Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

The report begins: "Newport Beach and other communities on California's coast are planning to build up wetlands, construct levees and seawalls or move structures inland as climate change raises sea levels."

Balboa Island, Newport Beach, California: An ocean surge overwhelms the existing seawall, 12/15/10. (photo: Newport Beach General Services)
Balboa Island, Newport Beach, California: An ocean surge overwhelms the existing seawall, 12/15/10. (photo: Newport Beach General Services)



Coastal Cities Prepare for Rising Sea Levels

By Tony Barboza, Los Angeles Times

06 March 11

 

Newport Beach and other communities on California's coast are planning to build up wetlands, construct levees and seawalls or move structures inland as climate change raises sea levels.

ities along California's coastline that for years have dismissed reports of climate change or lagged in preparing for rising sea levels are now making plans to fortify their beaches, harbors and waterfronts.

Communities up and down the coast have begun drafting plans to build up wetlands as buffers against rising tides, to construct levees and seawalls to keep the waters at bay or to retreat from the shoreline by moving structures inland.

Among them is Newport Beach, a politically conservative city where a council member once professed to not believe in global warming. Now, the wealthy beach city is considered to be on the forefront of preparing for climate change.

Though some in Newport Beach remain skeptical that global warming caused by humans is elevating sea levels, city planners are looking at raising seawalls by a foot or more to hold back the ocean. New homes along the city's harbor are being built on foundations several feet higher than their predecessors as a precaution against flooding.

"I feel a real sense of urgency to begin planning for this right now," Mayor Michael Henn said. "To me it's irrelevant what the causes of global warming are. What we are dealing with is the reality that sea levels are rising."

Sea levels have risen about 8 inches in the last century, and scientists expect them to rise several feet by the end of this century as climate change warms the ocean.

The focus on adaptation is a marked shift for cities such as Newport Beach that just a few years ago had made few preparations for the effects of climate change or were focusing on reducing their carbon footprints. Even as the California Legislature passed a landmark law in 2006 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, few coastal cities had any plans to confront rising waters on their own shores.

"The state of preparedness was close to zero in terms of looking forward to climate change and what it's going to bring," said Susanne Moser, a social science researcher at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University, who has surveyed coastal cities and counties about planning for rising sea levels. "Since then there's been an explosion of interest on the local level."

In Newport Beach, the attitude change came in response to concerns about the future of its harbor, an expansive waterfront dotted with islands and sheltered from the open ocean by the densely populated Balboa Peninsula. Tens of thousands of people live in the area, much of it just a few feet above sea level.

After a sea level rise of just over a foot, a 2008 city-commissioned study said, an extreme high tide would result in widespread flooding on Balboa Peninsula and "near-complete flooding of Balboa Island."

With that in mind, Newport Beach officials are focusing on low-lying Balboa Island, a tightly packed neighborhood of homes and beach cottages where locals zoom through the streets on golf carts and navigate the harbor in electric boats. A narrow sand spit that was dredged into an island a century ago, Balboa Island now houses nearly 2,000 homes, which are considered to be at the greatest risk of flooding in the city.

To protect against that possibility, new homes are already being built on foundations about three feet higher than the historic beach cottages they replace. And the city is conducting a study of the island's seawalls, built in the 1920s and '30s, to determine how high they will have to be raised.

Longtime residents point to eroding beaches and an increase in the number of unusually high tides over the years as evidence of a worsening problem.

In December, when a major storm hit during an extremely high tide, waves broke over the seawall and water pooled on sidewalks and streets. There was no serious damage to homes, but city workers had to pump the water back into the harbor.

Still, many islanders don't believe in human-induced climate change and remain unconvinced that an encroaching sea is a pressing problem.

Seymour Beek, whose family operates the ferry that connects the island to Balboa Peninsula and lives in an island home his parents built in 1922, said the threat has been overblown.

"The projections," he said, "I don't trust any of them. There's going to be plenty of time to cope if there is a significant amount of sea level rise."

Others think the risk is more imminent.

John Corrough, a coastal planner and former city harbor commissioner who lives on the island's south bayfront, said he would welcome the city raising the island's defenses.

"We now have four generations that have lived a good chunk of their life on this piece of sand and their cousins and grandpas and uncles lived on the next piece of sand over," he said. "We're counting on being able to continue this tradition into the future."

Statewide, government officials are moving to prepare for the risks posed by the rising sea. Under a resolution to be considered Friday, the California Ocean Protection Council would direct state agencies to incorporate science-based sea level rise projections into all decisions, projects and regulations.

And like Newport Beach, some of the coastal communities at greatest risk of inundation are already going ahead with their own adaptation plans.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, where the threat is more acute because of a history of filling in and developing the bay, planners are thinking about elevating the Embarcadero seawall and raising the height of levees around the San Francisco and Oakland airports. A proposed development on Treasure Island would raise the elevation of the ground to place homes farther above sea level.

In Hayward, southeast of Oakland, rising sea levels are expected to overtake marshes along its 4-mile coastline and threaten its water treatment plant and industrial district within the next generation or two. Planners are searching for ways - and funds - to build up those wetlands as a buffer.

The city of Ventura broke ground last year on a "managed retreat" project designed to protect Surfers Point, a popular beach and surf spot, by moving a bike path and parking lot some 65 feet from the shore.

Newport Beach Councilwoman Nancy Gardner, who encountered resistance to the idea of adapting to climate change when elected four years ago, said she is proud of the progress the city has made. But she remains conscious of the limitations.

Funding for public works projects is scarce, and relocating structures out of harm's way is an unlikely option in built-out Newport Beach, where homes with harbor views are worth several million dollars.

"We aren't going to retreat - we've got so much invested in real estate," Gardner said. "But the sooner we can start to think long-term, the more creative we can be in our solutions."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-32 # Jerry Matchett 2011-03-06 11:59
Do not confuse two separate issues
1. Is the climate changing? - answer YES
2. Is the major cause human release of CO2? - answer NO
 
 
+15 # Glen 2011-03-06 13:15
Well, Jerry, how do you account for the rapid increase in chaotic weather? Not over a thousand or more years, but within a century. Whether you believe in human involvement or not, there is change, and we must deal with it. Assigning blame is satisfying, and folks are indulging in that, but if one travels and observes the amazing changes human beings have brought to the planet such as:
cutting down billions of trees
releasing huge amounts of chemicals into
the atmosphere through industry etc.
using inordinate amounts of water for
decorative reasons
over grazing
burning to eliminate trees
releasing CFCs through refrigeration, killing the ozone layer

And on and on.

Regardless, it is happening, yes.
 
 
+9 # Curtis1027 2011-03-06 14:33
Quoting
Do not confuse two separate issues
1. Is the climate changing? - answer YES
2. Is the major cause human release of CO2? - answer NO



Jerry, we are not confused. According to the DOE the world generated 27 billion tons of CO2 in 2005 through the burning of fossil fuels.

Where does nature balance this out?
Volcanoes? An old saw. To be sure, the CO2 from volcanoes has added its share, but the best estimates by the USGS put this at about 130 million tons per year as an average.

That is 200 times less.

Burning forests? Don't press that one, even if you are a non-smoker.

Permafrost releases? CO2 from the deep? Ditto and ditto. Those are scary, and are part of the natural positive feedback we are inviting.

Jerry, the reason this is so important to you is as transparent to us as it is opaque to you. It challenges the very core of your political being.
 
 
+7 # The Die Hard 2011-03-06 14:59
And your degree is in what exactly?
 
 
+5 # Sukumar 2011-03-06 17:31
probably Bull
 
 
+10 # The Die Hard 2011-03-06 15:11
Human-caused global climate alteration -- disastrous from our point of view -- passed the point of no return about ten years ago, when the jet stream first started splitting and the major ocean current altered. When we started seeing coral bleaching, island water temperatures too hot for fish to spawn, what climatologists had been warning about for more than half a century was already well underway.

We can mitigate the causes and hope for a slight "boomerang effect," or we can keep up with the "drill, baby, drill" routine and end up with a planet devoid of most mammalian life.

Either way, the rate of change is accelerating, and probably about half of Earth's human population will die in the next ten years. Fast action now may save some semblnce of civilization for the other half. As I said, catastrophe -- but only from our point of view.
 
 
+8 # Yvonne Boudreaux 2011-03-06 20:58
Wow... Jerry is nattering like this is about the deck chairs on the Titanic. No one cares what you "believe", dear. Facts are stubborn things. Will you be gurgling your stupid beliefs through a snorkel? Get out of the way and let people who "get it" get busy...
 
 
+6 # Gary Ray Pierson 2011-03-07 06:44
Quoting
Do not confuse two separate issues
1. Is the climate changing? - answer YES
2. Is the major cause human release of CO2? - answer NO

Jerry, Jerry, Jerry.. I have no idea how old you are and don't care what your credentials are, but you must be under 30.. The air may look clear in many towns but the CO2 is still around in spite of measures to stop it.. They stopped it by making cars and jet planes and such, leave no smoke behind, but the CO2 is still there.. I remember when you couldn't see the Hollywood sign four blocks away, because of smog.. Coal is worse.. My grandfathers were both coal miners and died of coal related illness's, like you may some day... Or I.. Jerry, research unbiased reports on CO2... In other words, turn off FOX.. Cpl. Pierson 101st Airborne, Vietnam and Son of the American Revolution and Cherokee Nation... More American than most, except Native Americans and they have some pay back for us.. Casinos! Go to one Jerry and help America! hahahaha
 
 
+1 # Glenn Gall 2011-03-07 12:37
One right, one wrong.
 
 
+8 # George W-H 2011-03-06 12:27
This reminds me of Canvey Island, Essex, UK, on the Thames Estuary, which is now surrounded by a very high sea wall.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dbullock/4674950637/?reg=1
 
 
+7 # George W-H 2011-03-06 12:28
This reminds me of Canvey Island, Essex, UK, which is now surrounded by a very high sea wall. http://www.flickr.com/photos/dbullock/4674950637/?reg=1
 
 
+16 # jon 2011-03-06 12:30
As astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson recently said, the great thing about science is that it's true whether you believe it or not.
 
 
+6 # Forenna 2011-03-06 14:52
I love the way City Planners only tackle the obvious. I wonder why they called themselves "Planners" if all the think about is Today and not tomorrow!?
 
 
+9 # The Die Hard 2011-03-06 15:34
"We're not going to abandon all our expensive real estate! We'll just make the pie higher! Er, I mean the levees!"

Reality check, Newport Beach: New Orleans.
 
 
+3 # Glen 2011-03-07 17:38
Trouble is, New Orleans was subjected to the Dread Corps of Engineers, who failed to build well and then lied about it. They also dug canals and helped destroy wetlands that contributed to the onslaught of surges before the storm(s). So - not only do they have rising ocean levels, they also have corrupt organizations that edge them further along into disaster.

Folks don't really know what happened in New Orleans during and after hurricane Katrina, and they also blame folks for building that city where it is. BUT if the Netherlands can protect an area much father below sea level than New Orleans, then so could New Orleans or any other coastal city. It won't happen.
 
 
+4 # The Die Hard 2011-03-06 15:30
Sorry, Glen and Curtis, that question was for Jerry.

Jerry, if reality makes you feel uncomfortable, you can believe the oil-owned politicians and corporate-media deniers all you want to, but until you have the facts and the qualifications to evaluate them, neither you nor they are even entitled to an opinion, much less to bother us with it.

It was people like you who brought us to the precipice. Now either pull on the rope to haul us back away from it, or jump off.
 
 
-4 # chaamjamal 2011-03-06 17:05
the sea level has been rising by about 3mm a year since the end of the little ice age and if that rate of rise is perceived to be a threat to any coastal community the rational response is to take protective measures rather than to cut co2 emissions.
 
 
+1 # aikidokurt 2011-03-08 11:35
so you're suggesting a massive public works program in the worst economy in a hundred years? which coastal states could afford such a burden? only the corporations are showng profits; should they take the work on out of the generosity in their hearts? or what, take the unemployed out of the cities and put them to work repairing and building our national infrastructure? living in camps and being provided for by the the evil state? kinda like the NRA (nothing to do with rifles)? what're you, some sort of commie? what are you suggesting?...
 
 
+9 # Foxtrottango 2011-03-06 17:52
Mankind is indeed his worst enemy. That is what this stupid species gets for toying and wanton destruction with mother nature's environment. It's ironic that most of the ocean/seasides properties are own by the wealthy, people who couldn't care less about the environment, or didn't want to believe in those global or climate changes that will be forthcoming. The good part is, they are to be the first one to get it!

The bad part is, they will probably rely on their Republican buddies in Congress to come up with the money to try remedy the forthcoming disasters, all at the expense of the stupid taxpaying public who votes these shenanigans in the first place!

But worst of all, I truly believe that it's too late to do anything about it. The point of no return has already crossed that line.

It last century population's legacy to future generations.
 
 
+5 # 32Rockie32 2011-03-06 23:16
Making plans NOW? Too late. It should have already been done yesterday.
 
 
+4 # 32Rockie32 2011-03-06 23:26
Making plans NOW? Forget it, it's already too late. Get your scuba geer ready. The only good thing that is about to happen is that all the rich folks that helped create this delema, who live at the shore line will go down with the ship. The moment of reckoning is at hand. There is a higher power.
 
 
+3 # Gary Ray Pierson 2011-03-07 03:12
No sudden ( for the Earth) weather changes.. Nothings wrong with the environment... It's like arguing with people over emigration .. If it isn't happening and the Powers that be don't want any more Mexicans and such coming. Then why is so much stuff printed by corporation in Spanish.. They know, that's why people are piling up dirt along coastal islands and why were warming and freezing so radically.. That's not the same color sky I was born under.. When I was a kid, one had to watch out not to step on toads in the yard.. Yards still there.. Toads aren't and any one thinking weather change is bull and this type is natural is a toad too.. Toadies.. Most people don't notice slow change, slow brains.. I'm in my 60's and every thing has changed, mostly peoples logic and decency.. I blame the Bush election and his toadies for our lack of decency.. I blame us and corporate America and any corporation in the world, for making our planet a trash can.. Were all going into dimptsy dumpsters like trash as did Joseph Wheeler the 3rd when he said he was going to tell the news about what our country is doing with germ war fare and chemicals.. Two days later on Jan 3.. A dead Colonel Wheeler who worked with National security was in a dumpster.. It's just a message folks and if you don't know what their up to, your safe and naive.. Like Jerry... formally. Cpl. Pierson 101st
 
 
+4 # fredboy 2011-03-07 06:09
Buy snorkels.

Lots of snorkels.
 
 
+7 # Glen 2011-03-07 17:40
Remember the song with the line, "They'll be tying up the boats in Denver"? The composer had no idea that ocean would slip in through the back door.
 
 
+4 # john kelley 2011-03-07 08:07
Some say, those who dont remember history are bound to repeat it. I would say that history teaches us people ignore history.
 
 
+2 # aikidokurt 2011-03-08 11:28
I guess its time to decide: would you rather have animal life on earth, or rich people?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.