RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

Trump’s Con Exposes ‘Change-At-Any-Price’ Delusions

Written by Robert S. Becker   
Wednesday, 30 November 2016 05:52

Who but the Trumpster makes 282 unrealistic campaign pledges?

Like slick hawkers touting gold coins, penny stocks, sports upsets, or their version of salvation, Trump’s audacious hustle guarantees change (never defined), then redemption (for winners), then greatness (pie-in-the-sky).  Trump voters champion change, and that’s what they’re getting: a sweeping, hard right lurch from Obamaland. Anything but panaceas.

Not reforms that drain the Washington swamp of elites or special interests (au contraire). Not demolishing what allegedly “rigs” the “system,” whatever that means. Behold the opposite, or what qualifies as Trump chump change: empowering rule by billionaires and global bankers, rightwing generals and unelected, “alt-right” operatives, plus climate deniers, minority haters, anti-knowledge types, and anti-terrorist ideologues.

Contrary to his endless campaign howlers, Trump’s appointments look to entrench the very corruption his rhetoric assailed. Are any picks skilled at small-town job retraining or handcuffing Wall Street, big pharma or big oil profiteers? "Drill, baby, drill," here we come, regulations  begone. That's Trump “change,” plus scandalous, mafia-style cronyism between family assets and government operations. Where’s that wall we really need, between Trump’s crooked global corporatism and the White House power center?

How long will it take Trumpites sold a bill of goods to smell something rotten? Banished instantly are “presidential conflicts of interests,” booms Trump (and every wannabe autocrat), because what’s good for Trump must be good for America. Here’s monumental change and gall altogether: crass Trumpism indistinguishable from public and foreign affairs, let alone deal-making.

Consider Trump’s infrastructure gambit, offering huge corporate tax credits, not direct funding. That scam is less about job creation than privatized, construction-industry profiteering. Is he not a land developer? “In theory I could run my business perfectly,” brags Trump, “and then run the country perfectly.” “Perfectly” is the conman’s tell, imploding even the notions private interests can be in conflict with public ones. After all, why should his children not share the blessings after he won the lottery?

The Art of the Flip-flop

Two weeks into the morass and Trump reversals arrive on schedule, a parade of flip-flopping and backtracking on his juiciest bait-and-switch ploys. Winning comes first, then let’s make a deal, then jam it down opponents’ throats. No changes on GOP dogma, however: “tax relief” for the wealthy and corporations, slash social benefits and deregulate far and wide. Bingo, open season for fat cats most adept at gaming a corrupt system even further.

Despite post-Brexit “populist” misgivings, how amazing that angry, anti-status quo, working-class Yanks ever swallowed Trumpery, hook, line and sinker. Low-information voters appear stunned by the most outrageous of big city slickers, despite dishing out one distortion after another: “outsourcing” Rust Belt factories happened not just by going overseas but to the non-unionized South. Or that dirty coal is doomed not by regulation but because natural gas is cheaper, easier to mine and ship, and burns cleaner. Per conservative Jennifer Rubin, “A mandate for unicorns, rainbows and pixie dust does not mean much in the real world.”

Trump Chump Change

Trump is not the first to pander to an old, tired myth: just switching presidents (and parties) will restore America to greatness. Whatever Trump's change bluster, brace for a hard right lurch on money and taxes, billions for infrastructure (growing behemoths, not job growth), blasting Obamacare (watch out, have-nots), and continued scapegoating of the wrong goats (low domestic prices reflect low immigrant labor).

So far, the biggest visible change is how Trump changed (and degraded) national campaigning. Trumpism marks the triumph of loose-lipped, loud-mouth, celebrity style over substance (like not one program to address Main St. misery). Now campaigns will be scored as entertainment; now contempt, even chronic lying, will be rewarded; now being a non-politician devoid of a voting record shields a candidate from accountability or attack. Now, hiding your tax returns is a winning ploy, especially covert overseas liabilities.

When style trumps substance, “change” is totally fabricated by the beholder (or media hustler par excellence). Bush-Cheney changed how we make lawless wars— bingo, fiasco. Bill Clinton approved trade, welfare, banking and sentencing changes, many discredited, without reversing growing inequality started by Reagan. Obamacare delivered well-intentioned change, mortally wounded by contradictions (favoring drug, hospital and insurance firms), plus handing Republicans an electoral bludgeon.

Trump is not the first, simply the least qualified of the anti-Washington "outsiders" heaping scorn on the elusive "status quo." Except for H.W. Bush, every president since Carter won by campaigning against some version of the D.C. swamp. Compare Gore, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary—all losers with impressive Washington resumes, anchored with establishment chains.

Rule of the Know-Nothings

Trump in fact advances this slippery slope, by which ignorance, trust your gut arrogance, and inexperience are obscured by charisma (give Donald the Oscar for his performance as genuine, straight-talking insurgent). Trump took maverick bleating to new heights (step aside, McCain), wielding poisonous daggers to shred rival personalities, not positions. By railing against the “establishment” (or the equally vacuous "rigged system"), Trump reversed logic and common sense, making expertise, skill-sets and knowledge disqualifying negatives. Trump hornswoggled enough voters to think that manipulation he targeted as crony elitism was awful, whereas his coarse, know-nothing elitism was never manipulative, indeed redemptive. "What do you have to lose"?

Though logic withered, this election did highlight the core American contradiction. Only a virtuous, knowledgeable outsider can fix a totally rigged system, but Trump is none of these, thus already buttressing the swamp, not draining it. Trump voters overcame high cognitive dissonance by electing an insurgent promising change while reinforcing an entrenched rightwing Congress. This electoral “solution” ends up glorifying the power of the presidency to produce miracles. What a double scam: Trump the billionaire, icon of lordly dominance over serfs, takes office alongside inequality-driven, GOP dinosaurs who created serfs galore. That Hillary took the popular vote while losing only dramatizes gaping anti-democratic ironies. Any generic Democrat, even Hillary, offered far more deliverables for anxious workers.

In short, the least qualified, dubiously“populist” (first super-rich) president is now in charge, with autocratic disruption looming for both executive branch and judiciary. One isn't so much astonished at the “anything goes” Trump for being Trump but at gullible Rust Belt thousands buying this craven character as their messiah. Welcome to America, the land of “change-at-any-price” — with a discount for billionaires.

Trump is the ultimate rogue capitalist, the amoral modern Robber Baron, whose idea of disrupting “the system” is taking command, by whatever means necessary. Do supporters really think Trump will do far more for blue-collar folks than for billionaires, thanks to subsidies, tax cuts or loop holes? There will be high, staggering ultimate human costs paid by economic "losers."

Trump now commands enough leverage to outdo the unprecedented Dubya Demolition — while delivering only token PR wins. Apparently, not enough Americans learned the hard lessons from Bush-Cheney, so here’s another dose of unfeeling, rightwing ideology, with a cruder if more entertaining ringleader. One wonders how much misery ordinary folks must experience before they stop worshiping celebrity flash and then voting against their interests. Now that would be change worth celebrating.


url for 282 promises evidence from Wash Post your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # Robert S. Becker 2016-11-30 14:18

Support here from The Week that argues this Trump's cabinet is the most rightwing, corporate-frien dly cabinet in our history. So much for helping all those angry suffering "white, non-college, males" in MI or PA with bad or no jobs. Here we see the greatest con man in US history formalizes his values, and most of his campaign promises are already running for the exits. Yes, Trump is about change but it turns out he's really about letting the extreme right do what he won't enjoy: run the government to serve fat cats, including Trump Inc bigly, and the entrenched establishment. That political time bomb is already ticking we hope and his fans see the jaw-dropping bait and switch. .
0 # kyzipster 2016-12-19 13:03
Anti-establishm ent progressives along with pro-Hillary Democrats are trying to make sense of this election. Both groups suggesting that 'the left', whatever that is, needs to reach this 'white conservative former factory worker' archetype. Like that's where liberalism has failed, not being able to speak to the Fox News, Limbaugh diehards.

It seems apparent to me that the GOP base reacted to the failure of the Bush Presidency with a deep belief that the Republican Party, their establishment, is too liberal. Most hate or disapprove of Bush in the same way that a majority on the left hate or disapprove of Hillary Clinton. Believing the Dem Party is too conservative (a belief I share).

The GOP base wanted Trump, not Sanders or Stein, they believe that moving further right is the solution. They see Bush as too liberal, I've seen no polling but this has come up in conversations I've had with conservatives who seem very intelligent. There is a belief system they've developed, informed by 8 years of propaganda explaining Bush and the crash of 2008.

We won't 'win them back' with promises of a mandated living wage, free college and universal healthcare. We need to stop with these fantasies. It's the same elitist mindset that keeps the DNC stagnant and unable to reach its own base.

Not sure what the solution is exactly but winning back the progressive base, Labor and all the rest, seems like the best direction to me. Conservatives will not cross the aisle anytime soon.
0 # Robert S. Becker 2016-12-19 13:18
Part of the problem must be to propel more charismatic, untarnished, younger candidates, like Gavin Newsom, CA. People who can seem like outsiders who understand governance. And there are ways to link unemployed or underemployed workers both on the right and the left. Trump, if he fails with the most conservative cabinet in history, might well push centrist, right-leaning independents to reject the latest version of bad Republicanism. And Trump proves that taking risks, even being off the wall, is more important than all his infinite flaws. One can learn from the Trump win without broadcasting the worst kind of know-nothing clown show.
0 # kyzipster 2016-12-19 14:06
I agree. I see nothing good of Trump's win but there is much to learn. I don't see him moving to a more centrist approach if he fails. Like with Bush, any failure will probably not be seen until well into a second term. He is unpredictable, so who knows?

I agree about linking working people on the left and right. I don't see it happening in one or two election cycles easily. It's still intensely tribal, they believe strongly in their culture war soundbites. Trump just threw in some hot air about jobs and trade but he could not have won without the rest.

With the inevitability of more right-wing extremism with this government along with its failure to address the needs of working people, really the bottom 50% of the population, it could pave the way for a Sanders-like politician to reach a broad spectrum down the road but I think we're at risk of another establishment Democrat coming into 'save us' like Obama 8 years ago.

Change at the DNC seems extremely important as debate about this election is front and center. I don't see anything but more right-wing sociopaths running on the Republican ticket. I don't have my hopes up but it has shaken up the establishment.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.