RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Excerpt: "It happens this way every time: A big news event in the Trump-Russia investigation takes place, and commentators talk about it as though a house of cards were collapsing or a row of dominoes were falling."

Special Council and former FBI director Robert S. Mueller III. (photo: AP)
Special Council and former FBI director Robert S. Mueller III. (photo: AP)

Mueller Is Laying Siege to the Trump Presidency

By Mikhaila Fogel and Bejamin Wittes, The Atlantic

10 February 19

It won’t be a single news event that takes down the president.

oday is the first day I actually thought Donald Trump might not finish his term in office,” said the legal commentator Jeffrey Toobin on CNN last Thursday.

“This is the beginning of the end for Trump,” declared Neal Katyal, a former acting solicitor general, on MSNBC.

“The deal may be among the biggest news in the nearly 18-month investigation,” wrote Barry Berke, Noah Bookbinder, and Norman Eisen in The New York Times.

It happens this way every time: A big news event in the Trump-Russia investigation takes place, and commentators talk about it as though a house of cards were collapsing or a row of dominoes were falling. Each time, it’s the beginning of the end. Each indictment or plea is the “big one.” And then those expectations are disappointed. The sun rises the next day—in the east, as expected—and it sets in the west, as it did the day before. The Trump presidency endures.

This time it was the new plea deal from Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former lawyer and fixer. On Thursday, Cohen pleaded guilty to one count of lying to Congress, related to how long into the 2016 campaign he pursued building Trump Tower Moscow—and who exactly was aware of his efforts. In the surprise criminal information that formed the basis of his plea, Cohen admitted that, although he had told Congress the project had ended in January 2016, in advance of the Iowa caucus, planning for the project continued well into June 2016. What’s more, a person named in the criminal information as “Individual 1” but identifiable as Trump, along with his family members and his campaign officials, were briefed on Cohen’s efforts along the way. Additionally, Cohen was in contact with senior Russian officials about the matter.

The admission that the Trump Organization was working secretly—colluding, one might say—with the Russian government on a business deal late into the campaign and that Trump knew about this activity led many observers, including those quoted above, to treat this latest plea as the turning point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

But the underlying metaphors are wrong. There is no sudden bend in the path of the investigation. There is no house of cards. The dominoes will not fall if gently tipped. The administration is not going to come crashing down in response to any single day’s events. The architecture of Trump’s power is more robust than that.

We need to stop thinking of it as a fragile structure waiting for the right poke to fall in on itself. Think instead of the myriad investigations and legal proceedings surrounding the president as a multi-front siege on a walled city that is, in fact, relatively well fortified.

Siege warfare is not a matter of striking precisely the correct blow at the correct moment at a particular stone in the wall. It is a campaign of degradation over a substantial period of time. While those inside the fortified city may rely only on the strength of their walls and their stored resources, the attackers can take their time. Volleys of projectiles—arrows or trebuchets—pepper the city walls and those atop them, while the strength of the defending army diminishes as soldiers slip away and food dwindles. Moreover, active conflict is an episodic, not a constant, feature of siege warfare; the enemy army can encamp outside the walled city and blockade it without firing a shot. Over time, the walls and defending forces become degraded to such a degree that the invaders are able to scale the walls and sack the city.

No, Mueller and his forces are not a Mongol horde, but the Trump White House is very much under siege.

Mueller’s army isn’t the only force encircling Trump’s fortress, but it is the largest and most active force, and it actually has several distinct encampments. One contingent of Mueller’s forces is charged with investigating efforts by the Russian government to interfere with the 2016 election. In this capacity, the special counsel’s office has indicted individuals associated with the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm that has spread disinformation and propaganda on social media. His office also indicted 13 members of the Russian military intelligence organization, the GRU, in connection with deliberately hacking into the Democratic National Committee server and passing the fruits of that hack to WikiLeaks “to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.”

The immediate threat this particular force poses to the castle right now involves its evident interest in Roger Stone and the group of people around him. The GRU indictment does not name Stone, but he has publicly admitted that he is the person referred to in the indictment “who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump” and who corresponded with a fake hacktivist persona used by the Russians.

This front of the siege has become hot in recent months and will likely remain an area of intense activity over the coming weeks. Recently, Jerome Corsi publicly shared a draft statement of offense in connection with a plea agreement offered him by the special counsel’s office. The document details contact between Corsi and an individual reported to be Stone regarding WikiLeaks’ planned release of the hacked material. Moreover, in the coming weeks, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is expected to rule on whether Andrew Miller, another Stone associate, is obligated to testify before Mueller’s grand jury. Miller had appealed a contempt citation, contending that Mueller’s appointment was unconstitutional. Stone and Corsi both seem to expect indictments.

This front is likely to remain active and to generate big news events. But note as well if and when either man or both face charges, that will not be the sky falling for Trump any more than last week’s Cohen plea was. It will be just another set of stones blasted out of the city walls.

Last week’s events revealed another force surrounding the castle, also under Mueller’s command: the investigation of Trump’s efforts to do financial business in Russia. The president, while insisting there was “NO Collusion with Russia,” admitted that he “lightly looked” into building a tower in Moscow months into the 2016 campaign. Trebuchets from the Cohen front sounded into Friday evening, when Cohen’s lawyers filed a sentencing memorandum as a follow-up to the guilty plea. In the memo, Cohen’s legal team said that Cohen “remained in close and regular contact with White House–based staff and legal counsel to Client-1,” another euphemism for Trump. It’s unclear to what extent this investigation is one and the same with the main Mueller collusion force, but it is evidently an active matter, too.

Mueller’s forces also include a major encampment focused on obstruction of justice. This force has so far not done anything the public can see, but it may be getting ready to launch some kind of report against the castle. And this report, whenever it materializes, may prove devastating. But note that the day such a report is completed will also not be the “big one”—the cataclysmic event that causes the house of cards to collapse. After all, any report would likely have to undergo a lengthy approval process, either from within the Justice Department or by the courts, or both. It might have to be approved by Matthew Whitaker, the acting attorney general, before being released. It may have significant classified components. Even if the findings in this report are of bombshell proportions, given that it is unlikely Mueller will reject Office of Legal Counsel guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president, the damage that bombshell will inflict will ultimately be determined by Congress, and its detonation would likely be substantially delayed.

The forces in the castle have actually fought off one part of the besieging fighters. Paul Manafort has floated in and out of headlines throughout the siege. He was the first person, along with his longtime business associate Rick Gates, to be charged by the special counsel in October 2017 for various financial crimes. After his first conviction and subsequent guilty plea and cooperation agreement, his “flipping” appeared to pose a major threat to Trump. But that threat seems to have passed. The special counsel has declared that Manafort is still lying and has breached his plea agreement, and will file a memo this week detailing the extent of Manafort’s breach. This sucks for Manafort, but it’s great news for the folks in the castle. He’s almost certainly useless at this stage as a witness for Mueller. The part of the siege represented by Manafort has, at least for now, lifted.

Possibly more threatening, if less high profile, is Michael Flynn, the former national-security adviser, who is expected to appear for sentencing on December 17. Flynn’s sentencing hearing has been delayed for months, signaling active cooperation of some sort. Back in December 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in relation to conversations with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. He’s been silent since. Nobody knows what his cooperation with Mueller has consisted of—and thus how worried the forces in the castle should be about the Flynn encampment.

Cohen’s sentencing memo highlighted the presence of some allied forces around the castle separate from Mueller. It described, for example, Cohen’s cooperation with prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York, the prosecutors who reached Michael Cohen’s first plea agreement back in August. You remember this force: Cohen pleaded guilty to eight felony counts of tax evasion, one count of bank fraud, and two counts of campaign-finance violations involving hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. This front is also active. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that David Pecker, CEO of American Media Inc., has been granted immunity in the criminal investigation related to the investigation into Cohen. Allen Weisselberg, the longtime chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, was also granted limited immunity in this case. This front could explode at any time, but again, if and when it does so, the sun will rise and set the next day then too.

Cohen’s Saturday sentencing memo also put the spotlight on a non-federal front in this siege: New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood’s civil suit against the Trump Foundation for “a pattern of persistent illegal conduct, occurring over more than a decade,” for which she seeks $2.8 million in restitution. As the Cohen sentencing memo notes, Cohen has cooperated extensively with this suit as well as with investigations run by New York tax authorities.

There is also an encampment made up of private litigants. Trump is facing civil litigation regarding possible violation of the Emoluments Clause pending in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs are Democrat lawmakers. He also faces additional lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of his appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general following the forced resignation of Jeff Sessions.

Finally, there’s the big new army marching on the Trump fortress, with an expected arrival of January 3, 2019: The leadership of the new Congress has already promised to intensify oversight of this administration. Representative Adam Schiff, incoming head of the House Intelligence Committee, has hinted at a restart of that committee’s moribund investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Other committees will be aggressive as well.

Meanwhile, the castle’s defenders are slipping away at night: John Dowd, the president’s personal lawyer, has left matters in the dubious hands of Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow. The White House counsel’s office is a ghost town. Ty Cobb and White House Counsel Don McGahn are both gone. The office now appears to be manned by acting White House Counsel Emmet Flood and a skeleton staff of 25 lawyers (of the estimated 40 it would require to handle its workload).

So what will the big one look like, if not some Mueller-lobbed bombshell? When the walls are finally breached, how will we know that it really is the beginning of the end? Here’s a hint: The big one will not be a legal development, an indictment, or a plea. It will be a political development—that moment when the American political system decides not to tolerate the facts available to it any longer. What does that look like? It looks like impeachment. It looks like enough Republicans breaking with the president to seriously jeopardize his chances of renomination or reelection. The legal developments will degrade the walls. But only this sort of political battering ram can breach them.

Not all sieges succeed. Mont-Saint-Michel, a tiny fortified island off the coast of France, withstood English siege for the entirety of the Hundred Years’ War. If the political system does not come to care about what we are learning, it doesn’t matter how many boulders Mueller hurls against the walls of Castle Trump; the forces laying siege to it will, like the defeated Ottoman Empire after the siege of Vienna, eventually slink away into the snow.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-100 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-10 11:08
"Mueller’s army isn’t the only force encircling Trump’s fortress, but it is the largest and most active force, and it actually has several distinct encampments. "

I think this article is exactly right. And it is why the Mueller Probe is illegal and has been illegal from the moment the "counterintelli gence" investigation of Trump began in July of 2016 -- even before the elections.

The FBI, DOJ, CIA are not authorized by the Constitution to besiege a president and remove him. That is sedition, a very serious crime. All of this has been a coup d'état from the very start. The people who originated it -- Comey, Strzok, Page, McCabe -- always intended it to be an assault on Trump that result in his removal from office.

The FBI and DOJ are authorized to investigate crimes, not to frame up and destroy a president or anyone. The "Russian meddling" was always just a made up story to make it appear that the FBI/DOJ was investigating something.

The Mueller Force has a dual mission:

1. to take Trump down and out of office. It is destroying everyone in its path to Trump.

2. to cover up the real conspiracy that includes the CIA, MI6, FBI, DOJ, NSA and other intelligence agencies to manipulate the 2016 election and following Trump's win to take him out of office.

I think we are witnessing the emergence of a totalitarian regime centered in the intelligence agencies. They will accept only a president that is their puppet.

Weird to see the media cheer.
+25 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-02-10 14:08
'The FBI, DOJ, CIA are not authorized by the Constitution to besiege a president and remove him. That is sedition, a very serious crime.'

But some of them are constitutionall y authorized to investigate crimes, & it doesn't matter who committed them.
-21 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-11 08:07
Koot and Texas -- you hit the problem on the nose. All FBI and DOJ investigations begin with a memo articulating the "predicate" for the investigation; that is, a statement that a crime has occurred or in the case of a person there is probable cause that this person has committed a crime .

There has never been a predicate for this investigation. Two memos, one written by Strzok and the other by Rosenstein, serve as the predicate but the FBI and DOJ have refused to release either one. Trump has threatened to order these memos declsssified and released but the DOJ and FBI have objected very strenuously.

We have a good suspicion about what the problem is. The memos cite the Steele Dossier as the predicate. Everyone in the DOJ and FBI knew the origin of the Steele Dossier and knew that it was or is false. So these are illegal investigations.

It was floated that obstruction of justice was a predicate, but Rosenstein cannot supervise an investigation into himself. So for the obstruction investigation to fly, Rosenstein would have to recuse.

It has been said by some in the FBI/DOJ that Trump is not a target of this investigation; Russia is the target. But then why investigate Trump and all his associates. Why not tell him his campaign is being targeted by Russian agents and help him prepare?

The article above makes clear that the goal of Comey-Strzok-Fu sion-Orbis-Muel ler was from the start and now is the destruction of Trump.
+25 # Texas Aggie 2019-02-10 17:01
"The FBI, DOJ, CIA are not authorized by the Constitution to besiege a president and remove him. "

But they aren't focused on removing him no matter what, are they? As you said, "The FBI and DOJ are authorized to investigate crimes" which is exactly what they are doing, isn't?
+7 # Caliban 2019-02-12 13:59
No # RR, the Mueller probe was set in motion in order to determine whether or not Russia interfered in the 2016 US presidential -- and if it did interfere to determined the means and impact of that interference.

And that is all that has happened so far -- despite your claims of a huge, calamitous persecution of Donald Trump.

Now, if it turns out that DT knowingly accepted criminal support from Russian election manipulation it seems likely he will suffer some appropriate negative consequences. Indeed, you seem to accept that this will be the case and are already defending DT against charges that the Mueller team has not made.

Personally, I think that DT is too clever to let himself be directly tied to any such findings (should they occur), and that if DT does leave office early against his wishes, this will happen not because of Mueller or any other "vast conspiracy" but because of his own disdain for ethical and moral behavior in either his personal or political life.
+46 # futhark 2019-02-10 11:25
While it appears that the Mueller Investigation is turning up connections between the Trump campaign and agencies within the Russian government to tip the 2016 election in Mr. Trump's favor, whatever the Russians may have done shrinks to insignificance when compared with the efforts made by Israel to interfere with America's internal election outcomes. At the 2016 American Israeli Public Affairs Committee Donald Trump as much as openly declared that he would, when elected, follow an unswerving subservience to the dictates of Israeli policy makers.

Bernie Sanders was the only 2016 major party presidential candidate to decline attending the AIPAC meeting, at which it seems groveling before Israel is mandatory.

This subject was addressed in a recent program on Project Censored. American citizens are being deprived of their Constitutional right of free speech in states with laws against advocating an economic boycott of Israel in an effort to end its oppression of the Palestinian people.
+11 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-02-10 14:09
Not, of course, to mention the USA's going interference in Iraq & Venezuela, to mention just a couple....
-40 # BKnowswhitt 2019-02-10 14:40
False Phoney Lying Misleading .. all extreme Left Leaning Global Warming Prolififying .. and this nonsense .. all OPINION .. scare mongering .. false hope that they really didnt' lose the election .. to TRUTH .. this is what you get today .. complete bullshit!!!
-5 # economagic 2019-02-10 22:19
Yep, we just got it: Nonsense! "Complete bullshit!"
-20 # BKnowswhitt 2019-02-11 03:11
I may well be guilty of overstating my opposition at time though it's in direct proportion to the massive assault on the Truth. Trump will come out of it all untarnished though they got others interestingly who were players during his campaign and got them on tax fraud or similar .. just like the FBI when they went after the Mafia way back when .. tax evasion ... that's what you get also in witch hunts .. they will find nothing impeachable on trump a big waste of tax dollars by the desperate minority party that does not know how to lead ..
+4 # johnescher 2019-02-13 04:44
Quoting BKnowswhitt:
Trump will come out of it all untarnished...

This is what you think. I would say that you are so glibly cynical that you have no idea of how things actually work in the law and probably in the world, too. Have you ever sat in a court of criminal law? Did you identify with the accused? Did he get off? Well, sometimes, but not if the evidence was very, very good as in the case against Trump.
+29 # fitzgerald 2019-02-10 15:33
It is bizarre to see there are still those who, hearing the lies of Donald Trump going back to his birther campaign against President Obama, lies now totaling over 8000, his sycophant, lap dog obeisance to Vladmir Putin, most notably in Helsinki in broad daylight, taking Putin's side over America's Intel community, believe there is some sort of "conspiracy" against poor Donald Trump.

Insisting he's so misunderstood and unappreciated and the victim of that evil "deep state." All evidence being on the table that Trump is systematically attempting to destroy America's democracy with attacks on the judiciary, the Great American Free Press, and America's diverse Intel agencies, which have protected America from foreign adversaries since its existence.

The Cult of Trump has blinded roughly a third of America to the man's incompetence, stupidity, and narcissistic corruption. He is the crude, bold, racist shiny object hypnotizing that sad segment of society who want to believe his lies, as long as he does their dirty work for them. He is a sickness that is not even close to America's ideals and strength, a disease that Americans who love their country as it was founded, will indeed reject from its now beleaguered body, to regain its power, respect and stature in the world
+10 # pmargaret7 2019-02-11 22:30
Extremely well put! Your words reflect the thoughts of many of us that despise what has taken over as a so-called president. He is repulsive and stupid and has gotten away with lowering the bar of "governing" to unprecedented depths! Has the 25th amendment ever been used? Too bad it would require (and enable) Pence who is awful, but in different ways! I shudder to think that so many count on voting Agent Orange out in 2020, as I can't stand the thought that he won't be gone before that!
+16 # MindDoc 2019-02-10 16:06
Um... for the sake of clarity and transparency... When was this written &/or published? It sounded like a great overview of the current status, but throughout it refers to "future events" which have long passed! E.g.,"Michael Flynn, the former national-securi ty adviser, who is expected to appear for sentencing on December 17. " Oh, what year would be that be?

"Finally, there’s the big new army marching on the Trump fortress, with an expected arrival of January 3, 2019:" Gee, I wonder what that will be like, January 3, 2019.... And waiting on Whitaker to approve the not-near-comple te Mueller report? Whitaker is packed and halfway out the door. There are just so many anachronisms in this article, it's a journalistic disappointment. Either a few bits were added to a months-old story, or an old story was cut & pasted into a new one. Very ungracefully.

I'm sorry, I did so want to read this as a new and wonderful update about all that is happening - NOW! There are references throughout to "old news" and mentions of "forthcoming dates" that have long passed. So... when and how did this get put together. What is here is fine - factual and hopeful. But not reflecting the past month or so, and purporting to be current.

Just saying... Like many, I feel the castle de-swamping and resumption of truth being truth cannot come soon enough. Nor can justice for the biggest criminal endeavor in U.S./global history, perhaps. But for someone following the news this is painful.
-16 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-11 08:42
Mind -- this article was from the Dec. 4, 2018 issue of the Atlantic. It is old, but it is good summary of Mueller's goals. It shows clearly that the Mueller Probe is political and not criminal. The pretense of hunting around for a crime (what Trump calls the witch hunt) is great for news media who love a detective story.

But the final goal of Mueller is to drive Trump out of office by any means necessary. That's political. This is the FBI/DOJ meddling in US politics. It is criminalizing political opinion. If you favor good relations with Russia or an end to the war in Syria, you are a traitor and a Putin Puppet.

There is no update. It is just another Groundhog Day movie. The only update needed will be when Trump resigns.
-2 # Saberoff 2019-02-12 21:11
"If you favor good relations with Russia or an end to the war in Syria, you are a traitor and a Putin Puppet."

Ya, Tulsi!
+5 # chapdrum 2019-02-10 20:16
Let's hope so, because Congress and the Courts sure aren't doing anything.
Duly noted.
+2 # chapdrum 2019-02-11 19:05
P.S. "...laying siege..." based on what? Wittes is a dubious source, imo.
+3 # 2019-02-11 20:08
None of the commentary, speculation, opinions or rants matter at this time. No matter how you feel or what you think, the bottom line is simple. We gotta wait.
-3 # chapdrum 2019-02-12 14:46
None of the commentary, speculation, opinions or rants matter at this time. No matter how you feel or what you think, the bottom line is simple. We gotta wait.

Well, that's enlightening.
-1 # chapdrum 2019-02-12 18:12
“This is the beginning of the end for Trump,” declared Neal Katyal, a former acting solicitor general, on MSNBC.
Sure it is, sure it is.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.