Vidal reports: "Leading water scientists have issued one of the sternest warnings yet about global food supplies, saying that the world's population may have to switch almost completely to a vegetarian diet over the next 40 years to avoid catastrophic shortages."
A bull grazes on dry wheat husks in Logan, Kansas, one of the regions hit by the record drought that is expected to drive up food prices. (photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Food Shortages Could Force World Into Vegetarianism
27 August 12
Water scarcity's effect on food production means radical steps will be needed to feed population expected to reach 9bn by 2050.
eading water scientists have issued one of the sternest warnings yet about global food supplies, saying that the world's population may have to switch almost completely to a vegetarian diet over the next 40 years to avoid catastrophic shortages.
Humans derive about 20% of their protein from animal-based products now, but this may need to drop to just 5% to feed the extra 2 billion people expected to be alive by 2050, according to research by some of the world's leading water scientists.
"There will not be enough water available on current croplands to produce food for the expected 9 billion population in 2050 if we follow current trends and changes towards diets common in western nations," the report by Malik Falkenmark and colleagues at the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) said.
"There will be just enough water if the proportion of animal-based foods is limited to 5% of total calories and considerable regional water deficits can be met by a ... reliable system of food trade."
Dire warnings of water scarcity limiting food production come as Oxfam and the UN prepare for a possible second global food crisis in five years. Prices for staples such as corn and wheat have risen nearly 50% on international markets since June, triggered by severe droughts in the US and Russia, and weak monsoon rains in Asia. More than 18 million people are already facing serious food shortages across the Sahel.
Oxfam has forecast that the price spike will have a devastating impact in developing countries that rely heavily on food imports, including parts of Latin America, North Africa and the Middle East. Food shortages in 2008 led to civil unrest in 28 countries.
Adopting a vegetarian diet is one option to increase the amount of water available to grow more food in an increasingly climate-erratic world, the scientists said. Animal protein-rich food consumes five to 10 times more water than a vegetarian diet. One third of the world's arable land is used to grow crops to feed animals. Other options to feed people include eliminating waste and increasing trade between countries in food surplus and those in deficit.
"Nine hundred million people already go hungry and 2 billion people are malnourished in spite of the fact that per capita food production continues to increase," they said. "With 70% of all available water being in agriculture, growing more food to feed an additional 2 billion people by 2050 will place greater pressure on available water and land."
The report is being released at the start of the annual world water conference in Stockholm, Sweden, where 2,500 politicians, UN bodies, non-governmental groups and researchers from 120 countries meet to address global water supply problems.
Competition for water between food production and other uses will intensify pressure on essential resources, the scientists said. "The UN predicts that we must increase food production by 70% by mid-century. This will place additional pressure on our already stressed water resources, at a time when we also need to allocate more water to satisfy global energy demand - which is expected to rise 60% over the coming 30 years - and to generate electricity for the 1.3 billion people currently without it," said the report.
Overeating, undernourishment and waste are all on the rise and increased food production may face future constraints from water scarcity.
"We will need a new recipe to feed the world in the future," said the report's editor, Anders Jägerskog.
A separate report from the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) said the best way for countries to protect millions of farmers from food insecurity in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia was to help them invest in small pumps and simple technology, rather than to develop expensive, large-scale irrigation projects.
"We've witnessed again and again what happens to the world's poor - the majority of whom depend on agriculture for their livelihoods and already suffer from water scarcity - when they are at the mercy of our fragile global food system," said Dr Colin Chartres, the director general.
"Farmers across the developing world are increasingly relying on and benefiting from small-scale, locally-relevant water solutions. [These] techniques could increase yields up to 300% and add tens of billions of US dollars to household revenues across sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
People better get a grip.
How many people know that the production of meat includes giving the cattle hormones to stop them from ovulating? Do you want your children eating meat that is from animals that were given these anti ovulating drugs?
On the subject of the future, I think that we will reach a tipping point within 5 years and if we don't change, the world will slip into an irreversible decline and within 20 years the population of the earth will be a few million survivors!
The only solution is to have awareness campaigns in order to sensitize the uncontrollable, unstoppable, insensible cancer of the earth.
Trees are not only the largest living beings on earth but also the ones that live the longest.
They're not only our children's heritage like we claim, but the earth's heritage including all the living beings. They are the patriarchs of this earth & should be respected as such. Imagine a city without trees...
Be healthier. Stop eating dead flesh.
Share the planet with other species.
End the dominance paradigm.
Reproduce consciously or perhaps not at all.
Fracking is yet another short term fix for a long term problem. People in this country need to see the Oscar nominated documentary Gasland to better understand how their future is being mortgaged, yet again, by corporatocracy.
An interesting thought. If the Republicans applied the same logic to the eggs of chickens that they apply to the eggs of humans... would an egg be considered to be a chicken and thus not allowed to be eaten by vegetarians? Can you picture one of our "paid for by people (corporations)" standing up in congress and stating.... eggs are chickens? I think that with few exceptions that our senators and representatives should be spanked by their mothers and sent to bed without dinner!
Love this analogy, makes so much sense; could you possibly find your way to the Repub Nat Convention in Tampa this weekend?
We can deal with the problem on our terms with family planning, birth control, and free abortions on demand, or we can leave it to nature to control our numbers. We won't like nature's way.
Poaching and theft is already a big problem in some states, right along with theft. The loss of jobs created a lot of almost desperation. I live in a rural area and the poaching and theft is noticeable, more than in and around cities. Folks are desperate even to the point of breakdowns.
The big picture is as Ralph Averill explains: there are far too many people.
We must reduce the population. Even if there were no global warming, overfishing, and environmental destruction, the population would get so big that hunger and starvation would eventually be rampant.
But even if we lowered the population by a few billion, global warming will still cause huge catastrophes if we don't fight it. Worldwide, carbon emissions per person is still rising quickly, and we have to cut emissions by huge amounts before atmospheric levels will begin to slowly fall.
Let's face it: we can't quickly reduce the population by billions without killing billions, and we aren't going to do that. It will take a long time once we agree to reduce population before it goes down significantly. We can't wait for that. We must fight global warming and try to reduce the population at the same time. At the same time, we must protect other species to prevent a mass extinction. Only all these efforts together will allow our lives to get better instead of immeasurably worse.
Although there are sound ecological reasons, I'm not overly impressed with moral arguments for a vegan diet. We have no way to measure whether plants have sensitivity to pain, so from the moral viewpoint eating certain plants may be as cruel as meat eating. Furthermore, a mixed diet is healthier for omnivorous animals like us. We got big brained only after much of the plant life dried up and our ancestors were forced to scavenge, hunt & devour high protein meat. For 99% of homo sapiens prehistory & history, we've been omnivores. Good health for ourselves and the planet should mean eating a diet of fruits, greens, veggies & nuts, plus some high quality protein amino acids provided in lean meat--as long as these are locally produced, organic and treated with respect. Even 100% vegan won't help a bit if people keep having too many children, we keep allowing corporations to wreck the food chain, and our maltreated livestock are forced to bear too many eggs and offspring to feed a starving, expanding horde of genus homo.(Whoever named us "homo SAPIENS" must be writhing in his grave!)
If we had poly-amorous marriages with a large number (around 20) of adults, then everyone would be satisfied with a marriage that produced maybe six biological children. Every adult would look at every child as "their" child. We have already seen the polygamous marriages of the FLDS produce happy, well-adjusted children who refer to many women as "mother". It would work at least as well if there were not only many mothers but also many fathers.
RSS feed for comments to this post