RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "It remains unclear whether victims of rape or incest will be required to contact their abuser in order to receive child-care assistance from New Mexico. A public hearing regarding the new amendment is scheduled for October 1."

New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez (R). (photo: AP)
New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez (R). (photo: AP)


Will New Mexico Women Have to Contact Their Rapists in Order to Get Child Care?

By Rachel Kassenbrock, Ms. Magazine

25 September 12

 

s of Wednesday, New Mexico's Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) is considering a positive new amendment to its child-care assistance policy, which would exempt survivors of rape and incest from filing child-support claims against absent parents. Current policy dictates that all parents, if they want to receive state funds for child care, must file child-support claims against the other parent.

The amendment initially sparked outrage when it became known that the exemption would cover victims of "forcible rape" and incest. This would mean that anyone whose rape is not considered "forcible" (for example, anyone who is physically or mentally disabled, or who was unconscious or under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time) would still be required to contact the absent parent. Additionally, it would burden women in New Mexico with having to prove that their assault matched the state's definition of "forced." If they could not do so, they would be required to contact their rapists for child support, in turn granting their abusers control over their lives again.

Advocates have worked for years to keep terms such as "forcible" and "legitimate" from being used to categorize sexual abuse. Following the Feminist Majority Foundation's spring 2011 Rape is Rape campaign, in January 2012 the FBI updated the astonishingly limited definition for rape it had utilized since 1929: "the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." The definition has been expanded to include all possible forms of rape. However, the fact that the concept of "forcible rape" is still making headlines is worrisome, suggesting that officials are still attempting to normalize the phrase to categorize sexual-assault survivors.

Some were particularly disappointed that this policy was being supported by the nation's first Latina governor, Susana Martinez. RH Reality Check reports this statement from the Strong Families organization in New Mexico:

The attempt to qualify differing levels of rape is especially egregious coming from the nation's first Latina governor, a former tough prosecutor from southern New Mexico and a prominent speaker at the Republican national convention. Leaders want to emphasize that rape is rape, period.

After it was reported that this narrow definition of rape was written into a proposed state law, many began to fight it. Numerous women's health advocate groups responded rapidly, expressing disappointment and disapproval and holding a press conference on Sept. 20. Later that day, Gov. Martinez asked that her administration remove the phrase "forcible rape" from the amendment, stating that the words are redundant because "rape is a forcible sexual crime against an individual" and "[forcible rape] is not a term the state chooses to use in any kind of documents."

That was a victory. Still, in a country where some politicians seem to be looking for ways to downplay violence against women, the amendment's original language is troubling. In 2011, vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan joined Rep. Todd Akin and 171 others in co-sponsoring the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, which initially included an amendment that would grant exceptions in cases of "forcible rape." In March 2012, Gov. Martinez herself used the phrase "forcible rape" when declaring April to be New Mexico's Sexual Assault Awareness month. And let's not forget Senate candidate Todd Akin's comments from August 2012 that "legitimate rape" rarely causes pregnancy.

Though Gov. Martinez's turnabout is heartening, we're reminded that there's plenty of work ahead to ensure that the FBI's former definition of rape remains a thing of the past, and that all rapes are given the concern they deserve.

It remains unclear whether victims of rape or incest will be required to contact their abuser in order to receive child-care assistance from New Mexico. A public hearing regarding the new amendment is scheduled for October 1.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+19 # chuckw38 2012-09-25 08:08
How could this happen in the state in which I grew up????
I am a 74 y.o. Naval Veteran, who is Feminist to the core and defends Women's Rights about determining what is to be done to or with their own bodies!!! This simply isn't right and should NOT be allowed, in spite of what GOP SEXIST A-- Holes, who see Women as their property, to be done with as they so choose...want to do!!!
 
 
+6 # NOMINAE 2012-09-25 18:34
[quote name="chuckw38" ]How could this happen in the state in which I grew up????

All it takes is the bozos who elected a Tea Party Governor. The rest, as they say.... is history.
 
 
+19 # Mamazon 2012-09-25 08:37
What year are we living in? To think that women have to describe the kind of rape they endured to get child support is mind blowing. We are witnessing the American Taliban teaming up with corporate thugs to gut the laws that protect and support women. What next? Honor killings for those of us who were chosen by "God" to be raped? It is time for a modern version of Lysistrata to be enacted upon every rich white male in the country!
 
 
+2 # RLF 2012-09-26 03:18
Youch! Good thing I'm not rich. So now a woman in NM...my mother's home state...has to prove it was forcible after being raped? Not just the bargain basement type of rape. A Latina...educat ed by the Catholic church to take over the world by reproduction... by any means possible.
 
 
+5 # giraffee2012 2012-09-25 10:43
How do these legislatures get into office? DUH - so New Mexico (and other such GOP/TP run states) - get yourselves out to vote! The GOP/TP (a 3rd party) can only exist and torment the people if you don't vote and don't vote straight DEM.

Actually, the rapists SHOULD BE easy to find (in jail) - but, alas, most are given a pass and continue their treachery - yep supported by the people who make law in your state: SO )(*R&)WR it - vote and drag out all you can to register and vote. VOTE STRAIGHT DEM/OBAMA - no matter what your daddy told you: Times have changed!
 
 
0 # RLF 2012-09-26 03:20
Obama is always thanking God and pandering to these religious nuts...explain to me why he is sooo different.
 
 
+7 # Majikman 2012-09-25 11:09
What this says to me is that the repugs want us all to become a disenfranchised seething mass of poverty without rights...the better to exploit us. Gives a whole new meaning to "women and children first". Oh? Did we forget to mention there are no life boats?
 
 
+4 # Glen 2012-09-25 11:13
If citizens do not stand up and fight this type of ruling in every state, the damage will be far worse than against women's rights. Voting is not going to do it. People MUST demand their rights.
 
 
+4 # Regina 2012-09-25 12:33
Being raped by the law is no gentler than rape by forcible penetration. It's time to get these ghouls and crackpots out of office and out of power.
 
 
+5 # dovelane1 2012-09-25 13:01
It's been written that if you want to control people, one must first make them afraid.

Be concerned, but never afraid.

The republicans have gotten where they are by convincing many people to be afraid - mostly of anything or anyone who is different than they are.

Republicans (most) are about excluding everyone from the process of governance, that happens to be different from their norm, whatever that norm happens to be - different color skin or ethnic heritage (Obama, for instance) different gender (female for rich while males), different sexual orientation, or just different moral or personal values.

When we value differences, we become more inclusive. As Paul Wellstone said "We all do better, when we all do better."

It's been written that we get the governments we deserve. Women have to be more assertive about everything. The time for being passive is way past gone. The bull is now in every woman's china shop, and the Repubs and Tp'ers have thrown down the gauntlet. Stand up and be counted. the more women who decide to stand up, the more it will support other women in deciding to stand up.

The time is now, and we are the one's we have been waiting for. No fear - courage is the fleeing forward.
 
 
+9 # Corvette-Bob 2012-09-25 13:37
This country is slipping back into the dark ages. Maybe we will soon be conducting witch hunts and burning women at the stake for having sex with a rapist. Maybe we are all demented from the mercury being put into the air by the Koch brothers.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN