Rosenblum writes: "Nineteen years and only Allah knows how many lives later - perhaps 500,000 - that still stands. And now Donald Trump has chosen to cut and run, leaving Joe Biden with an ungodly mess in a collapsed state of hapless victims ruled by violent factions that see America as a bitter enemy."
Konar Province, 2010. (Moises Saman/Magnum Photos)
Abandoning Afghanistan
06 December 20
UCSON � �With satellite dishes snipped from tin cans, Afghans can sit back in the Middle Ages and keep tabs on the 21st century,� I wrote from Kabul in an Associated Press dispatch two months after 9/11. �Their bad luck is that this optical miracle works only one way.�
A teacher named Shahla Paryan had made the point as she poured me tea in her book-lined parlor. �I�m afraid the world just doesn�t understand us,� she said. �It is wrong to believe we are the same as those horrible people who brought terrorism to America. It is very wrong.�
Nineteen years and only Allah knows how many lives later � perhaps 500,000 � that still stands. And now Donald Trump has chosen to cut and run, leaving Joe Biden with an ungodly mess in a collapsed state of hapless victims ruled by violent factions that see America as a bitter enemy.
Trump is leaving behind only 2,500 troops, easy targets for a Taliban that America only ended up strengthening after its longest conflict in its history. With tragic irony, that is nearly the same number of men and women, U.S. armed forces volunteers, who died in vain since 2001.
Shahla was a university graduate who taught young girls to read, as much a part of Afghanistan as the more familiar women in body-bag burqas that evoke most Westerners� stereotypes. She saw Osama bin Laden as a plague that was no more welcome than locusts or cholera.
She was grateful to Americans for the hope of badly needed change, but she feared they would abandon Afghanistan as they did after the Soviets were driven out in 1989. �This is our great opportunity,� she said. �We cannot miss it.�
During those first heady days, reporters moved freely. An old man in the main market fitted me with a Chitrali pakol, that ubiquitous flat-topped cap, to the amusement of bystanders. In small shops, I scrounged up the makings of an Italian pasta feast for the AP bureau.
I was assigned to do big-picture stories, part of a team directed by Kathy Gannon, whose solid reporting over the years earned her almost total access to press-shy Afghan leaders of all factions. But, as is so often the case, the story was in small-picture vignettes.
One morning, prowling Kabul backstreets, I found a man collapsed in grief next to a gaping hole on the dirt road near his house. His daughter had been playing hopscotch there when an errant bomb landed from an American plane.
Back then, victims like that anguished father accepted Allah�s will. They understood why invaders from half a world away pursued Saudi terrorists who had struck at the heart of America. That didn�t last long.
U.S. forces tracked Bin Laden into Tora Bora, a mountainous cave complex near the Khyber Pass. Then their orders changed. George W. Bush diverted his attention to Iraq. The Americans handed over the operation to Afghan troops, who let him escape into Pakistan�s Tribal Areas.
American troops stayed on, turning their attention to the Taliban, which was fighting warlords for power. Mullah Omar, the Talib leader in Kandahar to the south, had given sanctuary to Bin Laden and his men. But the Taliban then posed no direct threat to the United States.
Rather than focus on basic essentials � schools, a government capable of stemming corruption, an effective police force, courts, agricultural production � Washington waged war. Military costs have since surpassed $2 trillion, little of that for development aid.
Bagram Airfield mushroomed into a giant base, where leaked documents later revealed suspected terrorists were tortured and beaten. Prisoners were shipped to Guantanamo, sometimes on dubious evidence from neighbors with personal vendettas.
As the quagmire deepened, reporters covered the war well until interest back home waned. Many newcomers on short visits missed the dominant and duplicitous role of Pakistan.
War is far easier to start than finish. Generals see lights at the end of tunnels; one more �surge� should do it. Societies fall apart as enmities deepen. Powerbrokers and profiteers amass fortunes. Mission creep leads to occupation. Corrupt leaders stymie plans to create workable democracy. Troops lose gained ground for lack of local government.
This is hardly new. Think of the Uncle Remus story, The Tar-Baby, in 1881. Br�er Rabbit fashions a doll of tar and turpentine to entrap Br�er Fox, who punches it repeatedly, getting steadily more entangled.
Earlier, a French general famously asked Napoleon how he would get out of an impossible battlefield situation. �I wouldn�t have gotten into it,� the little emperor replied.
Vietnam is the classic example. John F. Kennedy began with discreet �advisers� to help the South fend off the North. In 1964, I interviewed a returned pilot at Davis-Monthan Air Base in Tucson. He said his role was to advise Vietnamese crews when to drop bombs.
I asked if he spoke Vietnamese. He didn�t. Nor did the crews speak English. So, I asked? With a sheepish grin, he said that he simply cut out the middleman. Eleven years later, Gerald Ford had to declare victory and bail, leaving the communists to implant their own of style of capitalism.
Afghanistan has been indomitable since Alexander the Great bogged down and found another way east. It defeated Genghis Khan and Britain. The Soviet Union was undone by its futile war. Had America picked up the pieces and brokered peace, it might have thrived. Or maybe not.
Rep. Charlie Wilson of Texas tried. He persuaded Congress to supply $1 billion worth of heavy weapons to guerrillas � including Bin Laden � who humbled the Russians. But with no follow-up, rebel warlords turned their guns on each other. Much of Kabul was pounded to rubble.
Dexter Filkins� masterful book, The Forever War, narrates the passage from 9/11 until 2008 as Bush�s �global war on terror� blasted open a Pandora�s Box in South Asia, the Middle East and far beyond.
A brief excerpt, from a visit in 1998, describes the result of a lost decade:
�One morning I was standing amid the blown-up storefronts and the broken buildings of Jadi Maiwand, the main shopping street before it became a battlefield, and I was trying to take it in when I suddenly had the sensation one sometimes feels in the tropics, believing that a rock is moving, only to discover it is a living thing perfectly camouflaged. They were crawling out to greet me: legless men, armless boys, women in tents. Children without teeth. Hair stringy and matted.
��Help us,� they said.�
Another explains what America and its allies were up against:
�War in Afghanistan often seemed like a game of pickup basketball, a contest among friends, a tournament where you never knew which team you�d be on when the next games got underway.� War was serious in Afghanistan, but not that serious. It was part of everyday life. It was a job. Only the civilians seemed to lose.�
Bush left Barack Obama a free hand to shape his own policy, as presidents have routinely done in past wars. Beyond simple courtesy, continuity is vital to national security and global stability. Obama took months to hear all arguments before building to a peak of 110,000 troops in 2011.
�Commanders who were knee-deep in the fighting deserved some deference when it came to tactical decisions,� Obama wrote in A Promised Land. And, he noted later, �New presidents couldn�t simply tear up agreements reached by their predecessors.�
Biden urged a change in strategy, not just tactics. He counseled resisting the generals to negotiate a way to disengage from an unwinnable war. He was probably right. The goal was to deny potential terrorists a staging ground, but the conflict created yet more implacable foes.
Obama briefed Trump thoroughly on Afghanistan and, as Bush did, he left the way clear for a new president to chart his own course. In August 2017, when Trump was still listening to seasoned advisers, he read a 3,000-word policy statement at Fort Myers in Virginia.
�The consequences of a rapid exit are both predictable and unacceptable,� Trump said. �A hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum that terrorists would instantly fill � The men and women who serve our nation in combat deserve a plan for victory.�
Today that rings as hollow as Bush�s vow not to rest until he had hunted down the mastermind of 9/ll. Trump is abandoning not only Afghanistan but also Somalia and other global flashpoints. He is backing away from Iraq while goading Iran toward another unwinnable war.
Admiral William McRaven, who directed the raid on Bin Laden in 2011, excoriated Trump�s firing of Defense Secretary Mark Esper, among others. Partisan hawks with no experience in conflict endanger U.S. troops and increase the risk of retaliatory terrorism.
He wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed: �If our promises are meaningless, how will our allies ever trust us? If we can�t have faith in our nation�s principles, why would the men and women of this nation join the military? And if they don�t join, who will protect us?�
Because of a clueless amateur guided by his own selfish instincts who mocks the �suckers�� and �losers� defending America, Operation Enduring Freedom now echoes a Rudyard Kipling line after routed British troops fled to the Khyber pass: �An� you�ll die like a fool of a soldier ��
Mort Rosenblum has reported from seven continents as Associated Press special correspondent, edited the International Herald Tribune in Paris, and written 14 books on subjects ranging from global geopolitics to chocolate. He now runs MortReport.org.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
We are a little different in as much as we also have high personal debt to add to the high public debt obligations. Times are not good and not going to get better for a long while. And yes, Obama is a wuss at his best.
The problem with all the anger is that it really does no good. Most people are really responsible for their own contribution to this mess. Few complained while your 401k was increasing in value due to off shoring jobs or decreasing regulations. And most people spent way beyond their means and now want the government to fix in short order what took decades to accomplish.
The inverted debt pyramid is going to collapse. It is inevitable. When it does, it will take most of those with leveraged assets with it. A new order will arise. I just hope and pray that it isn't a Hitler or a Mussolini or a Stalin or Mao or Pol Pot or one of the other outrageous configurations of hate.
Pray for us all as we are going to need all the help we can get.
Time for new Democratic or Independent leadership. And not nut case tea party types. We need a real leader.
My guess is that Obama will lose against a middle of the road Republican like Romney b/c 1) the base has lost faith in the system and 2) the independent swing vote will go for a candidate like Romney.
The only chance that Obama has with the present course of action that he holds is if the Rep. party puts up an extreme right-winger, e.g., Ryan or Bachman.
It would also be smart to pay attention to the polls right before the election. If Alan ran,or another progressive, but only got 22% of Dem votes, it would mean bailing on him and backing Obama (hold your nose).
Friendly, appreciative correction: they have ZERO concern....
Declare victory in Afganistan. Bring the troops home. Take the entire cost of the war and split it down the middle. 1/2 to pay towards the imaginary deficit, 1/2 to pay for infrastructure projects in the US. Job priorities are first veterans of the Afghan fiasco and second the long term unemployed.
Can the tea baggers complain about a 1:1 new spending to deficit reduction and jobs for the soldiers and those that need it most?
You are right, I forgot about that detail.
Do you also feel like you have just been invited into the TARDIS, only to discover its just a box?
President Obama could follow the plan of former President Eisenhower who engaged the returning veterans in building a superb highway system plus rebuilding the infratructure throughout the country.
Yes, there will be, can be, if the banks are forced by the 50 state attorney's general to cut mortgage balances down to current market levels. The big banks got us into this underwater mortgage mess -- they can damn well pay to get us out of it! No taxpayer bailout needed.
He never took on the banks for more than a day, and even then it was tame.
The bailout was needed. We still have not addressed the real issue. And guess what? Its not making sure that banks are allowed to create ways to lend money in complicated schemes that give them better odds than Las Vegas could ever hope for. The real issue is that they are allowed to operate as unregulated monopolies.
p.s. Obama, the Congress is on recess! Name a head of the Consumer Protection Board, NOW!
I am a Libertarian. I am not Right Wing, I am not Conservative.
Libertarian thought has been hijacked by persons that believe Liberty is equivalent to Laissez Faire economics. I reject that notion.
I do subscribe to the basic Libertarian thinking. Which is; we create governments to protect our physical well being, promote the our economic security, and enhance the lives of all that choose to live under such a government.
A Consumer Protection agency or any other government agency that serves to protect me from the excesses of Laissez Faire economics is consistent with Libertarianism. That board protects my economic interests just as an army protects me from invasion.
This was the beginning of the end of the decline of the American working class into serf status at the hands of ruling coporate elite.
The two party system has failed the working class, yet many still put their hope into the hands of the democrats who are also guility of collaboration with the neo fascists in moving America to a have and have not economic status.
What is going to take the majority of Americans to wake up to the political reality that currently there is no political party on our side, we must fight to take back what the robber barons have stolen.
Look at the FAA situation! This new super-committee will fail (says the Turtle and Boner) -- and then the trigger kicks in which is down with the big 3 +++ education, head start, etc. and no tax reform.
Supreme Court must repeal the 2010 UNCONSTITUTIONA L decision of personhood to corporations to run negative ads and FUND their cronies in Congress. Supremes: "WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?"
Register and get mail-in ballots NOW and help anyone who is not in the know - to do the same. Vote these crooks OUT in 2012.
I thought he just told us the most important thing to do was to control spending and now he is talking about increasing spending. Perhaps he ought to review his speeches before he makes a bigger ass of himself.
Do they think the poor, working class and senior citizens cannot reason, cannot hear, cannot see what everyone in Washington DC is doing to the American people?
What JOBS?? The Democrats kissed the Republicans and T Party butts just to signed off on the nation's debt and in the Midnight hour..just for a temporary deal with these parties and cuts down the road.
Frankly, I am disgusted with all the parties, mostly the ones I supported.
There are a few dedicated key legislative people, so I have not lost all my confidence just yet.
The rich invest, shelter their money, avoid taxes, accumulate wealth and hoard wealth.
This stupid exercise of the debt ceiling just witnessed is to take more money out of the hand of those who spend (middle and working class), and put the money into the hands of those who will essentially hoard it.
I worked to get Obama elected and I voted for Obama. The reason I voted for him was because Clinton and McCain I thought would be disasters and the corporate media wasn't going to let anyone else win.
This president doesn't work for the American people. He answers to Goldman Sach, big pharma, Hollywood, AIPAC, Big oil, and all the other interest groups he lied and said would have not influence on his administration. Obama should either be impeached or hung for treason.
Obama should have demanded a clean bill raising the debt ceiling and campaigned in the states of any Republican who resisted for letters demanding this. The net result would have been an increased debt ceiling without an austerity program, probably before his deadline and certainly a few days after.
Where does it say in the Constitution that our 2 Houses of Representatives can decide to make a 3rd entity, of unelected people who cannot be lobbied?
What about drafting Al Gore?
So sad about Obama.... He had everything when he started,.... He could have been another Abe Lincoln, a JFK, a Thomas Jefferson type - and instead, he looks like Herbert Hoover before the big D.