Sterritt reports: "Ten-year-old Ta'Kaiya Blaney stood outside Enbridge Northern Gateway's office on ... waiting for officials to grant her access to the building. But the doors remained locked."
Ta'Kaiya Blaney, of the Sliammon First Nation, sings her environmental advocacy song, 'Shallow Waters,' 07/31/11. (photo: Richard Walker)
What a 10-Year-Old Did for the Tar Sands
24 June 12
Why a First Nations student from British Columbia is taking on a controversial trans-Canadian pipeline project - through song.
en-year-old Ta'Kaiya Blaney stood outside Enbridge Northern Gateway's office on July 6, waiting for officials to grant her access to the building. She thought she could hand deliver an envelope containing an important message about the company's pipeline construction. But the doors remained locked.
"I don't know what they find so scary about me," she said, as she was ushered off the property by security guards. "I just want them to hear what I have to say."
The Sliammon First Nation youth put in a great effort learning about environmental issues and the pipeline in particular, and hoped to share her knowledge and carefully crafted words. Enbridge officials said they were unable to provide Ta'Kaiya space or time and failed to comment because the Vancouver office is staffed by a limited number of technical personnel. Their headquarters are located in Calgary.
So Ta'Kaiya stood outside, accompanied by three members of Greenpeace, her mother, and a number of reporters and sang her song "Shallow Waters." The song's video has hit YouTube and been viewed more than 53,000 times.
She co-wrote her song after learning of Enbridge's bid to build twin 1,170 km pipelines to transport oil from the Alberta tar sands to British Columbia's north coast. Like the proposed TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline that would connect the Canadian tar sands to the U.S. Gulf Coast, Enbridge's Alberta-B.C. pipeline is widely opposed, largely because it would bring hundreds of oil supertankers a year to the Great Bear Rainforest - an ecologically significant region along a particularly dangerous route for tankers.
"Oil pipelines and tankers will give people jobs, but if there is an oil spill like the [BP spill] in the Gulf of Mexico, that will take other people's jobs and the wildlife will die," said Ta'Kaiya.
According to a Greenpeace website, "Twenty-two years after the Exxon Valdez tragedy, crude still coats Alaska's shores. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council estimates that 21,000 gallons of the 11 million gallons of crude oil that bled from the stranded tanker Exxon Valdez on the night of March 23, 1989 remain in the subsurface."
And Dustin Johnson, a Tsimshian youth who works at the Sierra Club in Edmonton, says that the tankers that are proposed to transport tar sands crude from northern Alberta to the B.C. north coast are much larger than the Exxon Valdez. "If the tar sands pipelines are successfully built on the coast," he said, "this would lead to at least 250 tankers per year navigating the intricate B.C. coastline - a risk the salmon- and ocean-dependent Northwest coast communities and economies cannot afford to make."
Greenpeace reports that 80 percent of British Columbians support an oil tanker ban in B.C.'s coastal waters. More than 70 First Nations in British Columbia have banned the transport of tar sands oil through their territories, including along the proposed oil tanker routes.
While Ta'Kaiya was waiting outside for Enbridge officials, B.C. Premier Christy Clark sent the girl an email, saying she had "watched your YouTube video and commend you for your talent. Your message is very clear - we must be concerned about the environment."
Clark said the B.C. government supports the ongoing environmental review, a process that has met much criticism from First Nations communities, environmental groups, and political leaders.
Meanwhile, in the U.S., opponents of a different project - the Keystone XL Pipeline - are preparing for two weeks of mass civil disobedience at the White House with the hopes of convincing President Obama to stop it in its tracks.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I'm hoping we'll reinforce and extend our east west pipeline from coast to coast. We can then cross the U.S. border at the presently licensed point rather than the XL shortcut, replace ME oil in our east, export from Halifax and extend west to Vancouver Island for Asian and California exports.
And as for whether you have the right to access anywhere you want in the country with your oil pipelines, the answer is no if it exposes someone to irreparable damage. You aren't allowed to hurt other people just because it makes you a lot of money.
Diverse local power sources provide energy security as well as save huge transmission costs. 50% of electrical power from central generating sites is lost in transmission lines. 'Tar-sands' are sovereign 1st Nation resources. 1st Nations will use & market tar sands not to be refined for gas & oil but appropriately as paving & roofing materials without refining.
What it IS about is that this particular Planet has not needed oil for vehicles nor for heating for at least 100 to 125 years. There are literally DOZENS AND DOZENS of solutions here for over a century that have ALL been Killed, Shelved, Destroyed, Made Illegal or otherwise been Made Unavailable. We don't need oil! We don't need oil spills! We don't need to destroy a major Planetary Gulf, its wildlife, its fish, its People due to OIL GREED. We don't need to waste the Annual GDP of a large country to be able to drive from here to there nor to heat our homes in Winter.
WHO BENEFITS from keeping things the way they are? You all know the answers.
So the re-frame needed, even for those hard-working folks at Greenpeace and similar Organizations, is that we need to focus TOWARDS 21st Century Energy Solutions and not
be enslaved by a very old very tired and VERY obsolete 18th century technology!
In other words -- Let us go for what we want and not push against what we don't want. Energy follows Focus.
I have said........... Bendi
I really think they believe they can eat the stuff when there is nothing left.
It is bad when Enridge won't even stoop to listen to what a 10 year old child has to say about their questionable practices.
RSS feed for comments to this post