RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

Economic Justice for Native Canadians, et al

Print
Written by David E.H. Smith   
Saturday, 20 September 2014 08:17
End of the DEPRIVATION of the Relevant INFORMATION & the Start of Getting the Information Directly to the most vulnerable community members for their Consideration in RETRIBUTION FREE forums?

It's might strike some Canadians, both; Native & non Native, and the non shareholders of the nations who have become, & those who are becoming, signatories to The NAFTA, C-CITreaty, CETAgreement, TPPartnership, et al, as odd that corporate Canada's desire to avoid, &/or, to dilute its contribution to The Compensation in The W.A.D. Accord (that brings some justice as a consequence of the government of Canada's/corporate Canada's deprivation of Native Canadians, et al, of the simplest & most basic economic information via their treaties with Native Canadians) has led corporate Canada to mislead their signatory associates & will bring corporate Canada, its shareholders, et al, to face charges of international fraud, etc. before, not only The Supreme Court of Canada, but, the highest courts of the aforementioned signatory nations. The superseding, cyber Court aka; The Shareholders' Tribunals may find that they are a new jurisdiction without a home & thus, "persona non grata".

The W.A.D. Accord & the related questions to it are presently before The Supreme Court of Canada. (CANADIAN ABORIGINALS; NEWS; CETA, TPP, C-CIT, et al; More Taxes/Service Cuts to Pay The Shareholders.) https://plus.google.com/100148384357668706698/posts/2pAKGvnG5kq

One of the many important questions is; "...4 A) And, less one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians who have been deliberately deprived of the due diligence information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord, et al, I am compelled to ask The Court: will the Court consider whether, or, not The Court's recent “Tsilhqot'in Decision”, makes it easier for corporate Canada, its global economic associates, their shareholders, et al, to sue the Tsilhqot'in First Nation & other Native communities in Canada...

...And, will The Court consider preventing any unrelated hardship to the NON shareholders as a consequence of the creation of the aforementioned Tribunals & corporate Canada & its associates intent to obtain the unencumbered access to the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada & irrespective of Native title to these lands & its resources?

"THE W.A.D. ACCORD" (Less Comprehensive version) https://plus.google.com/100148384357668706698/posts/7HXsUbS2yNE...
...(basically) The W.A.D. Accord (aka; "The Australian Question”) as it pertains to Aboriginal Canadians states that most Canadians, et al, agree that it is a “right”, not a “privilege” for the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members, et al, to obtain from the government of Canada, et al, its (the government of Canada’s) criteria for ascertaining the health and robustness of their Native communities’ economies. That is to say; the criteria would probably include, amongst other things, a list of those environmentally sustainable businesses, industries and/or enterprises that can:
1) provide the most vulnerable with the direct, cash dividends that amount to over two times (ie. factor of 2+) the amounts that the most vulnerable can obtain from all the present sources of social assistance,
2) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
3) be expanded to provide over 100% employment of the most vulnerable members of an Aboriginal community
and
4) etc.

And, finally, “The Australian Question” states that because “some” of the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members are being deprived of the aforementioned benefits and the information regarding these benefits, the most vulnerable are entitled to be compensated** for their deprivation (ie. their poverty, despair, disenchantment, fear, unconscionably high rates of unemployment & suicides, etc). “The Question” asks; is $47,400 ($87,000 Australian, circa 1984) per year a reasonable compensation ...?"*

*The Compensation; similar to the Residential Schools Abuse compensation, except larger.Also see; Google; "HELP IS ON THE WAY? Mr. Anaya, et al." https://plus.google.com/100148384357668706698/posts/2oHk1jKfUAp*******

For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, via The WAD Accord,see; Facebook; "David Smith, Sidney, BC",or,Google; "David E.H. Smith" to access RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN