Intro: "President Obama stood in a red-dirt field before acres of stacked pipeline pieces on Thursday to illustrate his support for expedited construction of the southern leg of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. But his public declaration for the project pleased neither the industry and its Republican allies nor environmentalists."
President Obama voiced his support for expedited construction of the southern half of the Keystone XL oil pipeline on Thursday in Ripley, Okla. (photo: Doug Mills/NYT)
Obama Declares Keystone Pipeline Support
23 March 12
resident Obama stood in a red-dirt field before acres of stacked pipeline pieces on Thursday to illustrate his support for expedited construction of the southern leg of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. But his public declaration for the project pleased neither the industry and its Republican allies nor environmentalists.
That was clear hours later when several people interrupted his next speech, shouting "Stop the pipeline!" at Ohio State University, where Mr. Obama emphasized clean-fuel alternatives in his "all of the above" energy agenda.
Mr. Obama's first appearance here near Cushing, Okla., an oil town known in the industry as the nation's pipeline crossroads, was intended to blunt two months of criticism of his decision in January to reject for now construction of the pipeline's northern leg from Alberta, Canada, to Cushing. Those attacks from Republicans in Congress and on the presidential campaign trail gained resonance as gasoline prices spiked.
"Unfortunately, Congress decided they wanted their own timeline - not the company, not the experts, but members of Congress who decided this might be a fun political issue," Mr. Obama told an invited audience of about 200 people.
"Today, we're making this new pipeline from Cushing to the gulf a priority," he said, while the northern portion requires additional review.
"But the fact is that my administration has approved dozens of new oil and gas pipelines over the last three years, including one from Canada," Mr. Obama added. "And as long as I'm president, we're going to keep on encouraging oil development and infrastructure, and we're going to do it in a way that protects the health and safety of the American people."
Environmentalists nationwide have rallied to oppose the entire pipeline, which would run from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, because its owner, TransCanada, wants to transport what environmental groups consider dirty oil from the tar sands of Alberta. They contend it would hasten climate change, threaten spills and pollute the air, water and wildlife.
While the southern leg is planned to relieve a bottleneck of oil from the Plains states awaiting shipment to gulf refineries and vessels, opponents say the pipeline would ultimately be used to transport tar sands oil, much of it for export globally, if TransCanada is permitted to build the northern half.
"In expediting the southern portion of Keystone XL, President Obama is trying to have it both ways," said Becky Bond, political director of Credo Action, part of a coalition of environmental groups that issued a joint statement of opposition.
"The president needs to prove that his initial rejection of Keystone XL wasn't simply a ploy to placate the environmental voters who dared to hold him to his own rhetoric about the need for real leadership on climate and our fossil fuel dependence," Ms. Bond said.
For the pipeline to cross the border from Canada to the United States, the administration would have to approve a permit, a process that requires environmental studies. Mr. Obama rejected TransCanada's initial path through Nebraska's Ogallala Aquifer - a route many Nebraskans opposed - but the company plans to resubmit its application, with an alternate route.
As gasoline prices have risen to $4 a gallon nationwide, Republicans have stepped up their attacks on Mr. Obama's decision, claiming it stands in the way of lower pump prices and thousands of construction jobs. The administration says that the critics' job figures are inflated and that oil from the pipeline would not reach markets anytime soon.
Even before Mr. Obama reached Oklahoma on the last day of his two-day energy tour, Republicans were deriding the visit as a publicity stunt since the only federal permits the southern pipeline needs are ones typically handled by agency employees, not the president.
"After rejecting and personally lobbying against Keystone XL and thousands of new jobs, the president plans to tout that he's now interjecting himself on behalf of a routine permit that is normally handled by bureaucrats," aides to the House speaker, John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, wrote in a blog post. A Boehner spokesman, Brendan Buck, added, "This is like the governor holding a press conference to renew my driver's license."
Mr. Obama's next stop, in Columbus, Ohio, was his last on a four-state swing to promote policies to reduce the nation's energy consumption and reliance on foreign oil. Having toured the oil pipeline site and, on Wednesday, an oil-drilling field on federal lands in New Mexico, Mr. Obama toured Ohio State's Center for Automotive Research, a leading institute for advanced energy research. He inspected four advanced vehicles, including the 300-mile-an-hour electric Buckeye Bullet.
In remarks to more than 1,000 students, faculty members and local residents, Mr. Obama alluded to the recurring problem of gasoline-price spikes. "We can't simply drill our way out of the problem," he said, because the United States accounts for 20 percent of the world's energy consumption but has 2 percent of the known oil reserves.
"As long as I'm president," Mr. Obama said, "America is going to be pursuing an all-of-the-above energy strategy. Yes, we'll develop as much oil and gas as we can, in a safe way, but we're also going to develop wind power and solar power and advanced biofuels."
"And we'll do it by harnessing the same type of American ingenuity and imagination that's on display right here at Ohio State," he added.
While the crowd's enthusiasm suggested a campaign rally, not all were won over. Jason E. Box, a climatologist and professor, called Mr. Obama's all-of-the-above strategy "fundamentally flawed because it locks us in for decades" to continued reliance on polluting fuel sources.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
My guess is that he doesn't want to.
But the reality is a vote for a democrat is essentially a vote for a Republican as the party philosophy is the same. There is only one party today the “Democratic Republican Party” which was what it was originally known as. They separated and have now merged once again.
The Democratic Republican Party was an American political party founded in 1792 by then Secretary for the State Department, Thomas Jefferson and Representative from Virginia, James Madison.
The party formed, first as a caucus in the House of Representatives and then in every state to contest elections and oppose the programs of then Secretary for the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson needed to have a nationwide party to counteract the Federalists, a nationwide party recently formed by Hamilton.
We need another party to counteract the Democratic Republican Party!
I would love to know who the Savior is these hypocrites know is coming to town to Save US. Believe it is us who must save the World, Tonto
vote third party, green, alternative,
we have been totally sold out by the dems and reps.
Better to vote for a loser than against
your principles.
Instant Runoff Voting and Proportional Representation in every election!!
We have been sold out. I guess the "chage we could believe in" was that, this time it would be a Democrat doing this to us. It's sort of a change, and we can certainly believe it's happening.
I think it's time to stop lecturing each other about strategy and just vote our consciences. So far, my need to keep repugs out of the White House trumps my need to vote for a true liberal who was actually listening to us.
So far...
Do you agree that more right-wing policies (like approving the tar pipeline and like the repuglican agenda) would be a further disaster for the US?!?!
If you want to convince us to vote for your party, it might be wise to do it in response to an article where we agree the President is too liberal.
Otherwise, your attempt to win converts is kind of comical.
And just for the record, there are many Republicans to the left of Obama.
Ask ron paul what he thinks of the tar pipeline. I'll give you a hint: he HATES ALL GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF BIG BUSINESS.
The only thing holding this pipeline back is government regulation of big business. He doesn't believe in public land, or the public welfare.
Ask him what he thinks of Medicare or Social Security.
These are libertarian ideas AND paul's.
Ask him what he thinks of the right to choose, or minorities, or even public schools for that matter.
If you want to give some examples of repuglicans to the left of Obama, I'm waiting for your list.
As for the many Republicans out there, as the saying goes, they did not leave the Party, Party left them.
Republicans, like my dad, are no longer aligned ideologically with the Republican Party.
I'm operating on the definition of "liberal" meaning someone who actually supports Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (the 3 most popular government programs in American history).
Johnson wants them cut or eliminated regardless of what American voters want to the contrary.
Is your Dad running for President? If not, he's kind of outside the limits of this discussion.
So far, your list still consists of ZERO.
He is a turn coat, breaking every pledge he made to get elected. I honestly do not believe Rumnutz would be any worse. Although I will also not vote for him!...
Obama has ruled against us every chance he got. And lied...
I would rather through away my vote on a third party candidate or not even vote rather then to give this fool my sanction. He promised us change, I thought he meant something other than our form of government, he has accomplished more in 3 years toward fascism then Bush did in 8...Think carefully who you vote for, Obama has been a complete disaster. what worse could Romeny be?
Chief Justice Warren Burger, of the US Supreme Court said 75 to 90 percent of American trial lawyers are incompetent, dishonest, or both. Maybe we should learn from this and never vote a lawyer into public office again. Romney also has a law degree, be very careful of a lawyer in the white house or congress again!
[snip]
This is what Eugene Debs referred to a century ago, when he declared he would rather cast a meaningful vote for what did want, and not get it, than a fake and hollow one for what he didn't want, and get that.
And so, a hundred years later, the game is still the game. If we want our votes to have any meaning, it's time to reject the fake choices between the two corporate parties. It's time to wise up, to grow up and like adults, to take a view longer than dessert, or the next two or three elections.
http://blackagendareport.com/content/how-waste-your-vote-2012
Think everyone must be reminded that everyone has a right to participate in the Environmental Impact Part as well as all the other impacts...They can be written in, sent to the Commission, the House and Senate, DEP Agency, EPA...
Find the Organizations that are fighting it, as they will hand the letters in for you also to make sure they get in.
Perhaps if people actually did something on their own, esp vote for good candidates, Governors, he would be a stronger President...but so easy to rant and not do a thing...it is the American Way, eh?
The ol' rope-a-dope only works in boxing AND IF you're Muhammad Ali AND if it's 1973.
Try the rope-a-dope with the oil industry and you'll be pummelled to death.
People think people like myself should wait on them and do the work...time they get off the butts, close their mouths and laptops and do something for themselves and the USA they keep saying is going downhill. I know these people...they are as much the problem as any Politician and Corporation.
Lord gave us the Power to Change things...try doing it
He is a farce.
RSS feed for comments to this post