RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Knefel writes: "Bloomberg does deserve some credit for managing to hoodwink a large number of New Yorkers ... But when it comes to handling Occupy, Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly - and the NYPD at large - are facing a new level of resistance."

Members of the NYPD scuffle with Occupy Wall Street protestors on May Day, 05/01/12. (photo: Getty Images)
Members of the NYPD scuffle with Occupy Wall Street protestors on May Day, 05/01/12. (photo: Getty Images)

New Lawsuit Takes On Bloomberg's 'Private Army' in New York

By John Knefel, AlterNet

06 May 12


Rodriguez v. Winski calls for the creation of an independent federal position to oversee the NYPD.

hen Mayor Michael Bloomberg referred to the NYPD as his "private army" and the "seventh largest standing army in the world," he managed to provoke scorn from all but his most slavish admirers. Though his description was wildly inaccurate regarding the size of the department, his overall Putin-esque characterization of the cops as a extra-municipal tool to be deployed at his whim struck many as remarkably and accidentally honest.

Bloomberg does deserve some credit for managing to hoodwink a large number of New Yorkers into believing he's some sort of benevolent technocrat instead of the corporate oligarch he so clearly is. But when it comes to handling Occupy, Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly - and the NYPD at large - are facing a new level of resistance.

Fifteen plaintiffs, including five elected officials, members of the press, an Iraq war veteran, and Occupy Wall Street activists are suing the city in federal court, alleging gross misconduct ranging from false arrest and imprisonment to possible conspiracy between the police department and JPMorgan Chase to chill citizen's rights to peaceably assemble. The suit is known as Rodriguez v. Winski and calls for, among other measures, the creation of an independent federal position to oversee the NYPD. The department is out of control, the suit alleges, and is incapable of holding itself accountable.

I'm also a plaintiff in the case and can testify from first-hand experience that the NYPD is out of control. This is obviously not news to the hundreds of thousands of young men of color who are stopped and frisked by the cops every year, and it's always important to stress that the kind of suppression a political movement like Occupy faces is both quantitatively and categorically different than the oppression marginalized communities face. So the stories laid out below come with the caveat of "police brutality in New York isn't new, but it's crazy and maybe we can get this under control."

In some ways what makes this lawsuit so extraordinary is the inclusion of four city council members, one of whom was beaten bloody and arrested by the police. Ydanis Rodriguez, the lead plaintiff in the case, was prevented from witnessing the eviction of Liberty Square by the NYPD on November 15, 2011. Rodriquez represents the 10th Council District in Manhattan and on the night of the raid he went to Liberty Square to exercise his right to observe police actions as granted to him by the council charter. By the end of the night Rodriguez was bloodied and in police custody, thereby rendering him incapable of fulfilling his duty to his constituents to act as a monitor.

More outrageous still is what the department did as damage control. When Time magazine picked up the story, it posted a photo of Rodriguez on the ground getting arrested. The complaint alleges that police officials contacted Time, requesting the dramatic photo be removed. Several hours later the story was accompanied by a photograph from an unrelated event showing Rodriguez speaking pleasantly with officers. Until this complaint was filed and reported on, this incident remained unknown.

Suppression of the Press

The NYPD's contempt for the press has been well documented. Ray Kelly's widely circulated memo telling his officers to allow the press to do their job has been uniformly ignored, which shows either Kelly's lack of control over his forces, or, more likely, the bad-faith in which it was written and distributed. From arresting so-called mainstream journalists like plaintiff Stephanie Keith, to harassing freelance photographers, to preventing the press from witnessing police misconduct, to manhandling reporters and their crews, to threatening to confiscate press badges, to (in my case) getting arrested for not having press credentials, it's fair to say the NYPD considers the First Amendment more of a friendly suggestion than a constitutional right.

One part of the story that hasn't been reported, until now, centers on plaintiff Justin Sullivan, who was arrested while filming arrests at a "mic check" action in Grand Central Station. Upon being taken into custody his still camera and video camera were confiscated, which is standard procedure. Sullivan was released from the precinct with several court summonses, but without his camera. It's worth quoting the complaint in full (emphasis mine):

107. When Plaintiff Justin Sullivan went back to the MTA Police Precinct located at Grand Central Station to ask for his missing video camera, he was re-arrested and held for approximately 24 more hours.

108. Additional charges were issued against Plaintiff Justin Sullivan at that time.

109. Plaintiff Justin Sullivan's still camera was not returned.

110. Plaintiff Justin Sullivan's video camera was not returned.

111. Plaintiff Justin Sullivan's data chips were not returned

112. A witness reported that she observed an officer who fits the physical description of Officer Lakeram (who specifically requested JS's cameras - JK) instructing another officer to break the camera.

That's an astounding set of allegations. After being arrested for filming somebody being arrested (who was actually speaking out against a previous arrest), Sullivan was released, re-arrested, and issued further charges. Beyond all that, his camera - which contained evidence regarding the previous arrests - was allegedly destroyed and his data cards were either destroyed, lost, or are still being held somewhere.

Also previously unreleased, but contained in the video submitted along with the complaint, is evidence of an MTA police dog biting the second arrested protester in the leg (min 4:15). I know from personal conversations I had after the incident that the victim suffered substantial pain as a result of the bite. These are just two instances of police misconduct at one relatively low-profile Occupy action. The complaint itself highlights too many other examples to enumerate here.

The Role of Chase Bank

One of the key defendants in this suit is JPMorgan Chase, which, compared to the NYPD and Brookfield, has remained relatively removed from Occupy - publicly, at least. Behind the scenes is a very different story, one that remains shrouded in mystery, but gets to the core of what Occupy is about. The suit alleges a conspiracy between Mayor Bloomberg, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly and employees of JP Morgan Chase to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights. From September 17 until at least October 12, the NYPD barred Occupy activists from engaging in speech or assembly in Chase Manhattan Plaza, a privately owned public space. That, in and of itself, is troubling enough. But on or around October 12, the complaint alleges, the NYPD barricades came down and were replaced by a much taller fence believed to be the property of JPMorgan Chase. Again, from the complaint:

"The close temporal proximity between the removal of the initial barriers and their replacement with the subsequent private fence shows that Defendant J.P. Morgan and state actors conferred and conspired to continue the violation of Constitutional rights of individuals seeking to gather and exercise their rights in said publicly accessible open area."

In early October, JP Morgan issued a press release touting its $4.6 million donation to the New York Police Foundation, the largest in the NYPF's history. The contribution began in September 2010, well before the emergence of Occupy, so the money wasn't related to the protesters initially, although the relationship between the financial firm and the police remains unclear. The NYPF is closely associated with the NYPD; the homepage on its website features a photo of NYPD Commissioner Kelly. We don't know what effect that donation had on police policies and behavior. But we do know that Occupy activists were barred from exercising their rights due to the content of their speech, and more needs to be revealed about the collusion between the police and financial elites.

The complaints go on and on. Also a plaintiff in the suit is Jeffery McClain, an Iraq war veteran who was beaten and called a traitor by police after marching with Occupy Wall Street. And there's Peter Dutro, who was arrested while inside a bank for protesting outside the bank, a charge which carries with it all sorts of metaphysical implications.

What's clear is that Mayor Bloomberg, the NYPD, and the financial elites are out of control, and the police department is unable or unwilling to hold itself accountable. There needs to be a federal level, independent monitor to oversee the NYPD for the good of the public and the protection of our constitutional rights. This suit is one of many steps being taken to better understand and more effectively combat the forces seeking to erode our rights one arrest at a time, and the battle, like this lawsuit, is just beginning. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+17 # jwb110 2012-05-06 11:07
The NYPD is the most corrupt and easily bought Dept is NYC. It's all just a new Tamminy Hall.
+21 # Lolanne 2012-05-06 11:27
This lawsuit is what I've been hoping would happen ever since the first videos and reports of the outrageous, gestapo-like tactics of the NYPD and the hired mercenaries NYPF first came out at the time they were happening. Their brutal tactics did not stop many Occupiers from catching and posting video online for the world to see.

That should have been enough to cause a serious federal investigation into what was happening in NY (and later spread to other cities). That it did not spur such an investigation is significant in itself, and makes me pessimistic about the call for a federal position being created to "oversee" NYPD.

There should already be a federal prosecution occurring against Bloomberg and his "army," but it's not happening. Why would we think appointing a federal overseer would be helpful? I just hope there are still federal judges in NY who will hear and judge this lawsuit fairly. There MUST be a way to reign these despicable bullies in!
-5 # Mark E. Smith 2012-05-06 12:01
@Holyone. You blame the Republicans and call for federal intervention. But you won't get any federal help because there are Democrats in power and they are more concerned about supporting their Republican colleagues and fellow oligarchs, than they are about the Constitution or the people.

There's another article here on RSN about Greece, where people have woken up and begun to understand that voting oligarchs into power won't change anything. The banks and big corporations gave more to Obama in '08 than to McCain because they knew he would do more for them, and he has.

Don't vote--voting delegates your power to the authorities and they'll use that power to bash your head in.
+4 # X Dane 2012-05-07 02:07
Mark they gave more to Obama because they realized that he would win. And they want to be on the winning side.

Now, like the sharks they are, they are smelling blood, so they returned to their first love the republicans, for Obama did NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY EXPECTED.
+14 # luvdoc 2012-05-06 12:12
Heil Mayor Bloomberg, Heil Commissioner Kelly, Heil JP Morgan Chase. luvdoc
+7 # sgrisham 2012-05-06 14:46
I was a victim of Bloomberg and NYPD Commissioner Kelly's policies during the 2004 Republican National Convention. I was peacefully, silently, and lawfully exercising my First Amendment rights in the city in which I lived, worked, and paid taxes when I was arrested next to a major symbol of free speech for me--the New York Public Library.

I was held, without charges and without access to a lawyer, along with 1,800 others, for 24 hours in a condemned bus terminal. Brand new cages had been built for us, but with only one bench to each large cage, so most of us slept on the floor, which was covered with toxic residue. Many suffered skin lesions and other health detriments.

(cont'd next post)
+13 # sgrisham 2012-05-06 14:47
I was then transferred to "the Tombs," the city's prisoner holding facility (not the Hilton, so much), for 24 hours more. My asthma medication was taken away when I was unlawfully booked in what amounted to an assembly line, and I wasn't given access to a doctor and inhaler until 36 hours after my arrest. I wasn't at all alone when I was finally granted medical attention.

Why did this happen to hundreds and hundreds, maybe thousands, of law-abiding, tax-paying citizens of New York City? So out-of-state Republican delegates, Republican officials, and George W. Bush didn't have to be bothered by our opinions or presence in the streets while they exploited our city--to which they *still* owed all the 9/11 compensation they'd promised, and which on any other day they loathed and insulted loudly for its intellectual liberalism and ethnic and religious diversity--for political gain.

Thanks to the color of my skin, an NYC judge, and an *amazing* attorney, I got off EASY.

I hope and pray this lawsuit addresses and stops the unconstitutiona l behavior of Bloomberg, Kelly, and the many "bad apples" of the NYPD.

I thank the plaintiffs, their attorneys, their witnesses, the judge, and everyone else who has to work--at taxpayer expense--becaus e "the law" seems not to believe it applies to them. I am deeply grateful to them for that hard work and for their patriotism, respect for the U.S. and N.Y. Constitutions, compassion, and bravery.
+7 # sgrisham 2012-05-06 15:49
Two critical omissions from my posts above, for which I apologize:

(1) NYC is also reviled for its LGBT population, and for the Statue of Liberty's generous suggestion, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free" and all that it implies.

(2) I owe a GREAT debt of gratitude to:

(a) My own devoted, right-minded, brilliant attorney.

(b) My family for their help, support, concern, encouragement, and example.

(c) The many patriotic, dedicated people with whom I was imprisoned. Almost without exception, they gave me hope, solidarity, friendship, aid, some good laughs, and great ideas for future activism, all of which helped pass a mostly-sleeples s, deeply disillusioned, rather uncomfortable 48 hours far more pleasantly.

(d) The few NYPD and NYC corrections officers who, rather than "just following orders," offered their help, support, and thanks.
+10 # DPM 2012-05-06 15:58
Occupy! Occupy!! OCCUPY!!! Everyone Occupy! Quietly, forcefully and finally! Occupy!!!
+12 # iggypops 2012-05-06 16:42
there's no better human than a good cop.
and no worse human than a bad cop.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

when the police break the law there isn't any law – it's just a fight for survival.
- billy jack
+2 # cordleycoit 2012-05-06 16:43
This is the New York I remember DA Greene going after Blacks. Cops just beating people, a boasting stupid mayor, that was sixty years ago. Now the cops belong to J.P. Morgan, they have new gases, guns and even better brutality. The judges don't care anymore for Occupy protesters than they did for civil rights demonstrators. Look for the Matrix and I'll show you an unchanging New York. Time to unarrest people.
+5 # indio007 2012-05-06 18:51
When are you people going to learn that you have to sue these cops as individuals, in their private capacity.

It is up to the individual to justify it.

If every person that was arrested marched down to court and filed a small claims action, this crap would stop fast.

You don't get a lawyer in small claims. So what you would have is a dumb as rocks cop trying to argue immunity. Needless to say I think it would be a big fail in their part.

The gov't isn't doing anything to anybody. These are individual men and women using their employment as an excuse to commit crimes.

I suggest everyone read , Are Cops Constitutional ?
Seton Hall Constitutional L.J. 2001, 685

You don't need a DA to prosecute a crime.
+7 # Willman 2012-05-06 21:13
The level of the New York elites and their army goes to show me that they will do anything to maintain their power.
It also shows how worried they actually are.
Bloomberg doesn't want to be another Mubarak.
+1 # Buddha 2012-05-07 11:47
NYPD is the testing grounds for the coming Authoritarian regime in America. It will be the testing ground for restrictions on our Constitutional rights, and implementation of provisions in the NDAA, CISPA, Patriot Act, the Supreme Court determining that strip searches for any arrest are non un-Constitution al, etc. If the authoritarians "can make it there, they can make it anywhere"

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.