Positive statements about the plight of humanity will seemingly not thrive.   Doesn't this factoid drain credibility from the important negative statements that MUST be said?

In spite of forest fires, most paper comes from spruce and pine. So am I wrong in thinking that fewer trees are being cut down because of the electronic print in computers and if this isn't true, it should be?

Well, the Two Sides organization, which represents the paper communication industry, totally disagrees with everything I just said (https://twosidesna.org/US/the-majority-of-us-consumers-value-paper-and-disagree-with-digital-only-communications/).

This Two Sides viewpoint has caused me to withdraw like a chastened puppy into my personal living space where my reams of paper are stacked and which offers the following consolation.

The more electronic print I can generate, the less new paper I will have to buy.