RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Leonard writes: "When there are Americans whose Social Security checks are being garnished to pay off their outstanding student loan debt, then it is clear that the United States has a problem."

Student loans have been a ball-and-chain on America's youth. (photo: Occupy Wall Street)
Student loans have been a ball-and-chain on America's youth. (photo: Occupy Wall Street)

The Student Loan Crisis Everyone Saw Coming

By Andrew Leonard, Salon

09 April 12


hen there are Americans whose Social Security checks are being garnished to pay off their outstanding student loan debt, then it is clear that the United States has a problem. And the rising number of seniors who haven't paid off loans taken out decades earlier is only one of several reasons to be alarmed by a report on student loan debt released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in March.

Total debt, as of the end of the third quarter of 2011, had reached $870 billion, a number, the Fed was quick to point out, that eclipses what Americans owed on their credit cards and on their auto loans. According to a more recent report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the amount currently owed on both federal and private student loans has already broken the trillion-dollar barrier.

That's not just bad for the people struggling to pay off their debt - people who, according to CFPB student loan ombudsman Rohit Chopra, are being punished for "doing exactly what they were told would be the key to a better life." The burgeoning debt numbers also pose a growing threat to the larger economy: money spent paying back student loans is money that isn't stimulating overall economic growth. Who will dare risk becoming a first-time home-buyer, for example, or buy a new car, when still struggling to pay back thousands of dollars on their education?

The Fed and CFPB reports launched a new round of well-deserved hand-wringing about the student loan "crisis." But one of the things that makes this crisis different from previous financial disasters - like, for example, the subprime mortgage debacle - is that it actually hasn't been ignored. In fact, you can make a good argument that the Obama administration has tackled the student loan crisis vigorously from the get-go, and achieved some signal triumphs, even while being ferociously opposed by Republicans at every single step of the way. Judging the overall success of Obama's efforts is tricky - it may take many years for Obama's reforms to make a dent in the overall quantity of outstanding debt - but there is little question that the White House is trying, and that for some students, at least, it has become easier to pay the bills.

The story of how President Obama has worked to help borrowers pay off their student loan debt and ease the path to affording a college education is a case study in how the current administration has worked to fix a broken system in the context of a political process that makes achieving any kind of progressive change almost impossible. And it also illustrates how the hard-won successes already achieved are extremely vulnerable. If, for example, Republicans take control of the White House and the Senate this November, and follow up by implementing the agenda outlined in Rep. Paul Ryan's proposed budget, the impact on struggling student loan borrowers will be severe. One of the few fronts on which the Obama administration can claim to have made real progress would suddenly turn into yet another retreat.

The story begins in July 2009, when Education Secretary Arne Duncan announced a number of changes to how the federal student loan program operates. Interest rates on existing student loans were cut almost in half, from 6 percent to 3.4 percent. More important, Duncan introduced a new way of paying back loans, called "income-based repayment." Previously, student loan borrowers had to pay back a set amount each month, regardless of how much they were earning. Under the new system, borrowers only had to pay 15 percent of whatever income they were making, and if, after 25 years, they still hadn't paid off their loan, the remaining debt was written off.

The Obama administration doesn't deserve primary credit for those changes, however. The new rules were part of the implementation of a law passed in 2007 during the George W. Bush administration, the College Cost Reduction and Access Act. But it's probably worth noting that that law - the brainchild of liberal California Democrat George Miller - was passed by the Democratically controlled Congress that came into power in 2006 and was initially opposed by a majority of Republicans in both the House and the Senate. It might also be worth noting that back in 2005, when Republicans held power in Congress, and forced through a major revamping of the nation's bankruptcy laws, a little-noticed-at-the-time provision ensured that private sector student loans could no longer - except under extreme circumstances – be discharged as a result of a bankruptcy declaration. This blatant handout to the private student loan industry set the template for what was to follow: Democrats have tried to make it easier for borrowers to cope with their debts, while Republicans have worked to make it more difficult.

The next major step, for which the Obama administration deserves a large amount of credit, came in the form of a major revamp in how the student loan industry operated, passed into law in March 2010 as part of the Affordable Care Act. Prior to reform, about 65 percent of federally backed student loans originated from the private sector, with the government guaranteeing the loans against the default. The system resulted in rampant corruption - loan companies paying off college financial aid administrators - and was savaged by critics as an expensive government handout to the private sector. By cutting out the middle man and converting all federally guaranteed student loans to direct loans administered by the government, the Obama administration ending up saving an estimated $68 billion - money that was then used to pay down the deficit and help fund a top Obama education priority, the significant expansion of the Pell Grant program.

Republicans screamed bloody murder - attacking the reforms as a "Washington takeover" of the student loan industry - a criticism echoed recently on the campaign trail by Mitt Romney, who described Obama's student loan reforms as a "government takeover." It was an assault that never made much sense, as the industry would not have existed without the federal guarantees and ended up costing taxpayers more than a government-administered program. But with Democrats in control of both the House and the Senate, the GOP couldn't stop it. And advocates working in the higher education sector generally gave the reform good marks, even while noting that there was much work to be done: "For students and families, this is all good news," Lauren Asher, president of the Berkeley, Calif., think tank the Institute for College Access and Success, told, at the time of the bill's passing.

After the midterm elections, further legislation to address burgeoning student loan debt - such as Sen. Richard Durbin's, D-Ill., efforts to once again allow student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy hearings - became politically unfeasible. Indeed, at least one Republican presidential candidate, Rick Santorum, even called Obama a "snob" for encouraging the very idea that more Americans should go to college. But the White House continued to seek creative new ways to lower the student-debt burden. In October 2011, as part of his "We Can't Wait" initiative, Obama announced an expansion of the income-based repayment program. Now borrowers would only have to pay 10 percent of their income, and the debt would be forgiven after 20 years instead of 25. The Department of Education also announced that borrowers who had taken out different kinds of federal loans would be allowed to consolidate them all together into a single payment plan with lower interest rates. Again, Republicans protested, complaining that Obama's measures would encourage "increased borrowing across the board."

And finally, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, a centerpiece of the Dodd-Frank bank reform act that Obama fought for against extraordinary GOP resistance, has made it abundantly clear that policing bad practices in the private loan industry will be a high priority of the new agency.

Taken in sum, the Obama administration has been consistent in its efforts to ease debt repayment, boost financial assistance to low-income Americans seeking a college education, and crack down on abuses in the student loan industry. As a result, many holders of student loans should be able to lower their payments, although some education activists say it's not clear that many Americans are taking advantage of things like the income-based repayment mechanism. But perhaps the most worrisome element to consider about the reforms is how tentative they are. In fact, the tide could start turning in the opposite direction as early as this summer. On July 1, the interest rate break included in the 2007 College Cost Reduction and Access Act expires, and the current Republican-controlled House has shown no interest in funding its extension. The recently released Ryan budget also calls for the repeal of Obama's expansion of the income-based-repayment program. As a result of the various budget and debt ceiling showdown battles of the last two years, the Pell Grant program has been steadily whittled down ever since its initial stimulus-bill-funded expansion. Indeed, Ryan's budget would move Pell Grants from mandatory spending into the discretionary spending category, making it even easier to shrink the program in the future.

Of course, Republicans have an easy explanation for their opposition to expanding the Pell Grant program, forgiving student debt and keeping interest rates low on student loans: We can't afford it. And there is some truth to that. If revenue increases are off the table, then the problem of how to pay for low loan rates, while at the same time providing expanded financial assistance, does become acute. But that just raises, once again, the question of priorities. We know, without any question, that college education translates into higher incomes. But the current Republican Party, by its own actions and rhetoric, has made it abundantly clear that protecting lower taxes for the wealthy is more important than ensuring that as many Americans as possible can get a good college education without consigning themselves to a lifetime of onerous debt. In contrast, Obama, working under the constraints of a system that allows him almost no freedom to operate, has consistently enacted reforms that relieve the pressure of that debt, and help ease the way to higher education. If that's snobbery, if that's a "government takeover," then maybe we need more elitist big government, and not less. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # barbaratodish 2012-04-09 18:37
All of higher education needs to be under RICO (Racketeer Influenced Corrup Organizations)i nvestigation, but who would investigate the investigators? I know, let's prepare to make internments camps the "go to" POS for real life experience. Let's subvert the NDAA mission and prepare in advance subliminally. Everyone begin to become aware how you found your lost sense of humor (inevitably it will be that those who have a sense of humor will be the targets for internment.)Tog ether we can all strategize humorously and dismantle all of law/flaw with guff(l)aws! lol
+7 # djnova50 2012-04-09 23:19
I am disabled. My disability income is pretty low. It's been ten years or more that I got sucked into a for profit school. I was going to use money from the sale of my mom's house to pay for school. However, the guy who had sold my mom's house did something with the money and ended up killing himself. So, I tried to cancel the enrollment process, before I had even taken one class.
The enrollment counselor told me not to worry, that I could get a student loan. I never saw any of the money, it went right to the school.
If I had known I would get sick and end up disabled, I would not have followed that path.
It's been nearly 10 years and now, I owe $20,000 that I still can't afford. My SSDI could be offset. But, at my age and degree of health disabilities, there's not much chance of me living another 10 years, let alone another 25 years. I have tried to get my student loan discharged due to disability; but, my claim was denied and it didn't seem to matter what the doctor wrote.
I would like to see a change made so that all people 60 years old and older could have their student loans totally forgiven, no matter what the circumstance.
+1 # Karlus58 2012-04-10 09:18
So sad that, at age 60...they have yet to receive their pound of flesh from you.
+5 # Majikman 2012-04-09 23:56
When the dems attempt to do something for the citizens, the repugs scream "government takeover". When the repugs sell out the country to the corporations and loot the treasury, it's "job creation."
Who can live is such a crazy world?
The dems better find the repug's secret dictionary...fa st!
+4 # jlohman 2012-04-10 07:59
Sorry to say, but this is one of the little fires. The BIG fire -- here and on every issue -- is the politician that has passed laws to cut spending out of education so they have dollars to pass on to their Fat Cat funders... in terms of subsidies and tax breaks. Live with it, or fix it! With 100% turnover in November! They ALL must go!
+1 # lilyredcloud 2012-04-10 08:39
The income-sensitiv e payment is a joke. It's based on gross income. Out of my gross income I pay for health insurance, pension, social security, etc. All of that amounts to one-third of my income. Then I have to pay the "income-sensitiv e" student loan payment which comes out to about one-fourth of my take home pay. It's no better than it was before.
+3 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-04-10 08:43
There's little effective difference between Student Loans & Indentured Servitude at fees charged by the Company Store. most forget that more than the student benefit from a completed education: the community is well served & the employer best of all.
+2 # laurahgilbert 2012-04-11 07:22
Well-stated, factual article. We need more of these. Last month I offered free Kindle versions of my two books on college financing...exp ected a few takers but had more than 1300 downloads in 24 hours. Students and families are beginning to understand higher ed as not only a path to a well-lived life but also as a consumer expense. Thanks for this article.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.