RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Jones writes: "Human activity endangers entire species, yet human culture is profoundly rooted in nature."

Woolly mammoths faced extinction between 4,000 and 10,000 years ago. (photo: Unknown)
Woolly mammoths faced extinction between 4,000 and 10,000 years ago. (photo: Unknown)


The Sixth Extinction Menaces the Very Foundations of Culture

By Jonathan Jones, Guardian UK

08 September 12

 

Human culture is profoundly rooted in nature, yet human activity endangers the survival of entire species of plants and animals.

n a cave in south-west France an extinct animal materialises out of the dark. Drawn in vigorous black lines by an artist in the ice age, a woolly mammoth shakes hairs that hide its face and vaunts slender tusks that reach almost to the ground.

Those tusks were not dangerous enough to save it. As human hunters advanced on its icy haunts, mammoths faced extinction between 4,000 and 10,000 years ago. The end of the ice age did for these shaggy cold-lovers, but humans helped: entire huts built from mammoth tusks and bones have been found.

We didn't mean to help make the mammoth extinct. The wonderful portrait of a mammoth in Pech Merle cave reveals that early homo sapiens was fascinated by these marvellous creatures. This masterpiece of cave art is as acute as any modern work of naturalist observation. The hunters who painted in caves showed the same passion for the natural world as their descendants do. Their culture must have been bereft when the mammoth vanished - even as they helped it on its way.

In the 21st century the same paradox endures. Human activity endangers entire species, yet human culture is profoundly rooted in nature. The loss of a species is also a loss of the images, stories, symbols and wonders that we live by - to call it a cultural loss may sound too cerebral: what we lose when we lose animals is the very meaning of life. Those first artists in ancient caves portrayed animals far more than they portrayed people. It was in the wild herds around them that the power of the cosmos and the mystery of existence seemed to be located.

No species in modern times embodies that fascination more fully than the tiger, one of today's most endangered predators. Since the Romantic age tigers have been endowed in art and literature with the marvellous essence of life itself, a primeval power like the enigmatic strangeness the stone age artist saw in a mammoth. "What immortal hand or eye,/ Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" wonders William Blake in his 1794 poem The Tyger. That same childlike awe - Blake's poem appears in his child's eye Songs of Innocence and Experience - is shared by Henri Rousseau's 1891 painting Surprised! of an archetypal tiger in a fantastic jungle.

These artistic hymns to the tiger are just the noblest expressions of an imagery that pervades modern culture from tigers who come to tea to tigers with neat feet. It just seems unimaginable that a creature so familiar in our shared dreams should vanish from the natural world. Human culture would lose immeasurably from such a disappearance. And what about sharks? More ancient than dinosaurs, under threat for the first time in their mind-bogglingly long history, these creatures feed modern culture some of its darkest folklore. Shark films and scare stories are the modern equivalent of stone age hunters telling tales about bears and wolves around the fire. We fear them, but our culture needs them.

Cute creatures as well as scary ones inspire the stories and myths that humans cannot live without. Amphibians, most threatened animal group of all, are among the most universal stars of culture. While Blake was marvelling at tigers, the Grimms recorded the folk tale of the frog-prince. Long before that Plato said the ancient Greeks were like frogs around a pond. Aristophanes wrote a comedy called The Frogs. American frogs were depicted by the Aztecs as well as providing Amazonian peoples with arrow poison. The very naming of poison dart frogs reveals how deeply they are associated with cultures that are themselves on the brink of extinction.

In Britain too, the amphibious denizens of threatened waterlands have always inspired imaginations. Could our culture survive without Toad of Toad Hall?

Not so long ago British beaches were seasonally covered with "mermaid's purses", the eggs of sharks and rays. The name reveals how deeply nature feeds folk culture, in Britain as in the Amazon. Is it possible still to find masses of mermaid's purses on the Welsh rocks where I used to wonder what they were? I have to look for them with my daughter soon, before it is too late. The range of animals and plants threatened by the sixth extinction - as covered by the Guardian over this fortnight - is such that it menaces the foundations of culture as well as the diversity of nature. We are part of nature and it has always fed our imaginations. We face the bare walls of an empty museum, a gallery of the dead.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+28 # KrazyFromPolitics 2012-09-08 13:55
The arrogant human disregard for the very source of our life has baffled me for years. If the point of no return doesn't occur in my lifetime, I fear for my children, and grandchildren.
 
 
+18 # cabotool 2012-09-08 21:44
I am 76 years old with an excellent scientific education. I have been observing the events on our earth since age 4 or so. I come to the conclusion that the point of no return will occur in 5 years or less!
Man is incredibly efficient at sowing the seeds of his own destruction!
 
 
-5 # QDP 2012-09-08 22:45
The single most regularly defined constant in our world, our solar system, our galaxy and the universe itself is that of certain extinction. Embrace it, as change is what created everything.
 
 
+17 # brianf 2012-09-09 07:57
It's good to embrace change. It's a completely different thing to be complacent when your species is causing the extinction of other species and perhaps itself. Hopefully that is not what you mean.

Similarly, it is good to accept that fact that everyone is going to die. But that does not give you the right to murder. You can try using "everyone dies" as a defense, but it won't work. Despite the fact that people have always died, murder is wrong.

Similarly, the fact that the climate has always changed does not absolve us of the guilt of causing dangerously fast climate change that is helping to cause extinctions and is pushing us more quickly towards the sixth mass extinction in the history of life on earth. This is the worst possible crime, much worse than murder or even genocide, because entire species will be destroyed, including our own, if we don't stop this in time.

If a mass extinction was occurring, and we were not the cause, I would still advocate doing what we could to stop it, if only to protect our own species. But to be actively causing a mass extinction - I can't think of anything more anti-life, more evil, or more stupid.
 
 
+8 # Adoregon 2012-09-09 09:48
Yes, yes and yes!!!
Homo Hubris... too full of itself to survive.
And as humans, who think of themselves as the zenith of creation, the "apple of "god's" eye, self abort, we casually inflict extinction on other species who are no less important [than humans] in the eyes of "god."
I define "god" as "the operative power of the universe." That which makes everything what and as it is. Science is how humans strive to understand "the operative power of the universe."

So, as an aside, please people, ask the politicians to define "god" whenever they bandy the term about. I doubt any (of the politicians) are able to articulate a cogent response.
 
 
+1 # Observer 47 2012-09-09 21:49
OUTSTANDING comment, Brian!! YES!!! If we were merely annihilating our own species, we'd be getting what we deserve. But it's surely a crime against the Universe, an abomination for all time, to take the innocent, non-human creatures with us!
 
 
+10 # JetpackAngel 2012-09-09 00:23
RIP, Japanese River Otters. You have now been declared extinct. Sorry, little guys.

Can we send a team of scientists to China to analyze their coveted tiger-bone longevity potions and declare them hooey so the tigers will be left alone? Or would we maybe have better luck voicing that argument to a brick wall?
 
 
+9 # mdhome 2012-09-09 05:12
Myths do not respond well to reason.
 
 
+8 # corals33 2012-09-09 00:52
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Human being
You have entered creation at a loss as to your origin and horribly unsure of your future and so obsessed with your present you prefer to dismiss everything else in an illusionary fit of something you call progress.Carry on as you wish but please remember the golden rule that says you cannot have your cake and eat it,no matter what you do.
 
 
+16 # WolfTotem 2012-09-09 04:05
"For greed, all Nature is too small."
Seneca

Is it not strange that those who aggressively trumpet the sacredness of life should be among the greatest destroyers of Life?
 
 
-2 # mdhome 2012-09-09 05:39
Too bad about the wooly mammoths , they look interesting, if you want to extinct something do it to the ticks.
 
 
+1 # MJay 2012-09-09 06:28
cabotool
Would you like to read an editorial "GREED Destroyer of Man"?
 
 
+9 # brianf 2012-09-09 08:11
Even without global warming, we would be in danger of causing the sixth mass extinction, eventually, from habitat destruction, barrier to migration, overfishing, overhunting, pollution, and so on. But global warming has already sped up the extinction rate, and will make a mass extinction unavoidable if we don't stop it.

If this mass extinction occurs, there is no way humans would survive. If you don't believe this, you don't realize how much we depend on other forms of life, and you don't know what a mass extinction caused by greenhouse gases is like. Read "Under a Green Sky" to get an idea.
 
 
+7 # Mamazon 2012-09-09 11:47
Sadly we are killing the oceans -- Fukushima,radio active dumping from Russia, the US and China, oil and gas leaks, dispersant chemicals to control the oil and gas leaks, climate temperature change, acidification.. .. And when the oceans can no longer support life -- we all go extinct. No more reincarnation - zip - nada - gone. Perhaps our stories will surpass us and some aliens will be checking out some Burning Man art centuries from now... They will think we are the weirdest species ever -- so full of creativity and so full of crap!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN