RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Pierce writes: "It makes a difference if there are tapes."

Michael Flynn. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)
Michael Flynn. (photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)


The Michael Flynn Tape May Have Just Changed the Landscape of the Investigation Into Trump

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

20 May 19


It makes a difference if there are tapes.

"And when Don Sanders, the deputy minority counsel ... asked the $64,000 question, clearly and directly, I felt I had no choice but to respond in like manner.”
—Alexander Butterfield to the Washington Post, June 14, 2012

t was Butterfield, of course, who gave up the goods to Sam Ervin's Watergate committee, revealing the fact that Richard Nixon had bugged practically every office in which he performed both his official duties and his criminal enterprises. That was the moment that Watergate became WATERGATE. There were tapes. It was no longer He-Said-He-Said between Nixon and John Dean. It was now He-Said-He-Said with Nixon doing a solo. Outside of watching Lee Harvey Oswald get shot live and on camera, and Neil Armstrong stepping onto the moon, that one moment is the most galvanizing bit of television I've ever seen. Watch it again. You can see that Butterfield knew exactly what was going to happen when he told the committee the truth, and the members of the committee have a brief but obvious moment of profound surprise.

It makes a difference if there are tapes. From NBC News:

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn told investigators that people linked to the Trump administration and Congress reached out to him in an effort to interfere in the Russia probe, according to newly-unredacted court papers filed Thursday. The communications could have "affected both his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation," special counsel Robert Mueller wrote in the court filings. Flynn even provided a voicemail recording of one such communication, the court papers say. "In some instances, the (special counsel's office) was unaware of the outreach until being alerted to it by the defendant," Mueller wrote.

The "Congress" element is a lovely bit of business. (Lindsey Graham? Tom Cotton? Devin Nunes? Some as-yet-unknown administration* tool on someone's staff? The mind reels.) But the important thing in this report is that there is a tape. Someone wanted to obstruct justice in the case of Michael Flynn and is now in that Nixonian He-Said-He-Said bind. And the judge in this case clearly knows it.

In a separate court filing, Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered federal prosecutors to file a transcript of the voicemail message, as well as transcripts of any other recordings of Flynn including his conversations with Russian officials.

Tape makes a difference. We may now be in a very different place. Later in that Watergate hearing, committee majority counsel Sam Dash had a question for Butterfield.

“If one were, therefore, to reconstruct the conversations at any particular date,” Mr Dash asked, “what would be the best way to reconstruct these conversations, Mr. Butterfield, in the President's Oval Office?”
“Well, in the obvious manner, Mr. Dash,” Mr. Butterfield answered. “To obtain the tape and play it.”

A very different place.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+40 # video4315 2019-05-20 13:03
Let's roll!! This and the NY Times story about Deutsche Bank executives refusing to pass information to Dept. of Treasury authorities about suspected money laundering activities in 2016 and 2107 by Trump and Kushner business entities open the door for meat-on-the-bon e investigations. We cannot let these go un-investigated . To do so would be a clear case of Congressional neglect of duty to uphold the Constitution.
 
 
+8 # WYThomas 2019-05-20 21:23
#video4315 You are correct.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN