RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Urist writes: "Guns, troubled young men, and violent video games. Together, they form a tragically familiar background story to America's recent shooting massacres in Columbine, Aurora, and Newtown."

Could taxing violent video games help prevent mass shootings? (photo: Reuters)
Could taxing violent video games help prevent mass shootings? (photo: Reuters)

Could Taxing Violent Video Games Actually Save Lives?

By Jacoba Urist, The Atlantic

24 February 13


uns, troubled young men, and violent video games. Together, they form a tragically familiar background story to America's recent shooting massacres in Columbine, Aurora, and Newtown. But the Constitution protects guns, and mental health is expensive and complicated to treat. So some lawmakers are responding to the latest tragedy by going after the third - and possibly least consequential - variable in this murky equation. There is a new push to tax violent video games.

Researchers are still trying to sort out what kinds of behaviors can (and can't) be attributed to playing games like "Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance" and "Killzone 3." And as it stands, the possible psychological link between digital aggression and anything on the scale of the Sandy Hook massacre is shaky at best. That's one of the reasons the president has called on the CDC to examine the potential relationship among video games, media images, and real-life violence.

Connecticut State Rep. Debralee Hovey (R-112) isn't waiting to read the conclusion. Hovey, whose district includes parts of Newtown, introduced House Bill 5735, establishing what she calls a "10% sin tax" on violent video games (those with a rating of "M", intended for consumers 17 and above). The proceeds would go to Connecticut's Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services to develop "to educate families on the warning signs of video game addiction and anti-social behavior."

Hovey isn't the first state lawmaker in the wake of the Newtown tragedy to target video gamers with a tax. Rep. Diane Franklin introduced a similar bill to the Missouri House on January 14th, calling for a 1% surcharge on games with a Teen, Mature, or Adult Only rating. The Missouri bill states that, "immediate action is necessary to protect the mental health of individuals exposed to violent video games."

Rep. Hovey says that she's been thinking about the issue of violent video games long before the Sandy Hook shootings. As an education consultant for children with a son of her own, Hovey has long worried about the effect of simulated gunfire on youth and believes that violent video games add "no value" to society as a whole.

"In conversations, I've found many 9-12 year old kids who are playing these M rated games," she said. "And they are way too fragile and malleable to be viewing this kind of realistic violence."

The proposed video game bill is modeled on other classic sin taxes - like those levied on alcohol, cigarettes, or at the slot machine - where the money collected by the tax not only raises general revenue but also goes into a specific fund dedicated to address the worse effects of the supposed "sin." For example, a tax on junk food helps fund public medical spending and PSAs about healthy eating. In this case, Hovey hopes a sin tax will help parents understand "that this kind of [video gaming] activity can impact their child's brains."

But video games aren't like cigarettes, and not just because their risks are less clear. A sin tax on cigarettes should limit smoking by forcing cash-strapped consumers to buy fewer packs. But even if a sin tax on video games reduces the number of video games sold, it won't necessarily limit the hours played. After all, what's the difference between two hours of "Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance" and an hour each of "Mortal Kombat" and "Killzone 3"?

Rep. Hovey says she doesn't worry about it. "I have no interest in becoming a nanny or parent to all these children or preventing the number of video games people buy," she said. "My goal is to ramp up awareness of how realistic the content is."


Adam Hoffer, an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, is one of three co-authors of a new working paper examining the creation and growth of the "sindustry"-and why sin taxes often aren't the magic remedy lawmakers hope they'll be.

"Video games [are] the vice right now, what's next down the road?" he said. "Are we going to tax violent movies? TV shows? Hey, why not an HBO tax?"

If the state of Connecticut feels strongly that parents should learn about video game addiction and anti-social behavior, Hoffer explains, the state can collect revenue from other sources- or allocate existing public health funds to the problem.

"I do like the [Connecticut] bill because it deals with an education component," says Michael Thomas, another a co-author of the working paper, and an economics and finance professor at Utah State's Huntsman School of Business. "But I fear that what happens in reality is that the expenditures end up getting put in a general fund or the specific public health part gets dropped from the bill."

According to Thomas, the logistics of allotting money from a specific sin tax to a trust for a particular public health campaign can get dicey. States often end up dipping into these funds if they need to make ends meet, and just put an IOU into the pot. In the end, the sin tax could just end up being a run-of-the-mill revenue grab - a politically correct way to raise money that does nothing to actually reduce gun violence.


"Raising taxes in general, on income, is a non-starter," said William Shughart, the third co-author of the working paper, and a professor in the economics and finance department at Utah State University. "So you have to find something only a minority of people take part in and then tax it." Video gamers, he says, are the prime example of a politically vulnerable group. As best he can see, the majority of the voting population doesn't play violent video games. And for that reason, Shughart believes the Connecticut tax will likely pass.

"It's a classic sin tax situation," Shughart says about why he's not surprised by the lack of evidence linking video aggression and real life shooting. "We are told, we must tax violent video games under some claim that they harm the people playing them, and we're told those harms are spilling over onto the rest of us who don't play these game."

The problem is, even in a perfect world, where placing a sin tax on certain video games reduces exposure to violent imagery and the money is used for a series of public service announcements about anti-social behavior, there's still no clear evidence that this would do anything to protect kids from gun violence or from another school shooting. Even more dangerous, lawmakers may fool us all into thinking we've solved the problem of gun violence by slapping a 10% price hike on "Grand Theft Auto," when in fact, the only problem they've solved is the hole in their own budget. In the meantime, we will have done nothing to reduce gun violence. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

0 # MidwestTom 2013-02-24 22:46
Why not include the movies in a violence tax? Say for every person killed in a movie the tax is $2 per showing. If there are ten people killed and the movie is showing in 400 theaters then the tax is $8000 per night if only shown once at each theater.
-2 # DaveM 2013-02-24 23:20
Perhaps a tax should be impose on human hands, since they are used in virtually all assaults. Those who do not wish to pay the tax may receive and exemption by having their hands cut off.
+4 # ER444 2013-02-25 02:36
Why not just get the REAL guns off the streets??
+3 # intheEPZ 2013-02-25 07:56
Saying there is a "lack of evidence linking video aggression and real life shooting" for statistically rare events is like saying there is "no evidence" that exposure to radiation from nuclear pollution causes cancer (despite NAS studies showing a direct link between radiation exposure and cancer rates, with children up to 5 times more vulnerable than adults). Hiding behind statistics can be a haven for cowards and profiteers and an excuse for inaction. Just one murder due to fascination with blood and gore intensified by video games is one too many. Sometimes you need to use common sense and dare to ask the real question: are these graphically violent, hideously gorey "games" good for anybody (aside from the NRA and arms manufacturers)? What are we training our children for? I applaud the CT & MO legislators for their courage.
+2 # RICHARDKANEpa 2013-02-25 09:40
I like taxing violent games and a tax on the phone when the car in moving, even if a person could cheat and claim one of the phones was instead used by a passenger they purposely took along with them. Since ever single one of these mass killers were first on the computer for a week even a month or more before deciding to kill ( the guy in Norway moved to the country to practice his rampage after hatching it in a month long computer haze. A tax on computer use without a a least 5 minute break would also be a good idea even if someone could cheat with two people on the same computer. PS How about a $ 20 a minute tax for texting in a moving car, and a $200 dollar a minute tax for being on the computer while driving which I stopped someone from doing. PS the current system of doing nothing until a disaster then throwing away the key is counter productive.
+4 # RICHARDKANEpa 2013-02-25 09:43
Inthe, you missed something the US military pushes violent games its good for recruitment purposes. And helps prepare them to fight.
+1 # MidwestDick 2013-02-25 09:52
A video game tax does not fall on a per use basis and so will deter only the most casual user. Even a 50% sin tax (not an unusual amount) does not provide a meaningful penalty compared to the tax-included price of a cigarette.
In any case, the American obsession with blood, gore, crime and war as entertainment does not begin or end with Grand Theft Auto or Duty Call, but is widespread in every medium. It will not be extirpated from just this one by a sin tax.
The only good outcome from this might arise as an unintended consequence. Since it falls heavily on adolescents and young adults, perhaps they will be stung into getting out and making an impact on our political life by the injustice of it.
Occupy Halo.
+1 # aj616 2013-02-25 10:26
There is evidence that children exposed to media violence at younger and younger ages are more likely to be desensitized to violence and to repeat violent behavior. I'm not opposed to such a tax but it shouldn't be limited to only video games. Ultimately more regulation on what corporations can and cannot market to children is what we need, and not just in the violence area, look at fast food and junk food and rising obesity rates in children, and then looks at all the ads targeting these foods to children. Other European countries restrict marketing to children, and while we do have some laws they should be less lax as in Europe.
0 # engelbach 2013-02-25 17:11
Most of American society is numb to the effects of real violence not because of video games built because of lack of media coverage of the carnage.

If the public were exposed to a daily dose of the mangled bodies of children hit by the administration' s drones there might be a real shift away from support for these barbarous murders.

Kids, especially boys, have always played at games simulating violence. Rather trying to change human nature, this needs to be balanced by the depiction of the true horror of killing.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.