Intro: "The world is close to reaching tipping points that will make it irreversibly hotter, making this decade critical in efforts to contain global warming, scientists warned on Monday."
'System Change Not Climate Change' banner at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP15, in Copenhagen, Denmark. (photo: kris krug/flickr)
Global Warming Close to Becoming Irreversible - Scientists
28 March 12
he world is close to reaching tipping points that will make it irreversibly hotter, making this decade critical in efforts to contain global warming, scientists warned on Monday.
Scientific estimates differ but the world's temperature looks set to rise by six degrees Celsius by 2100 if greenhouse gas emissions are allowed to rise uncontrollably.
As emissions grow, scientists say the world is close to reaching thresholds beyond which the effects on the global climate will be irreversible, such as the melting of polar ice sheets and loss of rainforests.
"This is the critical decade. If we don't get the curves turned around this decade we will cross those lines," said Will Steffen, executive director of the Australian National University's climate change institute, speaking at a conference in London.
Despite this sense of urgency, a new global climate treaty forcing the world's biggest polluters, such as the United States and China, to curb emissions will only be agreed on by 2015 - to enter into force in 2020.
" We are on the cusp of some big changes," said Steffen. "We can ... cap temperature rise at two degrees, or cross the threshold beyond which the system shifts to a much hotter state."
Tipping Points
For ice sheets - huge refrigerators that slow down the warming of the planet - the tipping point has probably already been passed, Steffen said. The West Antarctic ice sheet has shrunk over the last decade and the Greenland ice sheet has lost around 200 cubic km (48 cubic miles) a year since the 1990s.
Most climate estimates agree the Amazon rainforest will get drier as the planet warms. Mass tree deaths caused by drought have raised fears it is on the verge of a tipping point, when it will stop absorbing emissions and add to them instead.
Around 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon were lost in 2005 from the rainforest and 2.2 billion tonnes in 2010, which has undone about 10 years of carbon sink activity, Steffen said.
One of the most worrying and unknown thresholds is the Siberian permafrost, which stores frozen carbon in the soil away from the atmosphere.
"There is about 1,600 billion tonnes of carbon there - about twice the amount in the atmosphere today - and the northern high latitudes are experiencing the most severe temperature change of any part of the planet," he said.
In a worst case scenario, 30 to 63 billion tonnes of carbon a year could be released by 2040, rising to 232 to 380 billion tonnes by 2100. This compares to around 10 billion tonnes of CO2 released by fossil fuel use each year.
Increased CO2 in the atmosphere has also turned oceans more acidic as they absorb it. In the past 200 years, ocean acidification has happened at a speed not seen for around 60 million years, said Carol Turley at Plymouth Marine Laboratory.
This threatens coral reef development and could lead to the extinction of some species within decades, as well as to an increase in the number of predators.
As leading scientists, policy-makers and environment groups gathered at the "Planet Under Pressure" conference in London, opinions differed on what action to take this decade.
London School of Economics professor Anthony Giddens favours focusing on the fossil fuel industry, seeing as renewables only make up 1 percent of the global energy mix.
"We have enormous inertia within the world economy and should make much more effort to close down coal-fired power stations," he said.
Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell favours working on technologies leading to negative emissions in the long run, like carbon capture on biomass and in land use, said Jeremy Bentham, the firm's vice president of global business environment.
The conference runs through Thursday.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
"What's two degrees?
Look, the daily temperature swings twenty, even thirty degrees. From coldest Midwest day in February to hottest day in August, the temperature swings a HUNDRED-twenty, even a HUNDRED-thirty degrees!
And you're worried about JUST TWO?"
We still have a lot of educating to do.
Any scientist who does not distinguish between natural warming and anthropic warming--and FAILS TO ESTIMATE THE RELATIVE PROPORTION--is an irresponsible scientist.
For me the greatest anthropic danger is elimination of the habitats of millions of beautiful species with whom we share this planet.
If you also consider the other "natural factor" that can cause Earth's temperature to change substantially, volcanoes, then the net effect of "natural factors" since 1900 or so would have been a slight cooling of Earth.
Finally, since 1979, when Earth has been warming the most rapidly, energy from the sun has actually decreased.
All of these facts add up, in my mind at least, to the conclusion that humans are the overriding cause of current climate change.
So if you want the relative proportion of warming since the peak, after it started to cool again, it's a little more than 100%. Because if the trend had continued, it would have been a little cooler now instead of hotter.
The last ice age was about 6 degrees cooler than in preindustrial times, and by 2100 we are supposed to be about 6 degrees hotter. So the world will be roughly just as different as an ice age, except in the other direction. That estimate does not include several positive feedbacks that are already happening, so most likely it will get a lot hotter.
Unless we make some huge changes very quickly. That won't happen unless more people start learning about the science. I'm glad you show some curiosity. I hope everyone puts in some effort to learn more about climate science, before it is too late to stop this trainwreck.
Just such a vicious cycle (absent human actvity, of course) is believed to account for the hellish conditions on Venus, whose surface temperature is high enough to melt lead.
Good night.
RSS feed for comments to this post