RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Sirota writes: "Now, after two huge revelations in the last few days, we know more about what that means in practice - we know the kind of corruption and damage the 'reforms' mean for taxpayers and retirees, and we know what kind of new muscle is behind the effort to bring that corruption and destruction to other states."

Enron billionaire John Arnold. (photo: AP)
Enron billionaire John Arnold. (photo: AP)


4 Things You Need to Know About the Plot to Sell Your Pensions to Wall Street

By David Sirota, AlterNet

24 October 13

 

What your state legislators actually mean when they start throwing around the Orwellian phrase “pension reform."

ess than a year ago, the Wall Street Journal alerted its national readership to what was happening in the tiny state of Rhode Island. In a story headlined “Small State Gets Big Pension Push,” the paper noted that the state’s “rollback of public-employee retirement benefits has turned (it) into a national battleground over pensions.” With the help ofbillionaire former Enron trader John Arnold and his partnership with the Pew Charitable Trusts, conservative ideologues and Wall Street profiteers who engineered Rhode Island’s big pension cuts were looking to export those “reforms” to other states. Now, after two huge revelations in the last few days, we know more about what that means in practice – we know the kind of corruption and damage the “reforms” mean for taxpayers and retirees, and we know what kind of new muscle is behind the effort to bring that corruption and destruction to other states.

The first set of revelations comes from a detailed forensic analysis of Rhode Island’s pension system by Forbes columnist and former SEC investigator Edward Siedle. Commissioned by groups representing public pensioners in the Ocean State, the data-driven analysis ends up reading like a criminal indictment of the speculator-turned-State-Treasurer Gina Raimondo (D), who is now cheerily touted by the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party as a rising star. Raimondo has received such billing from corporatist Democrats in no small part because of her role in helping turn her state’s pension fund into a private profit center. Indeed, in 2012, this Wall Street-funded Democrat joined with Arnold to champion specific pension reforms that simultaneously slash guaranteed retirement income and give a disproportionate amount of retiree money to the hedge fund industry, thus enriching Raimondo’s old pals in the financial industry. According to Siedle’s report, they also potentially enrich Raimondo personally. Here are just some of his report’s key findings:

  1. “A sinister pall of secrecy”: The report documents “a sinister pall of secrecy” about the pension fund’s new investments in hedge funds – a pall “orchestrated by state officials and aided by key investment services providers.” Siedle reports that “the overwhelming majority of the information … requested for this review (has) been withheld in apparent violation of state law.” As Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi and I noted in our recent San Francisco Chronicle report, such secrecy is now the norm in states, as “reformers” have changed the law to prevent retirees from even seeing how much of their money is being handed over to hedge fund billionaires.
  2. A transfer of retirement income to Wall Street, potentially costing taxpayers big money:The report documents a “staggering, almost 700 percent planned increase in (pension) investment expenses from $11 million to an estimated $70 million—fees paid to Wall Street hedge fund and other alternative managers” who control the so-called “alternative investments” in hedge funds. In total, Siedle estimates that “the projected cost to (the pension fund) of the Treasurer’s $2 billion alternative investments gamble over the next 20 years amounts to in excess of $3 billion.” That’s more than the total savings of the retirement benefit cuts, meaning those cuts aren’t saving taxpayer’s money – they are beingused to finance a new Wall Street handout.

  3. “Profiting at the expense of the state”:Raimondo came to the Treasurer’s office from a financial firm backed by billionaire hedge funder Paul Tudor Jones. According to the report, “A significant portion of (her) wealth and income relates to shares she owns in two illiquid, opaque venture capital partnerships she formerly managed” at that firm – “one of which she convinced the state (pension fund) to invest in.” Siedle notes that during Raimondo’s time in office running the state’s pension system, the fees Rhode Island is paying to the fund she has an ownership stake in “are significantly higher than the venture capital industry.” As the report concludes, all of this means that “the Treasurer may literally be profiting at the expense of the state.”

  4. Worse returns that damage the pension fund even further: If all this graft was delivering better returns to the state’s pension system, it might be written off as merely a necessary cost of doing business and protecting taxpayers. But as Siedle documents, at the very moment Raimondo has handed over more retiree money to her hedge fund pals, “The investment performance of the Fund has lagged behind its peers, earning a mere 11.07 percent versus 12.43 percent for the median public-sector pension.” In total, the New York Times notes that for all of Raimondo’s insistence that giving Wall Street more taxpayer cash will generate better returns, neither set of hedge funds she has put state money into beat the returns of simply investing the cash in a simple S&P index fund – one that doesn’t incur massive fees paid to the financial industry that bankrolls Raimondo’s election campaigns.
  5. Siedle’s report is worth reading in its entirety to understand what your state legislators actually mean when they start throwing around the Orwellian phrase “pension reform” – and thanks to the second piece of news this week, we know that state legislators everywhere will almost certainly be throwing that seemingly innocuous phrase around. That news came from the St. Louis Beacon, which reports that none other than the American Legislative Exchange Council has decided to make cutting pension benefits one of its top goals in the 2014 state legislative sessions. They will be pushing to replicate Raimondo’s much-hyped “reforms” in legislatures throughout the country.

    It is difficult to overstate the influence of ALEC in state policymaking. Bringing together the largest corporations, best-connected lobbyists, and most powerful state legislators, it calls the shots when it comes to state economic policymaking. So it is huge news that it is prioritizing the Plot Against Pensions – and not surprisingly, its renewed involvement in the plot is connected to Enron John Arnold. That connection can be seen in the author ofALEC’s new report urging state legislators to convert traditional defined-benefit pension plans into 401(k) style schemes and consequently reduce pensioners’ guaranteed retirement benefits. It is written by none other than Utah State Senator Dan Liljenquist (R), who was not only the failed Tea Party primary challenger against U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R), but more important, a paid pension “reform” consultant for John Arnold’s foundation.

    Like Siedle’s analysis, the ALEC report is worth perusing – but for different reasons. While Siedle’s report is all about indisputable data and numbers, ALEC’s is all about a kind of misinformation so dishonest it’s hard to believe even the most shameless propagandists could even think it, much less publish it. As just one example, notice the section of the ALEC report telling legislators to lie to public employees by telling them “that pension reform will increase take home pay and benefits” and then citing that claim as rationale to entitle pension slashing legislation a “wage liberation act.” Of course, in almost every state that has experienced pension “reform,” retirement benefits have been cut, giving a far different meaning to “wage liberation.” Workers’ wages haven’t been liberated to make higher wages – workers themselves have been liberated from their wages.

    Why would ALEC involve itself in the effort to cut retirement benefits and replace cost-effective economically stimulative defined-benefit pensions with “alternative investments” and 401(k)-style systems? Part of it probably has to do with its connections to the financial industry which, as Rhode Island proves, see huge profit potential in “reforms” that let them raid public pension funds and bilk them with private investment fees.

    The other part, no doubt, is about protecting the corporate welfare on which many of ALEC’s corporate members rely. By pushing to balance state budgets exclusively through cuts to pension benefits, ALEC helps create a budget discourse that solely blames public employees for state budget shortfalls, and thus leaves corporate subsidies off the chopping block. Ultimately, pension shortfalls become the boogeyman, even though the corporate subsidies that benefit ALEC members (but that often don’t create jobs) are far larger than those pension gaps.

    None of this should be particularly surprising – in a pay-to-play political system, where there is cash under the control of industry-bankrolled public officials, there will always be the potential for graft and corruption. And where there is the potential to use state legislation to institutionalize graft and corruption, there has always been ALEC. What’s different here is scale. Public pension funds are collectively worth almost $3 trillion. Though that is supposed to be money to fulfill sacred retirement promises to public workers, a coalition of right-wing ideologues, billionaire political activists, Wall Street profiteers and bankrolled politicians sees that nest egg as a lucrative private profit center. If they are successful in hiding their rip-off schemes in the argot of “reform,” they will have accomplished one of the biggest heists in American history.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+32 # DPM 2013-10-24 22:24
And so many thought that only Republicans were crooks. Corruption is so endemic, in our system of government, a new system needs to replace it. I don't know what that would be, but this one is no longer working for us.
 
