Sanders writes: "'America will never be a socialist country,' President Trump said as he launched his bid for re-election last week."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Mark Makela)
Trump Is the Worst Kind of Socialist
28 June 19
merica will never be a socialist country,� President Trump said as he launched his bid for re-election last week.
That declaration was an effort to frighten Americans and undermine growing support for expanding Medicare and Social Security�two popular programs that have long been derided as �socialist.� Mr. Trump�s declaration hypocritically ignores that he and his Republican colleagues are the nation�s leading purveyors of an insidious form of corporate socialism, which uses government power and taxpayer resources to enrich Mr. Trump and his billionaire friends.
When we defeat Mr. Trump in this election, we are going to end his corporate socialism and use those resources to create a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights that benefits all people.
Consider the corporate socialism we�ve seen on Wall Street, where the high priests of unfettered capitalism reign. As you will recall, Wall Street�s deification of �free markets� went out the window in 2008 as they watched the financial crisis caused by their own greed and illegal behavior threaten the existence of some of the largest financial institutions in the country. Suddenly, Wall Street became strong supporters of big-government socialism.
They begged the federal government for unprecedented taxpayer assistance, and Congress provided them with the largest bailout in history. The major banks received some $700 billion from the Treasury and trillions in low-interest loans from the Federal Reserve.
Meanwhile, working people all across the country lost their jobs, their homes and their life savings. The most vulnerable were hit the hardest, with the African-American community losing half its wealth.
That was not an aberration. The norm across the corporate world is what the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. called �socialism for the rich, and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor.�
If you are a fossil-fuel company, whose carbon emissions are destroying the planet, Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans offer billions in government subsidies, including special tax breaks, royalty relief and funding for research and development. But if you are struggling to pay your utility bill, you get the free market�higher and higher electric bills.
If you are a pharmaceutical company, you make huge profits on patent rights for medicines that were developed with taxpayer-funded research. But if you are a taxpayer, you get the free market and pay the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs�and in some cases you die because you cannot afford the medication you need.
If you are a monopoly like Amazon, owned by the wealthiest person in the U.S., you get hundreds of millions of dollars in economic incentives from taxpayers to build warehouses, yet you end up paying not one penny in federal income taxes. But if you are a small business that falls behind on your store�s rent, you get the free market�which means you get an eviction notice.
If you are the billionaire Walton family, state and local governments grant you free land and subsidies and build infrastructure for your stores, even as Walmart �s tax-avoidance schemes drain local towns of public revenues. But if you are a Walmart worker, you get the free market�which means starvation wages.
If you are the Trump family, you got $885 million worth of tax breaks and subsidies for your family�s housing empire, which was built on racial discrimination. But if you are a homeowner struggling to pay your mortgage, you get the free market�which means foreclosure.
The time is long overdue for the U.S. to end corporate socialism for Mr. Trump and the rest of the billionaire class. Instead, those resources should be put to work to ensure shared prosperity by enhancing Social Security and Medicare and investing in roads and bridges, public schools, clean water and clean air.
Mr. Trump believes in corporate socialism to protect the wealth and power of the rich. I believe the U.S. must end corporate socialism and instead fulfill President Franklin D. Roosevelt�s vision of enshrining basic economic rights for all Americans. These include the rights to health care, a living wage, a decent job, a quality education, a secure retirement, affordable housing and a clean environment. We can make this 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights a reality with initiatives like Medicare for All, a $15 minimum wage, a Green New Deal, student-debt cancellation and legislation to expand Social Security.
I recognize that this agenda will face enormous opposition from corporate America and the 1%. They have a vested interest in protecting the corporate socialism that has enriched and empowered them. The wealthiest three families now own more wealth than the bottom half of the country, and they will do everything they can to block our agenda.
But more Americans are noticing the contradiction between coddled socialism for the rich and the destruction of opportunity for everyone else. I am confident that we will be able to build a grass-roots movement that will not only defeat Donald Trump in this election but finally create a government that works for all people, not just the billionaire class.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Something is drastically wrong with an educational system that equates war with strength.
I write as a retired public secondary school teacher of literature and writing who, for more than 32 years, expected and encouraged my students to get emotionally as well as intellectually involved with the characters, themes, and moral as well as social and political issues we discussed in class, from 7th grade through 12th grade.
This kind of education can be, and IS being, done in thousands of public schools all across the U.S.
All it needs is a supportive school board and community.
But the one thing I would change if I had a do-over would be to study more of the humanities in the broad sense, but especially the written arts of literature, drama, and poetry, because I think the people who produce works in those fields are the ones with the clearest insights into the human condition -- which is ultimately what it's all about.
As for economics, I'm recommending the graphic narrative, "Economix" (economixcomix. com). The author is NOT an economist but a journalist, self-taught in economics, and he gets it right, as in "how it REALLY works." The book includes an excellent account of how the academic field got to its present hideous state.
AFRICA's RICHEST NATION
Hillary Clinton, "We came, we saw, he died!" for her financing, arming & murder of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi over Libya's universal-medic are (is Bernie next?), education, employment, housing & Africa's highest standard of living. Libya was #1 financier of development-aid & investor in Africa's essential service infrastructure. Hillary's slave to world trillionaire OLIGARCHs who couldn't stomach Muammar's (Jewish mother) implementation of the gold-based African Dinar for all oil & commodity trading.
HIllary's record of approving CARPET-BOMBING of no-Afghani-hija ckers-Afghanist an, no-weapons-of-m ass-destruction -Iraq & her determinative role as Secretary of State of Libya. Hillary's State-departmen t operatives finance, arm & supply foreign mercenaries in Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt etc. because she worships oligarch wealth & Israel 1st.
THE DEEP STATE
Greater-Israel's Oded-Yinon-Plan OYP & its US daughters Project-for-a-N ew-American-Cen tury PNAC & New-World-Order NWO advanced by Netanyahu (supported by Hillary) for these destabilization , arming of our-perceived-e nemy's-enemy, bombing campaigns are clearly scheduled. General Westley Clarke describes being informed of the US role in OYP's taking out 7 countries. http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya-somalia-sudan-iran/5166
How are you doing?
As to how this might be facilitated, consider 9/11 as the U.S. version of the Reichstag Fire, then think of the impact of another 9/11-type event.
In which context also reflect on the probability what the Democrats are really doing by nominating Hillary -- this given the fact both parties are wholly owned subsidiaries of the One Percent -- is helping usher in overt fascism in the person of Trump, the newest incarnation of der Fuehrer.
Read it again and enjoy
Hillary Clinton will always overcompensate for being a woman
by trying to be tougher than any man out there in foreign policy and military matters.
She is more dangerous than John McCain!
unlike rump, crud and rabidio - hill and bernie endorse obama's treaty with iran
GOP candidates all prefer to bomb, bomb, bomb - bomb, bomb, iran, back to the stone age!
dan, you are unable to draw rational distinctions between parties, candidates or warmongers = you lack judgment - so i'm not supporting your bid for comment of the year!
- go bernie!
Aye -some of which she was the causative element.
So do YOU think the US of Armaments should continue to invade nations in which it's no welcome, thereby making more increasingly fanatical, dedicated enemies?
And do YOU believe in "American exceptionalism"?
Then go ahead a vote for she who represents this self-perpetuati ng war machine!
s a pathological liar and warmonger. FEEL THE BERN. Please go to www.citizensagainstplutocracy.org and take the pledge: BERNIE or Green. Give our BERNIE leverage @ the July convention!
It's also clear they and we were supplying weapons and training to these "protesters" from day one. JUST like Syria.
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/06/libya-gadhafi-french-spies-rebels-support.html#
milk producers are gonna hate # REDPILLED!
- stein is a 3rd-party candidate for national office, like nader in 2000 - the only thing a green candidate can accomplish in federal elections is to siphon progressive votes from the dem candidate!
didn't stein run in 2012? how did that work out for greens? greens are like a guy who goes to the frig, takes out the milk, opens the top, smells it's yeck!, spoiled, puts it back, and every four years takes it out again, just to see if it's fresh!
the irony is that stein is a competent candidate - like bernie, she should run for office as mayor, do a good job, run for office as senator or governor, as bernie proved a 3rd party candidate can win, and then and only then, run for prez as a dem! - before she prances around spoiling dem prez candidacies!
the greens' mission is to ruin dem candidacies because they maintain that there is ABSOLUTELY no difference between dems and zomblicans, which only shows inability to judge, lack of critical thought - when you believe in things that you don't understand, you're gonna suffer! - stevie wonder
greens haven't pulled a nader yet, but they won't quit trying! - go bernie! - and, in the general election, go dem!
Robbee, please keep posting these!
Way to CALL 'em ! Well observed. The Hillary Trollsters are not here,
of course, because there is *NO* way to defend THIS stuff.
Beyond that, however, they are not PAID to raid the policy pages. They are ONLY paid to sow fear, panic, hate and discontent relative TO the horse race.
Their job is to discourage Sanders supporters EARLY ON, and to get them to support the PRECISE sh*t we see above, but hopefully (on the part of the Trolls) without having the *SLIGHTEST* idea of what we ARE underwriting and personally approving with a vote for Clinton.
Are "Bernie" or Trump or ANY of the approved candidates likely to risk offending that country by actually voting to stop funding that country and the wars for its benefit?
Which "INDUSTRY".
hint: oil
Greater-Israel's Oded-Yinon-Plan & its US daughters Project-for-a-N ew-American-Cen tury PNAC & New-World-Order NWO are based in massive destabilization through arming foreign mercenaries religious madmen in conjunction with key oligarch-servan ts such as Hillary documented in French media & Hillary's emails. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/06/libya-gadhafi-french-spies-rebels-support.html#
While it takes all 7 billion of us contributing, in diverse ways to create the world economy, western colonial nations such as US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, NATO & Israel are willing to take the gifts of others, when western main contribution to world economy is hidden ownership, command, control & war.
Westerners are raised in glorification of 'colonial-settl er', our highest ideal, yet we're unable to openly or publicly dialogue through issues in debate or to employ nature's livelihood gifts. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/structure/both-sides-now-equal-time-recorded-dialogues
Damn ! Absolutely the *BEST* post I have seen all week.
KUDOS - Multiple KUDOS, Douglas Jack, thank you for such a highly informative, impeccably analyzed, and deeply well-thought-th rough contribution.
@ Billy Bob
Boldly Stated, both.
Unassailably accurate, both.
We've been fed the same tired line since 1968, when Humphrey, who supported LBJ's serial escalations of the Vietnam-Southea st Asia War Crime right up until a couple of weeks before the election, and who didn't even enter the primaries lest the unpopularity of the war lead to his defeat wherever he contested the peace candidates, presided over the Chicago police riots.
Ever since, we have been given ever-more reactionary and bloodthirsty candidates from both parties, with the exception of George McGovern, who was abandoned by the national party and the corrupt union leadership for being too pacifistic, and then blamed for losing to Nixon, whose dirty tricks were only exposed to get rid of detente.
It is true that the Rethuglicans have always led the way toward genocidal imperialism abroad and police-state fascism at home, but it is also true that the DemocRats have been panting in their wake every election -- and insisting, like Margaret Thatcher did for the UK, that progressives and genuine liberals have no choice but to go along lest the Evil Republicans nominate a Scalia to the Court. Which, you may or may not recall, resulted in every Senate Democrat voting in support of him, as well as of Anthony Kennedy, presented for approval in the last year of Reagan's presidency.
Well, without taking any pledge in re Bernie, I am not about to vote for a blood-dripping war hog. Sorry.
Some of the same people who now call for unconditionally supporting whomever the Democrats nominate called, likewise, for unconditional support for Obama [or, earlier in the season, for Hillary] in 2008. Those who bothered to research, or who had more than a nodding acquaintance with the history of the last few decades, and thus were less enthusiastic about "change," were pilloried then as now for being purists and the like.
As Noam Chomsky, who incidentally supports electing Democrats on the at least arguable point that minor differences between the parties may, given the immense power of the USan empire, lead to major differences in the lives of those outside our borders, has said, every one of the post war presidents since Nuremberg would, if we as Justice Robert Jackson pledged held ourselves to the standards we invoked in hanging the Nazi high command, have been hanged for crimes against humanity.
I'm afraid that any minor differences that still existed during the Reagan-Bush years have, with the Clintons and Obama, faded to insignificance. Hillary is a warmonger and a neo-con, and has never expressed any regret for the horror show she insisted on inflicting on Libya.
Sanders is also not free of the tentacles of the Zionist state, but at least he is not looking for places to change regimes in, and favoring military action to effect those overthrows.