Krugman writes: "Wait, you may protest, you didn't see any socialists up there. And you'd be right. The Democratic Party has clearly moved left in recent years, but none of the presidential candidates are anything close to being actual socialists."
Economist Paul Krugman. (photo: Forbes)
The S Word, the F Word and the Election
29 June 19
Guess which party is really un-American.
hat did you think of the bunch of socialists you just saw debating on stage?
Wait, you may protest, you didn�t see any socialists up there. And you�d be right. The Democratic Party has clearly moved left in recent years, but none of the presidential candidates are anything close to being actual socialists � no, not even Bernie Sanders, whose embrace of the label is really more about branding (�I�m anti-establishment!�) than substance.
Nobody in these debates wants government ownership of the means of production, which is what socialism used to mean. Most of the candidates are, instead, what Europeans would call �social democrats�: advocates of a private-sector-driven economy, but with a stronger social safety net, enhanced bargaining power for workers and tighter regulation of corporate malfeasance. They want America to be more like Denmark, not more like Venezuela.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I admired him very much, and now even more so after reading this biography of a life well lived.
I send my condolences to the Hatfield Family.
If my (sometime fallibl) memory serves me well, this sentence is not accurate. It was not until 1992 that the Senate joined the House in cutting off funds for nuclear weapon testing. The effort in 1987, passed in the House but failed in the Senate. Hatfield was a champion in 1992, of course, along with Senator Harkin and others. Another Oregonian Congressman lead the effort in the House in 1992, Rep. Kopetski (Spelling??)