RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Rosenblum writes: "Californians fight to protect hard-won victories from Donald Trump's corporate giveaways, such as emission controls, clean coastlines, and pristine wilderness. And more, they demand sanctuary status for fellow humans escaping hunger or violence at home."

500 protesters gathered in front of the Los Angeles Hall of Justice Wednesday evening to demand the passage of the California Values Act. (photo: Wilfred Chan)
500 protesters gathered in front of the Los Angeles Hall of Justice Wednesday evening to demand the passage of the California Values Act. (photo: Wilfred Chan)


A More Perfect Union – Or Maybe Calexit?

By Mort Rosenblum, Reader Supported News

09 May 19

 

OS ANGELES – During the Passover crush at Elat Market down on Pico, cashiers in yarmulkes rang up matzohs and Manischewitz with signature grumpiness. Yiddish-speaking shoppers pawed over Hebrew labels. For the stockers and sweepers, the Muzak was Mexican.

The Golden State comes in colors, and brown is a prevailing hue. Nearly 40 percent of its inhabitants are Latino, almost as many as “non-Hispanic white.” The rest range from Bantu black to exotic shades of pale. Part melting pot, part mixing bowl, California thrives on diversity.

Californians fight to protect hard-won victories from Donald Trump’s corporate giveaways, such as emission controls, clean coastlines, and pristine wilderness. And more, they demand sanctuary status for fellow humans escaping hunger or violence at home.

Smart politicians keep Trumpian Republicans on the defensive, from hardnosed prosecutors like Kamala Harris and Adam Schiff to Nancy Pelosi, speaker of an increasingly mad House, who lost her studied cool when William Barr whitewashed the Mueller Report.

“The attorney general of the United States of America was not telling the truth to Congress,” Pelosi said last week. “That’s a crime.” She blamed a corrupt triumvirate – Trump, Mitch McConnell, Barr – for answering only to moneyed special interests, imperiling the nation.

Then she dropped a neutron bomb in a New York Times interview. Unless a landslide sweeps away Trump in 2020, he could declare voter fraud and simply stay put for months in the Oval office with legal flimflam. Who would evict him? He commands U.S. armed forces.

California’s population of 39.6 million makes up 12 percent of America. Its $3-trillion economy ranks it fifth in the world, behind only the United States, China, Japan, and Germany. If the state can’t talk some sense into a backsliding mother country, why not Calexit?

Secession is unlikely, of course, and the state has plenty of its own problems. Yet on the crucial issue of immigration, along with the environment and natural resources, Americans elsewhere might look hard at California in pursuit of a more perfect union.

America is hardly “full,” as Trump asserts. On the contrary, an economy with full employment badly needs willing hands to work fields, staff hospitals, repair roads – and stack up kosher pickles at Elat Market. Some “aliens” create businesses that help the economy boom.

Trump’s cruel ethnic libels resonate with an ignorant, fearful base. But people aren’t defined by country of origin. Some are bad; most aren’t. Migrants tend to work hard, respect laws, and pay taxes. And as California knows, we need them at least as much as they need us.

Find Sergio Arau’s tragicomic 2004 film, “A Day Without a Mexican.” Suddenly, the plot goes, all Mexicans vanish from California, and a mysterious pink fog seals off the state. Traffic snarls, utilities collapse, stores shut, restaurants close, factories and fields are paralyzed.

Anti-immigration proponents skew the real picture. Over the past decade, more Mexicans have gone south than have come north. Poor crossers who brave the desert seldom carry water let alone drugs. No wall would stop the gangs that feed America’s habit.

The crisis today is about Central Americans, refugees fleeing climate-induced crop failure or brutal governments that Washington has long supported. Hateful rhetoric spurs families to head north in hopes of asylum before even more stringent controls are put in place.

Trump’s approach makes this worse. He slashes aid to Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador when technical assistance, backed by enforced human-rights protections, would allow desperate families to stay home where they would rather be.

Harsh treatment, including family separations and holding cages, amounts to a callous ploy that uses humans as political pawns. With vindictive glee, Trump recently said asylum-seekers trapped in limbo would be dumped in California to await hearings in backed-up immigration courts.

