RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Abdul-Jabbar writes: "The time-traveling DeLorean is speeding toward 1950, and when it hits 88 mph, it's going to suck the whole country back with it. Back to a time when pretty much everyone who wasn't a straight, white Christian male was considered a second-class citizen whose rights and future depended on the patriarchs' whims and largesse."

Protestors in Montgomery, Alabama, rallied May 19 against their state's abortion ban. (photo: Julie Bennett/Getty)
Protestors in Montgomery, Alabama, rallied May 19 against their state's abortion ban. (photo: Julie Bennett/Getty)


Why We Must Boycott States With New Abortion Bans

By Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, The Hollywood Reporter

22 May 19


The NBA great and Hollywood Reporter columnist calls for Americans to "stomp on the brakes of the DeLorean" that's taking our country back to an era of straight, white male privilege as laws in Georgia and beyond seek to "reduce women to baby incubators."

he time-traveling DeLorean is speeding toward 1950, and when it hits 88 mph, it’s going to suck the whole country back with it. Back to a time when pretty much everyone who wasn’t a straight, white Christian male was considered a second-class citizen whose rights and future depended on the patriarchs’ whims and largesse.

It’s hardly surprising that this entitled group would like to return to their rapidly eroding privileged status, which they hope to accomplish through sustained attacks on women, people of color, immigrants, Muslims and the LBGTQ community. By emboldening the right wing through vitriolic rhetoric, the Donald Trump administration has become the UV light in sleazy motel rooms that illuminates these hidden stains on our democracy. Right now the stains include Georgia, Alabama, Missouri and other states passing restrictive abortion legislation that reduces women to baby incubators.

The time has come for Americans to defend the principles of the Constitution by stomping on the brakes of that DeLorean. For now, one of the best ways to do that is through boycotting the offending states.

Boycotts cause hardships to the innocent as well as the guilty. That’s the whole point. Hardships motivate the self-righteous leaders to face the consequences of their political greed. A boycott’s success depends on the commitment of those seeking change to endure suffering. Rosa Parks’ arrest in 1955 kicked off the Montgomery Bus Boycott in Alabama that lasted a year and led to great hardships for whites and blacks. One of the boycott’s leaders, 26-year-old Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., had his home firebombed. The bus company suffered financial setbacks that affected its employees and other businesses. The black boycotters, who were 70 percent of the buses’ ridership, also suffered. For a year, they walked or carpooled until they were triumphant.

Some filmmakers who have chosen to continue to do business in Georgia are donating money to the ACLU to fight the legislation. While that’s a generous sentiment, it isn’t nearly enough. Here’s why: Unless a powerful message goes out right now, more states will pass these restrictive laws, as we have seen happen already. With women’s rights removed amid little meaningful opposition, LGBTQ rights will follow (as they already have in some states), and so on through every marginalized group. "Build the wall!" isn’t just about the physical wall, it’s about the legislative walls to separate undesirable groups from their constitutional rights. We’ve already seen increased efforts to nullify non-Republican voters through gerrymandering, impossibly strict voter registration rules and reducing polling locations in poor and minority areas.

A boycott is a clear statement that we value conscience over commerce. It means stop doing business with or in these states. For Hollywood, stop making films there. For businesses, stop buying their products or holding conventions or building there. For the average person, don’t visit. No tourism dollars. And we continue this practice until legislators reverse the policies or are removed from office. When the Writers Guild of America, of which I am a member, is willing to boycott talent agencies over packaging practices, certainly they would endorse boycotting states that demean many of their members.

Some prefer to wait and see what happens during the legal challenges as Georgia’s bill heads to the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority. "Wait and see" has always been the default response when people are called upon to do the right thing. King addressed this in his 1963 "Letter From Birmingham Jail": "For years now I have heard the word 'Wait!' It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This 'Wait' has almost always meant 'Never.' We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that ‘justice too long delayed is justice denied.'" If not now, when?

No one wants a boycott. So, to be fair to both sides, before implementing one, states can be given a reasonable deadline to repeal these unjust laws. Failure to do so should launch a coordinated boycott involving all organizations representing the many marginalized groups under attack. Success for all depends on working as one. Together these groups form a majority of the population and have the power to change things. The will of the majority was thwarted in the 2016 election, and we can’t let it happen again.

Since logical discourse about science, the separation of church and state and the constitutional rights of women has not been persuasive, the focus can’t be on changing these legislators’ minds, but rather changing their sense of entitlement. That their moral code is the only one. And this can only be accomplished through sustained pressure. It is not without some irony that Georgia and Alabama, which once used biblical quotes to justify slavery, lead the way in enslaving women by denying them autonomy over their bodies. Stopping them is especially crucial in the face of rising maternal mortality rates in the U.S. More than 700 women die annually due to childbirth, with black women dying at a rate three times greater than that of white women. Forcing a woman to give birth could be a death sentence. Who should make that decision, the government or the woman who faces death?

In April, a wet Connecticut high school baseball field meant the game would have to be canceled. Players and parents who wanted the game to go on decided to soak the grass with 25 gallons of gasoline and set the field on fire to dry it. Apparently, none had ever taken a science class. Instead of drying the field, they created an environmental hazard that required six to eight inches of gas-soaked soil to be excavated at a cost of at least $50,000. That’s the approach of these irrational, ill-informed and infantile legislators. If they can’t get what they want through the merits of their arguments, they will burn down the field so no one can play.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2019-05-22 22:55
Georgia is the headquarters of Coca Cola.
 
 
+7 # krallison 2019-05-23 00:33
Abdul-Jabbar is quite right.
I was already boycotting some of those states for other good reasons but they all are on my no-go list now.
 
 
+6 # janie1893 2019-05-23 00:43
Sir-- again, your wisdom is awesome. Thank you for your erudition. I only wish all of America would read and think about what you are saying.
 
 
+5 # DongiC 2019-05-23 05:17
As usual, Kareem, very well written. Kudos to you.
 
 
+5 # ddd-rrr 2019-05-23 06:24
.
Ah, this is brilliant writing, as is usual for Kareem Abdul-Jabbar -- and, as always, it makes
important associations, it is "to the point", and it is important in its concepts and coverage.
"Bravo" to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar for writing this wonderful article, and also to
The Hollywood Reporter and to Reader Supported News for
publishing this wonderful and useful piece!

DO PLEASE HEED KAREEM ABDUL-JABBAR'S ADVICE!
WE MUST **ALL** TAKE PART IN THIS EFFORT, NOW!
BOYCOTT THOSE STATES THAT CHOOSE TO
SET BACK SOCIAL GAINS MADE BY THE
"MINORITIES" AMONG US!!!

This is the ONLY effective and just route to take at this critical time in our history!
 
 
+5 # economagic 2019-05-23 07:53
Wow! Kareem dunks another one. Clearly written and brilliantly argued, this essay is a call not to arms but to action--non-vio lent action--to continue bending the arc of the moral universe toward justice.

The closing example is important, and instructive of the challenges we face. Schools have never comprised the majority of the education system. Home and family used to be first, but some three generations ago they were displaced by the most powerful mind-control device ever devised up to that time. By the late 1950s research was showing that the typical USian child, by the time s/he entered the first grade (kindergarten was not widely available except in the upper economic strata), had already spent more hours in front of the television than s/he would spend in school in the next 12 years. Doubt it? Do a rough estimate.

The level of a person's real understanding of the world about her/him probably peaked sometime between 1960 and 1970, and has increasingly tilted toward celebrities, trivia, and mayhem ever since. Increasingly even that has been displaced by various forms of pseudo-knowledg e, accompanied by the loss of such ancient principles as "Look before you leap" and "There but for the Grace of God go I."

Those of us who are able must follow Kareem's example and help to educate those whose education is to a great extent limited to "celebrities, trivia, and mayhem."
 
 
+5 # chrisconno 2019-05-23 08:35
Only in this case they are attempting to burn down our democracy. Yes on the boycott since we can't vote the creepy self-aggrandizi ng self-righteous hypocrites out just now. No to all products and attractions in those states that think they should be able to control our very personal and privates lives while cruelly shoving their version of their religion down our constitutional throats.
 
 
+4 # they said what? 2019-05-23 08:56
This focus on women is very one-sided. How about including a new oath for men? All men over the age of 18 commit, through signing a non-negotiable legal document, to supporting until the age of 18 or forever, as may be necessary in the case of disability, any children they help create. Men who violated this rite of passage oath would be appropriately punished, perhaps imprisoned while the earnings of their labor went to child support. If we are going to go back to the "good old days", then men need to be responsible for their sperm.

And this would be retroactive, so there would have to be mass signing days, with a special legislative day, when all the male legislators in the country over the age of 18 signed the agreement, and TV cameras recorded each and every one of them as they signed on to their male responsibilitie s. A very small version of the Handmaid's Tale for men.
 
 
0 # DongiC 2019-05-24 05:59
God, I love your idea. Allow me to suggest it to the Divine Persons when I meet them shortly. Can I have a video copy when the male legislators from Alabama sign?
 
 
+3 # they said what? 2019-05-24 07:59
I should have begun my previous comment with an appreciation of Mr. Abdul-Jabbar's comments, instead of merely venting on the topic of men telling women what to do with their bodies. However, Mr. Abdul-Jabbar's thoughtful comments inspired me to think about the one-sidedness of it all - the focus on women - and then to think about ways of intruding similarly on men and putting responsibility on them, particularly those male legislators who are so quick to condemn and so slow to take responsibility, probably the same men who love to let polluters off the hook.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN