Written by David E.H. Smith   

Re; the comment that I recently received:
"Ok now say this all in English, what you are trying to say is that big corporations control everything and they don't give back to the poor people, big corporations do not pay their fare share of taxes the métis and native people have been abused and ripped off for year , our government continues to help all the immigrants rather then settle up with what the stole from the native people It's time to pay And it's also time to stop cracking and destroying our water we can't drink oil"

about my article entitled "Indigenous Economies" & "MUNICIPAL EMANCIPATION" (Nov. 10, 2013; re posted below. Also known as; First 'Sueable' Native Municipalities & Last Native Nation),
no, I did not say that.

On the other hand, is that what one could have conclude after reading the material that I shared? And, I am not even sure that many Canadians, both; Native & non Native, understand the basis for "The Compensation" that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord? Do you understand it?

My point is; by way of posting the information & the questions in "Indigenous Economies" & "MUNICIPAL EMANCIPATION", it gives the readers of the article & myself, et al, the basis for sharing the answers to these questions, &/or, responses that you & I, et al, have received from, among others, the follow list of participants that intend to benefit directly & exclusively from the development of Canadian natural resources, with the creation a few more natural resources extraction jobs that are very costly to the environment & without the thousand of associated manufacturing jobs that are going off shore with the profits, the over inflated - publicly funded consultant fees, etc.

And, as the "Renditioning of Information" to the most vulnerable community members relates to various intelligence services, & if you don't mind me asking, where did you first learn about the The WAD Accord & its Compensation? Was it through Wikileaks at:
http://www.wikihow.com/Submit-a-Leak-to-Wikileaks
or,
Wikileaks,
University of Melbourne,
BOX 4080,
Australia.
Victoria 3052 ?

And, did you access the information by way of Edward Snowdon's leaked material?

Regardless of where you first encountered the less comprehensive, or, the comprehensive version of The WAD Accord, do you think Item #3 of The Accord is more important than Item #1?

Do you understand why?

On the other hand, in the interests of clarifying my remarks, you might consider the following:
if you understand the link between the aforementioned suicides, etc.
&
the deprivation of the information about the criteria for ascertaining the
health & robustness of a Native community's economy, et al,
then,
you might understand the basis for The Compensation embodied in The W.A.D. Accord.

Similarly, once one understands the basis for The aforementioned Compensation in the context of, not only Native treaty rights, Native land claim settlements, Native self-governance, etc.,
but, in the context of The Canada - China Investment Treaty (C-CITreaty), The Canada- European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETAgreement), The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), et al, with their secret arrangements & tribunals to ascertain & award punitive damages for encumbering the access to the natural resources that are continuing to be found in Canada (& the cutting of government programs, services, etc. to pay for the aforementioned, "alleged" encumbrances)
then,
one might understand the significance & importance of sending your

"NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CITreaty", et al, (See below; Notification to the Presidents of China, the EU, et al)?

to, amongst others, the potential foreign participants in the aforementioned arrangements, treaties, agreements, partnerships, et al, who do not want to become beholden to corporate Canada & its representatives in the House of Commons & Senate at the expense of furthering "alienating" Canadians, both Native & non Native, by being associated with the "unethical" & "inhumane" attempts by corporate Canada to play, not only Native Canadians off of non Natives Canadians, but, to play, both; Native & non Native Canadians off against the "racist" foreign investors & the potential exclusive beneficiaries of the aforementioned arrangements. Do you, the reader, understand the importance of "The NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGES..."?

Are Native & non Native economic leaders & their politicians sharing the information & questions regarding:
1) The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation,
2) the secret procedures & arrangements in the aforementioned Treaty, Agreement, etc.,
3) The "NOTIFICATION..."
&
4) et al,
with you, et al?
And, if they have, have you shared it with your family, your friends, your associates & fellow workers, et al?

That is to say; have Native & non Native economic leaders & their politicians shared the aforementioned information & questions with you & the most vulnerable citizens:
1) who make up 95% - 99% of both Native & non Native communities
&
2) who will continue not to be able to afford to become shareholders in the corporations that will make hundreds of billions of dollars as a consequence of the aforementioned arrangements?

Similarly, regarding "The Termination Plan" between Native Canadians & the governments of Canada, have Native & non Native economic leaders & their politicians shared with their constituents & you, how "The Termination Plan" makes the new Native municipalities, formerly the First Nations, capable of being sued for encumbering the aforementioned access to natural resources? Similarly, is it clear that the INTENT of The Termination Plan is to circumvent The Compensation that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord, et al?

Will the Referendum on "The Native Termination Plan" be as a "succinct" as the British Columbia's 2002 Native Referendum that was designed & asked by BC's Attorney General Geoff Plant? (see; BC's 2002 Native Referendum below).

And, have Native & non Native economic leaders & their politicians shared with you, et al, "The COUNTER OFFER to the aforementioned Termination Plan" which, amongst other things, may include:
1) the various different ways that some of the "coveted" foreign investors, et al, can be exculpated from paying some, &/or, any of "their" portion of The WAD Accord Compensation
2) some of the "coveted" foreign investors other "improvements",
3) an invitation to you, your family, your friends, your associates & fellow workers, the most vulnerable members of our communities, et al, to share your improvements to The Counter Offer, et al, for the purposes of discussing & considering the improvements in forums that you will not be subjected to any recriminations, &/or, later, punitive penalties by secret tribunals, &/or, arrangements
&
4) et al?

Do you have to be a Native, or, a non Native member of corporate Canada, &/or, a shareholder in corporate Canada, in order to deprive the most vulnerable community members of the aforementioned information, questions, etc.? Who do you think will continue to deprive you, et al, of the aforementioned information, questions, et al?

Are you insisting/demanding that corporate Canada's off shore profits, assets, &/or, or accounts be repatriated to Canada in order that the non shareholders, both; Native & non Native Canadians, can "scrutinize" the disbursements of the direct (cash) benefits derived from the aforementioned development of the natural resources, et al, found in Canada?

Don't you think that it would be interesting to compare our notes, yours & mine & others) about the various different responses & answers that we get from the following list of individuals & organizations who will be the direct (cash) beneficiaries of the aforementioned arrangements? (See Below; Canadian Politicians, "The Foot Soldiers of corporate Canada" & The Parties' Lobbyists Managers,"schmiergeldees" (Germ.), et al?

Do you think that you & your associates would find it is interesting to compare notes with others about the answers that we have received from contacting, among others, the potential participants & beneficiaries; from "The WAD Accord" to"The Counter Offer to the Termination Plan for Native Canadians, et al"?

And, after reading the above & the enclosed, what do you & your friends, your colleagues, et al, think are some of the other vulnerabilities of corporate Canada in its "misrepresentation" of its relationship with Native & non Native voters as it pertains to corporate Canada's promises to protect the "coveted" foreign investor, & some of the other potential investors, from the non shareholders?

And, while the initial discussions about The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, et al,
may be taking into consideration the disenchantment of Native & non Native Canadians caused by British Columbia's Attorney General Geoff Plant's 2002 Native Referendum,
do you insist/demand that the wording of the referendums guarantee the rights of Native & non Natives
&
include provisions for the non shareholders' more than adequate, prerequisite funding from corporate Canada to:
1) develop a consensus from the non shareholders about the aforementioned guaranteed rights,
2) develop the mechanisms to determine the punitive damages for challenging these rights
& the costs of enforcing the challenges to these rights, ie. non secret tribunals,
3) and while there exists some laws that prevent an individual from giving away, or, selling his/her rights, the referendum will provide for the forum that will ascertain The Compensation to be paid for the abuse of more fully detailed laws, etc.
&
4) et al?

Would you, et al, consider the following questions & issues for referendums:
1) is it a "right", or, a "privilege" for the most vulnerable community members to obtain the information from the government of Canada, &/or, others regarding:
2) the relationship between the deprivation of information & the aforementioned,
unconscionable high rates of suicide, etc.
3) the comprehensive version of The W.A.D. Accord & its Compensation,
4) "The "NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CITreaty", (CETA, TPP, et al) in order to eliminate the opportunity to avoid paying The Compensation, or, off loading the obligation to pay The Compensation to others, particularly the "coveted" Chinese investor, et al
5) "The COUNTER OFFER to The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, et al"
&
6) et al,
before they consider The Termination Plan Referendum & the aforementioned treaty, arrangements, Agreement, Partnership, etc.?


Which Native & non Native economic leaders & politicians are more interested in using The Termination Plan for Native Canadians to continue depriving the most vulnerable community members of the aforementioned information, such as; The Compensation that is to be paid directly to them, the most vulnerable,
than those leaders who are using "The Plan" in order to supersede the rights of all Canadians by way of the aforementioned arrangements, et al?

Do you think that there are members of the Assembly of First Nations who are continuing to benefit directly (cash), &/or, indirectly (consulting contracts, "future consideration", etc.) from depriving the most vulnerable community members of the aforementioned information?
And, who are the members of the Assembly of First Nations who do not want the most vulnerable community members to obtain the information about the aforementioned criteria, &/or, The Compensation, &/or, other? Ie. who are the information deprivers?

By way of closing, do you, the reader, think that the uncertainty that is created for the information deprivers by sharing the information that you & I, et al, may be gathering with the "coveted" foreign investor, et al (who does not want to be associated with the "unethical", &/or, "inhumane" practices of corporate Canada),
helps, or, hinders corporate Canada's continuing attempts to supersede 145 years of legislation, programs, services, tri-level of government agreements/cooperation, et al, that has improved (& is "improvable") the rights of all non shareholding Canadians by way of The Termination Plan for Native Canadians?
And, by protecting the "coveted" foreign investor, can "we" also give him a better reason to invest in all of Canada (with an emphasis on the 95% - 99% of Native & non Native Canadians who will continue to be unable to afford to invest in corporate Canada) & help us to protect us from the "avarice" of corporate Canada?

And, "finally", do you understand that by getting all of the potential participants to share their answers to the enclosed questions, et al, that "we" will be in a much better position to ascertain, amongst other things:
1) the intent & competency of the potential participants; particularly, the initiating "salesmen"
&
2) how to improve the aforementioned criteria, referendums, procedures, tribunals, "our democracy", et al?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam..."

PS - At the risk of repeating myself, do you know who is the "coveted" Chinese investor who said:
"It's not that we are racist when it comes to dealing with Canadians, it's just that
we can't stand the way that you suck up to us".

And, do you "know" which Canadians he is referring to? On the other hand, who do you "believe" that the "coveted" investor is referring to?
And, while I may believe that the "coveted" Chines investor was not referring to you...

See, also; Quid pro quo; "Preferred shares; indexed" & without liabilities & costs in exchange for permission to develop


**********

"Indigenous Economies" & "MUNICIPAL EMANCIPATION" (Nov. 10, 2013)

In regard to your NM1yr webinar series "Restoring Stable Indigenous Economies",
is there a reason why, Ms. Winona LaDuke, you did not share your understanding of the more comprehensive criteria that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord* which addresses the needs of the 95% - 99% of community members who are the most vulnerable?

Similarly, do you, Ms. LaDuke, understand the significance of The WAD Accord in the context of:
1) the recently announced First Nations' "municipal emancipation",
2) corporate Canada's arrangements with the executives of the Native & non Native political parties/organizations
&
3) the emerging form of the "democracy" of the "new" global economy,
which will enable the new Native municipal communities to be sued by corporate China, corporate European Union, et al, by way of the superceding C-CI Treaty**, CET Agreement***, et al, & their secret "Star Chamber"/tribunals should corporates China, the European Union, Canada, &/or, their shareholders, et al, feel that Native municipal communities, &/or, individuals are interfering, &/or, encumbering the accessing of the natural resources that might limit, &/or, negatively impact the value of the shares of the aforementioned corporate groups & their shareholders , et al?

And, besides the value of the natural resources that are continuing to be found on the lands that are claimed by the new First Nations' municipalities, what else of value can the aforementioned national corporate groups sue the new municipalities for?

In addition, has anyone, including Ms. LaDuke, shared the information about the procedures & mechanisms whereby, individuals & groups can use corporate Canada's & its shareholders funds to sue corporate Canada & its shareholders and those of China, the EU, et al, for preexisting challenges to the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, et al, for failing to share the information in The W.A.D. Accord including the basis for the Compensation that is embodied in it, etc.? Would Native Canadians prefer to utilize legal forums (courts) established by Native Canadians, or, utilize established, non Native courts & procedures that are run by Native Canadians, &/or, other adjudicating forums that are international, open to the public, without the fear of recriminations, et al?

If you, &/or, any of your viewers/readers, &/or, potential readers in Canada, China, the European Union, et al, have any questions regarding the above, &/or:
1) the Intent of the aforementioned "municipal emancipation" vs. the Intent of The WAD Accord, ie. protecting the rights of individuals, &/or, groups to sue corporate Canada with the assistance of the federal government to access corporate Canada's funding in order to research, carry out the suits & enforce them, et al, at no cost, &/or, risk to the harmless, non shareholders,
2) the non corporate Canada group that can/will investigate, adjudicate & enforce the "un ringing of the bell", ie. ascertain whether corporate Canada, the federal government, et al, has lived up to the spirit & intent of the "municipal emancipation" to; a) protect & share the rights of the individuals & groups without the fear of recriminations, et al, b) compensate the non shareholders & c) render them to the harmless state that exists prior to "the emancipation"
&
3) et al,
I can be contacted at:
David E.H. Smith,
2173 Bradford Ave.,
Sidney, B.C.
Canada. V8L 2C8

For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CITreaty, the CETAgreement, et al, via The WAD Accord for Native & non Native Canadians, et al,
see; Facebook; David Smith, Sidney, BC

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam..."

China Daily Hong Kong shared a link.
https://www.facebook.com/chinadailyhkedition

BBC World News
https://www.facebook.com/bbcworldnews

see; Facebook; David Smith, Sidney, BC
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003319183540&fref=ts

*The W.A.D. Accord
...(basically) The W.A.D. Accord (aka; "The Australian Question”) as it pertains to Aboriginal Canadians states that most Canadians, et al, agree that it is a “right”, not a “privilege” for the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members, et al, to obtain from the government of Canada, et al, its (the government of Canada’s) criteria for ascertaining the health and robustness of their Native communities’ economies. That is to say; the criteria would probably include, amongst other things, a list of those environmentally sustainable businesses, industries and/or enterprises that can:
1) provide the most vulnerable with the direct, cash dividends that amount to over two times (ie. factor of 2+) the
amounts that the most vulnerable can obtain from all the present sources of social assistance,
2) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
3) be expanded to provide over 100% employment of the most vulnerable members of an Aboriginal community,
and
4) etc.

And, finally, “The Australian Question” states that because “some” of the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members are being deprived of the aforementioned benefits and the information regarding
these benefits, the most vulnerable are entitled to be compensated** for their deprivation (ie. their poverty, despair, disenchantment, fear, unconscionably high rates of unemployment & suicides, etc).. “The Question” asks; is $47,400 ($87,000 Australian, circa 1984) per year a reasonable compensation ...?"

**The Compensation; similar to the Residential Schools Abuse compensation, except larger.
***C-CI Treaty; Canada - China Investment Treaty
****CET Agreement; The Canada - European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement

****************

LINK BETWEEN SUICIDES, etc. & the DEPRIVATION of INFORMATION
HELP IS ON THE WAY?

Re; the NUNAVUT & NESKANTAGA First Nation's high rate of SUICIDES.
After discussing with a PSYCHOLOGIST (Native), et al, the relationship BETWEEN:
the DEPRIVATION of the most vulnerable Native community members, et al, of the simplest & most basic information, such as the information in The W.A.D. Accord (aka; The Australian Question)
AND
the high rates of:
1) SUICIDES,
2) despair,
3) disenchantment,
4) unemployment,
5) poverty,
&
6) etc.,
that are found in many Native communities, et al, across Canada,
the PSYCHOLOGIST CONCURRED.

I have subsequently shared some of the aforementioned information, et al, with, &/or, have had the information & questions improved by, amongst others:
1) senior politicians & bureaucrats; both, federal & provincial, Canadian, et al,
2) the relevant lobbyists' clients & the executives of the political parties operating in Canada,
3) the "coveted" foreign investor, et al,
4) the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
&
5) et al.

If you are interested in utilizing the aforementioned information to minimize, &/or, ELIMINATE the aforementioned major contributing factor to the SUICIDES, etc,
&/or,
have questions regarding the basis for The Compensation (similar to the compensation re; the Residential Schools, except larger, et al) to the most vulnerable community members, et al, for being deprived of the aforementioned simplest & most basic information,
then,
you might consider contacting the above groups & individuals in order to obtain some of the information that is The W.A.D. Accord, etc.,
then,
contacting me by mail at:
2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, B.C. CANADA. V8L 2C8.

By way of closing, does the information in this letter & the information in The WAD Accord belong to you, or, to the community members?
And, what do the psychologists that the Nunavut, Neskanataga, et al, are utilizing know about the aforementioned relationship? And, do they concur, or, not?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam..."

cc.

l'Humanité shared a link.
https://www.facebook.com/humanite.fr

Major study shines light on Nunavut's suicide crisis
cbc.sh
People who died by suicide in Nunavut were more likely to have experienced childhood physical or sexual abuse, and were more likely to have been diagnosed with depression, according to a new study from McGill University.


China Daily Hong Kong
China Daily, China 's global newspaper, is the most authoritative voice of China , speaking to a worldwide readership. Launched in 1997, the China Daily Hong Kong Edition offers a unique, local perspective that has become essential reading for decision-makers, including HKSAR government officials,...
Media/News/Publishing: 1,800 like this


************
President Xi Jinping; You've been Served with "The NOTIFICATION of the Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CITreaty", et al.

President Xi President Xi Jinping, President of the People's Republic of China, et al;

It may be regrettable that I am serving you with:

"The NOTIFICATION of Pre-Existing CHALLENGE to the CANADA – CHINA
INVESTMENT TREATY"
but, due to the corporate Canada's inability, &/or, lack of willingness to answer
some of the most basic questions regarding:
1) the inter relationships between the basis of The Compensation that embodied in The W.A.D. Accord
and
the Canada - China Investment Treaty (C-CIT), ie. how much are corporate China, its shareholders, your people going to pay into The Compensation
and
2) the uncertainty caused by the secret mechanisms for investigating, adjudicating & penalizing the non shareholders for the abuses, arrangements, et al, of the C-CITreaty by of corporate Canada, et al,
the serving of the Notification to you & the people of China has become necessary.
Please see the enclosed copy of "The Notification" that Prime Minister Harper (& the attached article including references & the means to access more information) has been served with.

Having said that, I think that you may agree with me that you & I may be able to take this opportunity to ensure that corporate Canada's latest attempts, by way of all of
the political parties that are operating in Canada, to "suck up"* to corporate China, et al,
and
to make the government of China, et al, beholden to corporate Canada by way of the development of the natural resources that are being found in Canada,
will not prevail.

By way of closing, I am looking forward to reading about your improvements to The C-CI Treaty that would enable all of the people of both; Canada (including the 95% - 99% Native & non Native Canadians who are non shareholders) & China to obtain the direct cash benefits that can be derived from the development of Canada's natural resources & over a much longer period of time, particularly in the area of the co-manufacturing of the aforementioned resources & the financing of the projects & their infrastructures.

*"suck up"; Who is the "coveted" Chinese investor who said:
"It's not that we are racists when it comes to dealing with Canadians,
it's just that we can't stand the way that you suck up to us."?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
- Researcher
- "Qui tam..."

**********
Attorney General of B.C. Geoff Plant's 2002 "Native" Referendum
1. Private property should not be expropriated for treaty settlements. (Yes/No)
2. The terms and conditions of leases and licences should be respected; fair compensation for unavoidable disruption of commercial interests should be ensured. (Yes/No)
3. Hunting, fishing and recreational opportunities on Crown land should be ensured for all British Columbians. (Yes/No)
4. Parks and protected areas should be maintained for the use and benefit of all British Columbians. (Yes/No)
5. Province-wide standards of resource management and environmental protection should continue to apply. (Yes/No)
6. Aboriginal self-government should have the characteristics of local government, with powers delegated from Canada and British Columbia. (Yes/No)
7. Treaties should include mechanisms for harmonizing land use planning between Aboriginal governments and neighbouring local governments. (Yes/No)
8. The existing tax exemptions for Aboriginal people should be phased out. (Yes/No)
Voters were also told that, for each principle, a Yes vote would compel the provincial government to adopt the principle in treaty negotiations, while a No vote would mean that the government was not bound to adopt the principle when taking part in treaty negotiations.

**********
Canadian Politicians, "The Foot Soldiers of corporate Canada" & The Parties'
Lobbyists Managers,"schmiergeldees" (Germ.), et al:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Leader, Conservative Party
& Mr. DAN HILTON, Executive Director CP, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
or
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
or,
http://www.conservative.ca/
Minister for International Trade & Minister for Asian-Pacific Gateway
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Mr. Harper can be contacted by regular mail at:
1600 90th Avenue Southwest, Suite A-203
Calgary, Alberta, CANADA. T2V 5A8
Tom Mulcair, Leader, New Democratic Party
& Mr. NATHAN ROTMAN, National Director NDP,
Don Davies, MP (Critic for International Trade),
http://www.ndp.ca/contact
Justin Trudeau, Leader, Liberal Party
& Mr. IAN McKAY, National Director Liberal Party
http://www.liberal.ca/contact/
Daniel Paille Leader
& Mr. DANIEL PAILLE, President Bloc Québécois
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Elizabeth May, Leader, Green Party
& Ms. EMILY McMILLAN, Executive Director Green Party,
http://www.greenparty.ca/contact

Petroleum Related Companies
Mr. Al Monaco, President, Enbridge (pipelines) Inc.
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Mr. Fengjui Zhang, President, CNOOC Canada Inc.
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it (China's National Off-shore Oil Co., nee; Nexen Oil)
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
https://www.facebook.com/OilGasCanada

Canada's Five Largest Banks; Contact Us
Royal Bank of Canada
https://www.rbcroyalbank.com/RBC:-ZS4LKwYUBEBcQDSOkYAAAHZ/www_form.html
Toronto-Dominion Bank
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Bank of Nova Scotia
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Bank of Montreal
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Canadian Imperial Bank of Canada
https://www.cibc.com/ca/write-to-us.html

Provincial Securities Commissioners; Canada; Contact Us
Ontario; Mr. Howard Wetston
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
British Columbia; Ms. Brenda Leong
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Alberta; Mr. William Rice
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Manitoba; Mr. Don Murray
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ms. Navanethem Pillay
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)
http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/
Senators,
the Relevant Lobbyists' Clients; corporate Canada, et al,
the potential DIRECT (cash) beneficiaries of the C-CI Treaty,
the "guilty" penalty payers; the Canadian TAXPAYERS/Voters,
China's counter parts of the above, President Xi Jinping
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
EU's counter parts of the above, Mr. Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
et al.

***********
For more Info. & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics in the C-CITreaty, the CETAgreement, et al, via The WAD Accord,
see; Facebook; David Smith, Sidney, BC
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003319183540&fref=ts

How to Submit a Leak to Wikileaks
www.wikihow.com
Wikileaks.org is a site aimed at uncovering government, corporate, and other relevant information that the public has a right to know about but has been kept under wraps. A multi-jurisdictional public service aimed at protecting...

How to Submit a Leak to Wikileaks
www.wikihow.com
Wikileaks.org is a site aimed at uncovering government, corporate, and other relevant information that the public has a right to know about but has been kept under wraps. A multi-jurisdictional public service aimed at protecting...