If Democrats don’t support his policy, he said, “we’ll bring them to sanctuary city areas and let that particular area take care of it.” If California welcomes the idea of more people coming to the state, he said, “we can give them an unlimited supply.”

Last week, he said desperate applicants would be charged a fee, prompting an angry response from Rep. Raul Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat: “Seeking asylum is a right under U.S. and international law – not a privilege to pay for.”

Slamming the door won’t work. In Tucson, I visited a Benedictine monastery sold to private developers where Immigration and Customs Enforcement buses drop off asylum-seekers who manage to find relatives in America to sponsor them.

Officers take their belts and shoelaces, prison-style, and dump them on the doorstep. Volunteers feed them, provide bedding, and organize transport to new homes. I dropped off a 15-year-old named Wilson and his younger sister at the bus station for a three-day ride to stay with an uncle in Virginia he doesn’t know.

Speaking no English, with only donated kids’ backpacks, a change of clothes and a few sandwiches, they were off to a new life, frightened and bewildered. I asked Wilson his thoughts, and he shrugged. “What are my choices?” he replied.

For decades now, I’ve heard the same response across the world from conflict refugees and forced migrants. Few want to leave families, friends, and the cultures they know. Most dream of saving enough to get back home again – eventually.

Into the 1960s, the Bracero program allowed Mexicans to do seasonal work, pay taxes for benefits they’d never see, go home, and return when new crops needed picking. Now many who manage to sneak across the border stay put, clandestine, for fear of not getting back again.

Immigration is only part of it. For instance, despite new traffic that chokes LA freeways, the air is crystal clear, a sharp change from poisonous smog you could almost cut with a knife. California pioneered strict controls that became national law. Trump wants to undo that.

For a wide range of reasons, “Donald Trump” is mostly a laugh line in California, if not a trigger for invective. But not entirely. In the Southland, in the Bay Area and elsewhere in the state, I found plenty of people happy with a fact-free authoritarian.

In Los Angeles, I took a Lyft car to the airport. The driver, a black woman in her 50s, had a hearty laugh and rainbow-colored hair. She was bright and well-spoken. We talked about France, where she had lived for a while.

She barely broke even as a driver because of soaring gas prices. She made extra money taking care of homes for traveling rich people, she said, but life was tough. Then I switched to politics, ready for the usual diatribe about Republicans and the demagogy they condoned.

“Well, for one thing,” she said, eyeing the jammed 405, “you could take about five million of these people and make them disappear. We sure don’t need any more illegals.” With a sly smile, she added, “Don’t tell anyone, but I’m for Trump, 100 percent.”

As it turned out, she was from the Bahamas. She overstayed her visa and then laid low as an “undocumented alien” until she managed to wangle papers that allowed her to stay. Go figure.

The woman based her views on right-wing websites, radio, and social media exchanges with friends. The New York Times? “All lies,” she said. The Los Angeles Times? “I dropped that years ago.”

Ignorance lets people like her believe Trump’s absurd border fantasies. “Where there’s no fencing or walls,” he said in one rant, smugglers “just come in, and they have women tied up. They have tape over their mouths – electrical tape.… They have three, four, five of them in vans, or three of them in backseats of cars. And they just drive right in.”

Most Californians know better. The question is whether enough voters will follow their lead. We got to LAX in plenty of time. I ate some fish tacos with chile serrano salsa and caught my Southwest flight over the Colorado River back to the rest of America.

Email This Page


Mort Rosenblum has reported from seven continents as Associated Press special correspondent, edited the International Herald Tribune in Paris, and written 14 books on subjects ranging from global geopolitics to chocolate. He now runs MortReport.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-43 # BKnowswhitt 2019-05-09 21:49
Mort may be a good correspondent from the past ... but his hatred of Trump skews all ability to rationally and objectively report anything factual. All this blame on T .. just one item of proof .. Obama deported just as many .. this is not alternative news of any kind .. just far left garbage .. RSN desperate .. hope you go under .. You Deserve It!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
 
 
+11 # Citizen Mike 2019-05-10 07:59
Quoting BKnowswhitt:
Mort may be a good correspondent from the past ... but his hatred of Trump skews all ability to rationally and objectively report anything factual. All this blame on T .. just one item of proof .. Obama deported just as many .. this is not alternative news of any kind .. just far left garbage .. RSN desperate .. hope you go under .. You Deserve It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How could one not hate Trump? He has earned our hatred with his corrupt personal profiteering,ne potism, cruelty and arrogance, and is clearly unfit for office because of his ignorance.
 
 
+9 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-05-10 06:03
I'm all for a Calexit. And a Texit, too. Many other states or regions should withdraw from the increasingly dysfunctional and war-mongering Union. There is no future in sight for the Washington Regime other than increasing commitment to war and empire. These only degrade the goals of a state like California which would prefer to work on environmental issues, the problems of immigration, and its own standard of living.

Trump is the president the Washington Regime deserves. Hillary would have been just the same. Both are totally corrupt and totally under the control of the internationalis t crime syndicates like the CIA, NY investment banks, and the weapons makers who ring the city of Washington with their corporate headquarters.

The Washington government is an imperial regime. Who needs that? All empires are criminal and immoral. Who needs that? I don't think Washington can be reformed. It will only get worse.

Now is the time for Calexit, Texit, Oregxit, and others. When a few pull out, the rest will follow. The Union is finished.
 
 
+5 # revhen 2019-05-10 07:47
"God bless America?" Trump is God's punishment on America.
 
 
+4 # dbrize 2019-05-10 12:08
Quoting revhen:
"God bless America?" Trump is God's punishment on America.


Trump is another in a long line of lousy presidents in system that promotes such. There are no white hats that are going to save what has been a long journey to the systemic eradication of our Constitution and the republic it engendered.

For “a man of the cloth” to state that “God” has given us Trump as punishment is theological nonsense. If “God” decides to “punish” America much worse than Trump will be upon us.

Were you not a Presbyterian I would assign you 100 Hail Mary’s and Our Fathers as penance. :)
 
 
+5 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-05-10 08:32
'America is hardly “full,” as Trump asserts.'

I recall another leader who asserted his country was 'full'...& needed 'lebensraum', living space: so he invaded Czechoslovakia, & Poland, & Russia, &...& how long before Trump decides likewise?
 
 
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-05-10 12:34
You probably know -- there has been talk among the American elites as far back as the 1920s of annexing Canada. The American elites look at Canada a bit like European zionists look at Palestine -- a country without a people.



"The Origins of the Deep State in North America: Part one: The Rise of the Round Table Movement and the Sad Case of Canada (1864-1945)."


https://theduran.com/the-origins-of-the-deep-state-in-north-america/
 
 
0 # futhark 2019-05-13 06:49
The idea that the British colony north of the border (now Canada) was a legitimate target for United States aggression and annexation goes back much earlier than the 1920s. The War of 1812 between the United States and the United Kingdom was instigated on the somewhat flimsy pretext of an objection to sailors on U.S. vessels being conscripted into the Royal Navy, but the disposition of troops during the War shows that the conquest of Ontario and Quebec was a priority.

https://www.history.com/news/how-u-s-forces-failed-to-conquer-canada-200-years-ago
 
 
+9 # jwb110 2019-05-10 10:43
If "Obama deported just as many", and the numbers prove that, then why does Trump continue to blame the previous administration? I traveled that lower tier of this country a great deal during the Obama years and the "Black SUVs" were very much in evidence. What Obama didn't do was to rile up a base whose xenophobia has spread out to other "perceived" minorities. The question is who is next on the list after the "Mexican Solution"?
 
 
0 # solartopia.org 2019-05-13 00:25
all for cal exit. we should include hawaii, oregon, washington and, to keep it interesting, british columbia.
 
 
0 # futhark 2019-05-13 12:37
The idea that the British colony north of the border (now Canada) was a legitimate target for United States aggression and annexation goes back much earlier than the 1920s. The War of 1812 between the United States and the United Kingdom was instigated on the somewhat flimsy pretext of an objection to sailors on U.S. vessels being conscripted into the Royal Navy, but the disposition of troops during the War shows that the conquest of Ontario and Quebec was a priority.

https://www.history.com/news/how-u-s-forces-failed-to-conquer-canada-200-years-ago
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN