Excerpt: "The United States launched two massive military campaigns eight years ago. Now, one month before the World Health Organization reveals its view on the legacy of the two battles for the town, a new study reports a "staggering rise" in birth defects among Iraqi children conceived in the aftermath of the war."
Some reported defects include: Babies born with only one eye, babies born with missing limbs or too many limbs, a higher than normal incidence of babies with brain damage or tumors, cardiac defects and missing genitalia. (photo: LIFE)
Huge Rise in Iraq Birth Defects Linked to US Cluster Bombing
15 October 12
New study links increase with military action by Western forces
t played unwilling host to one of the bloodiest battles of the Iraq war. Fallujah's homes and businesses were left shattered; hundreds of Iraqi civilians were killed. Its residents changed the name of their "City of Mosques" to "the polluted city" after the United States launched two massive military campaigns eight years ago. Now, one month before the World Health Organisation reveals its view on the legacy of the two battles for the town, a new study reports a "staggering rise" in birth defects among Iraqi children conceived in the aftermath of the war.
High rates of miscarriage, toxic levels of lead and mercury contamination and spiralling numbers of birth defects ranging from congenital heart defects to brain dysfunctions and malformed limbs have been recorded. Even more disturbingly, they appear to be occurring at an increasing rate in children born in Fallujah, about 40 miles west of Baghdad.
There is "compelling evidence" to link the increased numbers of defects and miscarriages to military assaults, says Mozhgan Savabieasfahani, one of the lead authors of the report and an environmental toxicologist at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health. Similar defects have been found among children born in Basra after British troops invaded, according to the new research.
US marines first bombarded Fallujah in April 2004 after four employees from the American security company Blackwater were killed, their bodies burned and dragged through the street, with two of the corpses left hanging from a bridge. Seven months later, the marines stormed the city for a second time, using some of the heaviest US air strikes deployed in Iraq. American forces later admitted that they had used white phosphorus shells, although they never admitted to using depleted uranium, which has been linked to high rates of cancer and birth defects.
The new findings, published in the Environmental Contamination and Toxicology bulletin, will bolster claims that US and Nato munitions used in the conflict led to a widespread health crisis in Iraq. They are the latest in a series of studies that have suggested a link between bombardment and a rise in birth defects. Their preliminary findings, in 2010, prompted a World Health Organisation inquiry into the prevalence of birth defects in the area. The WHO's report, out next month, is widely expected to show an increase in birth defects after the conflict. It has looked at nine "high-risk" areas in Iraq, including Fallujah and Basra. Where high prevalence is found, the WHO is expected to call for additional studies to pinpoint precise causes.
The latest study found that in Fallujah, more than half of all babies surveyed were born with a birth defect between 2007 and 2010. Before the siege, this figure was more like one in 10. Prior to the turn of the millennium, fewer than 2 per cent of babies were born with a defect. More than 45 per cent of all pregnancies surveyed ended in miscarriage in the two years after 2004, up from only 10 per cent before the bombing. Between 2007 and 2010, one in six of all pregnancies ended in miscarriage.
The new research, which looked at the health histories of 56 families in Fallujah, also examined births in Basra, in southern Iraq, attacked by British forces in 2003. Researchers found more than 20 babies out of 1,000 were born with defects in Al Basrah Maternity Hospital in 2003, a number that is 17 times higher than recorded a decade previously. In the past seven years, the number of malformed babies born increased by more than 60 per cent; 37 out of every 1,000 are now born with defects.
The report's authors link the rising number of babies born with birth defects in the two cities to increased exposure to metals released by bombs and bullets used over the past two decades. Scientists who studied hair samples of the population in Fallujah found that levels of lead were five times higher in the hair of children with birth defects than in other children; mercury levels were six times higher. Children with defects in Basra had three times more lead in their teeth than children living in non-impacted areas.
Dr Savabieasfahani said that for the first time, there is a "footprint of metal in the population" and that there is "compelling evidence linking the staggering increases in Iraqi birth defects to neuro-toxic metal contamination following the repeated bombardments of Iraqi cities". She called the "epidemic" a "public health crisis".
"In utero exposure to pollutants can drastically change the outcome of an otherwise normal pregnancy. The metal levels we see in the Fallujah children with birth defects clearly indicates that metals were involved in manifestation of birth defects in these children," she said. "The massive and repeated bombardment of these cities is clearly implicated here. I have no knowledge of any alternative source of metal contamination in these areas." She added that the data was likely to be an "underestimate", as many parents who give birth to children with defects hide them from public view.
Professor Alastair Hay, a professor of environmental toxicology at Leeds University, said the figures presented in the study were "absolutely extraordinary". He added: "People here would be worried if there was a five or 10 per cent increase [in birth defects]. If there's a fivefold increase in Fallujah, no one could possibly ignore that; it's crying out for an explanation as to what's the cause. A rapid increase in exposure to lead and mercury seems reasonable if lots of ammunition is going off. I would have also thought a major factor would be the extreme stress people are under in that period; we know this can cause major physiological changes."
A US Defense Department spokesperson said: "We are not aware of any official reports indicating an increase in birth defects in Al Basrah or Fallujah that may be related to exposure to the metals contained in munitions used by the US or coalition partners. We always take very seriously public health concerns about any population now living in a combat theatre. Unexploded ordnance, including improvised explosive devises, are a recognised hazard."
A UK government spokesperson said there was no "reliable scientific or medical evidence to confirm a link between conventional ammunition and birth defects in Basra", adding: "All ammunition used by UK armed forces falls within international humanitarian law and is consistent with the Geneva Convention."
Dr Savabieasfahani said she plans to analyse the children's samples for the presence of depleted uranium once funds have been raised. She added: "We need extensive environmental sampling, of food, water and air to find out where this is coming from. Then we can clean it up. Now we are seeing 50 per cent of children being born with malformations; in a few years it could be everyone."
Metal hazards
Lead
Throughout pregnancy, lead can pass from a woman's bones to her child; the levels of lead in maternal and foetal blood are almost identical. Children and particularly the unborn are more susceptible to lead than adults. At high levels of exposure, lead attacks the brain and central nervous system, causing comas, convulsions and even death, according to the WHO. Children who survive acute lead poisoning are typically left with mental defects and behavioural problems.
Mercury
Exposure to metallic, inorganic or organic mercury can permanently damage the brain, kidneys and developing foetus. Mercury can enter the air, water and soil. Its harmful effects can be passed from mother to the unborn child, leading to brain damage, mental defects, blindness, seizures, muteness and lack of co-ordination.
Depleted uranium
A toxic heavy metal, depleted uranium is what is left over after natural uranium has been enriched, either for use in weapons or for reactor fuel. While the US and UK acknowledge that the dust can be dangerous if inhaled, the jury is still out when it comes to long-term damage to people and their children. Scientists have suggested that its molecules can travel to the sperm and eggs, increasing the probability of cancer and damage to genes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Its so much easier now, before cluster bombs and drones you had to march people across the country while they slowly starved or froze to death. The empire has not changed much... still killing and stealing .
Radiation has been the cause of many deaths, diseases, and deformities, thanks to weapons used in Iraq when attacked by Bush I, the Balkans, Iraq again, and Afghanistan, most recently. It doesn't take a 500 pound bomb to cause all this, either.
There is more to it, obviously, with modern weapons, but I doubt that, regardless of the hideous death visited upon people in Europe, the people, mostly children died by the thousands due to leukemia caused by the radiation in those bombs as happened in Iraq prior to Bush II attacking that country.
I think you miss the point Phantomww is making: if the rate of birth defects after WWII in Germany (not nuked) or japan (nuked) was not the fivefold increase observed in Iraq, then there is a difference in the circumstances.
Phantomww argues, and I agree with the contention, that the main difference is the usage of DU.
Yes the US would have used it in Germany had it had it, but that is not the point. the point is the huge correlation between DU (and for sure other chemicals) presence and birth defects in conditions where other factors such as stress and presence of other more classical explosives.
DU is a prime suspect, not so much because it is a radioactive material but much more because it is an extremely toxic material as most of the heavy metals.
The deformities found in Iraq, especially Fallujah, were reported on at least a year or two ago, right along with past reports on the 500 thousand dead due to leukemia, and related, after the attack in the early '90's. Residual radiation and toxins continue to be found, and exposure continues.
It is also true of exposed military personnel.
first, CBU contain NO DU. Thus there is no difference in content (HE) than what was used in WW2. So IF HE causes birth defects then there would a correlation between Germany and England in WW2 and Iraq. I would also contend there would be a similar correlation with Japan because only 2 cities were hit with ATOMIC (not nukes) weapons.
also, we did not use bunker busters in the cities in the story so they can not be the cause.
That leaves DU. DU is used in main tank gun rounds and 30mm A-10 gun (GAU-30). Not bombs or CBU.
So the real question is how many DU weapons were fired? If the number was not very high then the study is wrong. If the number was high then it may have some truth.
Finally, the only difference between a dumb 500lb bomb and a smart 500lb bomb is that one has guidance and the other does not. The actual bomb is the same.
There are plenty witnesses to hideous events on this planet, and many are not beholden to any corporation or government agencies.
Those who are not critical of the U.S. haven't a clue what is going on.
I agree Glen that there are alot of folks on this board (including me) that are highly critical of the US...my comment was realy aimed at those that seem to dismiss sources that are critical of those that are appear to be "opposed" or "stand up" to the US (e.g., Assad or Putin) and then these sources seem to simply be attacked for being US/CIA/Isreali stooges. I also agree that there are certainly credible, independent sources out there (for the middle east i would give Robert Fisk as one example of an "independent" westerner). I also agree with you that those who are not critical of the US don't have a clue but I would add that those that are not at the same time critical of Assad or Putin (to give just two examples) are just as clueless (although for different reasons). My point was simply to note that i found it interesting that those that dismiss things coming from the UK Independent on Syria for example were not making similar comments about them when they print an article critical of the US.
If Mitt Romney is elected, which I believe is possible, he will within 8 months of his election, he will invade Iran. I believe, and I spent my entire career evaluting people as an attorney, that he is a bully and a coward and that his management of the war will be more brutal than George W. Bush was in Iraq. The war could easily drag Turkey, Syria, Israel (of course), and Iraq.With the war, there would be a severe interruption of oil to the industrial nations and plunge the world into a "severe" recession.
Then the republicans will finally kill off the 47% useless as they are. Medicare and social security will certainly be abolished, for there will be NO more money.
And all our middle class children will be canon fodder, for they will not be able to get educations enabling them to have decent jobs.
And the republicans need soldiers to fight their NON-STOP WARS.
For nearly four years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has presided over a conservative coalition that has proven stable in a country where governments rarely serve out a full term. Re-election could grant him a fresh mandate to continue his tough stance toward Iran's suspect nuclear program, put the already deadlocked peace process with the Palestinians further into deep freeze and complicate relations with the U.S. if President Barack Obama is re-elected.
SICK - what an oxymoron - typical for western "civilization". Humanitarian bombs killing in Yugoslavia etc.
Bush's Iraq misadventure revealed to the world that we may have a large military and a LOT of hardware....... BUT we are a giant on CLAY FEET.
We can NOT subdue other countries as we once may have been able to.
Romney/Ryan love to say that Obama has made America weak....BALONY. ..BUSH DID THAT.....
Romney wanted to keep our forces in Iraq....BUT AGAIN IRAQ DID NOT WANT IT. And there was not a damn thing we could do about it.
Our military is so worn out after many tours on duty, that they are killing themselves much faster than an enemy could.
Also too many returning veterans commit crimes because they are plagued bu PTSD and unemployment. I saw something hopeful on 60 minutes yesterday. Several judges are giving the vets a second chance.
They can agree to enroll in treatment and work programs and when they have fulfilled the obligation....a nd it is not a short time one...their record will be cleaned up and they can go forward without a criminal record. Which otherwise would ruin their chances for a decent life.
How much more death-dealing genius will our death machine, its scientists, R & D funders, lobbyists, politicians and upper-military keep displaying to kill, maim but not care for or heal?
Time we took a look at our own hypocrisy here on this blog.
I am anti War. I believe Creator said Thou Shalt Not Kill ? Yet we buy guns, teach our kids to shoot guns. We have Congress, Military esp CIA getting us into WARS but we are going to take the blame for their health? Our troops were coming home with illnesses way before these cluster f___k bombs were blowing off so explain that.
If you do not like Bombs and War...what are you doing about it> I have been protesting since the 60's
RSS feed for comments to this post