RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

"HELP IS ON THE WAY?; The INHUMANELY HIGH RATES of SUICIDES, etc. in Canada"

Print
Written by David E.H. Smith   
Thursday, 08 May 2014 08:42
Re; the NESKANTAGA First Nation's (Canada) high rate of SUICIDES.
After discussing with a psychologist (Native), et al, the relationship BETWEEN:
the DEPRIVATION of the most vulnerable Native community members, et al, of the simplest & most basic information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord* (aka; The Australian Question).
and
the high rates of:
1) SUICIDES,
2) despair,
3) disenchantment,
4) unemployment,
5) poverty,
&
6) etc.,
that are found in many Native communities, et al, across Canada,
the PSYCHOLOGIST CONCURRED.

I have subsequently shared some of the aforementioned information, et al, with, &/or, have had the information & questions improved by, amongst others:
1) senior politicians & bureaucrats; both, federal & provincial, Canadian, et al,
2) the relevant lobbyists' clients & the executives of the political parties operating in Canada,
3) the "coveted" foreign investor, et al,
4) the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
&
5) et al.

If you are interested in utilizing the aforementioned information to minimize, &/or, ELIMINATE the aforementioned major contributing factor to the SUICIDES, etc,
&/or,
have questions regarding the basis for The Compensation (similar to the compensation re; the Residential Schools, except larger, et al) to the most vulnerable community members, et al, for being deprived of the aforementioned simplest & most basic information,
then,
you might consider contacting the above groups & individuals in order to obtain some of the information that is in The W.A.D. Accord, etc.,
then,
contacting me by mail at:
2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, B.C. CANADA. V8L 2C8.

By way of closing, does this information & the information in The WAD Accord belong to you, or, to the community members?
And, what do the psychologists that the Neskanataga are utilizing know about the aforementioned relationship & do they concur, or, not?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam..."

* For those who may not be familiar with The WAD Accord, &/or, its recent developments, see below the less comprehensive version of The W.A.D. ACCORD (aka; The Australian Question), &/or, The Accord can be accessed on line by way of the submission entitled:

"Towards a More Informed Opinion regarding the Environmental Impact & Context of the NGP (Pipeline), et al", Researched & Submitted by D.E.H.S., July 24, 2012 to the Enbridge Co.'s NGP Joint Review Panel..

Contact:

Ms. Colette Spagnuolo,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Process Advisor, Northern Gateway Project.
(22nd Floor, 160 Elgin St. Ottawa ON K1A 0H3).
regarding:
http://gatewaypanel.review-examen.gc/cl... r-eng.html
Public Registry; File #A43076.
All letters of comment are under "F". This comment is available.
under the subfolder "S".
Further questions?;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
cc.
******
The W.A.D. ACCORD (aka; The Australian Question); Less Comprehensive Version
*The W.A.D. Accord
...(basically) The W.A.D. Accord (aka; "The Australian Question”) as it pertains to Aboriginal Canadians states that most Canadians, et al, agree that it is a “right”, not a “privilege” for the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members, et al, to obtain from the government of Canada, et al, its (the government of Canada’s) criteria for ascertaining the health and robustness of their Native communities’ economies. That is to say; the criteria would probably include, amongst other things, a list of those environmentally sustainable businesses, industries and/or enterprises that can:
1) provide the most vulnerable with the direct, cash dividends that amount to over two times (ie. factor of 2+) the
amounts that the most vulnerable can obtain from all the present sources of social assistance,
2) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
3) be expanded to provide over 100% employment of the most vulnerable members of an Aboriginal community,
and
4) etc.

And, finally, “The Australian Question” states that because “some” of the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members are being deprived of the aforementioned benefits and the information regarding
these benefits, the most vulnerable are entitled to be compensated** for their deprivation (ie. their poverty, despair, disenchantment, fear, unconscionably high rates of unemployment & suicides, etc).. “The Question” asks; is $47,400 ($87,000 Australian, circa 1984) per year a reasonable compensation ...?"

**The Compensation; similar to the Residential Schools Abuse compensation, except larger.
***C-CI Treaty; Canada - China Investment Treaty
****CET Agreement; The Canada - European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN