The report begins: "Life in the oceans is at imminent risk of the worst spate of extinctions in millions of years due to threats such as climate change and over-fishing, a study showed on Tuesday."
Atlantic Bluefin, on the brink of extinction, 06/15/09. (photo: Greanpeace)
Ocean Life on the Brink of Mass Extinctions
21 June 11
�
ife in the oceans is at imminent risk of the worst spate of extinctions in millions of years due to threats such as climate change and over-fishing, a study showed on Tuesday.
Time was running short to counter hazards such as a collapse of coral reefs or a spread of low-oxygen "dead zones," according to the study led by the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO).
"We now face losing marine species and entire marine ecosystems, such as coral reefs, within a single generation," according to the study by 27 experts to be presented to the United Nations.
"Unless action is taken now, the consequences of our activities are at a high risk of causing, through the combined effects of climate change, over-exploitation, pollution and habitat loss, the next globally significant extinction event in the ocean," it said.
Scientists list five mass extinctions over 600 million years - most recently when the dinosaurs vanished 65 million years ago, apparently after an asteroid struck. Among others, the Permian period abruptly ended 250 million years ago.
"The findings are shocking," Alex Rogers, scientific director of IPSO, wrote of the conclusions from a 2011 workshop of ocean experts staged by IPSO and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) at Oxford University.
Fish are the main source of protein for a fifth of the world's population and the seas cycle oxygen and help absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas from human activities.
Oxygen
Jelle Bijma, of the Alfred Wegener Institute, said the seas faced a "deadly trio" of threats of higher temperatures, acidification and lack of oxygen, known as anoxia, that had featured in several past mass extinctions.
A build-up of carbon dioxide, blamed by the U.N. panel of climate scientists on human use of fossil fuels, is heating the planet. Absorbed into the oceans, it causes acidification, while run-off of fertilizers and pollution stokes anoxia.
"From a geological point of view, mass extinctions happen overnight, but on human timescales we may not realize that we are in the middle of such an event," Bijma wrote.
The study said that over-fishing is the easiest for governments to reverse - countering global warming means a shift from fossil fuels, for instance, toward cleaner energies such as wind and solar power.
"Unlike climate change, it can be directly, immediately and effectively tackled by policy change," said William Cheung of the University of East Anglia.
"Over-fishing is now estimated to account for over 60 percent of the known local and global extinction of marine fishes," he wrote.
Among examples of over-fishing are the Chinese bahaba that can grow 2 meters long. Prices per kilo (2.2 lbs) for its swim bladder - meant to have medicinal properties - have risen from a few dollars in the 1930s to $20,000-$70,000.
(Editing by Jan Harvey.)
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
retrospective that "free World" propaganda is censoring.
NATO killed son and his 3 GRAND CHILDREN.
In 1986 Reagan killed his adopted baby daughter - Hana.
This is TERRORISM - Killing Gaddafis Grandchildren - NATO, OBAMA ... British royalty - sick "western civilization"
NATO (Obama) not targeting Gaddafi, just his grandchildren.. .Impeach Obama. ...
so how is killing someone's son and three kids under age 12 protecting civilians exactly?
how does blowing up a house in a residential neighborhood constitute protecting civilians?
everyone is a war is a murderer, let's face it. they all think they're the good guys and they all think the other guys are the bad guys- they're all wrong
And this was 2nd targeted bombing of Qaddafi in 2 days.
NATO (Obama) IS not targeting Gaddafi, just his grandchildren ..
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nation-reacts-to-osama-bin-ladens-death/2011/05/02/AFEpl8VF_gallery.html?hpid=z3#photo=1
Since 9-11 America has developed a cult of death. Americans like the ignorant assholes in the Post photos seem ecstatic over the announcement that their president has personally order the murder of another human. The US is, indeed, a sick nation.
We live in celebrity symbols - far from reality. It is SICK.
I will celebrate when we will get out of Afghanistan. War got US bankrupt - think that it is too late anyway. Going way of SSSR.
Yes, it is sad when innocents die. Yes, it should be avoided whenever possible. But in this situation, Gaddafi once again placed himself above the rules, and the death of family members is the result.
Try to remember, this is a leader who has brutalized his own people, bombed his own people when they resisted oppression. Gaddafi has been a threat to freedom, ours and theirs, for more than 30 years.
As a liberal, I do recognize there are some people who are so evil they simply need to be removed. Assasination is a viable strategy, requires fewer deaths than a war, and does not inflict great devastation on civilians. The only regret here is that once again, Gaddafi survived.
mathaba.net/news/?x=626593
facts that "free World" propaganda is censoring.
NATO killed son and his 3 GRAND CHILDREN.
In 1986 Reagan killed his adopted baby daughter - Hana.
"there are some people who are so evil they simply need to be removed. Assasination is a viable strategy ..."
How is NATO making difference which kids should be on not to be killed ?
Imagine psychopath taking the gun in your neighborhood and killing three kids because he is "He is angry with something" and other people even government figures supporting his views. NO this is no way forward - Bomber pilot or the one who issued such an gruesome order should be shown in public and charged for crimes in same way as psychopath with the gun. Kids should play whatever they surname or religion is - they have nothing to do with anyone's political views.
This kids are dead now and they will never play again - Do you have children ?