Goodstein reports: "American nuns are preparing to assemble in St. Louis next week for a pivotal meeting at which they will try to decide how to respond to a scathing critique of their doctrinal loyalty issued this spring by the Vatican - a report that has prompted Roman Catholics across the country to rally to the nuns' defense."
Sister Claudia Bronsing takes part in a vigil at St. Colman Church in Cleveland, Ohio, in support of Catholic nuns who were criticized by the Vatican. (photo: Michael McElroy/NYT)
Nuns Weigh Response to Scathing Vatican Rebuke
29 July 12
merican nuns are preparing to assemble in St. Louis next week for a pivotal meeting at which they will try to decide how to respond to a scathing critique of their doctrinal loyalty issued this spring by the Vatican - a report that has prompted Roman Catholics across the country to rally to the nuns' defense.
The nuns will be weighing whether to cooperate with the three bishops appointed by the Vatican to supervise the overhaul of their organization, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which represents about 80 percent of women's Catholic religious orders in the United States.
The Leadership Conference says it is considering at least six options that range from submitting graciously to the takeover to forming a new organization independent of Vatican control, as well other possible courses of action that lie between those poles.
What is in essence a power struggle between the nuns and the church's hierarchy had been building for decades, church scholars say. At issue are questions of obedience and autonomy, what it means to be a faithful Catholic and different understandings of the Second Vatican Council.
Sister Pat Farrell, the president of the Leadership Conference, said in an interview that the Vatican seems to regard questioning as defiance, while the sisters see it as a form of faithfulness.
"We have a differing perspective on obedience," Sister Farrell said. "Our understanding is that we need to continue to respond to the signs of the times, and the new questions and issues that arise in the complexities of modern life are not something we see as a threat."
These same conflicts are gripping the Catholic Church at large. Nearly 50 years after the start of Vatican II, which was intended to open the church to the modern world and respond to the "signs of the times," the church is gravely polarized between a progressive wing still eager for change and reform and a traditionalist flank focused on returning to what it sees as doctrinal fundamentals.
The sisters have been caught in the riptide. Most of them have spent their lives serving the sick, the poor, children and immigrants - and not engaged in battles over theology. But when some sisters after Vatican II began to question church prohibitions on women serving as priests, artificial birth control or the acceptance of same-sex relationships, their religious orders did not shut down such discussion or treat it as apostasy. In fact, they have continued to insist on their right to debate and challenge church teaching, which has resulted in the Vatican's reproof.
The former head of the church's doctrinal office, Cardinal William J. Levada, said after his last meeting with the nuns' leaders in June, just before he retired, that they should regard his office's harsh assessment as "an invitation to obedience."
"I admire religious men and women," Cardinal Levada said in an interview with The National Catholic Reporter. "But if they aren't people who believe and express the faith of the church, the doctrines of the church, then I think they're misrepresenting who they are and who they ought to be."
The sisters say they see no contradiction in embracing the Catholic faith while also being open to questioning certain church teachings based on new information or new experiences. The Leadership Conference has not taken a stand in favor of the ordination of women or the acceptance of gay relationships, but it has discussed such topics at its meetings. Members insist that open discussion of church doctrine is not only their right but is also healthy for the church.
They say their approach is no different from that of many Catholic priests and laypeople, not just those in the United States. As evidence, they cite messages of support they have received from Catholic religious orders of men and women all over Europe, Asia and Latin America - as well as in the United States.
"We make our vows, but our obedience isn't blind," said one mother superior, who, like others, did not want to be identified while the future of the Leadership Conference is in limbo. "Obedience comes from listening."
Vatican II led to dramatic changes now taken for granted by many Catholics: allowing worship in local languages instead of only Latin, encouraging the participation of laypeople, and cooperating with other churches and faiths.
The council also approved a document, "Perfectae Caritatis" ("Perfect Love"), that instructed men and women in religious orders to study their orders' founders and original sources, and use that inspiration to re-evaluate and renew their mission. The sisters say they took the instruction to heart.
"We were the ones who probably took Vatican II and ran the fastest and the farthest with it," said Sister Janice Farnham, a retired professor of church history at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry. "Sometimes our church leaders forget, we were tasked to do these things by the church. The church said jump, and we said, how high?
"The church said update, renew, go back to your sources, and we did it as best we could. We did it with a passion, and we paid dearly."
The sisters after Vatican II had access as never before to higher education, and they went on to become scholars and theologians, chief executives of hospitals, legal aid lawyers, social workers and martyrs in countries like El Salvador. They took on issues including economic injustice, racism, women's rights, immigration, interfaith relations and environmentalism - which for many years put them in collegial working relationships with bishops who were also engaged in those causes.
But the two popes who reigned for the last 34 years - first John Paul II and now Benedict XVI - appointed bishops who are far more theologically and politically conservative than their predecessors. Drawing on these popes' teachings, this new generation of American bishops has steered the church's social priorities toward opposition to abortion, gay marriage and secularism.
The Leadership Conference was a thorn in the Vatican's side even before 1979, the year its president at the time, Sister Theresa Kane, welcomed John Paul to Washington with a public plea to ordain women in the priesthood. The group has remained unified despite pressure from the Vatican by making decisions only after consulting its membership. It is hardly the small splinter group that some conservative critics have recently tried to portray.
The disciplinary action against the nuns comes just as American bishops are struggling to reassert their authority with a wayward flock. The bishops are in the midst of a campaign to defend against what they see as serious threats to religious liberty - especially a government mandate to provide employees of Catholic institutions with health insurance that covers contraception. But the prelates are well aware of polls showing that about 95 percent of Catholic women have used birth control at some point in their lives, and 52 percent support same-sex marriage - little different from the public at large.
The dissonance is of great concern to American bishops and the Vatican.
"The church must speak with one voice," Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the papal nuncio to the United States, said in an address in June to American bishops at their meeting in Atlanta. "We all know that the fundamental tactic of the enemy is to show a church divided."
He added pointedly that at this "difficult time," there is a special need for women and men in religious orders, and for Catholic universities, to "take on an attitude of deep communion" with the bishops.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
They don't do anything to earn it, yet they expect it and demand it.
Besides, my family is Irish. I've never understood why we had to pay homage to an Italian church with a Jewish (Essene) god.
Tho' I'm a gay man, I left pre-Vatican II when the pope went to impoverished Latin America and demand that the people not take steps to prevent having more children than they could feed. This seemed outrageously immoral to me and I walked away from the church. Their twisted, groundless, clueless way of treating sexuality is what has led to countless children being abused. They're sick and in denial. Sex is ideally an expression of love yet they try to keep it in the gutter where they end up themselves.
According to the story, when Jesus rose from the dead, the only witness was one woman. The male disciples doubted her story, of course, but nonetheless, shouldn't women have a bigger role in the churching business?
The 3 Abrahamic religions all seem hostile to female participation, except in subservient ways.
Why is Bronze Age mythology almost mandatory today?
Always has been.
I remember a priest saying to me, in jest, "Ah, the women of the church always on their knees; either praying or scrubbing." I didn't laugh.
This reminds me of a story my father told me, of a proud parent, watching her son march by in a July 4th Parade, and saying, "Oh, they are all out of step except our son Johnnie."
The Papal Nuncio seems to think that 95% of Catholic women are wrong on birth control, and 52% are wrong on same-sex marriage. The poor man is still in the "Pray, Pay and Obey" time warp, and does not seem to see anything strange in defining "an attitude of deep communion" as "unconditional surrender."
Though his own commission unanimously advised that church teaching on contraception be revised, Pope Paul the Sixth reaffirmed traditional teaching. His reasoning seemed to run along these lines: The Church has always taught against contraception; but the Church is infallible; therefore contraception is wrong.
To take a second instance: As bishops all over the world were receiving reports of sexual abuse of kids by Catholic priests, the concern of bishops wasn't concern for these "least of my little ones," but for the reputation of the Church. The bishops worshiped a church of their imagination rather than govern the real churches for which they were responsible. It was an act of idolatry.
There's no easy way to apologize for this act. Instead of apologizing, the bishops have tried to divert attention by attacking nuns. Their behavior is pitiful
The Bible tells us that God gave Man free will, but apparently that "free will" is only allowed to those who do not question. My free will tells me to resist any effort to return the world to the 13th century, where anyone questioning the church was burned at the stake for heresy and witchcraft--and the rich thought they could buy their way into Heaven, after a lifetime of doing whatever they wished to the poor serfs who had to serve them.
These nuns make me proud to be a Catholic. Well, okay, lapsed Catholic, but still, I was baptized and brought up as a Catholic.
Wake up. There is no Santa Claus, no Easter Bunny, and the Pope is not infallible. It's all smoke and mirrors. Look within and you will find a real source of virtue. But you really HAVE to look within, not without! Strengthen your powers of critical thinking, people! Don't cede power over to someone claiming to know better than you what is right or wrong. Follow the money. Use the clues.
(Joseph Ratzinger in: Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II ,Vol. V., pg. 134 (Ed) H. Vorgrimler, New York, Herder and Herder, 1967).
Here's my letter: GO, SISTERS, GO !
I have hopes for Catholicism. It's gone through learning pains before--like the Reformation, a reaction to the papacy's flaunting of pomposities such as changing the title of the pope from simple "Bishop of Rome" to "Vicar (Surrogate) of Christ", introducing the notion of papal infallibility, claiming the "supreme sword" of rule over both church and secular society, forbidding married priests in an attempt to make the priesthood sacrosanct in the manner of ancient pagan celibate cults, the sale of indulgences through which the pope took over God's judgment of the destination of souls in the afterlife, and much more that irritated people with common sense. These over-the-top claims led to movements within the Medieval hierarchy like the Conciliarists, popular revolts, and finally schism. My church democratized long ago, and our congregants' eagerness to serve the world shows that many religious liberals have become better at following Jesus than a lot of those who claim to be Christian. ("By their fruits shall ye know them.") I heartily cheer these nuns' desire to carry forward John XXIII's vision.
to follow the teachings of Jesus than a politician. They should remember that Jesus was not always humble, or perhaps it is better to say that he was humble before God, not the government and institutions of man. At the Vatican, and indeed the Catholic church, in fact any Christian church are 100% man made. Remember too that the disciple Mary was his most beloved.
At the well, at his Resurrection, at His Birth, in his agony, and with his pal Mary Magdalene. Shame on us for kicking women around. It's all the value of Bishops who could not shepherd goats let alone LAMBS!!
To compensate for the fact that all PERSONALLY accumulated cultural knowledge and personal experience (or even "virtue") dies with each individual and we have no wish to re-invent the wheel, men create bureaucracies with their hierarchies to continue along "necessary" work (schools, armies, banks, farms, factories, etc).
These man-made "tools" preserve certain necessary social functions. That way if an individual or group with specialized skills or problem-solving knowledge dies, the bureaucratized organization can continue their tasks. Humans join such bureaucracies to perform within them, piecemeal, certain actions that have the overall effect of repeating their founder's work. And so on down the centuries.
In this way, a recurring social problem has a bureaucracy that deals with it.
So, one needs ask oneself, "what problem was the church, a man-made tool, designed to solve?" The second, what is the function of nuns within this bureaucracy? Perhaps one or both have out-lived their usefulness. The rest is dogma. Moving on.
What people will decide is that the social problems are real and need to be addressed. If the church agrees with them, then religion will be retained as the base for that decision, but if religion fights against that feeling, then religion will be abandoned as irrelevant. What the bishops are doing is providing a vast armory of munitions for people who say that religion is NOT the basis for morality. The bishops need to think about that.
Or maybe I'm just weird when I say, "Hey, whatever gives you peace and purpose, go for it, just try not to hurt anybody."
/"The church must speak with one voice,"/, why? So your peons won't get confused, or because you said so? I look at an unchanging doctrine the same way I look at some royal pedigrees: sure, it's impressive in a way, but becomes less so when the inbreeding turns all future progeny into idiots.
/"We all know that the fundamental tactic of the enemy is to show a church divided."/
And which enemy would that be?
They seem to have a certain serenity about them and a great sense of humor. I also do not like the present pope. I see evil in him, and wonder how he was chosen. Go Nuns!
I am a Sister of Perpetual Determination and I am Perpetually Determined to live a life, not governed by the men of the "Church", but governed by my own concience based on the true teachings of Jesus.
Let's do switch imagination.... the priest take care of the sick, poor, and immigrants (like Jesus did)leave little boys alone AND the nuns take over the Vatican.....I bet they would throw aside all those robes and forget kissing the ring, they would be about the work. Just saying.....
-- A unanimous decree by American Bishops meeting in Baltimore in their annual convention.
I listened to a NPR discussion between a nun from this group and a bishop. He continually ignored, bypassed and re-framed in ways favorable to catholic mumbo jumbo, her excellent comments discussing the issues.
I hope this group continues the fight so we can see the lengths that the catholic hierarchy will go, to suppress women even today. I also hope they form a new group which the vatican can't control and continue to raise these important issues.
RSS feed for comments to this post