because it declared that the essential provisions of Act 10 to be unconstitutional," Lester told the Journal Sentinel.

Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen's spokeswoman Dana Brueck told the paper he would likely appeal the ruling.

“We believe the law is constitutional," he said. “We are reviewing the decision but we're planning to appeal."

Wisconsin lawmakers on both sides reacted strongly.

“This decision will help to re-establish the balance between employees and their employers," Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca told the Journal Sentinel. “The decision gives us an opportunity to get back to the Wisconsin values of sitting down and working together to iron out differences, not taking away the constitutional rights of our citizens."

Rep. Robin Vos (R-Rochester), meanwhile, told the paper, “A judge living in the fantasy world of Dane County has decided they are going to substitute their singular opinion as opposed to the collective will of Wisconsin, through the Legislature and the recall process."

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the state's second-largest public-employee union, posted a celebratory Facebook message that garnered more than 1,000 likes and some 350 shares in hour. (A couple of other Facebook users, meanwhile, gloated on Walker's Facebook page, “In your face.")

Teachers in Wisconsin were scheduled to rally Friday night in Madison and Saturday in Milwaukee to support Chicago teachers on strike, and unions were planning to bus teachers to Chicago for a Saturday rally, according to The Associated Press. The Chicago teachers reached a “framework" for a deal on Friday afternoon.

After Wisconsin lawmakers passed Walker's proposed law last year, tens of thousands of people - many of them teachers - rallied outside the state's Capitol building in Madison, causing school closures. In February, the state's Democratic state senators left the state for Illinois, unsuccessfully attempting to stop the law's passage. In June, Walker won a recall election after more than 930,000 signatures called for him to be removed from office.

Republican leadership has rallied around Walker. GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney has him called Walker a “hero," while Wisconsin native Reince Priebus, chair of the Republican National Committee, dubbed him “the anti-Barack Obama." At the Republican National Convention in Tampa last month, Walker was spotted tearing up during a speech by GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin congressman.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+77 # Barbara K 2012-09-15 06:49
Great news! I wondered how long he would be allowed to disobey the laws. Too bad he wasn't recalled when the people had the chance.
 
 
+21 # in deo veritas 2012-09-15 09:08
WORSE that the oligarchs who own him (guess who) haven't been recalled by their master (guess who that is?). That will happen one fine day as it does to us all.
 
 
+5 # HowardMH 2012-09-17 07:18
Right Barbara,
Be afraid America be very afraid. The fact he was not recalled with all the evidance against him proves again just how stupid the people really are in Wisconsin. As Forest said, "Stupid Is as Stupid Does" and we got a whole lot of stupid out there just letting this crap happen.
 
 
+59 # bobby t. 2012-09-15 07:02
I guess the constitution is too liberal for Huey Long, oh I mean Scott Walker. When he talks of "collective will" of the people he wants you to think that everyone in the state is on his undemocratic side. They are not. He got to stay in office by a slight majority of the uneducated in his state. He was almost recalled which is hard to do. Especially when you have people who will not admit they made a boo boo.
 
 
+20 # wsh 2012-09-15 13:41
The author says, "Walker won a June recall election that was widely viewed as a referendum on the law, which he had proposed."

No....Walker won the recall because the Dems sent back the same guy who lost to him the 1st time around. ANYBODY but Tom Barrett would have beat him.

The Wiscos rejected Walker and his union busting by recalling him -- but the Dems f'ed up and sent Barrett back to challenge him again. Dumb move.
 
 
+47 # bobby t. 2012-09-15 07:04
If this whole fiasco was made into a movie five years ago, it would go down in flames. Who would believe this nonsense? Cheeseheads used to be liberal. What the hell happened?
 
 
+17 # in deo veritas 2012-09-15 09:05
Too many weak-minded turned into "XXXX"heads. I try to avoid vulgarity on the web.
 
 
+45 # independentmind 2012-09-15 07:05
I am pleased withe verdict and hope that it hold up on appeal. This and some rulings in Ohio have restored my confidence in the judicial system. A little ray of hope.
 
 
+23 # warrior woman 2012-09-15 09:26
It should hold up because if memory serves, he did not put "ALL" unions into the anti-collective bargaining law, he exempted some who endorsed him like the police. On that basis, it was illegal, it had to be all or none by law and it wasn't. THe ugly 5 Supremes should also uphold the verdict but based on who they are, it would seem that this is an uphill battle.
 
 
+24 # bobby t. 2012-09-15 07:16
If this decision is overturned in the Supreme Court, unions, as we know them, will be gone. Then what? Nazi Germany? Brave new world? Food riots? The rest of the world looks on in disgust? They love to see the high and mighty fall. And they also hate it. They have looked to America for so many years. We have spread our founder's brilliance (except for slavery) all over the world.
Certainly not Star Trek! In that world they had ended poverty and disease!
 
 
+43 # chrisconnolly 2012-09-15 07:28
I don't understand how taking away the freedom to collectively bargain holds with the chant that the democrats are taking away our freedoms. These republicans lie then accuse who they are lying to of lying. If we truly want to maintain what vestige of freedoms we have left we had better elect a democratic congress along with a democratic president. Politics today are sounding more and more like Animal Farm where no means yes and truth is lies.
 
 
+21 # bobby t. 2012-09-15 07:55
2012 is 1984. Our new motto is lie,Cheat, and Steal, Until you get Caught, and then get off if you are rich enough.
Today the feds are putting a guy in jail for drug and medicare fraud-45 million. Small potatoes.
However, HCA of America, Columbia Hospitals, CEO at the time being the current governor of Florida, defrauded Medicare of , and get this, one point seven BILLION dollars. Now you are talking big money.
Did the government get it back?
Is Gov. Scott, (me, I don't know nothing buddy, see nothing you hear, I had no idea of what they were doing, hear nothing.....yea h, right.)
The CEO of this corporation in jail?
Does Wall Street own the government?
Who went to jail?
Scooter LIbby was pardoned after being the fall guy for Bush/Cheney and he (yeah right.) committed teason.
 
 
+23 # NAVYVET 2012-09-15 08:00
Of course the Pea Tartiers will take this to the Supremes, but in the meantime, from one who spent 3 years in Wisconsin as a child:

HOORAY!
 
 
+3 # tonywicher 2012-09-15 08:02
So where was Obama during all those demonstrations? Did he even once go to Wisconsin nto show his support for the people? Did he even send a surrogate? No, nothing, nada. Now he's posing as the protector of working people, but when push comes to shove, Obama sells out.
 
 
+2 # bmiluski 2012-09-17 06:52
Nice try Tony. President Obama did not intervene because this was a STATE issue. Had he done so, YOU would have posted that he had no business butting into State issues.
 
 
+18 # Brooklyn Girl 2012-09-15 08:35
I'd like Walker to point to one situation where a reactionary activist did something progressive and moved things forward. Does he understand the definitions of the terms he is using?
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-09-17 06:55
Nice try TONYWICHER..... ....but, President Obama stayed out of this because it was a STATE issue. Had he done something YOU would have then whined about how he had no business interfering in a state issue.
 
 
+1 # DaveM 2012-09-15 08:35
Might it have been a good idea to focus on this court challenge instead of the ultimately unsuccessful recall election? This is how "checks and balances" work!
 
 
+29 # Skeeziks 2012-09-15 08:44
"...Walker was spotted tearing up during a speech by GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin congressman..."

I tear up too; every time I see where these Republicans want to "lead" us.
 
 
+21 # Grizzled 2012-09-15 08:50
I think my 4th grade Civics unit taught me that the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches of our government are there to provide checks and balances on one another. At this point, it seems to have functioned properly. If upheld by a higher court, the people of Wisconsin will still have the opportunity to re-legislate should their representatives have the will to do so.
 
 
+22 # in deo veritas 2012-09-15 09:03
Hopefully this is the first crack in the dam that will crumble and wash away the neofascist 4th Reich running the state of WI!
 
 
+22 # Mrcead 2012-09-15 09:20
"After Friday's ruling, the governor called Colas a liberal activist judge who wants to go backwards."

Yet he expects people to respect HIS authority.

Walker can go pout in a corner somewhere.
 
 
+12 # m... 2012-09-15 17:04
''...the governor called Colas “a liberal activist judge"''

As far as I can tell, it was Republicans who started all this 'Activist Judge' name-calling whenever a court decision went against them.

BUT..

If an 'Activist' Judge is someone who interprets the/a Constitution in a fashion which more or less broadens its scope and meaning to include ideas and concepts and 'facts' not obviously seen within the grammatical construction of the Document-- then the prime example of 'Activist Judges' in our time would have to be the 5 Rightwing (Corpo-hACTIVIS Ta?) Supreme Court 'Justices' who looked at the U.S. Constitution and saw where it contained the equation--> (Global) Corporations+(G lobal Foreign) Shareholders+Co rporate Wealth-Power-Mo ney = WE the People+ Unlimited Right to 'MONEY-SPEAK' into American Elections.

Myself.., I must be blind as a bat. Because no matter how many times I read the U.S. Constitution, even upside down and sideways while squinting, I cannot find that equation.
Maybe someone can help an old man out here and point it out to me.

So, in my mind, its looking more and more to me like an 'ACTIVIST' Judge, as is most often spoken of and described in Media Commentary, would more or less be simply defined as a Judge who Pisses off Republicans..?
 
 
+5 # Barbara K 2012-09-16 14:09
m... You have it figured out. Your last sentence is so spot on.
 
 
-3 # Activista 2012-09-17 12:15
Wisconsin judge ruled Friday that a controversial state law limiting unions' rights is unconstitutiona l .. Judge who Pisses off Republicans..?
Chicago judge ruled .. Emanuel attack on Teacher Union strike. Is kosher - this is DEMOCRATIC? People wake up, stop playing Republican x Democrat game ... this is SYSTEM not parties or politicians.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN