Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

The report begins: "More than 100 anti-war protesters, including the man who leaked the Pentagon Papers (Daniel Ellsberg), were arrested outside the White House in demonstrations marking the eighth anniversary of the US-led war in Iraq."

Daniel Ellsberg, one of over 100 anti-war demonstrators arrested at the White House, 03/19/11. (photo: Getty Images)
Daniel Ellsberg, one of over 100 anti-war demonstrators arrested at the White House, 03/19/11. (photo: Getty Images)



Ellsberg, 100 Anti-War Demonstrators Arrested at White House

By Eric Tucker, Associated Press

20 March 11

 

ore than 100 anti-war protesters, including the man who leaked the Pentagon Papers, were arrested outside the White House in demonstrations marking the eighth anniversary of the US-led war in Iraq.

The protesters, some shouting anti-war slogans and singing "We Shall Not Be Moved," were arrested Saturday after ignoring orders to move away from the gates of the White House. The demonstrators cheered loudly as Daniel Ellsberg, the former military analyst who in 1971 leaked the Pentagon's secret history of the Vietnam War that was later published in major newspapers, was arrested and led away by police.

In New York City, about 80 protesters gathered near the US military recruiting center in Times Square, chanting "No to war" and carrying banners that read, "I am not paying for war" and "Butter not guns."

Similar protests marking the start of the Iraq war also were organized Saturday in San Francisco, Chicago and other cities.

In California, hundreds of people marched in downtown San Francisco. Hundreds more, including students from more than 40 high schools and community colleges, marched in Los Angeles in protest of the US presence in Iraq, organizers and police said.

Some used the rallies to draw attention to the new military action in Libya.

"You can't stand by and watch people being slaughtered. At the same time you don't want to foster war. It's walking a very fine line," Bishop Otis Charles told KCBS-TV at the San Francisco protest.

The demonstration in Washingtonmerged varied causes, including protesters demanding a US military withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan as well as those supporting Bradley Manning, the jailed Army private suspected of giving classified documents to the website WikiLeaks.

One chant that was repeated was: "Stop the War! Expose the Lies! Free Bradley Manning!"

Manning is being held in solitary confinement for all but an hour every day at a Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Virginia. He is given a suicide-proof smock to wear to bed and is stripped naked each night. On Sunday, a protest will be held in Quantico, outside the brig where Manning is being held.

Ellsberg has publicly defended Manning, calling him a "brother," and WikiLeaks.

Hundreds of protesters attended the rally and marched around the White House, but the crowd - which included many military veterans - thinned considerably as the US Park Police warned that they'd be arrested if they didn't move. As officers moved in with handcuffs, one protester who clutched the gates outside the White House shouted, "Don't arrest them! Arrest Obama!" and "You're arresting veterans, not war criminals!"

Authorities said 113 protesters were arrested, processed and given violation notices for disobeying an official order. They could pay a small fine and be released, or be freed with a future court date.

"The majority were cooperative," said US Park Police spokesman David Schlosser.

One military veteran who showed up for the rally was Paul Markin, a 64-year-old retired US Army colonel from Lynn, Mass., who said he's frustrated by what he sees as the US government's escalation of the wars. He said he's been against wars since coming home from Vietnam.

"Ever since that time, I've gone to the other side. Instead of a warrior, an anti-warrior," Markin said.

Ralph Nader, a consumer advocate who's unsuccessfully run several times for president, attended the demonstration and said anti-war protesters needed to continue putting pressure on government leaders. He said he believed most Americans and even soldiers agreed with the views of the protesters.

"I believe they reflect the majority opinion of the soldiers in Afghanistan," Nader told The Associated Press. "This is a majority opinion movement."

There was little talk at the DC protest of the US missile strikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces in Libya on Saturday, part of an international effort to protect rebel forces.

But the Times Square demonstration that was meant to mark the eighth anniversary of the Iraq invasion quickly became a protest against Saturday's military strikes.

Gary Maveal, 57, a law professor from Detroit who was visiting the city for a conference, said he feared the Libyan attacks would become a "quagmire."

"We don't have a good record of getting out of anywhere in a hurry," he said.

US Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY, joined the protesters, saying he was angry that Congress was not consulted before the military strikes. He said he was undecided on whether the military action against Libya was justified.

"Our presidents seem to believe that all we have to do is go to the UN and we go to war," Rangel said as a large television behind him at the recruiting station showed an advertisement for the Air Force with crews loading missiles onto fighter jets.

"Going to war is not a decision that presidents should make," he added.


Associated Press reporter Chris Hawley in New York City contributed to this story.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+35 # sallyb36 2011-03-20 10:51
I've watched us march to war since I was in 1st grade. It was patiotic then. I liked drawing swastika garnished war planes plummeting downward in the battlefield. I haven't cared for war, or an excuse for war, ever since then. Here on the "Home Front" we're advised there isn't money to take care of our own. The next thing we learn is that there is always money for war. I can't bear this changeling budget.
 
 
+32 # tomo 2011-03-20 11:52
Wonderful that Ellsberg is still out there fighting the good fight! That Bradley Manning is being spotlighted in many of the protests is also a very welcome sign. What kind of people would we be if progressives let this persecution of a young American whistle-blower go on--just because the President is a Democrat! Evil is evil! and the torture of this young American is evil.
 
 
+2 # Sukumar 2011-03-20 20:08
Johnson too was a Democrat who escalated an unwinnable war started by his predecessor.
 
 
+22 # Don Thomann 2011-03-20 11:57
From the moment the U.S. decided that "National Interests" were of more importance than our purported principles of peace, justice and equality, we have been mired ever more deeply in war, injustice and inequality. That those travesties have become our rallying call for further cuts to our communal welfare and for further spending on our insatiable hunger for conflict, speaks volumes about the state our Nation finds itself in today. Until the glaring discrepancy between what we "claim to stand for" and what we do indeed "fight for" are exposed, in all their shame and disgrace, we are rightfully doomed to the catastrophe that awaits us.
"God forgive America!"
 
 
0 # Doctoretty 2011-03-20 12:18
Well, I guess it's nice to know we still have a leftwing in this country. The extremes keep the rest of us on our toes.
 
 
+20 # Helen 2011-03-20 12:21
If I weren't almost 80 years old, I'd be marching with them. I am sick of war. What would happen if all of us who are sick of war just declined to pay our federal income taxes? Could they put us all in jail?
 
 
+16 # JoanWile2 2011-03-20 12:45
Helen, there were plenty of people over 80 at the New York City rally at the Times Square recruiting center. Some were in their 90's. Don't let age stop you. Joan Wile, founder, Grandmothers Against the War
 
 
+12 # giraffee2012 2011-03-20 13:20
Helen-- I'm too old to march too. Yes, they'd put us in jail - although Justice Thomas "forgot" and didn't even get a slap on the wrist - and I'm not sure he's paying those years of unpaid Taxes on his wife's income.

I think theis Libya war was "planned" (behind closed doors) -- the UK, US, France etc are too organized to gave tge YB rule one day and everything happen like precision a day later

The USA is too controlled by BIG $$ and the miliary --- thanks to the Supremes (funded by Kock brothers)
 
 
+11 # pamelawy 2011-03-20 12:57
Oh, so now we're not permitted to demonstrate on public property that our tax dollars support? What's up with that?
 
 
+5 # Activista 2011-03-20 13:13
U.S. decided that "National Interests"?
problem is that Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya is not part of our national interest.
Check:
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
book
 
 
+6 # Kayjay 2011-03-20 15:42
Sadly, it's not surprising that there's ALWAYS monies for war. I would like to see a political cartoonist take on this notion with a multi-panel piece. First panel would include volunteer soldiers taking on their 8th tour of duty. Here on home front, a scene of Americans giving thanks for a meal of top ramon, another panel depicts little johnny struggling to read "cat", a panel depicting family members pouring over book "Do it yourself surgery for dummies." and finally a panel showing military contractors clinking glasses over a new contract.
 
 
+7 # ritaague 2011-03-20 15:46
May I offer very strong suggestions to the 113 arrestees? Get good legal assistance/representattion , enter not guilty pleas and sign onto trial by large sized jury. Do not agree to entering a guilty plea in order to accept deferred sentencing, but rather make certain your attorneys motion for and insist on full disclosure, i.e. onsite and offsite warrentless surveillence, wiretaps, etc..

Don't be suprised if the prosecuter(s) motions for dismissal rather than providing full disclosure. That happened here in the nation's super fusion center, Colorado Springs, when two peaceful peace protestors (they were among the seven arrested, brutalized, etc. at the 2007 St. Patrick's Day Parade; Google: Colorado Springs Independent, Jan. 21, 2010, "No Peace or Justice") were arrested for merely holding up a peace banner outside of police lines at the 2008 Dem. State Convention.

When, at pre-trial both an affidavit re. hyperbolic dish surveillence on a nearby hotel roof and a motion for full disclosure were presented, the city suddenly motioned to dismiss. God forbid it become public information how much of our civil rights have been quashed under the guise of national security.

Thank you brave and real true patriots. You set us an example of how to fight to restore democracy and UNDO THE COUP!
 
 
+13 # Lee Black 2011-03-20 17:28
It seems ironic to me that while we praise the demonstrations in other countries we arrest those demonstrating in our own country.
 
 
+1 # tedrey 2011-03-21 04:54
The Cornish "Song of the Western Men" that freed Bishop Trelawney, brought up to date:

"And shall Brad Manning die, then?
And shall Brad Manning die?
Here's 20,000 patriots
Will know the reason why!"

It should be chanted at every march and protest. The number will grow.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.