RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Wasserman writes: "Eight years ago this week apocalyptic radiation clouds began pouring out of Fukushima. They haven't stopped."

IAEA fact-finding team examines devastation at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in May 2011. (photo: IAEA/Greg Webb)
IAEA fact-finding team examines devastation at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in May 2011. (photo: IAEA/Greg Webb)


How Fukushima Nukes Kill Our Climate, Our Planet, Ourselves

By Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

13 March 19

 

ight years ago this week apocalyptic radiation clouds began pouring out of Fukushima.  

They haven’t stopped.

Nor have the huckster holocaust deniers peddling still more of these monsters of mass destruction. Some even deny the health impacts from Fukushima fallout that’s already more than 100 times greater than Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s.

Many push fake “new generation” reactors already priced out of by renewables.

But far more deadly is their demand to operate the old, crumbling reactors that daily grow more dangerous.

Here are some inconvenient truths: 

  • About 450 reactors now spew huge quantities of waste heat that kill our global weather patterns.

  • All daily emit carbon and more during “normal” operations and the mining, milling, and enrichment of radioactive fuel.

  • All daily kill millions of marine creatures with hot offal dumped into oceans, lakes, and rivers.

  • Many kill birds and bats with tall cooling towers that spew radioactive and chemical pollutants.

  • None can safely manage their uber-intense radioactive waste.

  • All raise nearby human infant death rates.

  • All see human infant death rates drop when they shut.

  • All daily risk more partial explosions as at Fermi I (1966) and Three Mile Island 2 (1979), and full ones like Chernobyl 4 (1986) and Fukushima 1, 2, 3 and 4 (2011).

  • Many sit on or near active earthquake faults.

  • Many are vulnerable to death by tsunami.

  • Most are vulnerable to lightning strikes and air attack.

  • All are embrittled by decades of constant heat, pressure, and radiation that make them likely to shatter in an accident.

  • All are internally cracked to varying degrees.

  • Many suffer from “deferred maintenance” left undone by greedy owners.

  • Some are visibly crumbling.

  • The industry is short of skilled operators.  

  • Some old reactors operate with pre-digital control systems.

  • Overstuffed spent fuel pools endanger us even more than the reactors themselves.

  • Most spent fuel casks are thin and many are deteriorated.

  • Nowhere are there credible evacuation plans.

  • Bankrupt nuclear utilities can’t manage their basic grid, let alone run dying reactors.

  • Davis-Besse’s owner blacked out 50 million people in 2003 with unmaintained power lines.

  • Diablo Canyon’s owner is under federal criminal probation for killing eight people in a 2010 San Bruno gas explosion caused by its faulty pipes.

  • PG&E’s faulty power lines sparked 2017-2018 fires that killed more than 80 people, incinerated more than 10,000 structures, drew $10 billion in lawsuits, and destroyed one of the world’s most precious ecosystems.

  • In bankruptcy, it’s now stiffing fire victims it promised to compensate.

  • A month ago, it burned down five buildings in San Francisco.

The forever “Nuke Renaissance” still fantasizes about new reactors that won’t be built.

The small ones are already priced out. The big ones are behind schedule and over budget.

Tax/ratepayer billions are being scammed to support dangerous, decrepit old nukes that can’t compete with wind, solar, batteries, and LED.  

Their owners don’t want them inspected.

When the next Fukushima blows, they’ll yell that no one will be hurt, the climate won’t be heated, and the oceans will be safe.

But today our lives depend on moving those wasted trillions into our vital Solartopian transition.

ALL those Fukushimas-in-waiting must shut NOW.

And never again – like eight years ago this week – can we let exploding nukes destroy our climate, poison our oceans, kill our children, and threaten all life on earth.

Email This Page


Harvey Wasserman’s Green Power & Wellness Show is podcast at prn.fm. California Solartopia is broadcast at KPFK-Pacifica, 90.7 fm, Los Angeles. His Life & Death Spiral of US History: From Deganawidah to Trump to Solartopia will soon be at www.solartopia.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+23 # chrisconno 2019-03-13 11:09
It seems this issue never changes course. Forty years ago I organized people around the Washington Public Power Supply System, or WPPSS (pronounce whoops). All the issues were the same: too expensive, too many hazards, too many health risks, too little oversight, too little benefit, no place for the waste. So much money to be made makes for dumb decisions.
 
 
+22 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-03-13 12:12
I’ve been wondering when Fukushima, like a months-old drowning victim, was going to ooze up to the surface of our consciousness again. By the way Three Mile Island also caused a very significant spike in Infant Mortality rates for 6 years after its meltdown. & see: https://phys.org/news/2019-03-fukushima-current-state-clean-up.html
Fukushima: current state of the clean-up
March 8, 2019
by Karyn Nishimura
 
 
+18 # PABLO DIABLO 2019-03-13 12:13
"Once a form of life reaches a certain level of intelligence, it will destroy itself." --- Enrico Fermi
His response to using radio waves to search for intelligent life (SETI) in the Universe.
 
 
+6 # MainStreetMentor 2019-03-14 15:50
He rode up to the building
In a chauffeur driven car
A Rolls-Royce I think it was
He sported a cigar …

Wow … A big impression!
A rock-star could he be?
No, just a salesman -
For Nuclear energy.

An’ there within the boardroom
A ’fore his spiel began
He flexed his corporate muscles
With avarice in his plan:

His presentation: awesome
His dress: impeccable
But the content of his words
Were not so laudable

Embraced were words of safety
Extolled was energy
But n’er did he speak “meltdown”
Nor “nuclear misery”

He hung his head in shame
When questions then began:
Earthquake?; Tsunami?;
Radiation in Japan?

Infant abnormality;
A sea of glowing fish;
Nuclear reality
Comes from the Corporate wish

Of dollar bills in coffers
Which Suffering constructs
And Corporations build some more
While counting all their bucks.

Citizens! Send him packing!
For Japan and we both know:
Nuclear energy is …
A deadly way to go.
 
 
+18 # ahollman 2019-03-13 14:32
Unlike the many "accidents" that have occurred at various nukes over the decades, it's no accident that, as atmospheric CO2 levels rise and the planet heats up, nukes are now being touted as a "safer" non-carbon-base d alternative to carbon-based energy production.

I'd value this promise as equal to the value of past promises: zero. Nuclear energy "too cheap to meter" wasn't, and isn't. Ditto nuclear energy that was supposed to be "clean", energy that was supposed to be "safe" and immune to the threat of nuclear proliferation. And, over 60 years after the first nuke started up (Shippingport, PA, 1957), we still can't agree on how to deal with the long-lived radioactive waste.

We need an industrial/clim ate policy, not only nationwide but worldwide, that will 1) rapidly increase our renewable (wind, solar, and to a lesser extent hydro) energy production, 2) develop much better battery storage to deal with the intermittent nature of these sources, and 3) to rebuild our transmission grids to ship electricity from where it is generated to where it is needed.

That's the "generate from renewables" piece of the pie. The other two parts are to recycle more and to use less in the first place. Both require more elaboration than I can provide here.

This is a very big deal, will require difficult individual and collective choices, and we don't have much time, but we can do it. This policy is like democracy; all the alternatives are worse.
 
 
-34 # BKnowswhitt 2019-03-13 15:01
CO2 is not a harmful 'GAS' .. Cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki thriving today post being nuked .. also in russia .. all the global warming lying euro's who are driving this 'One World Crap' have NUkes .. Germany and France and most of Europe .. that's the ONLY solution to your lying .. so you lie sideways you Doomsdayers .. then you LIE about Alternatives .. i drove through Iowa two summers ago hot as hell summer .. all huge wind turbines along I-80 not one of them turning .. not a breath of wind .. waste of time money .. and oh yeah can't possibly run The Grid ..
 
 
+3 # Yadayada 2019-03-15 09:22
I have to say I am concerned with the amount of erroneous or misleading info here.

Just the first few for instance:

About 450 reactors now spew huge quantities of waste heat that kill our global weather patterns.

The heat generated by the reactors does get in the atmosphere just like it does for coal, petroleum or gas plants, but unlike these last three nuclear does not add CO2 blankets on our planet which is the real killer.
Oh, and the energy produced by wind or solar also eventually ends up in the atmosphere when it's used.

All daily emit carbon and more during “normal” operations and the mining, milling, and enrichment of radioactive fuel.
Just as extracting and moving coal or petroleum does, and then without all the CO2 released when these are burned.

Another outstanding one:
All raise nearby human infant death rates.
Ever seen the effects of coal plants smokestacks on the population downwind?

Many arguments are for regulating the nuclear power business, not destroying it.

Some are non-sequitur:
"Some old reactors operate with pre-digital control systems."
And so what? The 2000MW HVDC link between France and the UK has a purely analog regulator that is a marvel of redundant design that is not susceptible to hackers because there is NO software.

Hiding the right arguments against nuclear in a heap of non-sequitur is doing a disservice to the cause.
 
 
+3 # Yadayada 2019-03-15 09:32
Following my previous comment assuming they are published in the right order:

Nuclear power needs regulation and should be phased out, but believing we can transition to purely renewable in a decade without a societal meltdown is a pipe dream.
Nuclear is far from perfect but a good 20 years more of it is necessary to allow quick phase out of the energy tech that does kill us and the climate: #1 coal, #2 coal, # coal, #4 petroleum, #5 gas, in that order.

If we can get away from these three (I noticed too) then the major crisis could be contained and then we can think of phasing out nuclear.

And yes nuclear frightens us all, me included, but look at the stats of people killed by nuclear vs. by breathing in smokestacks or in congested urban centers, not to mention by climate change to which nuclear almost does not participate.

Where is the thyroid cancer epidemic after Fukushima? How many people did the nuclear accident actually kill? (The only answer I found so far is about 100 during the rushed evacuation).

Nuclear is the reason why the French have less than half per capita CO2 footprint than the US citizens: 60% of electrical power there is nuclear - ever heard of an accident there?

If you want to set your sights on something that IS killing the climate, check out the energetic cost of the digital economy, which grows 30% a year and already corresponds to 50% of the CO2 emissions by the world cars, which only(!) grows 4% a year.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN