RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Hill writes: "A federal court has overturned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of sulfoxaflor, a pesticide linked to the mass die-off of honeybees that pollinate a third of the world's food supply."

A federal appeals court overturns the government's approval of a powerful new pesticide linked to the killing of honeybees. (photo: Shutterstock)
A federal appeals court overturns the government's approval of a powerful new pesticide linked to the killing of honeybees. (photo: Shutterstock)


Bees Win Big in Court, EPA's Approval of Toxic Pesticide Overturned

By Taylor Hill, TakePart

15 September 15

 

federal court has overturned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency�s (EPA) approval of sulfoxaflor, a pesticide linked to the mass die-off of honeybees that pollinate a third of the world�s food supply.

The three-judge panel said the EPA green-lit sulfoxaflor even though initial studies showed the product was highly toxic to pollinators such as bees. The chemical compound belongs to a class of insecticides, known as neonicotinoids, that scientific studies have implicated in bee deaths.

�Because the EPA�s decision to unconditionally register sulfoxaflor was based on flawed and limited data, we conclude that the unconditional approval was not supported by substantial evidence,� the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel wrote in its opinion.

In her opinion, Judge Mary M. Schroeder wrote that the EPA had initially decided to conditionally approve the chemical but ordered more studies done to better understand the effects the systemic insecticide would have on bees.

�A few months later, however, the EPA unconditionally registered the insecticides with certain mitigation measures and a lowering of the maximum application rate,� Schroeder wrote. �It did so without obtaining any further studies.�

The product, sold in the U.S. as Transform or Closer, must be pulled from store shelves by Oct. 18.

Gregory Loarie, lead counsel for environmental group Earthjustice, which represented beekeepers and beekeeping groups in the case, said the ruling could lead to reviews of other EPA-approved pesticides.

�The EPA rarely, if ever, has reliable information regarding the impact that insecticides have on honeybee colonies writ large, as opposed to individual, adult worker bees,� Loarie said in an email. �With the findings in this case, EPA should move quickly to re-examine other registrations for possible flawed and limited data.�

Sulfoxaflor, created by Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences, is a systemic insecticide. When it�s sprayed on soybean, cotton, citrus, fruit and vegetable crops, it kills bugs on contact and is also absorbed into the plant�s flowers, stems and roots. When insects ingest any part of the plant, they die too.

Paul Towers, spokesperson for advocacy group Pesticide Action Network, said that because sulfoxaflor was only approved in 2013, it hasn�t been widely used. �The prospect of greater use loomed, especially as other neonicotinoids are under increased scrutiny and pressure for phase-out,� Towers said.

That phase-out already has started in Europe; EU member nations banned three neonicotinoids in 2013 for two years after the chemicals were linked to the dramatic decline in bee populations there.

�This is the classic pesticide industry shell game,� Towers said. �As more science underscores the harms of a pesticide, they shift to newer, less studied products. And it takes regulators years to catch up.�


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-7 # davehaze 2020-09-25 13:41
Utterly disgusting and fair warning what a sick "I am not a socialist!" chief executive he would make...

...prepared to lead the world into perdition and war.
 
 
+2 # revhen 2020-09-26 06:51
O contraire. Trump is up to what he is doing: destroying our government, our nation in favor of Russia, big business, and the very wealthy.
 
 
-3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 08:00
 
 
+2 # Freddy 2020-09-26 09:40
"Vote 'none of the above'" - Sounds pretty much like advice straight out of Putin's playbook. What a coincidence.
 
 
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 16:07
Fred -- I thought Putin wanted Trump. Has he changed his mind. Why did he tell you and not tell me? Is Putin switching teams. Maybe he's moving over to Biden now?
 
 
-3 # laborequalswealth 2020-09-26 10:53
Yep. The Deep State can't wait for more wars.

Ah! But we have such a vibrant democracy that now we get the "choice" of voting for a corrupt, war-mongering, demented political hack, or a corrupt not quite as war-mongering demented political idiot. (I will allow readers to decide which is which.)

This is like having to chose between small pox and cholera.
 
 
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 16:18
 
 
+1 # bardphile 2020-09-26 17:46
More like between small pox and an annoyingly persistent case of bronchitis. Our democracy would survive Sleepy Joe, but not another 4 years of the Donald.
 
 
+1 # davehaze 2020-09-26 15:23
Ask yourself if you were one of the 70% of Americans who were fooled into believing in 1 Iraq having WMD 2 Sadam Hussain was aleigned w Al Qaida 3 he was an existential threat to the US 4 involved in 9/11 and 5 that we should invade Iraq before they invade us.

Sounds silly now because none of it was true. I might cut you some slack that you believed the lies because you were just one of the hundred million unsuspecting TV-watching gullible. You are not one of those 500 national security experts who did the lying.
 
 
+1 # Colleen Clark 2020-09-27 16:29
I hope I'm in the majority in enough states voting for Biden. Trump is self-centered and ignorant which are terrible qualities in any candidate for office, much less one running for election or re-election as POTUS. He'll be fine back in Trump tower. He can continue lying but it won't matter to the rest of the country any more.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN