RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

The Post Office is not going Broke. It is a scam!

Print
Written by John Zwiebel   
Thursday, 11 October 2018 09:02

The 11 Oct Editorial in Kauai's News Paper "The Garden Island", "Postal Service can�t continue on same financial path" states that the USPS is losing money.� This is not quite true.� The Post Office does not use taxpayer money and the taxpayer is not on the hook to pay for the accounting problems that Congress, in 2006, burdened the Post Office with when it passed HR6407 by voice vote in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate.

The burden is that the Post Office was required to fund retirement benefits for all of its current and future employees over a ten year period which ended in 2016.� USPS failed to meet this mandate.� There is controversy over whether this funding requirement is for a 75 year period (meaning USPS would have to fund retirement for employees who haven't yet been born), but there is no doubt that it funding is required for at least 45 years of payments.� This requirement is unique to the Post Office.� No other US corporation or entity, including Social Security has this burden.

The office of the Inspector General provides this metaphor to explain the nature of the burden.� �What if your credit card company told you: �You will charge a million dollars on your credit card during your life; please enclose the million dollars in your next bill payment. It�s the responsible thing to do.� Doesn�t seem quite right, does it?�

If we look at the USPS financials and compare revenue to expenses, the Post Office is operating in the black and has been for years.� The lie that the Post Office is going broke is almost as great as the lie that Social Security is going broke.

I will not take a position on whether or not pensions offered by employers or unions should be fully funded, but I will repeat that NO corporate entity or union in the USA must meet this requirement.� I will then encourage the reader to look into the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation and realize that when corporations and unions go bankrupt that the PBGC takes over pension payments often drastically reducing the benefit paid to the retiree.� In other words, a person can work his entire life thinking he is saving adequately for retirement, only to have it all disappear after he retires.

The question is, �Why does Congress place this Burden on the Post Office?�� Well, it is an often repeated ploy that is used over and over again to encourage the public into thinking that some specific government agency is going broke.� If that agency is going broke, then, of course, it has to be turned over to �Real Businessmen� who �know how to do things�.� In other words, privatized.

Americans need to look long and hard at the results of privatization.� It rarely leads to better services but it always leads to huge profits for the owners of the corporation that take the service private.

Some examples:� Correction Corporation of America, now known as CoreCivic.� This company manages prisons and it does it very, very poorly, but had a Net Income of $61M.� Blackwater, now known as Academi, owned by Erik Prince � brother of Secretary of Education Betsy Devos, has been responsible for several military fiascos, including Fallujah. The US State Department alone has awarded Blackwater contracts worth $1B.� Speaking of Betsy, she is an advocate of Charter Schools, which take money away from Public Schools.� While some Charter Schools are exemplary many go broke burdening taxpayers with the responsibility of cleaning up the mess.� Others operate much like Islamic Madrasas indoctrinating children into beliefs that conflict with the nature of a free democratic society.

Pete Peterson has been spreading the canard for years that Social Security is going to go broke.� Many Republicans and some Democrats have taken up the call to privatize your FICA (Social Security Payments) and put it in the hands of Wall Street.� They make promises that your retirement will be much more secure because �just look at how well the Dow Jones always does.�� They don�t talk about the fact that companies that go broke are removed from the Dow Jones.� Consider the Lehman Brothers disaster that nearly crashed the entire US economy and lead to the �Great Recession�.� Many people still have not recovered.� But Social Security payments are still being made.

Beware of the siren song of privatization.� It very rarely leads to better services but puts control over those services in the hands of a few oligarchs who are more interested in financing their next yacht than in ensuring you are provided the services you deserve.� If a government agency isn�t performing as well as it should, you should question why our members of Congress don�t want it to work.� Go to opensecrets.org and check out the contributions made to Congress by Prince, Devos, Peterson, the Koch brothers and the organizations they represent.

Congressional members promote privatization of the US Post Office because they are paid to do so.

Beware of the Republican �Two Santa Clause� theory.� Have you noticed that with the Republicans controlling all 3 branches of the US government that no one talks about the US debt any longer.� Please recall it was Dick Cheney who said �deficits don�t matter�.� In fact the recent tax cut passed by Congress is going to cause that debt to balloon even more.

Well, guess what�s coming � especially if the Democrats take control of Congress.� Soon you will start hearing about how the US government itself is going to go broke.� More stories about the heavy burden of Social Security will be shoved in your face.� You will be told that the only way to �save� America from certain disaster is to reduce government and do away with Social Security.� Don�t fall for these lies.� They are presented to you by members of the Oligarchy, where only 8 billionaires control more wealth than 1/2 of the population of the world.� They want it all.� Don�t let them take it.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+28 # Jayceecool 2016-06-30 09:11
A simple reminder: the November presidential election will be determined by voter turnout. With the exception of the passionate movement supporting Bernie Sanders, the Democrats are facing their low turnouts of recent elections...
 
 
+32 # Texas Aggie 2016-06-30 09:46
While it may be understandably very difficult for some progressives to vote for Hillary Clinton, it should be no problem at all to vote for progressives further down the ticket, even if you leave the president box blank or check the Green party.

And those progressives further down the ticket need a big turnout. Be there!
 
 
+4 # MainStreetMentor 2016-07-01 15:23
 
 
+10 # Patriot 2016-06-30 09:35
Since neither party (at the moment) is a running widely accepted candiate for the office of the President of the United States, I'll put my money on record low voter turnout, a tactic Americans somehow have deluded themselves into thinking effective at anything but turning the winner into the person whose party succeeded in dragooning the most voters to the polls.

I also think the election will wind up in the House. Bernie Sanders, the ONLY viable candidate in the election, will receive many write-in votes in states where they are permissible, but most of them will not count if the states require registration as a write-in candidate. Many of the candidates who did not last the entire primary course may also receive write-in votes. The Green Party and other parties will receive generous protest support.

People who alway have opposed Clinton's and Trump's candidacies are unlikely to vote for either of them. Trump my pick up some die-hard so-called Democratic voters who truly loathe Clinton, just as Clinton may win some of the disgusted Republican voters. Independents, having the same options, probably will make the same choices.

I do not think that any candidate will have 51% of the vote.

Any one want to place a very small wager? Say, five toothpicks?
 
 
+15 # lmorneweck 2016-06-30 10:49
You don't need 51% of the vote. (Bill Clinton never came close.) You just need to win enough electoral college votes, which, for better or worse, HRC can do and Trump probably can't.
 
 
-1 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:00
"Viable" in this context mean "able to win." That's not Bernie Sanders, not any more.

Sandersites need to wake up and smell the coffee. Hillary Clinton may not be their brand, but spitting her out because she doesn't taste just right might mean having to swallow the tainted stuff known as Donald Trump.
 
 
+5 # jimmyjames 2016-06-30 09:46
If Jill Stein can garner enough support across America, 15% required, she will be allowed to participate in the Presidential debates. The same goes for Gary Johnson. Currently, Jill is at 7% and Gary at 10%. If Bernie does not win the nomination, many of his supporters will flock to support Jill Stein, potentially carrying her support over the 15% threshold. And Gary may well do the same with disenchanted Republican voters.

Assuming this happens, there will be some of the greatest debates we've ever had in this nation. Should be quite a circus to watch!! My money is on Jill Stein to win the debates.
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:17
jimmy -- right on. that's what I am hoping for.
 
 
-1 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:02
Quoting jimmyjames:
If Jill Stein can garner enough support across America, 15% required, she will be allowed to participate in the Presidential debates. The same goes for Gary Johnson. Currently, Jill is at 7% and Gary at 10%. If Bernie does not win the nomination, many of his supporters will flock to support Jill Stein, potentially carrying her support over the 15% threshold. And Gary may well do the same with disenchanted Republican voters.

Assuming this happens, there will be some of the greatest debates we've ever had in this nation. Should be quite a circus to watch!! My money is on Jill Stein to win the debates.

You'd be throwing it away, even if she somehow actually does get to 15 percent. If Ms. Stein were that good, more voters would have heard of her by now. (Frankly, I'm surprised she's even at 7 percent.)
 
 
+10 # guomashi 2016-06-30 10:16
If the Republican party is shattered how can that be a bad thing?

Unfortunately, things like the recent supreme court decisions are more likely to motivate Republican voters than to discourage them.

Now we need to shatter the Democrat party. Both need to be actively destroyed. Nothing new can emerge absent a destruction of the structures at hand which are literally sucking up all the oxygen in the country.
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:18
guo -- right on. that's what I am hoping for.
 
 
+12 # BettyFaas 2016-06-30 11:39
I question the greatness of the trade agreements that are coming with the TTIP and the TPP. Canada oil is suing the U.S now. under NAFTA for their perceived loss of profit from the denied XL pipeline completion.The upcoming trade agreements will only strengthen the multi-national corporations' power over nations' laws. weakening nations and worker rights further.
 
 
+2 # Karlus58 2016-06-30 12:26
Dear Jesse Berney! I don't know you but, gosh darn it! You've put this all into incredible perspective. Thank you! Your thoughts need to be front and center of each newscast of each and every home in this country.
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:25
 
 
+4 # Jim Rocket 2016-06-30 14:36
You may be correct but it's quite a stretch to say that Trump supporters understand any of that. They got boned and they're angry...that's as deep as it goes. They like him and he's rich. What more do you need?
 
 
+2 # RMDC 2016-06-30 17:29
Rocket -- you may be right. I'm not sure any die-hard supporter of any presidential candidate thinks very hard about issues. Most of the posters on this board are 1000 times more thoughtful than the average voter. It is hard to know what Trump supporters think -- although I do know a few and they talk about imposing tariffs all the time. They are college educated. One is a lawyer who is pretty informed on trade agreements and is supporting Trump.

I don't know any progressives who talk about trade tariffs. To them, trade agreements are mostly about corporate power, environmental protection, worker rights, and the like. But tariff free trade is how corporations exploit workers.
 
 
-2 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:04
Well, that and using undocumented immigrants as serf labor to bring down U.S. workers' wages by weakening unions.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN