RSN August 14 Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Sam Youngman Reports: "President Obama announced Friday that the U.S. will complete its drawdown of troops by the end of the year, concluding the war in Iraq after almost nine years."

President Barack Obama speaks in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, 10/21/11. (photo: Philip Scott Andrews/NYT)
President Barack Obama speaks in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, 10/21/11. (photo: Philip Scott Andrews/NYT)



Obama Declares Iraq War Over

By Sam Youngman, The Hill

21 October 11

 

resident Obama announced Friday that the U.S. will complete its drawdown of troops by the end of the year, concluding the war in Iraq after almost nine years.

Obama, who sprang to national prominence with his condemnation of the war begun by his predecessor, declared in the White House briefing room that "after nearly nine years, America's war in Iraq will be over."

The president spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki earlier Friday, and Obama said the two leaders are in "full agreement about how to move forward."

Obama said he invited Maliki to the White House in December to discuss the "normal" relationship the two nations will now enjoy.

"This will be a strong and enduring partnership," Obama said.

White House officials had considered leaving a few thousand troops in Iraq past the end of the year, but Iraqi officials were cold to the idea of immunity for soldiers remaining in Iraq.

Obama said that he and the Iraqi government will "continue discussions" on how to continue training and equipping Iraqi forces.

The president noted that troops are also drawing down in Afghanistan, saying that when he took office there were more than 180,000 troops deployed in both wars. By the end of the year, Obama said, that number will be halved.

"And make no mistake, it will continue to go down," Obama said, declaring that "the tide of war is receding."

Obama closed by summing up other foreign policy successes, including Thursday's news from Libya, and saying that America is leaving Iraq from "a position of strength."

Now, Obama said, the task for our veterans will be enlisting them in rebuilding the U.S. economy.

"After a decade of war, the nation that we need to build — and the nation we will build — is our own," Obama said.

Obama's announcement doesn't mean there won't still be a U.S. presence in Iraq.

The U.S. has an embassy and two consulates in the country, and the State Department has long been scheduled to take over the lead role for the U.S. mission in Iraq.

Foggy Bottom officials have been quietly building what some lawmakers have called a "private security force" that will be charged with keeping American diplomats and U.S. facilities safe once military troops are withdrawn. A handful of U.S. Marines will also be in Iraq to guard the U.S. diplomatic posts, as they are in other countries.

While the White House put the likely number of private security contractors who will be in Iraq come Jan. 1 at 4,000 to 5,000, Senate Armed Services Committee member Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) said Wednesday that she understands that 14,000 of the 17,000 State Department personnel that will be in Iraq after the military withdrawal could be private contractors.

This story was posted at 12:38 p.m. and last updated at 1:44 p.m.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-8 # Activista 2011-10-21 13:07
Obama is moving "forces" to base in Bahrain.
Did not say how Iraq is better - "democratic" after nine years of occupation - how the defense budget will be cut by 50% - " 17,000 State Department personnel.." translate private armed US gangs ..
Obama lies make me SICK.
readersupportednews.org/opinion2/265-34/8029-are-we-really-done-with-iraq
 
 
+2 # susienoodle 2011-10-21 14:08
I'm assuming you have never served in the military, you just like to criticize the commander in chief.
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2011-10-21 17:21
he is worth critizing, he is a fool and a puppet of Wall Street warmongering
 
 
-14 # vexact 2011-10-22 10:50
You Libs are forgetting this Obama put MUSTARD ON HIS HAMBURGER!. I think it might have been French Dijon or some other socialistic condiment.
 
 
+8 # Billy Bob 2011-10-22 15:34
What is it about conservatives that make them reduce political arguments to discussions about food? Ronald McDonald isn't running for President, is he?

Between you, with your commie mustard and "joeconserv"'s obsession with latte, I'm really having a hard time taking you seriously.
 
 
+1 # Lloyd Wagner 2011-10-21 18:43
I served in the military, and Obama's lies make me sick.
 
 
+19 # pernsey 2011-10-21 21:20
Im surprised Bushes initial lies that started the whole thing dont make you sicker!!
 
 
+3 # Lloyd Wagner 2011-10-22 02:14
Seems you're assuming. Have I ever said anything in praise of Bush?
What makes me really sick is a whole string of warmongering liars (puppets of the MIC) in the White House, the latest being Obama.
 
 
+7 # Doubter 2011-10-21 21:35
I am assuming you are a brainwashed military robot. To paraphrase Einstein regarding the military: “He has only been given his big brain by mistake; a backbone was all he needed. This plague-spot of civilization ought to be abolished with all possible speed.”
P.S. I'm an 86 yr. old WWII actual combat vet who likes to criticize commanders. Has that gone out of style?
 
 
+41 # Todd Williams 2011-10-21 14:12
Bush's lies made me sick. Obama is just moping up the pile of crap that Bush left us. Activista, you are dillusional at best. Obama is doing the best he can under the circumstances. Would you rather have had McCain/Palin in charge of our military? Get real.
 
 
+17 # CTPatriot 2011-10-21 15:21
Thanks for trotting out the standard OBot/OFA cheer leading points. It must really suck when the best thing you got is "be afraid" of the alternative. Considering how little Obama has deviated from Bush in terms of actual policy and outcomes, I'm only slightly more afraid of the alternative.

In truth, both political parties are captive to Wall Street and the MIC. That's why I support #OccupyWallStre et as the only viable solution to mopping up the mess created by Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama (and I voted for this guy).
 
 
+6 # John Locke 2011-10-21 17:22
both were bought and paid for by Wall Street and the Industrial arms developers...
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-21 20:43
Please stop using the same cliches. OB and Democrats have done what? Not even Air time denouncing anything for how many years?
 
 
+6 # jamminon 2011-10-21 14:20
Are you talking about lies of omission, or is there any quote in that article that you think is a lie? If so, which ones?
 
 
0 # wantrealdemocracy 2011-10-21 18:37
Obama says, "The tide of war is receding". Now THAT is a flat out lie. We have new wars in starting in Africa. I don't think the murder of Kaddafi will end the fighting in Libya. It will go on for years. And don't think that war was a matter of NATO, it was us, the United States that bomber that nation based on false stories of a need to protect the people from the attacks of Kaddafi. He was killed so as not to allow him to tell the other (true) stories of the attack on Libya by foreign nations with greed for the oil and water of that nation.
 
 
+2 # Doubter 2011-10-21 21:39
"...not to allow him to tell the other (true) stories..."
Probably applies also to Bin Laden.
 
 
+6 # Lloyd Wagner 2011-10-21 18:47
Lets see how this one works out:

"Now, Obama said, the task for our veterans will be enlisting them in rebuilding the U.S. economy."

Ya, sure. Obama's going to give the returning vets jobs. No lie.
 
 
+5 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-21 20:46
Lie...strong an enduring partnership??? We are bailing. Need votes for 2012
Vets are going to help build Economy..where are they getting jobs???
Private Contractors more halliburton Handouts nice More like rebuilding Iraq on our dime
 
 
+21 # Glen 2011-10-21 14:30
Activista, there is no way the U.S. is going to abandon the oil fields, much less the military bases established in Iraq, so you are correct. There are also resources available beyond oil, such as water and minerals.

All the U.S. will do is move troops somewhere else, with still another excuse to "improve" the conditions within a particular country. Take a dart and throw it at any oil country in Africa.
 
 
+11 # John Locke 2011-10-21 17:25
yup Glen spot on...But I would add to that how much do you think we are paying the Private Army staying in Iraq as opposed to our own troops? and yes we will never abandon the Iraq Oil which after all was the real reason for the war!!!
 
 
+7 # Saberoff 2011-10-21 20:55
Who needs troops anyway, when we have mercenaries and drones?
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-21 20:41
Will agree that no one has made Iraq better, in fact we are leaving them to go back to normal.

Defense budget cut...dream on
 
 
+5 # pernsey 2011-10-21 21:19
Bushes lies make me sicker. He started this whole fiasco!!
 
 
+1 # Activista 2011-10-22 19:52
readersupportednews.org/opinion2/265-34/8029-are-we-really-done-with-iraq

PLEASE read above ...
 
 
+23 # Kayjay 2011-10-21 13:23
Are they planning to close down any or all the bases as well? Or is that "toehold" in the region to important to give up?
 
 
+19 # DaveM 2011-10-21 13:26
How many believe this will actually happen? There are at least two months left to create a crisis or move the war to Iran.
 
 
+4 # susienoodle 2011-10-21 14:07
you must have Obama confused with what Mc Cain would do.
 
 
+7 # raphaelschild 2011-10-21 16:09
That is the point, Dave. We need those "resources" (i.e. warm military bodies) so that we can go whip Iran's ass. You didn't really think the Wall Street puppeteers and their Washington muppets would actually stop before they achieve total world domination, did you? Sorry, never happen until the American people wake up and take control of their government.
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2011-10-21 17:26
God Dave, you see what comin our way! good for you!!!
 
 
+35 # Billy Bob 2011-10-21 13:28
Too bad "the war" is narrowly defined as being waged by the military.

The war really did end when bush announced "mission accomplished". The mission was to OCCUPY Iraq endlessly. We'll still be doing that and our tax dollars will still be paying for it. No one has announced that the army of taxpayer funded oil industry mercenaries will be leaving any time soon.

Until that happens, this is all just smoke and mirrors.
 
 
+28 # Barbara K 2011-10-21 13:34
Thank you, Mr. President. It is time to end this war, and end the one in Afghanistan too. We need our kids and our treasure right here in our own country. Thanks for getting rid of the bad guys too.
This is really great news.

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
 
 
+3 # wantrealdemocracy 2011-10-21 18:40
What is the difference between the two corporately funded political parties? One is a lesser evil? Isn't being evil enough to cause you not to vote for them?
 
 
+1 # E-Mon 2011-10-22 02:50
Obama's lies... Bush's lies.... Clintons lies... Nixon's, LBJ's.. All of them are liars.. However there is hope!! There is one person I see in the vast sea of bought-out lying shills calling them selves candidates worth voting for.... Ron Paul, a republican. He stands out like a sore thumb amongst his own party. Why? He voted against the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Says America should stop trying to police the world and shut down the hundreds of military bases we have all over the world... I.E. Stop meddling in everyones business. Wants to end the "war on drugs" (a colossal waste of $$ for a war that can't be won just like the war on terror) and free all prisoners in prison for non-violent crimes.... i.E. Possession of drugs. Most importantly he wants to abolish the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank and start printing real interest free US currency backed by gold or silver. There's not enough room here to expound upon why this is so important.... Suggest watching "The Money Masters" on Youtube or reading the life changing book "The Creature From Jekyll Island, A Second Look at the Federal Reserve" by G. Edward Griffin
 
 
0 # futhark 2011-10-22 13:14
Ron Paul is the reason I never give "NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!" Barbara K a "thumbs up". One must distinguish each candidate on his or her position and record and not let party affiliations keep us from voting in those who will actually help our country or voting out duplicitous rascals.
 
 
0 # Billy Bob 2011-10-22 15:30
Makes perfect sense...

unless you're paying attention to more than one issue at a time, or unless you are a little bit skeptical about paul's honesty concerning the one and only issue that he agrees with the left about.

ron paul isn't going to save us, and in fact, would make things a whole lot worse.
 
 
+15 # noitall 2011-10-21 13:54
"The war in Iraq is ended"...NewYea r horns and pops w/ thin paper strings float in the room. "well not exactly..." the policy remains the same. We'll just shift our resources to the next oil..I mean water..I mean suffering people yearning to be free. That's it. The poor people in the rest of the Middle East need some tuning...I mean Democracy and 'american-recog nized freedoms'. Resources now free to be relocated in Iran and Libia and elsewhere where the forces of good can assist with "development". Thank you Mr. Obama.
 
 
+19 # giraffe 2011-10-21 14:10
Barbara K - good comment!

"It" has already been announced that we will treat Iraq as an ally - but the Iraqis have not guaranteed us safety so we may not put a base there! Until the Iraqi's have their "spring" -- So it depends.

I think his move "went against the military complex" (who, with the GOP, have perpetuated this long war)

Libya has invited the USA to assist set-up their Democracy. If we don't move in (in some way) - the Brother hood, or Al Quaeda, etc. will move in - so it is a no brainer that we will put "something" into Libya!

And we won't have to spend as much $$ as we have consistently spent in Iraq.

Now - VOTE DEM VOTE OBAMA - or we will not stop the "person hoods" from dictating our demise.

Help get minorities/ old/ etc registered -- and every Dem should get mail-in ballots (even Dem governors are pulling crap in Dem districts)

Of course, the GOP and LAME MEDIA will spin the Iraq pull out as they do everything President Obama does.

Don't forget last night 10/20/11, the GOP/TP fillibustered the jobs bill so they can give more $$ to the rich who they are beholden to for paying for their campaigns. Vote them OUT! VOTE DEM (unless you make $1M + / yr) or down we go!
 
 
+5 # noitall 2011-10-21 15:29
"Libya has invited the USA to assist set-up their Democracy" come on! Repeating something time and again and expecting a different outcome is the definition of INSANITY! That what you have catagorized as "Libya" is like calling the teabaggers "America". We've helped the thugs in Florida overthrow Cuba (oh, that's next week). We should try not to use our fairytale ideals (if only they were present here) to evaluate other cultures and people and countries. We @#$&-up every time. We should pull out our thugs and our weapons, leave a pot of money to cover the residue of our "regime change" and leave the surviving People to sort it out. But no, people like you perpetuate the STORY and our private sector is given security and $$$$ to move in and 'secure' the "freed" country's natural resources and treasure and the people become second class in their own country. Read a real history book if you need a refresher (I recommend something by Howard Zinn)
Thanks Americans for the democracy. Let us know when you would like some help on your own.
 
 
+2 # David Starr 2011-10-22 12:37
Howard Zinn is an appropriate recommendation. In fact, I plan on rereading his, A Peoples' History of the United States
 
 
0 # boudreaux 2011-10-25 13:47
Very well said giraffe, very well and I agree with you 100%.....and yes Barbara that was a very good comment!!!

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!
 
 
+13 # LessSaid 2011-10-21 14:14
I don't remeber the USA offically declaring war in Iraq. So it's a War when we are leaving. What were we involved in for the past 9 years.
 
 
+7 # futhark 2011-10-21 18:07
Wars start legally, according to the fundamental law of the land, the Constitution of the United States of America, when they are declared by Congress. I think the precedent is that they are legally over when a treaty is signed between the two formerly belligerent parties. At least I know that the United States became legally involved in World War I following the passage of a declaration of war on Germany on 1917 April 6. It was ended when President Warren G. Harding signed the Knox-Porter Resolution on 1921 July 12. The United States involvement in World War II legally started with a declaration of war by Congress on 1941 December 8 and ended with the Treaty of San Francisco coming into force on 1952 April 28.

So much for the history lesson. War is too serious an issue to be dealt with unilaterally by parties not Constitutionall y empowered to do so. Let's not be so casual about these things in the years to come. The Framers had their reasons for restricting the Executive Branch from involving the nation in war at its whim.

Violence perpetrated at the direction of an executive without proper legal procedures is piracy or, at best, characteristic of a warlord, not befitting the President of our Republic.
 
 
-3 # charsjcca 2011-10-21 14:24
It's 2 years and 9 months too late. See you later BHO.
 
 
-5 # Susan W 2011-10-21 14:37
I really wonder why O is given credit for doing this when he is only following through on an agreement made by Bush. Are his backers so desperate for something positive they will act as though he came up with this? Not that long ago he was saying that withdrawal wasn't going to happen. He was talking of leaving troops behind for an extended period of time and only now pulls them out when they are denied immunity for their murderous ways.

I know I will get all kinds of crap from the Obamabots for posting this but perhaps you ought to see past the spin and realize this guy is a bigger hawk than we have seen in a long time. If he was seriously anti-war he would not continue the folly in Afghanistan, let alone escalate it.
 
 
-1 # CTPatriot 2011-10-21 15:22
Great comment. And of course, the Obots have been busy hitting the old thumbs down as you expected. They can't handle the truth, let alone see it.
 
 
+1 # Susan W 2011-10-21 18:11
Looks like I'm on track to get the most thumbs down! I must have hit some nerve.
 
 
+7 # jon 2011-10-21 15:33
"see past the spin and realize this guy is a bigger hawk than we have seen in a long time"

Bigger than Bush/Cheney?
 
 
+6 # Susan W 2011-10-21 16:15
Big as, bigger than it's all a matter of degree. He sure as hell isn't against warfare anywhere, anytime it suits his corporate backers. We desperately need anyone in the White House who believes that war is bad, peace is good and this policing of the globe has got to end.

To defend one guy for ending a war another guy started while concurrently starting wars of his own just shows what a hopeless mind set this country is in.
 
 
+4 # Billy Bob 2011-10-22 06:34
Some people have a hard time dealing with criticism of a Democratic President coming from the left. They assume that if you disagree with the President, you must be a repug wanting to replace him with a repug who would be even worse.

I plan to vote for Obama in 2012 because we're stuck with him for now. If a true Democrat were to challenge him in the primaries I'd vote for them. No one has come up to the plate. Biden certainly won't be running for President in 2016. As bad as reality is, 2016 will be the next time when we have a clear choice. A Democrat will probably win that election too, the way things are going. And, the way things are going, that Democrat will probably be what we thought Obama was going to be.

The fact that I won't ever vote repug, AND that I WILL vote Democratic just to keep repugs out, doesn't mean I disagree with a word you said. The trouble is that we need leverage, and we don't have any.

People acting like the President can do no wrong, simply because he's better than bush jr. are the ones who've set the bar so low, that a stick insect could please them.
 
 
+1 # Doubter 2011-10-22 13:56
It seems we ALWAYS have to choose between the lesser of two evils.
 
 
+2 # Billy Bob 2011-10-22 15:27
It doesn't just seem that way. It is that way.
 
 
+11 # noitall 2011-10-21 15:36
Thanks for the correction...Th ank you George W. for ending the 'war' that you lied us into. And thanks for the cheep gas (if you have a short memory). "May the fleas of a thousand camels invade your arm pits." Johnny Carson.
 
 
+14 # noitall 2011-10-21 15:41
All you naysayers of poor misunderstood Obama...its like hating the one side of your '89 Ford Pinto and loving the other side...both sides suck! Impeach the Supreme Court majority; Publicly funded Elections Now; Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine; Reminder: Lessees have responsibilitie s to the Public Airwaves.
 
 
+18 # fredboy 2011-10-21 14:40
Another campaign promise. Let's hope he keeps it. Still waiting for him to fulfill many from the first election...
 
 
+2 # DLT888 2011-10-21 15:06
I know, fredboy. I'll wait until I see it before I believe it.
 
 
+7 # fredboy 2011-10-21 14:41
LessSaid, I think it might be most appropriately termed an "oil intervention."
 
 
+12 # MitchelCohen 2011-10-21 14:42
What about the thousands of soldiers of fortune and private armies, which now amount to more than the U.S. contingent in Iraq, and do not see themselves bound by any government or human rights laws?
 
 
+4 # Dick Huopana 2011-10-21 14:53
Hooray! The war with Iraq is over! Funny, though, why Americans aren't pouring out into the streets to celebrate. Maybe, instead of feeling victorious, everyone is left feeling screwed, blued and tattooed. Yes, that's why we can roll bowling balls down the streets today without hitting anyone. Still, happy V-Day everyone.
 
 
+16 # DLT888 2011-10-21 15:09
I see this as Kucinich does as he always speaks the truth:

“Yet today’s announcement fails to acknowledge that we will simply be replacing one U.S. occupation with another. Under the State Department’s current plans to take the place of the Department of Defense as the main U.S. force in Iraq post-military withdrawal, we are still maintaining a massive presence there, now with the State Department and its heavily armed private security contractors. And it is the presence of armed U.S. contractors that is the problem. It will continue to foment instability and violence in Iraq and the region. We need to get out now, not just trade uniforms and personnel. It is reasonable to ask whether the people of Iraq will notice any change."
 
 
+10 # bluebluesdancer 2011-10-21 15:38
The Private Contractors will cost more than our military, and will allow Obama to claim that all our military forces are 'out' of Iraq, when in fact we will still be there, and still paying for 'bodies in Iraq' with our tax dollars. Just not in the same uniform.
Don't get me wrong... I'm not against taking our troops out, I just don't believe it counts when it is really sleight of hand...
 
 
+1 # MainStreetMentor 2011-10-21 15:42
Thank you, Mr. President.
 
 
+15 # humanmancalvin 2011-10-21 15:46
Thank you President Obama for finally ending the illegal war made by Bush & company. Now, time to clean up the financial disaster the same clownish republicans made & continue to support.
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-21 20:54
Rebuild the Economy....the Jobs are not here for us now but with another couple million home we will have jobs by January...
Not a President, A God
 
 
+1 # pernsey 2011-10-21 21:23
Bush lied and many died!! Thank you President Obama for finally ending it!!!
 
 
+3 # Anise 2011-10-21 22:45
Nothing could make me happier than to have a perfect president, but it won't happen. It just won't.While we all sit around criticizing Obama and deluding ourselves into thinking we can have perfection, we'll end up with President Perry/Romney/Ba chman/Hitler-cl oned-from-the-d ead.... will it really be worth it?
 
 
+3 # hwatt 2011-10-22 00:26
I am in no way an Obama apologist, but I am old enough and have been around American politics long enough to know that it is, unfortunately, a true choice of the lesser of two evils.
That may change in the not too distant future considering the Occupy Movement and the rapid pace of technology especially social networking, but for now to support a long shot or a Teabagging Repub would be national suicide.
IMHO, with enough active public pressure, Obama et al. can be driven to do the right thing; the Teabagger Repubs, on the other hand, will simply start shooting.
 
 
+4 # Susan W 2011-10-22 10:18
I have only one more thing to say about presidential politics. Until we get rid of the antiquated electoral college the president is not elected by the people. That is one of the biggest reasons a viable third party will never emerge to challenge the rightward drift of both major parties.

In the meantime O will spend his billion dollars in the "swing states" and ignore the rest of the country knowing full well his loyal backers will continue to hold their noses and reelect him as the lesser of two evils. Which, in more ways than one, still makes him evil.
 
 
0 # 666 2011-10-24 05:22
Iraq: "mission accomplished" ....
Now, how 'bout IMporting some democracy to the US...

that could be a bumper sticker: "America: Import Democracy" or "Fix the balance of trade, import democracy"
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN