RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Barry Lando concludes: "The same corrupt Saudi regime that fueled Bin Laden's outrage is still in power, still backed by the United States. Indeed, they have been doing their utmost to tamp the spreading revolt, spending millions to bribe Yemen's tribal leaders, dispatching their troops to Bahrain to help crush the uprising of the Shiite majority in that country. Indeed, that brutal repression may radicalize thousands of young Shiites, generating hosts of new recruits for al Qaeda or other extremists Islamic groups - even as the corpse of Osama bin Laden lies somewhere at the bottom of the sea."

Osama bin Laden is seen at an undisclosed location in this television image, 10/07/01. (photo: Al Jazeera/AP)
Osama bin Laden is seen at an undisclosed location in this television image, 10/07/01. (photo: Al Jazeera/AP)



Osama bin Laden: Everyone's Missing the Point

By Barry Lando, Reader Supported News

02 May 11


RSN Special Coverage: Egypt's Struggle for Democracy

he jubilation of Americans and Western leaders at the death of Osama bin Laden, though understandable, misses the point. In many ways, the figure gunned down in Pakistan was already irrelevant - more a symbol of past dangers than a real threat for the future.

Indeed, from the point of view of America and many of its allies, the most menacing symbol in the Arab World today is not Osama bin Laden but another Arab who recently met a violent death - Mohamed Bouazizi, the 26-year-old Tunisian fruit vendor who chose to set himself on fire after being harassed by corrupt local police.

His act, of course, ignited the storm that has spread across the Arab World and proven a much more serious threat to America's allies in the region than al Qaeda ever was. Ironically, his sacrifice probably also dealt a far more devastating blow to al Qaeda's fortunes than the assassination of Osama bin Laden.

The Arab world today bears no relationship to the situation a decade ago after 9/11. Obsessed with bin Laden and al Qaeda, the US has been sucked into a vast quagmire - a disaster for the Americans, their economy, and their standing in the Arab World.

What particularly provoked Osama bin Laden - a Saudi - was the decision of Saudi rulers to accept the presence of more than a hundred thousand "infidel" US troops and their allies in Saudi Arabia following Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. In general, he and his followers were outraged by US support for corrupt, repressive regimes from Saudi Arabia to Egypt to Yemen, as well, of course, for America's backing of Israel.

As Osama himself told CNN in 1997, "the US wants to occupy our countries, steal our resources, impose agents on us to rule us and then wants us to agree to all this. If we refuse to do so, it says we are terrorists ... Wherever we look, we find the US as the leader of terrorism and crime in the world."

Bin Laden's message resonated throughout the Muslim world. But US officials remained deaf to its meaning, and continued obsessed with al Qaeda and its Taliban allies. The upshot - US policy was the best recruiter Osama could have asked for. Over the past decade, hundreds of thousands of American soldiers, CIA killer teams, mercenaries, predators, and "diplomats" swarmed across the region from Iraq to Afghanistan to Pakistan to Yemen and Somalia, supported by sprawling new bases and pharaonic embassies.

The bill for all this - for an America crippled by cutbacks in health, infrastructure. and education - will be in the trillions of dollars. But despite this massive effort, none of those targeted Arab countries could by any stretch of the imagination be considered a success story. Hostility to the US is high throughout the region. In polls, the majority of those Arabs queried consider the United States a greater threat than al Qaeda.

In Pakistan, despite the US lavishing tens of billions of dollars on that country's military, it turns out that Osama bin Laden, rather than groveling as an outlaw in the isolated tribal regions, has been living in a fortified villa near the country's major military academy and a large army base, just a few miles away from the capital city.

America had also launched an ambitious civilian aid program: $7.5 billion over five years, designed to win Pakistani hearts and minds and bolster the civilian government. But, corruption is so rife throughout the Pakistani government, and its officials so incompetent, that the US has been unable to disburse most of the aid. As the New York Times reports:

Instead of polishing the tarnished image of America with a suspicious, even hostile, Pakistani public and government, the plan has resulted in bitterness and a sense of broken promises ...

The economy is failing. Education, health care and other services are almost nonexistent, while civilian leaders from the landed and industrialist classes pay hardly any taxes.

Pakistanis see the aid as a crude attempt to buy friendship and an effort to alleviate antipathy toward United States drone attacks against militants in the tribal areas.

The same reports come from Afghanistan. A decade after the US invaded, tens of thousands of American troops are still fighting what seems to be, at best, a see-saw battle against the Taliban. There also, according to another report in the New York Times , the US is backing incompetent, corrupt, unpopular leaders. Millions of dollars of US funds actually get diverted as payoffs to the Taliban and their allies - bribing them not to attack US projects, such as $65 million highway that may never be completed in Eastern Afghanistan.

The vast expenses and unsavory alliances surrounding the highway have become a parable of the corruption and mismanagement that turns so many well-intended development efforts in Afghanistan into sinkholes for the money of American taxpayers, even nine years into the war.

Now back to Mohamed Bouazizi the Tunisian fruit vendor whose death unleashed the Arab Spring that is still roiling the region.

Though Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda have yet to be credited with overthrowing an Arab regime, the spark provided by Bouazizi has already led to the downfall of American-backed tyrants in Tunisia and Egypt, and continues to threaten other despots in Libya, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain.

Ironically, most of the leaders overthrown or desperately trying to hang on to power had declared themselves implacable enemies of al Qaeda. Yet, again, it was not Bin Laden, but Bouazizi, who turned out to be a far greater menace.

Precisely for that reason, it is Bouazizi's Arab Spring, not sophisticated US killer teams, that most threaten al Qaeda and its allies. By demonstrating that secular uprisings can succeed in toppling the aged, crusty tyrannies, young Arabs across the region have - so far - undercut the appeal of the Islamic radicals.

So far, because despite the early successes in Tunisia and Egypt, the future of the Arab Spring is far from clear. The current process will take decades to play out. The political and economic establishments have been decapitated in Egypt and Tunisia, but not decimated. In the rest of the region, though seriously shaken, the old order still reigns supreme.

The same corrupt Saudi regime that fueled Bin Laden's outrage is still in power, still backed by the United States. Indeed, they have been doing their utmost to tamp the spreading revolt, spending millions to bribe Yemen's tribal leaders, dispatching their troops to Bahrain to help crush the uprising of the Shiite majority in that country.

Indeed, that brutal repression may radicalize thousands of young Shiites, generating hosts of new recruits for al Qaeda or other extremists Islamic groups - even as the corpse of Osama bin Laden lies somewhere at the bottom of the sea.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+26 # swimdoc 2017-05-19 18:05
Go for it, Iowans! Demand Improved and Expanded Medicare for All! Don't prematurely "compromise" by accepting the promise of a public option before you even get started. Insist that your elected members of Congress sign on to HR 676 while still opposing dismantling of the ACA. It's time to move beyond the ACA to real national health coverage for everyone living in the U.S.
 
 
+3 # JCM 2017-05-19 18:56
 
 
+10 # Charles3000 2017-05-19 19:27
I wish everyone could learn that Medicare is NOT single payer; it is either two or three payers involved. We need "single payer" NOT Medicare for All!"
 
 
+13 # Scott Galindez 2017-05-19 22:18
You are right Charles...Medic are for All is a slogan but Conyers bill and Bernie's that is coming expand Medicaid to a single payer system. Medicare is popular with the American people so we are using that to sell universal healthcare.
 
 
+18 # diamondmarge7 2017-05-19 19:32
This is SUCH exciting news! I had heard of NY & CA moving towards single psayer; I have also contributed & fotwarded emails to contacts regarding the heavy efforts in CO. How fabulous that IA is moving in this marvelous direction, too. Mebbe we "exxceptional" Americans might finally join the rest of the industrial world & stop being gouged and screwed by for-profit
BigMed and BigPharma. I AM SO THRILLED.
 
 
+3 # elkingo 2017-05-19 23:07
Socialized Medicine Goddammit!
 
 
+15 # lamancha 2017-05-20 00:28
I find it almost criminal that the network pundits - CNN, MSNBC and others - are not taking up the cause of single payer. Even the so-called liberal network hosts & pundits ( no progressives in sight ), are not taking up the cause. All they report on is what the Republicans are proposing. What a waste!
 
 
0 # RNLDaWy 2017-05-20 10:28
Correct they make their money on whining about losing the election and mislead you with that. Also elected officials who work for our government have the best healthcare and salaries and guaranteed income of any person in the country same as high earners in the private sector. They don't want you to know the facts Medicare is not single payer .. at least a two tier system would be better .. Medicare for All .. unless you are a high earner then you can choose your plan .. because not a problem for those with the dough .. or WORKING IN GOVERNMENT .. wink wink wink!
 
 
+5 # virtualaudio 2017-05-20 16:45
Kudos to Bernie for planting the seed of Single Payer in the minds of most Americans. Though I'd prefer he had won the election, this profound shift of public sentiment justifies the time & money I put into his primary bid. If only the Dems in Congress and the 'progressive' news & opinion outlets would take up the cause.. Before the presidential race, I'd occasionally hear people like Chris Hayes talk about single payer. He also did a lot of segments on climate change. Since the election season started, I haven't heard a peep about these issues from him or others. There seems to be a an attitude of disdain toward Bernie from these guys.. During the primary, Maddow interviewed Sanders & Clinton on the same day, while Matthews did Trump; Trump made a stupid comment about punishing women for getting abortions, which Maddow used to ambush Sanders.. when asked, Sanders reiterated his commitment to women's rights, then dismissed Trumps comment as more B.S. Maddow then tracked down Clinton and told her only the 2nd half of what Sanders said, which gave Clinton the opportunity to slam Sanders for not being sufficiently pro-choice. Maddow had this smirk on her face when she talked to Clinton, like a little kid who knew they were doing something bad and getting away with it. What's wrong with these people? If you want the public's trust, be consistent! Otherwise Trump's assault on the media will continue to resonate. (sorry to digress, but it is annoying)
 
 
0 # futhark 2017-05-20 10:12
The government has no more business in providing medical insurance than it does providing fire protection and police services, educational opportunities for minors, roads and highways, or protection from foreign invasion. It seems that an increasing number of people are waking up to the fact that there is little justification to have any of these without the others.
 
 
+7 # Wise woman 2017-05-20 10:41
State by state looks like the only way single payer will be accomplished. If that's the way it has to happen, so be it. All the more reason we have to get on top of our elected officials to do the right thing for America. Here in CT, where I live, big med and big pharma rule. Blumenthal and Murphy have to get on the ball and change that. That and legalizing mj which is presently under the control of the state and the price gaugers as well as the criminal element.
 
 
-3 # Rain17 2017-05-21 20:00
The biggest obstacle to single-payer:

"I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for other people's healthcare ( i.e. illegal immigrants, minorities on welfare, or any other umpopular group) at my expense."

Too many Americans maintain that position. Until artitudes toward socisl programs chanfe for the better single-payer will remain politically a nonstarter in this country.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN