RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Wooten, Bernd, and Seifert report: "Occupiers, Tea Partiers, landowners, and environmentalists are challenging construction of the Keystone XL pipeline's Gulf Coast segment - together."

A broad coalition of groups is fighting the Keystone XL pipeline in Texas. (photo: Tar Sands Blockade)
A broad coalition of groups is fighting the Keystone XL pipeline in Texas. (photo: Tar Sands Blockade)



Why We're Putting Ourselves on the (Pipe)Line With the Tea Party

By Will Wooten, Candice Bernd, Ron Seifert, YES! Magazine

28 August 12

 

Occupiers, Tea Partiers, landowners, and environmentalists are challenging construction of the Keystone XL pipeline’s Gulf Coast segment - together.

n July 27, TransCanada Corporation announced that it had received the last permit required before breaking ground on the Gulf Coast Segment of the Keystone XL pipeline. Although this news elicited many emotions among landowners and local communities, surprise was not among them. The campaign to stop the pipeline is now entering its fifth year, and pipeline opponents everywhere are mobilizing.

The Tar Sands Blockade is a peaceful direct action campaign designed to unite everyone and anyone committed to stopping the pipeline. We stand in solidarity with landowners in Texas and Oklahoma whose property rights have been trampled, as well as with communities whose health and safety are being imperiled. And it’s not just local communities along the pipeline route who stand to be harmed. First Nations communities downriver from tar sands extraction sites in Alberta, Canada, are suffering from abnormally high cancer rates. Meanwhile, Keystone XL would threaten us all by opening the floodgates to the largest untapped reserve of carbon in North America.

Why Direct Action?

In 2008, TransCanada was granted the extraordinary power of eminent domain - the ability to legally condemn and appropriate private property - and the corporation immediately leveraged it to pressure landowners into signing contracts. "TransCanada lied to me from day one," says East Texas landowner Susan Scott. "They bullied me and said either I sign their papers or they’d take me to court."

According to the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, eminent domain may be used only for projects that serve a public use or purpose. The Texas Landowners Bill of Rights, too, says that property can be taken only for public use. Yet at no point did Texas officials verify that TransCanada’s pipeline would do either. The fact that Texas officials granted a foreign corporation the power of eminent domain without ever requiring them to demonstrate public use is unconscionable. As a result, landowners like Susan did what most people would do: they appealed to local representatives and regulators for help.

Unfortunately, their lobbying, letter writing, and testimony at public hearings fell on deaf ears. All of our representatives, both state or federal, are beholden to the oil and gas industry. Not one opposes the Gulf Coast Segment. Our public officials have been captured, rendering useless all traditional means of addressing our grievances. There is but one tactic left powerful enough to withstand the weight of TransCanada’s heavy hammer: nonviolent direct action.

Putting Differences Aside

Blocking the Gulf Coast Segment with human bodies is not going to be easy. Fortunately, the campaign’s momentum has been building for years, as demonstrated by the overwhelming response to the launch of the Tar Sands Blockade website and the popularity of our Twitter and Facebook postings. Some of that support comes from the landmark sit-in action at the White House that took place in 2011, followed weeks later by an enormous rally in Washington, D.C. That event provided a groundswell of energy and a network of participants eager to take the next steps. The Tar Sands Blockade is uniting these passionate individuals with landowners along the proposed pipeline route. We invite anyone willing to line up, as equals, to join us in civil disobedience.

Dozens of people took us up on that offer and attended the Keystone Convergence training weekend from July 27 to 29. Despite the late-July Texas heat, participants spent two full days discussing action plans and support roles, and practicing nonviolent blockade techniques. The enthusiasm on display was remarkable, and so was the diversity of participants. They ranged in age from twenties to seventies, in political positions from left to right, and in experience from newbies to veteran activists.

In an age of political polarization, it was refreshing to see older, self-identified Tea Party members who deeply value property rights literally holding hands and linking arms with bright-eyed young environmentalists and Occupiers, some of whom owned nothing but their clothes and the food in their travel packs. The traditional categories often applied to climate justice activists break down when we look at the coalition of pipeline resisters now ready and willing to put their bodies on the line.

Even more surprising than the diversity of supporters is that this call to action comes from the heart of oil country. Texas and Oklahoma would seem unlikely places from which to recruit a team of anti-pipeline activists. Nonetheless, the din of outspoken landowners is finally reaching sympathetic ears across the nation. David Daniel, another East Texas landowner, knows as well as anyone what it feels like to have elected officials refuse to listen to legitimate grievances. "I have been told by too many people that even though I am right, these multinational companies have too much money and power," he said. "They say I can’t fight and win, that I just have to let the pipeline happen and try to make the best of it." David finds this unacceptable, and so do we. We hope that you do, too.

The next chapter in the Keystone XL pipeline story is being written now, and it has the makings of a thrilling climax. The Tar Sands Blockade team recognizes that this story is far more complex than a simple conflict of economic versus environmental interests. This pipeline is too dangerous to exist. It threatens our health, security, and constitutionally protected rights.

The truth is that the Keystone XL story is about injustice, and it is once again time for ordinary people to act collectively in the proud American tradition of civil disobedience to confront this injustice. We must rely on nonviolent direct action as a proven method for seeking justice so that, finally, we the people can close the book on the Keystone XL pipeline.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+12 # dkonstruction 2012-08-28 13:03
To me, the most important part of this piece and the lesson progressives/le ftists must learn is that their initial knee-jerk reaction to write-off the entire tea party movement (i.e., its base and not its demagogic billionaire backers) was a huge mistake and essentially gave those folks no where to go other than into the outstretched arms of its ultra-right wing manipulators (from the Rick Santorum's to the Koch's to the Bachman's etc). In many ways, the critique (such that it is) of the tea party base shares much in common with the critique of progressives/le ftists i.e., our government (and the economy as a whole) doesn't work for the vast majority of us. Instead of simply dismissing all that were attracted to the this part of the tea party message progressives should have been reaching out to those disaffected (overwhelmingly white) folks and try to make common cause on issues where we should be natural allies. I'm not so naive that i think that there are not some pretty awful, racist, rabid right wingers amongst them but to not reach out to their base with a genuinely progressive message and try to argue that they should be with us and not agin us essentially assured that they would go over to the far right. Hopefully the tar sands battle is just the first of many in which we can actually win over and make common cause with folks that we should be trying to reach.
 
 
-3 # dbriz 2012-08-28 15:51
You make a good point however I can assure you that it will fall mostly on deaf ears. Glenn Greenwald, a left leaning civil libertarian par excellence frequently makes the same point using Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul as his example.

The civil libertarian right and left have much they can agree on and little that they disagree about can't be put off to a later date.

It is perpetual war, big corporate cronyism, and the MIC that represent the greatest threat to our economy, liberties and the Constitution. On this the libertarian right and left agree.

That said, you could not believe the crapola Greenwald received every time he mentioned a good word about Ron Paul.

No, you will not find the majority of the left doing anything other than finding every excuse possible to vote for Obama.

They will play the LOTE card to the hilt rather than withhold their votes. You will hear from the them the same thing "conservatives" said about George Bush in 2004,"...don't worry he'll come around in the second term...".

Yeah, sure he will.
 
 
+2 # BobbyLip 2012-08-29 09:19
The point is not whether Obama will come around in a second term--he probably won't to the satisfaction of those of us further on the left--but what Romney/Ryan will do in a first term. Say what you will about the lesser of two evils argument, the fact remains: when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you get less evil. And when you smooth the way for the Republicans, you get more evil. Ask anyone but the rich or the deluded.
 
 
-3 # dbriz 2012-08-29 11:07
When you choose to vote LOTE you are de facto participating in, propping up and endorsing an evil, rotten system. The fact that it may or may not be a bit less evil is of no real consequence.

The winners always have a "mandate" and they really don't know or care whether or not you held your nose when you pulled the lever, to them it's a "mandate" just the same.

The empire's wars will continue, the big bankers and crony global corporations will still be in charge and the CIA/MIC shadow government will continue to call the shots.

Unfortunately, thinking a vote for LOTE in the form of Obama will harm the "rich" in any way, classifies as delusion.
 
 
+10 # X Dane 2012-08-28 23:51
If you have any faith in the eminent Nasa climate scientist, James Hansen. His words are: " If the tar sands oil pipeline gets built, it is game over for the planet, for it is the dirties, heaviest, worst polluting oil in the world.

And because of the high percentage of sand in the oil, the pipes breaks down more easily, and that will be disaster for the aquifers the pipelines traverse..
We need to keep protesting, and do all we can to prevent it from being built.
 
 
-4 # dick 2012-08-29 05:22
The left should have hooked up with conservative populists against Wall St. YEARS ago. But Obama declared bankster$ off limits. CATASTROPHIC mistake. National rage get DIRECTED at Obama, & he deserved it for shielding criminals. Had Obama not wanted their dirty money, populist Obama could have led 2010 election win, even supporting anti-Wall St. non-Dem candidates in a few districts. Barry's sell-out to Wall St. criminals and Nixon like pardon for all their crimes is impeachable Obstruction of Justice, BETRAYAL of his country.
Blowing off libertarians & conservative populists to cozy up to Wall St. was NUTS. Monumental arrogance goes before the fall.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN