RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Monbiot writes: "Had we put as much effort into preventing environmental catastrophe as we've spent on making excuses for inaction, we would have solved it by now."

'Catastrophe afflicts people now and, unlike those in the rich world who can still afford to wallow in despair, they are forced to respond in practical ways.' (photo: Guillem Sartorio/AFP/Getty Images)
'Catastrophe afflicts people now and, unlike those in the rich world who can still afford to wallow in despair, they are forced to respond in practical ways.' (photo: Guillem Sartorio/AFP/Getty Images)

Only Rebellion Will Prevent an Ecological Apocalypse

By George Monbiot, Guardian UK

16 April 19

No one is coming to save us. Mass civil disobedience is essential to force a political response

ad we put as much effort into preventing environmental catastrophe as we’ve spent on making excuses for inaction, we would have solved it by now. Everywhere I look, I see people engaged in furious attempts to fend off the moral challenge it presents.

The commonest current excuse is this: “I bet those protesters have phones/go on holiday/wear leather shoes.” In other words, we won’t listen to anyone who is not living naked in a barrel, subsisting only on murky water. Of course, if you are living naked in a barrel we will dismiss you too, because you’re a hippie weirdo. Every messenger, and every message they bear, is disqualified on the grounds of either impurity or purity.

As the environmental crisis accelerates, and as protest movements like YouthStrike4Climate and Extinction Rebellion make it harder not to see what we face, people discover more inventive means of shutting their eyes and shedding responsibility. Underlying these excuses is a deep-rooted belief that if we really are in trouble, someone somewhere will come to our rescue: “they” won’t let it happen. But there is no they, just us.

The political class, as anyone who has followed its progress over the past three years can surely now see, is chaotic, unwilling and, in isolation, strategically incapable of addressing even short-term crises, let alone a vast existential predicament. Yet a widespread and wilful naivety prevails: the belief that voting is the only political action required to change a system. Unless it is accompanied by the concentrated power of protest – articulating precise demands and creating space in which new political factions can grow – voting, while essential, remains a blunt and feeble instrument.

The media, with a few exceptions, is actively hostile. Even when broadcasters cover these issues, they carefully avoid any mention of power, talking about environmental collapse as if it is driven by mysterious, passive forces, and proposing microscopic fixes for vast structural problems. The BBC’s Blue Planet Live series exemplified this tendency.

Those who govern the nation and shape public discourse cannot be trusted with the preservation of life on Earth. There is no benign authority preserving us from harm. No one is coming to save us. None of us can justifiably avoid the call to come together to save ourselves.

I see despair as another variety of disavowal. By throwing up our hands about the calamities that could one day afflict us, we disguise and distance them, converting concrete choices into indecipherable dread. We might relieve ourselves of moral agency by claiming that it’s already too late to act, but in doing so we condemn others to destitution or death. Catastrophe afflicts people now and, unlike those in the rich world who can still afford to wallow in despair, they are forced to respond in practical ways. In Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Malawi, devastated by Cyclone Idai, in Syria, Libya and Yemen, where climate chaos has contributed to civil war, in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador,, where crop failure, drought and the collapse of fisheries have driven people from their homes, despair is not an option. Our inaction has forced them into action, as they respond to terrifying circumstances caused primarily by the rich world’s consumption. The Christians are right: despair is a sin.

As the author Jeremy Lent points out in a recent essay, it is almost certainly too late to save some of the world’s great living wonders, such as coral reefs and monarch butterflies. It might also be too late to prevent many of the world’s most vulnerable people from losing their homes. But, he argues, with every increment of global heating, with every rise in material resource consumption, we will have to accept still greater losses, many of which can still be prevented through radical transformation.

Every nonlinear transformation in history has taken people by surprise. As Alexei Yurchak explains in his book about the collapse of the Soviet Union – Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More – systems look immutable until they suddenly disintegrate. As soon as they do, the disintegration retrospectively looks inevitable. Our system – characterised by perpetual economic growth on a planet that is not growing – will inevitably implode. The only question is whether the transformation is planned or unplanned. Our task is to ensure it is planned, and fast. We need to conceive and build a new system based on the principle that every generation, everywhere has an equal right to enjoy natural wealth.

This is less daunting than we might imagine. As Erica Chenoweth’s historical research reveals, for a peaceful mass movement to succeed, a maximum of 3.5% of the population needs to mobilise. Humans are ultra-social mammals, constantly if subliminally aware of shifting social currents. Once we perceive that the status quo has changed, we flip suddenly from support for one state of being to support for another. When a committed and vocal 3.5% unites behind the demand for a new system, the social avalanche that follows becomes irresistible. Giving up before we have reached this threshold is worse than despair: it is defeatism.

Today, Extinction Rebellion takes to streets around the world in defence of our life-support systems. Through daring, disruptive, nonviolent action, it forces our environmental predicament on to the political agenda. Who are these people? Another “they”, who might rescue us from our follies? The success of this mobilisation depends on us. It will reach the critical threshold only if enough of us cast aside denial and despair, and join this exuberant, proliferating movement. The time for excuses is over. The struggle to overthrow our life-denying system has begun.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+21 # indian weaving 2019-04-16 13:16
It's true. Only the complete annihilation of the Washington, DC beltway will give life on earth any chance, but only as starters. And I doubt we'll even get to that step 1. Folks, we're gonna have to be willing to die to save life on earth at this point, sorry to say. Otherwise, all life will become extinct on planet earth, the universe's miracle burned up by humans.
+5 # wrknight 2019-04-16 18:29
Wars and violence never solve anything. They only make matters worse.
+2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-04-18 09:26
Well, the right way to annihilate Washington -- and I'd add New York, Chicago, and San Francisco -- is to cut off the money that flows into these centers of death. Starve them of their life blood which is the money of the working class of the world.

Once again, Marx was right.

"The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. "
+3 # economagic 2019-04-16 20:58
Please clarify: If you are saying it is time to be willing to KILL to save life on earth, I think you are premature, to say the very least. We are monstrously (sic) outgunned (sic), suggesting that a frontal physical attack on our oppressors would be suicide for nothing.

If on the other hand you are saying that many will perish before balance can be restored, I think that is self-evident, not because the planet is overpopulated but because too much of the population not only wants to "live like kings" but to live "better" than any king ever has. That is not only self-contradict ory, but contradictory to everything we understand about what allows people to prosper and find some sort of happiness.

Many will give up in despair; some will wear themselves out trying to save others, or to persuade those who wish to hold back the hands of the clock that their quest is futile.
0 # Depressionborn 2019-04-18 12:19
Colder weather will do nicely. The problem will be famine unless the cold is delayed?
0 # economagic 2019-04-21 20:32
Poet Robert Frost beat you to the punch by nearly a century ("Fire and Ice," 1923), but he had the sense to leave the answer open. Oh, but I forgot: You are one of those crazies who does not "believe in" science, i.e., knowledge (the meaning of the Latin "Scientia"), of the most reliable sort we have.
+31 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-04-16 17:48
I look at the Notre Dame fire & think, without any intent to characterize the event as a 'judgement' or 'prophecy': A great, beautiful & unified assemblage was almost destroyed by the carelessness of the very people responsible for preserving it. An analogy for us: we are treating the planet in the same way.
0 # Tarry Faster 2019-04-16 23:15
Here is my take - with viable solutions - on the whole dire mess:
+2 # jwb110 2019-04-17 09:26
There are a ton of the Religious Right that see this as the much sought after Apocalypse. I get the feeling that this will happen quickly and "they" will be saved. The extinction of the human race will be as long a process as the rise of the human race has been.
The wing nuts of the world are running us into the ground whether they are driven by religious extremism or greed.
+4 # Suzanne Taylor 2019-04-17 12:25
George Monbiot is a treasure. For years he has been a clear voice for enlightened thinking.
+4 # janie1893 2019-04-17 16:03
So many will have to die before we wake up to what is occurring.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.