 
+4 # RLF 2013-10-25 08:43
I think it is time the country broke up into manageable size countries. There is no good reason to be so big anymore.
 
 
+4 # soularddave 2013-10-26 06:34
How about breaking up big banks and hedge funds to make them more "managable"?

I always hate seeing NPR (public radio) sponsors' names mentioned in these scg emes because it means the public won't get the whole story - if any.

What about "state banks" as a safe parking place for pension funds? Or would this just be another opportunity for graft & corruption?
 
 
+17 # jon 2013-10-25 10:29
Until we get the money out of electioneering, there will be no democracy.
 
 
+13 # tm7devils 2013-10-24 23:33
I guess the feds feel that these shananigans are grouped under "state's rights"...
If you are the fuckee, it doesn't matter much who the fucker is.
 
 
+25 # karenvista 2013-10-24 23:36
ALEC is Republicans.

Pension Funds have been a target since before the Great Recession.

One of the most important reasons the three government approved rating agencies earned big money from banks and Hedge Funds is that they were paid to rate sub-prime Mortgage Backed Securities as AAA because that was the rating required for Pension Fund investments. That's how they raided the Pension Funds that the R's are now complaining are under-funded.

Well, I guess. W. said they didn't have to be fully funded and then they invested in junk securities that were AAA rated. Could that possibly surprise anyone?

That was the plan. Rob the pensioners and transfer all their retirement to Wall Street.
 
 
+19 # gentry cooper 2013-10-24 23:48
Raimondo is not a democrat. She is really a conservative/co rporate/republc ani who ran as a democeat to get elected in a liberal state. This is another ploy by the well financed elites; to back politically & financially, people who will do their bidding & place them in positions of power. In matters of common peoples' financial & health well being, military murder, social security & medicaid cuts, corporate welfare, banking regulation, student loan debt wipe out, and education "reform" Raimondo is as right wing as they come. Corey Booker, mayor of Newark, New Jersey, being touted as a new democratic senator for New Jersey, is the same way.
 
 
+2 # RLF 2013-10-25 08:44
Obama is the same kind of DINO crook.
 
 
+3 # JSRaleigh 2013-10-25 09:47
Quoting RLF:
Obama is the same kind of DINO crook.


Sadly though, Obama *IS* still the lessor evil.

How I yearn for the days when there was still a choice between the good guys & the bad guys. But maybe I'm just fooling myself.
 
 
+9 # California Neal 2013-10-25 00:19
Really? Corey Booker is another right-winger in Democrat clothing? I'm not saying he isn't, I'm saying that I've only seen positive reports, or possibly propaganda, for the guy. So this is disappointing, if true.
 
 
+5 # RLF 2013-10-25 08:45
They only said good things about Obama and the first thing he did out of the gate was keep almost all of Bushes people. Some liberal!
 
 
+9 # gentry cooper 2013-10-25 01:04
Checkout his positions on those issues I mentioned above. Checkout how his policies as a mayor affected the poor & lower middle classes. Checkout what his policies actually were and who really benefitted financially. Finally checkout the corporate & banking inrerests who are backing him financially.
 
 
+1 # MidwesTom 2013-10-25 06:26
Remember Obama raises more money on Wall Street than Romney. This is not a Dem vs Rep contest. This is us vs Wall Street, and Wall Street owns all but a very few politicians. You may disagree but I would list as un-owned: Bernie Sanders, Rand Paul, Elizabeth Warren, and Ted Cruz (cruz may be owned by the oil industry, but not Wall Street).
 
 
+3 # Glen 2013-10-25 06:32
And don't forget the Koch Bros in their ownership of politicians, even those outside the fed government.
 
 
+4 # jon 2013-10-25 10:35
What's the difference between oil and Wall Street. Either way he is definitely not for "us".

And, if openly owned by oil, that means he is for sale and we will discover his other owners in due time.

Again, until we get money out of elections, the system will remain increasingly corrupt
 
 
0 # Edwina 2013-10-26 09:50
There is also a progressive caucus working on this. Ellison, Grayson, Merkley, and others.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN