RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Shiva writes: "Food is supposed to provide us nourishment and health but because of the toxins it contains, what we consume has become a major threat to our health."

Scientists testing pesticide levels on GMO corn. (photo: Natural Society)
Scientists testing pesticide levels on GMO corn. (photo: Natural Society)


Is Our Food Poisoning US?

By Vandana Shiva, The Asian Age

03 January 13

 

ood is supposed to provide us nourishment and health but because of the toxins it contains, what we consume has become a major threat to our health. Some toxic substances are added to our food physically, through adulteration, while some enter our food system chemically, through pesticide residues. And some toxins enter the food chain genetically, through genetic engineering of seeds and crops. Even food packaging can be a source of toxins in food.

While physical adulteration, like stones in pulses, can be removed, the chemicals can't be. The pollutants will stop entering our food system only when poisonous chemicals are banned. Genetic pollution and contamination of food is the new, big threat to food safety and it cannot be undone. Once toxic genes are put into a plant, they are in the genetic code. There is no rollback. Which is why the debate on biosafety of GMOs is so intense.

With growing consumerism and greed, food safety is being bypassed. The distance between growers and eaters is getting larger and being ignorant about what comprises our food is getting deeper. Traders adulterate food to make more money, and consumers, manipulated to focus on the cosmetic appearance, buy adulterated food not knowing what they are eating. Government agencies, which are supposed to inspect and stop adulteration, fail because of corruption and inadequate support.

We are eating hazardous substances every day. Copper salts are used to colour pickles and canned vegetables green. The craze for the cosmetic appearance of food has created a market for dyes injected in watermelon, peas, capsicum and brinjal. Brick dust in chilli powder, coloured chalk powder in turmeric, and papaya seeds in black pepper are old tricks.

With new chemicals available in the market, adulteration has reached new levels. Apples are sprayed with lead arsenate; turmeric and mixed spices are adulterated with lead chromate. These substances can cause anaemia, abortion and paralysis.

One of the worst tragedies of food adulteration was the 2008 Chinese milk scandal, which was a food safety issue involving milk and infant formula adulterated with melamine. Melamine is an industrial chemical used to manufacture melamine-formaldehyde resin, a type of plastic known for its flame retardant properties. When added to milk, it caused it to appear to have higher protein content. But melamine causes renal and urinary problems and its use in food production is universally banned. The milk scandal broke in July 2008. By November there were 300,000 victims, with six infants dying from kidney stones and other kidney complications.

If the Chinese were using melamine in milk, the Indians are using urea to make synthetic milk. Synthetic milk is produced by mixing urea, caustic soda, cheap cooking oil, detergents, water and a tiny bit of natural milk. It has the colour, the structure and even the fat levels of natural milk and thus clears the basic tests. Synthetic milk can cause loss of sight and hearing and is even said to cause cancer.

Oxytocin is a hormone secreted and stored by the posterior pituitary gland that contributes to the second stage of labour. It has uterine-contracting and milk-ejecting actions. Oxytocin is now available as an artificial drug for use in emergencies. The drug can lead to the rupture of the uterus and, in rare cases, rupture of the womb. While the oxytocin for humans is priced at '15 per ampule, veterinary oxytocin is priced at 50 paise per ampule.

The dairy industry uses it on animals in the mistaken belief that it increases milk production when all it does is make the milk come faster, while destroying the cow's reproductive system. The cow goes dry in three years and is abandoned.

Not only is the cow harmed, but those who drink milk from oxytocin-injected cows are also at risk, especially children. Oxytocin causes imbalanced hearing and weak eyesight. For expecting mothers, oxytocin increases the risk of post-partum haemorrhage and can inhibit breastfeeding. Because of hormones in food, minor girls are attaining early puberty. Oxytocin is also used for growing vegetables. Injected into a pumpkin or squash, it doubles the size overnight.

Pesticides are becoming a major threat to our health. India has gone through three major tragedies - the Bhopal gas tragedy, the endosulfan tragedy in Kerala and the tragedy of Punjab's cancer train - related to pesticides that should have woken us to the fact that pesticides kill and cripple.

We are using 750 times more pesticides than Europe, foolishly equating poisons with progress. A study carried out by the All-India Coordinated Research Project on pesticide residues in food under the India Council of Agricultural Research concluded that 51 per cent of all food items have pesticide residues, and 20 per cent had pesticide residues above permissible levels. Globally the figures are 21 per cent and two per cent respectively. Indians are being poisoned at much higher levels than the rest of the world. And these poisons have consequences for our health.

Dr Rashmi Sanghi, a research scientist at the LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur, found organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticide residues in human breast milk. When other researchers analysed the blood samples of women with breast cancer in Jaipur and compared it to blood samples of women without breast cancer, they found significantly higher levels of pesticide residues in the samples from women suffering from cancer.

Even as we have an increasing disease burden due to chemicals and pollutants, there is an attempt to push GMOs despite the serious health risks they pose. We need to assess these risks on the basis of the Precautionary Principle. The principle implies that there is a social responsibility to protect the public from exposure to harm when scientific investigation has thrown data and evidence of health risks. Suppressing research on risk assessment of GMOs does not make the risks go away. A "don't look, don't see" policy does not make for safety.

The last Indian deserves healthy, nutritious and safe food. That is why we at Navdanya have started the campaign "Know your food, Know your farmer". Join us, for the sake of earth and for the sake of your health.

The writer is the executive director of the Navdanya Trust


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-3 # twocents 2013-01-03 11:56
the writer says, "The drug can lead to the rupture of the uterus and, in rare cases, rupture of the womb." Huh? they are one and the same.
 
 
+7 # cafetomo 2013-01-03 12:06
A litany of incrimination. An indictment of greed. Corporations are people, but the reverse is as true. Allowing human nature to exempt itself from responsibility yields a predictable result. Allowing them the arrogance of legislating their own invisibility is the height of foolishness.
 
 
-21 # happycamper690 2013-01-03 12:48
I love RSN. I really do. But this obsession about food is truly over the top. GMO's do much more good than harm. The same is true for radiation. Nobody has ever been killed by irradiated food, but a lot of people have been killed by salmonella and E coli that would have been killed by irradiation. There is a wildly hysterical public response to anything containing words like "nuclear" or "radiation" due to a broad and very serious level of general scientific ignorance among those who react so strongly. I am an academic PhD chemist with 45 years of experience and I do not work for, or consult for, any company in the food industry.
 
 
+19 # dkonstruction 2013-01-03 13:52
As a PhD chemist (which I am not) with 45 years experience (and which i don't have) i would assume that you would agree that one should not make claims about either the health or dangers of anything without study of the long term effects? My understanding is that this has not been done with GMOs. And, isn't this at least one of the reasons that the largest health insurance companies in the US, Kaiser Permanente recently came out with a statement expressing serious concerns and warning about the potential dangers of GMOs? Is Kaiser simply being "over the top" and has an "obsession about food"? And, if this stuff is perfectly safe why don't aren't insurance companies willing to provide coverage to growers of GMOs for any harm shown to have been caused by GMOs? At the very least all of this would suggest caution and far more serious study (not to mention labeling so consumers can make their own decisions) before making blanket pronouncements about how this stuff is perfectly safe. And, does something have to killed for their to be health problems? this seems to be both illogical and unscientific at best.
 
 
+5 # Kootenay Coyote 2013-01-03 14:24
See
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/271-38/13346-stanford-scientists-shockingly-reckless-on-health-risk-and-organics
Stanford Scientists Shockingly Reckless on Health Risk and Organics
for evidence of criminally incompetent neglect of long-term studies.
 
 
+6 # sandy.lieberson 2013-01-03 13:03
glad to know you are attempting to do something about this craze for corrupting our food.
thank you Vandana. i was fortunate enough to meet you at the Berlinale and hear you speak. We need more like you!!
 
 
+9 # Street Level 2013-01-03 15:35
We need to support those like Vandana who will speak out and defend something as basic as food. Too many have been silenced by corporate thugs who threaten careers, funding and credibility.
For too long we have been sold the idea that products are "safe" or even good for us when they are laced with iron filings, melamine, sewage, pesticides and corporate and military waste.
Yes, our obsession about having to GMO EVERYTHING has got to stop.
 
 
+6 # Jonathan Levy 2013-01-04 18:53
Obama is the main supporter of the worst pesticide polluter on earth, Monsanto. After all, Barry appointed Michael Taylor, ex-VP and chief lawyer for Monsanto, to head the FDA. predictably, Taylor pushed through round-up ready alfalfa and will pretty much push anything Monsanto makes. Actually, Monsanto is our government, a major weapon of imperial food control.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN