RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

The DEATH of FIRST NATIONS;'The BIRTH of "SUE-ABLE" NATIVE "FIRST MUNICIPALITIES"; "EMANCIPATION" & "Indigenous Economies"?

Print
Written by David E.H. Smith   
Sunday, 13 April 2014 18:22
DEATH of FIRST NATIONS; BIRTH of "SUE-ABLE" NATIVE "FIRST MUNICIPALITIES";
(Last Edited Mar. 23, 2014)

Regarding First Nations becoming Municipalities & the Referendum on it, do your readers & potential readers in China, the European Union, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, think that the move to municipalities is a means to:
1) sue First Nations & thus, "force" First Nations to comply to natural resource development which has very limited environmental liability
&
2) cut more Native & non Native programs & services in order to pay the penalties & compensations to foreign corporations that may be deprived of the profits derived from the development of the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada?

What are the various different ways that your readers & potential readers can make sure that the wording of The Native Municipalities Referendum adequately addresses the questions above?

Please find below my letter regarding Anishnaabe activist Ms.Winona LaDuke's webinar series that elaborates on the above issues & questions. Also see;
Google; "David E.H. Smith";
1) "The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL; The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS; The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty (CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al"
&
2) The W.A.D. Accord.

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam...
************

DEATH of FIRST NATIONS; BIRTH of "SUE-ABLE" NATIVE "FIRST MUNICIPALITIES";
"EMANCIPATION" (& "Indigenous Economies")? (Last Edited; Mar. 21, 2014)

Ms. LaDuke; "Indigenous Economies" & "Municipal Emancipation"
In regard to the NM1yr webinar series "Restoring Stable Indigenous Economies" with Anishnaabe activist Ms.Winona LaDuke, is there a reason why Ms. Winona LaDuke did not share with us her understanding of the more comprehensive criteria that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord* which addresses the needs of the 95% - 99% of community members who are the most vulnerable?

Similarly, does Ms. LaDuke understand the significance of The WAD Accord in the context of:
1) the recently announced First Nations' "municipal emancipation"
and
2) corporate Canada's arrangements with the executives of the Native & non Native political parties/organizations,
which will enable the new Native municipal communities to be sued by corporate China, corporate European Union, et al, by way of the C-CI Treaty**, CET Agreement***, et al, & their secret "Star Chamber"/tribunals should corporates China, the European Union (EU), Canada, &/or, their shareholders, et al, feel that Native municipal communities, &/or, individuals are interfering, &/or, encumbering the accessing of the natural resources that might limit, &/or, negatively impact the value of the shares of the aforementioned corporate groups & their shareholders , et al?

And, besides the value of the natural resources that are continuing to be found on the lands that are claimed by the new First Nations' municipalities, what else of value can the aforementioned national corporate groups sue the new municipalities for?

In addition, has anyone, including Ms. LaDuke, shared the information about the procedures & mechanisms whereby, individuals & groups can use corporate Canada's new funding reserves, & those of its shareholders, to sue corporate Canada, corporate China, corporate EU, et al, & their shareholders, as per preexisting challenges to the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, based upon the signatories of the Treaty/Agreement failure to share the information in The W.A.D. Accord & the basis for the Compensation that is embodied in it, etc.? Would Native Canadians prefer to utilize legal forums (courts) established by Native Canadians, or, utilize established, non Native courts & procedures that are run by Native Canadians, &/or, other adjudicating forums that are international, open to the public, & without the fear of recriminations, et al, in order to sue; a) the natural resource developers, b) their shareholders, c) their associated benefactors, such as banks & investment companies, et al?

If you, &/or, any of your viewers/readers, &/or, potential readers in Canada, China, the European Union, et al, have any questions regarding the above, &/or:
1) the Intent of the aforementioned "municipal emancipation" vs. the Intent of The WAD Accord, ie. protecting the rights of individuals, &/or, groups to sue corporate Canada with the assistance of the federal government to access corporate Canada's funding in order to research, to carry out the suits & to enforce them, et al, at no cost, &/or, risk to the harmless, non shareholders,
2) the non corporate Canada group that can/will investigate, adjudicate & enforce the "un ringing of the bell", ie. ascertain whether corporate Canada, the federal government, et al, has lived up to the spirit & intent of the "municipal emancipation" to; a) protect & share the rights of the individuals & groups without the fear of recriminations, et al, b) compensate the non shareholders, both; Native & non Native & c) render them to the harmless state that exists prior to "the emancipation"
& prior to ratification of the Canada - China Investment Treaty, The CETAgreement with the European Union, the Trans Pacific Partnership, et al, & preexisting the FTAgreement & NAFTAgreements
3) et al,
I can be contacted at:

David E.H. Smith,
2173 Bradford Ave.,
Sidney, B.C.
Canada. V8L 2C8.

For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CITreaty, the CETAgreement, et al, via The WAD Accord for Native & non Native Canadians, et al,
see; Facebook; David Smith, Sidney, BC
www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003319183540&fref=ts
or,
Google; "David E.H. Smith"

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam...
************

*The W.A.D. Accord
...(basically) The W.A.D. Accord (aka; "The Australian Question”) as it pertains to Aboriginal Canadians states that most Canadians, et al, agree that it is a “right”, not a “privilege” for the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members, et al, to obtain from the government of Canada, et al, its (the government of Canada’s) criteria for ascertaining the health and robustness of their Native communities’ economies. That is to say; the criteria would probably include, amongst other things, a list of those environmentally sustainable businesses, industries and/or enterprises that can:
1) provide the most vulnerable with the direct, cash dividends that amount to over two times (ie. factor of 2+) the
amounts that the most vulnerable can obtain from all the present sources of social assistance,
2) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
3) be expanded to provide over 100% employment of the most vulnerable members of an Aboriginal community,
and
4) etc.

And, finally, “The Australian Question” states that because “some” of the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members are being deprived of the aforementioned benefits and the information regarding
these benefits, the most vulnerable are entitled to be compensated** for their deprivation (ie. their poverty, despair, disenchantment, fear, unconscionably high rates of unemployment & suicides, etc).. “The Question” asks; is $47,400 ($87,000 Australian, circa 1984) per year a reasonable compensation ...?"

**The Compensation; similar to the Residential Schools Abuse compensation, except larger.

***C-CI Treaty; Canada - China Investment Treaty

****CET Agreement; The Canada - European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement

************

GOOGLE; RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS,
Reader Supported News (RSN)

1) CETA; IS corporate CANADA JUST continuing its "SUCKING UP" (C-CIT) & shi..."PURGING DOWN?,

2) FINANCIAL & HUMAN RIGHTS NEWS: EU - CAN. Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETA): 'EU may consider "Renditioning Info" as Condition of CETA Deal to Minimize "Unethical & Inhumane" Arrangements between Canadian lobbyists' clients/parties' executives; CHINA may follow in C-CITreaty'?,

3) WHY the AFN may be "DRAGGING its HEELS" on CRITICALLY N.B. ISSUES & Causing the Formation of a New First Nations Group?,

4) "NATIVE SUICIDES LINKED TO INFO. DEPRIVATION" HELP IS ON THE WAY?,

5) C-CI Treaty; "It's Now SAFE..." CETA... Euros cautioned about corporate Canada,

6) (RSN) "CHINA'S KIND HELP from its MINISTRY of STATE SECURITY (MSS) maybe ACCEPTED by CSIS..."?,

7)> “... WE ARE RACIST when it comes to dealing with CANADIANS...”? FINANCIAL & HUMAN RIGHTS NEWS; DEHS, Re; "A Response..." is not an answer to the questions raised in "C-CI Treaty; SPY/AGENT PROVOCATEUR...or, The RELUCTANT (Ethical & Humane) PATRIOT?,

8) Improving, or, Eliminating the China-Canada Investment Treaty via The WAD Accord,

9) FINANCIAL NEWS: Canada-European Union - Trade and Investment Enhancement Agreement (TIEA) The taxpayers/voters of Europe are cautioned... arrangements with corporate Canada,

10) ENBRIDGE; JRP: "TOWARDS a more INFORMED OPINION...",
11)(RSN) CSIS; PRIVY COUNCIL; "The THREAT ASSESSMENT"; CSIS; re; NAFT Agreement, C-CI Treaty, CET Agreement, TP Partnership, et al. (Edited; Jan., 2014),

12) > Have you HELPED YOUR FAMILY & Friends by sending your NOTIFICATION of a PREEXISTING CHALLENGE?,

13) (RSN) SPY/AGENT PROVOCATEUR for corp. China-Canada, & their Investors, or, The RELUCTANT (Ethical & Humane) PATRIOT for the Most Vulnerable (99%) of Canadians-Chinese, et al?; The Mechanism for Ascertaining & Vote to stop, &/or, Improve the Canada-China FIPPA,

14) "A Response..." is not an answer to the questions raised in "C-CI Treaty...",

15) Improving, or, Eliminating the China-Canada Investment Treaty via The WAD Accord ("China treaty uproar signals growing rift between Ottawa, grassroots conservatives"),

16) Eliminating, &/or, Improving the C-CI Treaty (FIPPA) by Using The WAD Accord & Ms. Elizabeth May's (MP) letter,

17) (RSN) TIRED of Political BELIEFS; why not ask QUESTIONS that can form the basis for more INFORMED OPINIONS? See; Response to Ms. Elizabeth May - MP, Nov. 2, 2012 letter.A DIAGNOSTIC TEST of Canada's Version of "DEMOCRACY"; SIMPLE, "DEMOCRATIC" QUESTIONS for "our"(?) Members of Parliament, et al.,

18) (RSN) SECRET C-CITreaty & CETA TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING,

19) >"WELL, YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN". - George H.W. Bush. Re; American police to operate on Canadian soil; arrangements between corporate America & corporate Canada; CETA & C-CIT.,

20) >The RED HERRING; The SENATE "SCANDAL",

21) USING The WAD ACCORD to IMPROVE, &/or, ELIMINATE the C-CI Treaty (FIPPA); Response to Ms. Elizabeth May - MP, Nov. 2, 2012 letter.,

22) "Indigenous Economies" & "MUNICIPAL EMANCIPATION",

23) (RSN) Non SHAREHOLDERS, Native & Non Native, are WHINING CAMP FOLLOWERS?,

24) "CONSIDERATIONS' paid to ALL PARTIES to PROMOTE C-CITreaty & CETA, et al and to LIMIT "OPPOSITION" (see; The WAD Accord)?,

25) (RSN) INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE, or, INTELLIGENT SHARING; The Edge, or, Illusion for Who?,

26) (RSN) DEATH of FIRST NATIONS; NOW "SUE-ABLE" NATIVE "FIRST MUNICIPALITIES"; "EMANCIPATION" & "Indigenous Economies")?,

27) (RSN) The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL; The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS; The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty (CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al,

28) GLOBAL LOBBYISTS' MANAGERS ACKNOWLEDGE & understand REFERENDUMS on;"The WAD ACCORD's COMPENSATION", "NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CI Treaty" (& CET Agreement, TP Partnership, et al,) "The COUNTER OFFER to The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL", et al?,

29) CHAIRMAN MAO'S LAST LAUGH? / The GREEN PARTY of CANADA, et al, LEAKs...,

30) (RSN) An OPEN LETTER to Canadian NON SHAREHOLDERS (both; Native & non Native), et al.145 years of corporate Canada using non shareholders' tax dollars to be used to REWARD SHAREHOLDERS with punitive penalties paid by NON SHAREHOLDERS via NAFTA, C-CIT, CETA, TPP, et al, SECRET TRIBUNALS.

see also;
1) (RSN) PRIME MINISTER HARPER, et al, YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with; "NOTIFICATIONS of Preexisting CHALLENGES...C-CITreaty" & CETA..., TPP, et al,

2) PRESIDENT XI JINPING (CHINA); YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with "The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE...C-CITreaty",

3) PRESIDENTS; H.V. ROMPUY (EU Council), J. BARROSO (EU Commission) & M. SCHULZ (EU Parliament); YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with "The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE...CETAgreement",

4) PRESIDENTS/PRIME MINISTERS Trans Pacific nations; YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with "The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE... TPPartnership"

***********
Re; Response to Comment;
"The DEATH of FIRST NATIONS..."
Sandy,
Thanks for your condolences, encouragement & understanding. You might consider the implications of the article below entitled "The DEATH of FIRST NATIONS..." as it pertains to corporate Canada's (by way of its representatives in Parliament):
1) misrepresentation to the foreign participants of the arrangements, The C-CI Treaty, The CET Agreement, The TP Partnership, et al
&
2) how corporate Canada intends to "protect" the domestic & foreign shareholders from the Native & non Native fallout by way of the rewards of the secret (insider) trade tribunals, aka; "The Death Star/Star Chamber".

Isn't there something about the pride/avarice & glee that corporate Canada is taking regarding 'The BIRTH of "SUEABLE" NATIVE "FIRST MUNICIPALITIES"...' in playing off:
1) Native Canadians against non Native Canadians
&
2) non shareholders against shareholders, both Native & non Native and domestic & foreign,
that is more than a little disturbing/repugnant to the "coveted" Chinese investor, et al.

I hope that the article will provoke more than a few thoughts from you & that you might consider sharing them with me &...
ET AL.

If you check my wall, I have updated the list of "RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS".

David Smith
- "Qui tam..."
************
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN