FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Paul and Kaldveer report: "Monsanto and Big Food are taking the battle for consumers' hearts and minds to the next level. And it's no coincidence that they're pulling out the big guns just as the Washington State I-522 campaign to label genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food products is gaining steam."

93 percent of Americans support GMO labeling. (photo: file)
93 percent of Americans support GMO labeling. (photo: file)


Monsanto, Big Agribusiness to Spend Millions on GMO Propaganda

By Katherine Paul, Zack Kaldveer, AlterNet

05 July 13

 

Polls show it will take a lot more than new public relations tricks to convince consumers.

onsanto and Big Food are taking the battle for consumers' hearts and minds to the next level. And it's no coincidence that they're pulling out the big guns just as the Washington State I-522 campaign to label genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food products is gaining steam.

Can industry front groups and slick public relations firms convince us that the products they're peddling are not only safe, but good for us? Will the millions they spend on websites and advertorials pay off?

We're guessing not, given the latest New York Times pollstating that 93 percent of Americans want labels on foods containing GMOs.

Still, it can't hurt to know who's behind the latest salvo of lies and misinformation.

In this case, it's a new website and forum, introduced by biotech trade groups no doubt with the help of a new PR firm. And a new front group. The freshly launched GMOAnswers.comis funded by the biotech industry, which claims it just "wants to talk." And the recently formed Alliance to Feed the Future,representing more than 50 multinational food, agribusiness and biotech companies, wants to give us the "real" scoop on our food system.

Monsanto Has All the Answers

Last month the Holmes Reportrevealed that Monsanto was interviewing public relations firms to spruce up its image. A tall order given Monsanto's status as "most evil corporation in the world." (A google search of "Monsanto most hated corporation" returns over 823,000 results).

This week, the New York Times reported on the launch of GMOAnswers.com, a new website intended to "answer virtually any question posed by consumers about genetically engineered crops." Except, of course, where they're hidden in our food.

You've got to hand it to the PR firm - new, old, Monsanto's or otherwise - that landed that article. Who gets a mention in the Times these days just for launching a website? Organizations that are funded by Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta and BASF, apparently.

The Timesquoted, extensively, Cathleen Enright, executive director of the Council for Biotechnology Information and also vice president for food and agriculture at another trade group, the Biotechnology Industry Organization. Enright told the Times that: "We have been accused of purposely hiding information. We haven't done that but now we will open the doors and provide information." Say what?

Enright couldn't emphasize enough how this was all a result of the biotech industry being misunderstood by the public, and how Monsanto and the rest of the industry just wants to be open.

Whoever registered the website domain name for GMOAnswers.com doesn't share Enright's new touchy-feely enthusiasm for openness and transparency. The domain's ownership is hidden behind Network Solutions LLC. Maybe the new PR firm isn't all that proud of its new clients?

Big Food Is Dishing up the Lies, Too

It isn't just the biotech industry spinning the facts. Big Food is dishing up its share of lies, too.

To counter the steady drumbeat of public relations defeats, damning scientific research and grassroots political pressure, Monsanto and over 50 other multi-national food, agribusiness, and biotech companies created the "Alliance to Feed the Future" (AFF).

The AFF's stated mission? To "balance the public dialogue on modern agriculture and large-scale food production and technology" and to serve as a source for accurate and "real" information about our food system.

In fact, the AFF is nothing more than a few high paid consultants doing the bidding of the American Meat Institute, CropLife America, Grocery Manufacturers Association, United Egg Producers, Biotechnology Industry Organization, and the International Food Additives Council, among others.

Dave Schmidt coordinates the alliance. Schmidt, who is also CEO at the International Food Information Council, recently told Sustainable Food Newsthat "the alliance's aim is to educate who he called 'opinion leaders,' including those in the university sector, professional societies, journalists and government officials." Of course, he said, the group also aims to "inform" consumers, too.

But a close look at the AFF reveals all the hallmarks of a typical "astroturf" group. A deceptive-sounding name designed to create a positive public impression. A sophisticated public relations plan designed to control and shape the public discourse. Obfuscation around its main sources of funding. And a tendency to attack industry critics, create the perception of doubt regarding previously accepted science, and exploit consumers legitimate economic fears.

And, like most front groups, the AFF's seemingly unlimited resources guarantee it can churn out one lie after another, faster than the independent fact-checkers can debunk them.

Big Food recognizes its stranglehold on our food supply is threatened. A critical mass of educated consumers, food and natural health activists, environmentalists, social justice advocates, and animal cruelty groups are organizing a powerful movement capable of overthrowing North America's trillion-dollar junk food empire.

Consumers are increasingly wary of foods that have been genetically engineered by the same companies that brought us toxic pesticides, DDT, Agent Orange, dangerous pharmaceuticals and PCBs.

Sales of organic foods are projected grow this year at twice the rate of conventional food sales, and exceed $35 billion in 2013. Proof that consumers by the millions are rejecting an industrial food and farming system that relies on toxic pesticides, animal drugs, antibiotics, growth hormones, climate disrupting nitrate fertilizer, and inhumane, polluting, and disease-ridden factory farms.

More and more critics and journalists are exposing the hazards and cruelty of our food supply system. Even the New York Times recently revealedthat for decades, processed foods have been diabolically engineered and laced with synthetic chemicals and additives designed to turn consumers and children into obese, cancer- and heart disease-prone junk food addicts.

The writing is on the wall. No amount of industry smoke and mirrors can change the fact that more and more people are looking at food with their eyes wide open.

Will corporations win our hearts and minds with their website propaganda and front groups? We think not.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+7 # Phlippinout 2013-08-05 22:04
Go ahead Monsanto, spend your dirty blood money, I am not moved in the least.
 
 
+3 # Jaysson Brae 2013-08-06 08:18
Few people expected Monsanto to be able to defeat California's ballot issue requiring GMO labelling, last year. It seemed to have wide public support.
But in the last 4 months of CA's ballot campaign, MonsterInsanito dumped unlimited millions into an ad campaign that totally drowned out pro-labeling forces -- and somehow Golden State voters fell for it.

Monsanto will now try the same strategy in Washington State.
Let's hope Washington voters will be less hypnotizeable/m ore discerning.
 
 
0 # womyn 2013-08-06 08:49
Watch documentary: Genetic Roulette http://geneticroulettemovie.com/
Full Movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBlp_thTq0Y

I am afraid folks in Washington will be just as gullible and fearful of the threat of increased food costs to label them GMO free as were Californians.

After Monsanto poured millions and mounted what became a huge successful campaign to fool and confuse Californians about GMOs, the majority of Californians voted against GMO labeling.
 
 
+2 # PABLO DIABLO 2013-08-06 10:59
Boycott the corporations that are killing us.
 
 
0 # Mrcead 2013-08-06 17:01
What do they feed their families? Be wary of the peddler who isn't his own best customer.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN