RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Engelhardt writes: "Make no mistake: we're entering a new world of military planning ... All this should reassure us that, despite the talk of massive cuts, the US military will continue to be the profligate, inefficient, and remarkably ineffective institution we've come to know and squander our treasure on."

The aftermath of a US drone attack on a Pakistani village. (photo: Ijaz Muhammad/AP)
The aftermath of a US drone attack on a Pakistani village. (photo: Ijaz Muhammad/AP)

Offshore Everywhere: The Plan to End National Sovereignty as We Know It

By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

06 February 12


ake no mistake: we're entering a new world of military planning. Admittedly, the latest proposed Pentagon budget manages to preserve just about every costly toy-cum-boondoggle from the good old days when MiGs still roamed the skies, including an uncut nuclear arsenal. Eternally over-budget items like the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, cherished by their services and well-lobbied congressional representatives, aren't leaving the scene any time soon, though delays or cuts in purchase orders are planned. All this should reassure us that, despite the talk of massive cuts, the U.S. military will continue to be the profligate, inefficient, and remarkably ineffective institution we've come to know and squander our treasure on.

Still, the cuts that matter are already in the works, the ones that will change the American way of war. They may mean little in monetary terms - the Pentagon budget is actually slated to increase through 2017 - but in imperial terms they will make a difference. A new way of preserving the embattled idea of an American planet is coming into focus and one thing is clear: in the name of Washington's needs, it will offer a direct challenge to national sovereignty.

Heading Offshore

The Marines began huge amphibious exercises - dubbed Bold Alligator 2012 - off the East coast of the U.S. last week, but someone should IM them: it won't help. No matter what they do, they are going to have less boots on the ground in the future, and there's going to be less ground to have them on. The same is true for the Army (even if a cut of 100,000 troops will still leave the combined forces of the two services larger than they were on September 11, 2001). Less troops, less full-frontal missions, no full-scale invasions, no more counterinsurgency: that's the order of the day. Just this week, in fact, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta suggested that the schedule for the drawdown of combat boots in Afghanistan might be speeded up by more than a year. Consider it a sign of the times.

Like the F-35, American mega-bases, essentially well-fortified American towns plunked down in a strange land, like our latest "embassies" the size of lordly citadels, aren't going away soon. After all, in base terms, we're already hunkered down in the Greater Middle East in an impressive way. Even in post-withdrawal Iraq, the Pentagon is negotiating for a new long-term defense agreement that might include getting a little of its former base space back, and it continues to build in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, Washington has typically signaled in recent years that it's ready to fight to the last Japanese prime minister not to lose a single base among the three dozen it has on the Japanese island of Okinawa.

But here's the thing: even if the U.S. military is dragging its old habits, weaponry, and global-basing ideas behind it, it's still heading offshore. There will be no more land wars on the Eurasian continent. Instead, greater emphasis will be placed on the Navy, the Air Force, and a policy "pivot" to face China in southern Asia where the American military position can be strengthened without more giant bases or monster embassies.

For Washington, "offshore" means the world's boundary-less waters and skies, but also, more metaphorically, it means being repositioned off the coast of national sovereignty and all its knotty problems. This change, on its way for years, will officially rebrand the planet as an American free-fire zone, unchaining Washington from the limits that national borders once imposed. New ways to cross borders and new technology for doing it without permission are clearly in the planning stages, and U.S. forces are being reconfigured accordingly.

Think of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden as a harbinger of and model for what's to come. It was an operation enveloped in a cloak of secrecy. There was no consultation with the "ally" on whose territory the raid was to occur. It involved combat by an elite special operations unit backed by drones and other high-tech weaponry and supported by the CIA. A national boundary was crossed without either permission or any declaration of hostilities. The object was that elusive creature "terrorism," the perfect global will-o'-the-wisp around which to plan an offshore future.

All the elements of this emerging formula for retaining planetary dominance have received plenty of publicity, but the degree to which they combine to assault traditional concepts of national sovereignty has been given little attention.

Since November 2002, when a Hellfire missile from a CIA-operated Predator drone turned a car with six alleged al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen into ash, robotic aircraft have led the way in this border-crossing, air-space penetrating assault. The U.S. now has drone bases across the planet, 60 at last count. Increasingly, the long-range reach of its drone program means that those robotic planes can penetrate just about any nation's air space. It matters little whether that country houses them itself. Take Pakistan, which just forced the CIA to remove its drones from Shamsi Air Base. Nonetheless, CIA drone strikes in that country's tribal borderlands continue, assumedly from bases in Afghanistan, and recently President Obama offered a full-throated public defense of them. (That there have been fewer of them lately has been a political decision of the Obama administration, not of the Pakistanis.)

Drones themselves are distinctly fallible, crash-prone machines. (Just last week, for instance, an advanced Israeli drone capable of hitting Iran went down on a test flight, a surveillance drone - assumedly American - crashed in a Somali refugee camp, and a report surfaced that some U.S. drones in Afghanistan can't fly in that country's summer heat.) Still, they are, relatively speaking, cheap to produce. They can fly long distances across almost any border with no danger whatsoever to their human pilots and are capable of staying aloft for extended periods of time. They allow for surveillance and strikes anywhere. By their nature, they are border-busting creatures. It's no mistake then that they are winners in the latest Pentagon budgeting battles or, as a headline at Wired's Danger Room blog summed matters up, "Humans Lose, Robots Win in New Defense Budget."

And keep in mind that when drones are capable of taking off from and landing on aircraft carrier decks, they will quite literally be offshore with respect to all borders, but capable of crossing any. (The Navy's latest plans include a future drone that will land itself on those decks without a human pilot at any controls.)

War has always been the most human and inhuman of activities. Now, it seems, its inhuman aspect is quite literally on the rise. With the U.S. military working to roboticize the future battlefield, the American way of war is destined to be imbued with Terminator-style terror.

Already American drones regularly cross borders with mayhem in mind in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. Because of a drone downed in Iran, we know that they have also been flying surveillance missions in that country's airspace as - for the State Department - they are in Iraq. Washington is undoubtedly planning for far more of the same.

American War Enters the Shadows

Along with those skies filled with increasing numbers of drones goes a rise in U.S. special operations forces. They, too, are almost by definition boundary-busting outfits. Once upon a time, an American president had his own "private army" - the CIA. Now, in a sense, he has his own private military. Formerly modest-sized units of elite special operations forces have grown into a force of 60,000, a secret military cocooned in the military, which is slated for further expansion. According to Nick Turse, in 2011 special operations units were in 120 nations, almost two-thirds of the countries on Earth.

By their nature, special operations forces work in the shadows: as hunter-killer teams, night raiders, and border-crossers. They function in close conjunction with drones and, as the regular Army slowly withdraws from its giant garrisons in places like Europe, they are preparing to operate in a new world of stripped-down bases called "lily pads" - think frogs jumping across a pond to their prey. No longer will the Pentagon be building American towns with all the amenities of home, but forward-deployed, minimalist outposts near likely global hotspots, like Camp Lemonnier in the North African nation of Djibouti.

Increasingly, American war itself will enter those shadows, where crossings of every sort of border, domestic as well as foreign, are likely to take place with little accountability to anyone, except the president and the national security complex.

In those shadows, our secret forces are already melding into one another. A striking sign of this was the appointment as CIA director of a general who, in Iraq and Afghanistan, had relied heavily on special forces hunter-killer teams and night raiders, as well as drones, to do the job. Undoubtedly the most highly praised general of our American moment, General David Petraeus has himself slipped into the shadows where he is presiding over covert civilian forces working ever more regularly in tandem with special operations teams and sharing drone assignments with the military.

And don't forget the Navy, which couldn't be more offshore to begin with. It already operates 11 aircraft carrier task forces (none of which are to be cut - thanks to a decision reportedly made by the president). These are, effectively, major American bases - massively armed small American towns - at sea. To these, the Navy is adding smaller "bases." Right now, for instance, it's retrofitting an old amphibious transport docking ship bound for the Persian Gulf either as a Navy Seal commando "mothership" or (depending on which Pentagon spokesperson you listen to) as a "lily pad" for counter-mine Sikorsky MH-53 helicopters and patrol craft. Whichever it may be, it will just be a stopgap until the Navy can build new "Afloat Forward Staging Bases" from scratch.

Futuristic weaponry now in the planning stages could add to the miliary's border-crossing capabilities. Take the Army's Advanced Hypersonic Weapon or DARPA's Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2, both of which are intended, someday, to hit targets anywhere on Earth with massive conventional explosives in less than an hour.

From lily pads to aircraft carriers, advanced drones to special operations teams, it's offshore and into the shadows for U.S. military policy. While the United States is economically in decline, it remains the sole military superpower on the planet. No other country pours anywhere near as much money into its military and its national security establishment or is likely to do so in the foreseeable future. It's clear enough that Washington is hoping to offset any economic decline with newly reconfigured military might. As in the old TV show, the U.S. has gun, will travel.

Onshore, American power in the twenty-first century proved a disaster. Offshore, with Washington in control of the global seas and skies, with its ability to kick down the world's doors and strike just about anywhere without a by-your-leave or thank-you-ma'am, it hopes for better. As the early attempts to put this program into operation from Pakistan to Yemen have indicated, however, be careful what you wish for: it sometimes comes home to bite you.

Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's as well as The End of Victory Culture, runs the Nation Institute's His latest book, The United States of Fear (Haymarket Books), has just been published.

[Note: I couldn’t have written this piece without the superb reportage of TomDispatch Associate Editor Nick Turse on bases, drones, and special operations forces. I offer him a deep bow of thanks. Tom] your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+6 # CandH 2012-02-06 21:18
Yes, I've been reading about the "end of empire" now, at least since the '08 crash. Interesting that this article is but a 180-degree u-turn on that meme, inciting even the sentence:

"A new way of preserving the embattled idea of an American planet is coming into focus and one thing is clear: in the name of Washington's needs, it will offer a direct challenge to national sovereignty."

Or maybe the meme "end of empire" was to reflect that the coup was now actually complete, and all the world was the 1%'s oyster? Either way, the former insinuation didn't ring true in '08, and as we see, all systems are still a go. Bombs away...for some unidentified amorphous-sover eign elite's interests...cer tainly not the world's 99%.
+8 # DaveM 2012-02-07 01:24
The age of imperialism has not ended, it has merely changed with the times. Once, saber-rattling armies massed along national borders and every so often charged across if the natives could not be "pacified". Now, an invading army consists of a few people playing video games....and who never see the blood when the "first person shooter" requires pulling the trigger.

It's all so neat, so sanitary, and of course, so economical. As long as you're not on the receiving end.
+13 # Valleyboy 2012-02-07 05:44

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children."

'Nuff said.
+6 # RMDC 2012-02-07 06:54
Thanks, Tom. This is very good. Most of the world knows this already. IT is just americans who don't know. And that is because they don't want to know that their government has become the world's #1 terrorist gang. The US regime might as well be called "Murder, Inc."

Good comments on the ghoulish Patraeus holed up at the CIA conducting his favorite death squads all over the world. Has there ever been a worse psychopath than Patraeus? God, I hope the rumors about his presidential aspirations are false.

The US can kill a lot of people and destroy huge areas of the world, but it cannot gain the respect and admiration of anyone any more. It was once respected all over the world for its political values and work ethic. But now nearly all people in the world see it as a vicious and murderous empire that is out of control. The world is hunkered down and just waiting for the monster from Washington to die. Let's hope that comes soon so that the world can begin to rebuild. And american citizens can begin to rebuild.
+7 # RMDC 2012-02-07 07:11
This is Jason Ditz from --

"In a high profile pre-Super Bowl interview on NBC, President Barack Obama attempted to calm fears of an impending war with Iran, saying that Israel hadn’t yet decided on whether to attack Iran, but assuring that the US was committed to remaining “in lockstep” with Israel whatever it decides and describing
Israel’s security as his “top priority”. . . . his comments suggest that the decision is really Israel’s to make."

So Obama told the biggest audience he could find that Israel gets to make the decision, the US will follow along in lock step. Isn't this an abrogation of his responsibility as president? What about Congress's role in declaring war? What kind of fucking idiot and traitor is Obama. Israel is run by an insane man, Netanyahoo. And Obama commits the US to following him in lockstep.

It has to be that the term "lockstep" was carefully chosen. Obama was sending a signal to the Israeli lobby. For Obama a war against Iran that might kill a million people is of much less importance than taking campaign contributions from the Israeli lobby away from republican candidates. The presidential race is now about who can lick Israel's and Netanyahoo's ass the with the greatest deference. Pretty disgusting.
+5 # Activista 2012-02-07 13:16
SS troopers marching in the lockstep ..
This is the image ....
+5 # reiverpacific 2012-02-07 11:35
What everybody forgets and this article regrettably, whist full of well-researched military-hardwa re and deployment content fails to even touch on, is the destruction of the planetary eco-systems and other living beings of all kinds by it's very nature and size.
The most endangered entity here is the planet itself and the great circle of life; but nature has it's own forces which the death-machine never takes into it's calculations and I sincerely believe that the planet can and will hit back with a power that we've only seen glimpses of in the worst "Natural disasters" yet experienced.
I'm no "woo-woo" by the way, just try to be attuned to and consciously grateful that we as a species get to live in the incredibly small circle of even possibility for the evolution of intelligent life (if you can call a species that who works so hard at self-destructio n and furtherance of a death culture) by being in the "Goldilocks zone" of star-fueled planetary-based biology, so far found to be unique in our part of the galaxy.
The ultimate irony is calling this monster-spawn of the power hungry a "Department of defense"!
I'm sure that you can all come up with another title more honestly reflective of it's true nature, "Department of Global Threat" (DGT)! Nice and simple, what!?
0 # rhgreen 2012-02-07 16:36
Read Andrew Bacevich's books, especially 'The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism' , to add more facts to all this yelling & screaming & complaining.
+1 # Emil Sinclair 2012-02-07 17:22
Not a word about this expansion in the "Homeland" as well, including with U.S. military, covert and mercenary personnel. We have military bases in virtually every state in the country, many with hidden prisons better known as concentration camps, and the U.S. itself is being turned into a militarized police state where any American citizen can be called a "terrorist" at whim, "disappeared" into custody, and indefnitely detained without proof and without trial, all in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land, the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights; which, as far as the U.S. government and military are now concerned, can be damned. So much for freedom, for it is no more, in the so-called "land of the free".
-1 # disgusted American 2012-02-08 02:19
Definately embarassing to be an American.

Saw a great bumber sticker yesterday:

Be nice to America or it will spread democracy in your country.

Yup! That about sums it up except that the U.S. gov't won't even bother using the spreading-democ racy pretext b/c basically these monsters don't give a damn about humanity.

And the way the U.S. gov't gets away with all it does against it's own people and the people of the rest of the world is due to the willful ignorance and apathy of the American people who do nothing but complain.
+1 # Emil Sinclair 2012-02-08 16:37
Complain about what? My experience is that most of them do NOT complain; and, in fact, are now keeping their mouth's shut because they're cowards as well, and are afraid to speak up for fear of the government coming after them; that is the portion of them who don't blindly believe that the U.S. government can do no wrong.

You certainly are right about the apathy and ignorance... willful ignorance and apathy. Most "Americans" are brainwashed into believing that if they vote, they've supposedly done all they need to do to be "patriotic", other than attaching U.S. flags made in China and falsely patriotic bumper stickers to their vehicles perhaps.

Correction, they don't complain unless of course it's about meaningless and/or unimportant things. There, unfortunately, seems to be no shortage of such things that most "Americans" prefer to complain and/or argue about; but, when it comes to the important stuff which they really SHOULD be complaining about, they take little or no responsibility.
0 # Emil Sinclair 2012-02-15 21:38
...And I should have added: If they even vote at all or feel that they have any responsibility to be patriotic at all, that is. Or feel any loyalty to the Bill of Rights and Constitution, and/or international law(s), or responsibility to defend our human rights and civil liberties, at all either. Which most of them don't... by design. They have been intentionally and systematically dumbed-down and/or "washed-of-brai ns" by the powers-that-be to not feel any, or much of any, inkling of the duty OF ALL OF US to fight back against the extreme onslaughts against ALL OF OUR civil liberties, freedoms and human rights.

And, thus, that's why those powers are being so exceedingly successful at doing away with U.S. national sovereignty and independence as we used to know them, at turning the U.S. into a "national security", corporate-fasci st totalitarian militarized police state and dictatorship like Nazi Germany, East Germany, communist Russia or China, and North Korea, etc., and bringing the U.S. under world government enslavement, eliminating all True Human Rights, Civil Liberties and Freedoms.

ALL OF US better rise up en masse against this or we're all fracked!

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.