RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Cohen writes: "Mainstream news outlets keep pounding home the same message - that the 'Democratic establishment' or 'Democratic moderates' are worried sick that Bernie Sanders can't beat Trump. They worry about a Trump landslide, and a 'down-ballot disaster' in Congressional races."

Chris Matthews on the set of 'Hardball' in 2011. (photo: Matt McClain/WP)
Chris Matthews on the set of 'Hardball' in 2011. (photo: Matt McClain/WP)


Did Chris Matthews Reveal What the Democratic Establishment Really Fears?

By Jeff Cohen, Reader Supported News

03 March 20

 

ainstream news outlets keep pounding home the same message � that the �Democratic establishment� or �Democratic moderates� are worried sick that Bernie Sanders can�t beat Trump. They�worry about�a Trump landslide, and a �down-ballot disaster� in Congressional races.

Democratic insiders, we�re told, fear a re-run of 1972 � when progressive antiwar candidate George McGovern lost 49 of 50 states to Richard Nixon. Given our divided electoral map, with nearly 40 states safely blue or red, such a scenario in 2020 is thoroughly absurd.

That didn�t stop�now-ex-MSNBC host Chris Matthews � who abruptly resigned Monday after having had an on-air,�Sanders-induced�crack-up in recent�weeks���from offering�this prophecy�in mid-February: �I was there in 1972 at the Democratic convention when the people on the left were dancing in glee�. And they went on to lose 49 states in their glee. So that could happen again. So clearly. That�s what I see. It could happen again.�

Let�s put aside that�mad prediction. Or Matthews��paranoid Cold War comment�linking Sanders somehow to public executions in New York�s Central Park. Or�his comparison�of Sanders��triumph�in Nevada to the finality of the Nazi conquest of France. Or his sexism.

And let�s recognize that even a crazed TV character � like�Network�s Howard Beale � is capable of blurting out an important truth once in a while. On the eve of the Nevada caucus,�Matthews let the cat out of the bag�about the true fears of many in the Democratic establishment:

�I�m wondering whether the Democratic moderates want Bernie Sanders to be President. Maybe that�s too exciting a question to raise � they don�t like Trump at all. Do they want Bernie Sanders to take over the Democratic Party in perpetuity? If he takes it over, he sets the direction of the future of the party. Maybe they�d rather wait�four�years and put in a Democrat that they like.�

Notice that the worry here is not that Sanders will lose, but that�he will win. And proceed to transform the Democratic Party. And�presumably�the country.

Matthews�was�not expressing fear of 1972. It�was more like fear of 1932. That�s when�Franklin Roosevelt (a Sanders hero) triumphed and � propelled by labor and socialist movements � transformed society with a New Deal benefiting working people.

The corporate media�s �Bernie can�t win� drumbeat should arouse skepticism among news consumers. First, because political outcomes are difficult to predict � especially after an unstable reality-TV star and a young African American (middle name �Hussein�) won the White House. Second, because few have been�more�wrong for so long in their predictions than mainstream media pundits and their pals in the Democratic establishment.

In 2000, the cautious candidate of the Democratic establishment, Al Gore, was sure�to�win. He didn�t. In 2004, they told us the ever-vacillating John Kerry was the most electable. He lost. In 2016, media and party elites pushed hard for Hillary Clinton against the Sanders challenge, insisting she was the candidate who could beat Trump. She didn�t.

As�a�newspaper of the corporate Democratic establishment (and endorser of Gore, Kerry, and Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries), The�New York Times�has long repeated the �Bernie can�t win� mantra.�So�I give the�Timescredit for publishing an important opposing view last week in a guest column by analyst Steve Phillips of Democracy in Color: �Bernie Sanders Can Beat Trump. Here�s the Math.�

Phillips cites head-to-head polling that shows Sanders beating Trump nationally and �outperforming Mr. Trump in polls of the pivotal battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.��

Phillips says the changing electorate (even from 2016 to 2020) and the�particular way�that Sanders won the popular vote in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada augur well for Sanders as the candidate who best matches up against Trump:

�In all three early states, he received twice as much support from voters under 30 than his closest competitor. In Nevada, he received about 70 percent of the vote in the most heavily Latino precincts�. This will be the most racially diverse electorate ever, with people of color making up fully one-third of all eligible voters. The share of eligible voters from Generation Z (18-23-year-olds) will be more than twice as large in 2020 as it was in 2016.�

More than other contenders, Sanders has shown he can inspire the two fastest-growing, anti-Trump sectors of the electorate � youths and Latinos. Writes Phillips: �In Michigan and Wisconsin, which were decided in 2016 by roughly 11,000 and 22,700 votes respectively, close to a million young people have since turned 18.� He notes that �160,000 Latinos have turned 18� in Arizona, a state Trump won by only 91,000 votes.

I co-produced a documentary in which we�interviewed working-class whites�in the Rust Belt of Ohio,�longtime Democrats who�d voted for Obama, voted for Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary and then jumped to Trump (often out of anger over NAFTA). These are the so-called �Obama-Trump voters� � and no Democratic nominee is likely to�win more of them back�than Sanders.

The progressive senator is also �most likely to reclaim those Democratic voters who defected to the Green Party� � the �Obama-Stein voters.� As Phillips points out: �The�increase�in votes for Jill Stein from 2012 to 2016 was greater than Mr. Trump�s margin of victory in Michigan and Wisconsin.�

As the South Carolina primary showed, one crucial voting bloc that Sanders has so far had trouble inspiring is older African Americans � although he beat Biden among blacks under 30, according to an NBC News exit poll.

If mainstream media spent less time on horse-race analysis and�dubious�predictions, and more time accurately presenting the candidates� records, perhaps�almost every�voter�of every color would know that Sanders was�a brave civil rights activist�at the University of Chicago � a student leader in the then-renowned Congress on Racial Equality (CORE), who �sat-in� and was arrested protesting discrimination against African Americans.

The pictures of�young Bernie in action�are dramatic and important to see.

At least as important as seeing Trump swing a golf club � or watching the latest anti-Sanders smear from TV pundits carrying�on�the�Chris Matthews�tradition.



Jeff Cohen�is cofounder of the activism group�RootsAction.org�and founder of the media watch group�FAIR.�

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+14 # dotlady 2018-10-18 10:38
I'm sure the oil and gas industry has every incentive to spend money to treat the wastewater and try to get the chemicals out to make it reusable with the lower standards set by the top environmental agency or the government itself, which cares so much for people's safety. Also, it is impossible to remove radiation from wastewater from shale in Marcellus and other uranium shale areas. So they have already raised the permitted levels of radiation in our drinking water.
This is a sick joke. Do we agree to this proposal or do we stop or at least slow the production of fossil fuels?
 
 
+9 # tedrey 2018-10-18 14:10
Every sensible, ethical, and sane argument tells against this proposal. The only thing for it is the greed and callousness of the oil and gas industry. Want to bet how it turns out?
 
 
-1 # awen 2018-10-19 15:15
Human are so stupid
 
 
+1 # Caliban 2018-10-20 00:32
Overgeneralizat ion.
 
 
0 # chapdrum 2018-10-20 19:54
Don's "administration " doing just as it said it would.
Better that he stays in office, then.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN