Kennedy writes: "As Governor Mitt Romney grapples with his Party's national banner, the test of his moral fiber will be the vigor with which he resists the dark impulse of ignorance, greed, vitriol, demagoguery and division, and how robustly he safeguards America's interest in a strong and independent democracy. Will Romney lead the GOP with the brand of decency that is his heritage, or will he choose instead, to outsource indecency and mudslinging to surrogates and Super PACs?"
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (photo: Santa Clara University)
Mitt Romney's Test of Moral Fiber
09 January 12
was surprised when Mitt Romney's son, Matt, resuscitated the "birther" issue in New Hampshire on December 29. Speaking at a campaign event, the young Romney deflected a question about his father's refusal to release his income tax return by citing a proposal that President Barack Obama should first release his own birth certificate. Mr. Romney, who has since retracted his statement, apparently did not realize that, at White House urging, the state of Hawaii released the president's long form birth certificate on April 25, 2011.
The White House deemed that action necessary to quiet a noisy debate that was distracting the country and damaging the national interest. The basis of the tempest was the Constitution's Article II Section 1, which seems to prohibit anyone except "naturalized American citizens" born in the USA from serving as president. A small group of conspiracy crackpots, theorizing that the president was lying about having been born in Hawaii, found a bullhorn for their quackery on Fox News and hate radio. Like milk on a hot stove, the bizarre obsession of a lunatic fringe suddenly grew to envelop even the rational remnants of the Republican Party, drowning sane discourse on vital issues of public import. It was apparent from the outset that the topic's steroidal appeal was its dog whistle usefulness in highlighting the "otherness" of America's first African American president; there was no appetite among these conservative cohorts for applying the Article II Section 1 prohibition against the GOP's 2008 candidate, John McCain, a white man born in Panama.
Mr. Romney's initial choice to stir life back into the issue raised consistency questions peculiar to the Romney clan. Mitt's father - Governor George Romney of Michigan - was driven to distraction by his own "birther" movement when he ran in the Republican presidential primaries of 1968. Supporters of his opponent, Richard Nixon, argued that George Romney's presidency would be unconstitutional because Romney had been born in Mexico where his grandfather and five wives had fled to evade America's polygamy laws.
On a more salient point with relevance to the current campaign, the 1787 Constitutional Convention included the Article II Section 1 prohibition due to the prevailing fear that a foreign power might otherwise gain undue influence over America's democracy. Ironically, the greatest threat of that outcome today comes from those Super PACs which Romney's allies and campaign staffers have pioneered in Iowa. Arguably, Super PACs now pose the most menacing platform for foreign and private interests to gain an alarming hold on the White House. Under the current Supreme Court holding in Citizens United v. FEC, there is nothing to stop foreign governments or foreign owned corporations from secretly donating hundreds of millions of dollars to Super PACs enabling them to pick favored candidates and destroy their opponents.
Prior to his withdrawal from the presidential contest on February 28, 1968, George Romney ran an extraordinarily honest, thoughtful and honorable campaign. The senior Romney, a former Chairman and CEO of American Motors Corporation, criticized the military industrial complex for lying to Americans about Vietnam and mocked the products of Detroit's Big Three as "gas guzzling dinosaurs." He was a vocal advocate of Civil Rights and anti-poverty legislation. He supported strong unions as the launching pad for America's middle class and criticized conservative palaver about "rugged individualism," unrestricted free markets, and wholesale corporate deregulation as "nothing but a political banner to cover up greed." Romney, a Mormon bishop, refused to work on Sundays (with rare exception), fasted before big decisions, spurned dirty campaigning and other appeals to the dark forces of ignorance, greed, racism and division.
As Governor Mitt Romney grapples with his Party's national banner, the test of his moral fiber will be the vigor with which he resists the dark impulse of ignorance, greed, vitriol, demagoguery and division, and how robustly he safeguards America's interest in a strong and independent democracy. Will Romney lead the GOP with the brand of decency that is his heritage, or will he choose instead, to outsource indecency and mudslinging to surrogates and Super PACs?
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
 18 April 2018
|
 19 April 2018
|
 18 April 2018
|
 20 April 2018
|
 19 April 2018
|
 20 April 2018
|
 19 April 2018
|
 20 April 2018
|
 19 April 2018
|
Comments
A note of caution regarding our comment sections:
For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.
It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.
We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.
It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.
Adapt and overcome.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
What are we going to do with this mess? All these guys have one hand in their pockets, and the other holding the microphone communicating false ideas that don't come true when they're in office. Like someone I can think of right now!
It's obviously time for transformation in all areas of politics!
Do you not know that the majority of the research done on vaccines is paid for by the same Pharma companies which make the vaccines?
Do I detect a conflict of interest?
Do you not know that vaccines are used to sterilize whole populations? cause the same diseases they are purported to eliminate and are used in depopulation efforts in Africa, China and India? Have you heard about eugenics?
Do you know that vaccines contain mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, polysorbate 80 aborted fetal tissue, human DNA fragments?
Did you know that there is not one study that examines the effect of all 50 doses of some 15 vaccines (the current CDC vaccine schedule) on a developing infants brain, endocrine, immune and neurological systems?
Where is the moral fiber of government sponsored vaccine damage and death?
You must be a paid minion of the Medical Mafia!
I listen to Concerned Scientists and Canadian Doctors who warned us...GOP certainly didn't nor did their Pharmaceutical Companies. Read up people
With little to no testing needed as long as FDA is paid off, I wonder how safe these meds are.
Curcumin is a beautiful herb coming from Tumeric. In the 1940's Chemical Corporations fought President in use in Cancer Medicine. Curcumin is used for centuries by Asian doctors to cure many diseases, cancer one. It has been proven to stunt growth of Tumours in animals and even put animals in Remission.
In 1970's Nixon tried to get this researched to promote cure for cancer, watergate squashed the promotion of this research
Time we start looking into the simple Herbs, Mushrooms and let Chemical Corporations esp Monsanto eating their own Chemicals.
Chemicals if you start some research are causing more cancers, more mental problems than ever before. Facts are out there, Mother Earth has many as does web. There is proof that Autism is on rise, perhaps the Monsanot Seeds of Agent Orange coatings are too blame, guess what they make other chemicals also..in fact they are ethoquixon which is in our animal feed. It causes cancers, immune disease in our animals. It is produced by Monsanto and used on boats where fish are harvested. So we ingest also. Read up Willy, I have been for over 45 years
I suggest the following answers to your questions:
Will Romney lead the GOP with the brand of decency that is his heritage...? No.
...will he choose instead, to outsource indecency and mudslinging to surrogates and Super PACs? Yes.
What this nation needs to understand is that we simply cannot survive** the elections of a President, a House and a Senate that are, philosophically , inextricably linked to Corporate America and the 1% that controls our legislators and our economy. We need to beat our way back toward sanity and a national policy in which the middle class - the workers, the hewers of wood and the drawers of water - are treated like equal members of society and NOT the disposable, eaisly-and-econ omically replaced commodities which we became AFTER we drank the plutocrats' Kool-Aid and turned our backs on the working man's only fiends; The Unions.
*but don't ask him for his tax returns. and don't ask him where he got th money or where he keeps it.
** If we do hold the presidency, regain the House & increase our Senate membership to 60+ we will be in for four more years of the S O S as we've had since 2008 . . . and the Supreme Court is likely to go conservative by margins of 6-3 or 7-2 .
That makes it different, right?
We are in a sad state with Obama and Romney as the front runners.
How about Rocky Anderson? In him you get decency and an agenda to tune the tables on the Wall Street Gamblers.
There are 23 independent countries in NORTH America, 19 'dependent territories' and 7 'other areas.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_in_North_America
I read that the Philipines and India have formed a lobby to influence congress to vote against the American call center worker. Americans will not have representation in congress until they outlaw Citizens United.
My Dad worked in upper management at American Motors in the 1950s and 1960s so I had a chance to observe George Romney at close range. He was a larger than life figure. Among other things, as the top staff person at the Automotive Council for War Production, he played a leading role in the conversion of the U.S. auto industry to war production during World War II and the subsequent re-conversion to automobile production. He singlehandedly engineered the Compact Car Revolution of the late 1950s as CEO of the No.4 automaker.
I'm sure that Mitt Romney's core values are what he absorbed from his parents and from his church. Yes, the fact that he has received so much money and support from big Wall Street firms is troubling as well as the hard-right positions he has taken in the candidate debates. If elected President, however, I believe he would not be a Wall Street stooge but someone who addressed the nation's problems rationally and with the public's interests at heart.
He didnot take the lessons of hard work, fighting for populace vote, he disregarded that...too bad he didnot have to serve.
He is a puppet and he looks it as he has no clear, strong speech ability. None of them have the backbone to stand up for principals, they are just mouth pieces for those who pay their way. They too shall come to Pass
Don't you think the Kennedy's have had enough of politics?
I admit, there is one advantage for a Kennedy, not for a Romney: as relatively old money, he can tell the money people off. Romney might be able to do that, but he'd never want to: they're his buddies, his collaborators in looting the American economy.
Iran has done nothing it is not a military threat to the USA. It is a peaceful nation that unlike the USA & its allies it has not attacked, invaded or occupied another nation in over 300 years.
It threatens the USA because it refuses to let its people live in poverty while foreign corporation & the 1% profit from it's natural resources & labors of its people.
It created its own version of democracy and economic policy which while capitalism is failing it & others have prospered even in times of global economic distress.
Mitt Romney along with the rest of the GOP (aside from Ron Paul) are running on the lies, fabrications & misrepresentati ons of the past trying to scare the people into electing a war monger as president. In reality it is not to keep the USA or Israel safe from military attack but to preserve capitalism, the 20th century name for Feudalism. To maintain the status quo where the majority of the world wealth, resources, & property is controlled by the 1% & war is used to maintain profit margin.
Instant global communication has exposed the capitalist propaganda campaigns as lies, misrepresentati on & fabrication and shown the populous that different economic policies can be successfully employed to benefit the nation as a whole not just the 1%.
They will instigate a war before they allow economic equality.
And some of you still trust that he will stand up for the 99%.
If you think that, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.
Romney changes his position to suit his audience and get its votes. He lies and exaggerates to mislead people. I don't love Obama anymore but Romney scares me more as do all the other GOP candidates.
What do we do now? Darned if I know.
The "national interest" is damaged most when the Constitution is made inconsequential and of no legal effect. The country was distracted, not by the call for proof of eligibility but by the stonewalling by Obama and his supporters. The law is the law and the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
Further, "naturalized citizenship" is not the Constitutional test, but "native-born" of parents who are both American citizens. The "birth certificate" that was released PROVED that Obama was not eligible to be President because his father was "Kenyan" and not a US citizen.
Doesn't matter? Well, the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. You don't like it? Pass an amendment, but don't try to slide this obvious fraud past us. It DOES matter, if for no other reason that it is a measure of adherence to the rule of law. It set the tone for what was to come and was,indeed, a harbinger for the erosion of the Bill of Rights that has continued unabated.
What's the matter with you, anyway?
What REALLY matters is that the BANKSTERS have him surrounded (Geithner, Summers et all) and are looting the treasury with or without his complicity. I'm 86 but YOU are the one that's gonna pay for these bailouts; ha ha.
I've only seen one mention that the mortgage holders should have been bailed out instead o the banks. The banks would have come out smelling like roses and the people could keep their homes.
But NO, the money has to go straight to the banks and to hell with everybody else!
And you're worried about a birth certificate!
The guy's a hand puppet and the country is at least 2/3 down the drain and you're distracted by such a superficial conspiracy theory.
Get real and figure out who is really running the show if you need something to get mad about.
"Further, "naturalized citizenship" is not the Constitutional test, but "native-born" of parents who are both American citizens. The "birth certificate" that was released PROVED that Obama was not eligible to be President because his father was "Kenyan" and not a US citizen."
I don't know what constitution is your guide, but it definitely is not the U.S. version, which states:
"No person except a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
See anything about both of one's parents having to be citizens? not even one of them has to be a citizen!
How about admitting you were wrong?
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.
Is this a rhetorical question?
I have to keep reiterating that ALL belief is the acceptance of statements without sufficient (or any) proof.
Only KNOWLEDGE would do it, but sadly: "I only know that I know nothing."
(I guess I could sum it up by stating that you shouldn't fall for ANYONE'S line of bullshit - why only pick on the Mormon absurdities?)
RSS feed for comments to this post