RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Renter reports: "Companies like Monsanto, the original producer of Posilac (an rBST) product had to reluctantly put safety warnings on the sides of their packages - admitting that it has about 20 'toxic effects' on the cows."

Much of the US milk supply is contaminated by growth hormones. (photo: California Dairy Association)
Much of the US milk supply is contaminated by growth hormones. (photo: California Dairy Association)



Monsanto's Cloned Growth Hormone Contaminates US Milk

By Elizabeth Renter, Natural Society

03 July 12

reast-feeding mothers are often cautioned against eating and drinking certain things; it's because some of these things can find their way into their breast milk and then their baby. Wouldn't it make sense, then, that some of the hormones and antibiotics given to dairy cattle would make their way into your milk carton? One hormone, recombinant bovine somatotropin, or rBST, is given to about 20% of dairy cattle in the United States, having unknown effects on individuals who consume their milk.

Is rBST safe?

IS rBST safe? That depends on who you ask. Companies like Monsanto, the original producer of Posilac (an rBST) product had to reluctantly put safety warnings on the sides of their packages - admitting that it has about 20 "toxic effects" on the cows.

It's a hormone that forces cows to produce more milk. More milk = more money, but the hormone makes the cows sick. Among other things, it causes mastitis which is an infection of the udder. This infection causes pus to be released into the milk. Yes, pus is in your milk.

In turn, large scale dairy operations that use rBST must use more antibiotics in the cows to counter the infection causing effects of the hormones.

According to the Organic Consumers Association, Dr. Samuel S. Epstein of the Cancer Prevention Coalition warns:

  • rBST milk is chemically and nutritionally different than natural milk.

  • Milk from cows injected with rBST is contaminated with the hormone, traces of which are absorbed through the gut into the blood of people who consume this milk or products made from it.

  • rBST milk is supercharged with high levels of the natural growth factor (IGF-1), which is readily absorbed through the gut.

  • Excess levels of IGF-1 have been incriminated in well-documented scientific publications as causes of breast, colon, and prostate cancers. Additionally, IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms against early submicroscopic cancers.

Interestingly, numerous large and wealthy countries have banned the use of hormones in milk including all countries of the European Union, Norway, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and New Zealand. The United States, obviously has not.

What does this mean for you?

It simply gives you another reason to buy organic, hormone-free dairy products (if you must consume dairy). And if you think you can do without dairy - it's just another reason to go vegan or simply avoid dairy.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+13 # punk 2011-11-02 11:13
if we dont fund assange's defense fund, we can say goodbye to gov transparency and protection of whistle blowers who expose corruption. just suck it up. any powerful gov can do whatever it wants to, torture, rape, bomb, overturn inconvenient govs, and anyone who exposes it will be disposed of. u will be owned by corporations and uninformed about what your gov is doing.
http://www.swedenversusassange.com/
 
 
+9 # Vardoz 2011-11-02 12:10
They can probably resurface in under a different name. But when one does this kind of thing, they have to expect to get some serious heat. I think we all know now what we are dealing with. The actual details are no longer as important. We've lost our civil liberties, they have outsourced all our jobs, taken away our protections and now want to go after our life saving entitlements that we paid for. They have no intention of bailing out Main St. It is total corporate anarchy and Citizens United has fueled the flames. They have stolen our pensions, broken our unions and paid off our reps. So what is left? A very deadly and serious corporate take over that intends to rob us of everything and leave us jobless and destitute like we are one of those South American countries that supported the death squads. They are going in for the kill and we know that now and this is why we are protesting. We know our lives and futures are in danger. They are ravenous, ruthless madmen who are in my opinion mentally ill because who their right mind would so eagerly engage in such heartless destruction of a nation, our economy and people?
 
 
+15 # cadan 2011-11-02 11:18
So somehow nothing can be done about Cheney or Bush, but on very meager evidence Assange (who helped reveal, in fact, more war crimes from Cheney and Bush) has to go on trial. And perhaps the endgame against him is to have him tried in the US, as some of our blood-thirsty senators have howled for.

And our "free enterprise" system blocks even donations from going to WikiLeaks.

Assange, like Anwar al-Awlaki, has committed the unforgivable sin of being effective.

Probably a disaster for him personally, but really shows in high relief what contempt the establishment is worthy of.
 
 
+9 # Kev C 2011-11-02 11:37
Next stop a whistlestop tour of Washington, Langley and then onto Guantanamo Bay for the real interogation/to rture. When he waves goodbye to Britain from the steps of the plane you can bet he won't be waving again at Britain. The next wave will be the ones in the Atlantic that he will be winging his way over.
Wonder how long before the CIA arrange for him to disappears in an extraordinary rendition (otherwise known in every law as 'Kidnapping')?
 
 
+7 # sandyboy 2011-11-02 11:58
Very odd language for judges - saying if he had done what he did in UK he'd have been charged. First, that assumes guilt - we don't know whether he did anything illegal; second, how can they possibly know whether he'd have been charged, as UK cops/prosecutor s maight've reached a different conclusion to the Swedes?
 
 
+1 # CL38 2011-11-02 15:59
sure shows the bias of the court.
 
 
+9 # seeuingoa 2011-11-02 12:37
Assange and Manning.
May the future be kind to them
 
 
+5 # nice2blucky 2011-11-02 14:19
I am reminded of what Noam Chomsky said about why the U.S. invaded Iraq -- in terms of the political reasoning -- after the U.N Security Council voted against the authorization to do so.

He said that one of the rationales was, essentially, that nobody tells the U.S. what to do or controls U.S. policy decisions and actions except us.

Regardless of logic or law, these authoritarians are going to do what they want, they, and they alone, decide.

F everyone else.
 
 
+3 # TROB 2011-11-02 19:18
This is ridiculous. What are they going to do to this man? It is so obviously a setup with the two "raped" victims (one of whom I read in the "distant" past had reneged on her accusation). Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
 
0 # geraldom 2011-11-02 19:44
On one hand, I support Julian Assange & Wikileaks, but Assange got me so angry when he didn't attempt to leave the UK when the walls were obviously closing in on him. The UK, as far as I'm concerned, hasn't been a sovereign nation for many years now when it became a puppet nation controlled by the U.S. along with most of the nations that make up the Euro Zone, including France & Germany and, of course, Sweden.

Before Assange stupidly gave himself up to the UK authorities, he could have easily left the country & ran off to various nations which do not jump through America's hoops. One of those countries is Iceland.

Assange had to have known the danger he was putting himself into by giving himself up to the UK authorities. He could've saved himself & his organization so much money by leaving the UK as well preserving his freedom.

What I don't understand is why his attys don't speak truth to power, to say the obvious, to tell the world that the UK court system is as corrupt & as rotten as the U.S Court system, that they're more like Kangaroo courts than courts of justice, that the people & the judges running the UK Court system have become mere puppets to the demands of their govt and the U.S.

Assange's attys were stupid to even try going thru the UK court system. They should've immediately went to the European Court of Human Rights.
 
 
+2 # Progressive Patriot 2011-11-02 19:55
What right do Visa and Mastercard have to block payments to WikiLeaks? They have no right to tell me where to spend my money.
 
 
+1 # seeuingoa 2011-11-03 01:43
IF IF IF

We all stop buying Swedish
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN