Intro: "New chemical analyses have found that Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Diet Coke, and Diet Pepsi contain high levels of 4-methylimidazole (4-MI), a known animal carcinogen."
On Monday, Scientists at the Center for Science in the Public Interest released the troubling results of lab tests conducted on sodas containing caramel coloring. (photo George Frey/Reuters)
Lab Tests Find Carcinogen in Coke and Pepsi
07 March 12
ew chemical analyses have found that Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Diet Coke, and Diet Pepsi contain high levels of 4-methylimidazole (4-MI), a known animal carcinogen. The carcinogen forms when ammonia or ammonia and sulfites are used to manufacture the "caramel coloring" that gives those sodas their distinctive brown colors, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the nonprofit watchdog group that commissioned the tests. CSPI first petitioned the FDA to ban ammonia-sulfite caramel coloring in February 2011.
CSPI today reiterated its call to the Food and Drug Administration to revoke its authorization for caramel colorings that contain 4-MI, and in the interim to change the name of the additive to "ammonia-sulfite process caramel coloring" or "chemically modified caramel coloring" for labeling purposes.
"Coke and Pepsi, with the acquiescence of the FDA, are needlessly exposing millions of Americans to a chemical that causes cancer," said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. "The coloring is completely cosmetic, adding nothing to the flavor of the product. If companies can make brown food coloring that is carcinogen-free, the industry should use that. And industry seems to be moving in that direction. Otherwise, the FDA needs to protect consumers from this risk by banning the coloring."
CSPI collected samples of Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Diet Coke, Diet Pepsi, Dr Pepper, Diet Dr Pepper, and Whole Foods 365 Cola from Washington, D.C.-area stores. Pepsi's products had 145 to 153 micrograms (mcg) of 4-MI in two 12-ounce cans. Regular Coca-Cola had 142 mcg per 12 ounces in one sample and 146 mcg in another. Diet Coke had 103 mcg per 12 ounces in one sample and 113 mcg in another.
To put those levels into context, the state of California has a 29-microgram benchmark for 4-MI. Levels above that in a serving of food or beverage may be required to bear a warning notice. Based on California's risk model, CSPI estimates that the 4-MI in the Coke and Pepsi products tested is causing about 15,000 cancers in the U.S. population.
While federal law bans food additives that cause any number of cancers, the FDA has an exception for contaminants of food additives, for which it tolerates a lifetime risk of one cancer in one million people. Three of four samples of Dr Pepper or Diet Dr Pepper that CSPI tested had low levels of 4-MI, with about 10 mcg per 12 ounces. But even those levels pose a cancer risk of seven in one million-seven times greater than what FDA allows. The lower levels in those three samples indicate that it is possible to lower, if not eliminate, the amount of 4-MI.
Pepsi told CSPI that it has switched to a coloring in California that contains much less 4-MI and plans to do the same in the rest of the country.
"When most people see 'caramel coloring' on food labels, they likely interpret that quite literally and assume the ingredient is similar to what you might get by gently melting sugar in a saucepan," Jacobson said. "The reality is quite different. Colorings made with the ammonia or ammonia-sulfite process contain carcinogens and don't belong in the food supply. In any event, they shouldn't be obscured by such an innocuous-sounding name as 'caramel coloring.'"
As troubling as the new test results are, CSPI says soda drinkers should be much more concerned about the high-fructose corn syrup or other sugars used in soft drinks. Soda drinkers are much more likely than non-soda drinkers to develop weight gain, obesity, diabetes, and other health problems.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Is that per year? Or, over the lifetime of the product? Or, cumulatively? Or, ????
And, I agree with the final point. HFCS is a far more dangerous ingredient. Not only is it dangerous in and of itself, but it's also used to make unpalatable (read, "inedible"!) foods 'tasty'... so we end up eating crap that should be consigned to the compost pile!
Don't drink any sodas or sugar based drinks that have a little juice in them.
Don't consume beverages or foods that contain High Fructose Corn Syrup, artificial colors or flavors.
Don't use any artificial sweeteners. If you want a low calorie sweetener, use Stevia or Xylitol or a mixture of them. They are natural and harmless.
Don't eat white flour, especially bleached white flour, white rice, white sugar. Eat whole grain rice (brown rice) and whole grains in general.
Don't eat any hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils. Don't eat cottonseed oil and avoid palm oil.
Don't eat processed meat products or bacon that have nitrite or nitrate preservatives. Avoid foods that have any preservatives.
Avoid GMO foods. Corn which grows its own pesticides is toxic.
Don't take ant-acids or tylenol (ibuprofin). If you need an aspirin, take a half a tablet. Eat less and drink less alcohol, and you will not need these.
This is just a starter toward a healthy diet. However, just by following these guidelines you will be much more likely to be healthy.
Another suggestion: eat SLOWLY... you'll eat less.
And, I think you meant to write:
"...free range GRASS fed meats". 'Grain feeds' make for unhealthy animals - so they need to be fed lots of antibiotics and shot up with steroids and other growth promoting hormones, and they have lots of unhealthy fats in their tissues.
Unthinkable / Undrinkable
Coca Cola proudly adding CANCER to it's corporate death dealings.
What is a real anomaly is that healthier alcoholic drinks are so regulated here but my daughter has been getting little tots of wine since she was five, like kids in France, Spain Italy and other countries, has grown up with an educated and discriminating pallet and never touches Coke etc.
Hell even the fashionable bottled waters these same distributors sell as "Pure" is mostly taken straight from the faucets you can drink out of free and they've been caught at it but just slapped on the wrists.
It's not unlike banning Marijuana and all hemp products so that people can kill themselves legally with tobacco and it's additives. It's all in the mass-marketing, innit!?
I think they call it caffeine.
I take issue with "healthier" alcoholic drinks. They are responsible for way more deaths than this faux caramel coloring. But, let's not hijack the thread.
We need MORE regulation. If you want carcinogens out of the food supply and more honest ingredient labels, there's only one way to acheive that - through GOVERNMENT REGULATION.
Say it out loud to yourself:
G-O-V-E-R-N-M-E-N-T
R-E-G-U-L-A-T-I-O-N
See?! It sort of rolls of the tongue, doesn't it? I bet you didn't even injure yourself. It's not really a naughty word, even if St. Ray-gun thought it was. It turns out he was wrong.
You need to understand that the government (USDA) subsidizes corn, wheat, soy and other agricultural products. The corn is mainly GMO and that is where high fructose corn syrup comes from to sweeten soda and even our bread. All of our snacks like Doritos, corn chips, tortillas, Cheetos etc.. are made from GMO corn. The USDA does not require that GMO foods be labeled as such. How about all of our bread,pastries, pasta products made from subsidized white, bleached,GMO wheat flour? Read the label next time and see that many of these products use partially hydrogenated trans fat oils. These fats cause some serious damage to our precious arteries.
How about instead of more GOVERNMENT REGULATION we demand that GMO labels be placed on GMO products. The government should stop subsidizing these commodities and should promote the production of whole grain non GMO agricultural products.
We don't need more regulation the entire agricultural industry needs to be dismantled and reconstructed.
Demanding that GMO labels be put on products IS GOVERNMENT REGULATION. How else do you propose we make any meaningful "demands"?
Alice Waters heading the USDA or FDA we will never have safe food or drugs.
http://activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/o/13-center-for-science-in-the-public-interest
Enjoyed that article! Thanks!
Although I get the monthly CSPI newsletter I too get a little perturbed with Michael Jacobson and his crew. This whole low-fat movement is what is making us fat as a nation. So we cut out the fat and we eat more carbs which in the end makes us fat. CSPI also pushed to remove beef/pork fat out of the restaurants and so they started using partially hydrogenated oils which according to many experts is poison to our arteries. These fats contain trans fats and clog up the arteries more so than regular natural fat from animals.
All you have to do to see the truth is look at the diet of an Inuit native. They eat mainly a high fat and protein diet from the marine mammals they capture. They do not suffer from diabetes or heart disease. They are actually very fit and healthy on their animal fat/protein diet.
(I'm 86 & planning on hanging around for a long time, assuming the (human) world doesn't give up before I do.
Also stay away from diet drinks as they contain sugar alcohols which are much sweeter than HFCS and sugar. People hooked on these crave sweets more and can actually lead to weight gain.
Is it just to make the drink more tart? That can be done with citric acid. I have no idea. Is it cheaper than citric acid?
This is about what they can get away with. Without laws with teeth, they can and will do whatever they want. That's what business for profit is all about.
It is now clear that excessive fructose is the primary driver of insulin resistance and central obesity. When a person with insulin consumes high glycemic carbohydrates, their brain is subjected to magnified glucose spikes. Because glucose in high doses is toxic to nerve cells, over time these glucose spikes seem to trigger a chronic brain disorder characterized by a long list of brain dysfunction symptoms. We now call this disease Carbohydrate Associated Reversible Brain syndrome or CARB syndrome. Because the brain plays a key role in auto-regulating fat stores, people with CARB syndrome start to store extra fat at any caloric intake.
It also appears that this disease process is behind the rising incidence of depression, ADHD, PTSD, eating disorders, anxiety disorders, fibromyalgia, bipolar II, obsessive compulsive disorder and similar brain conditions.
Excessive body fat and a brain that doesn’t work so well—our waiting rooms are now filled with people who fit this description. Think about it before you sit down to enjoy that soda and pizza.
Humans prefer things we don't need and aren't good for us. And people's livelihoods depend on this worthless junk: junk food, fuel, weapons, alcohol.
The pending crash will catch so many people by surprise. But the top toppers will always take their cut before the bottom drops out on the rest of us.
Every economic system in place today is based on some form of unfairness. Communism is sheer criminality and force. Capitalism exploits the work force and is easily manipulated to enrich people who don't deserve riches. Socialism doesn't guarantee anyone anything.
The only system as yet untried is the Unity of Mankind. Who will investigate this system, or must it evolve out of the ruins of what was once a great society.
RSS feed for comments to this post