RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Rich writes: "Even looking at the 80-minute-plus laundry list from Trump's point of view, the speech seems to have failed at every level."

Nancy Pelosi claps at Donald Trump's State of the Union Address. (photo: Getty)
Nancy Pelosi claps at Donald Trump's State of the Union Address. (photo: Getty)

Trump's Big Speech Failed at Every Level

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

07 January 19

Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, what to make of the State of the Union, the continuing blackface scandal in the Virginia statehouse, and a leaked accounting of Donald Trump’s “executive time.”

n the State of the Union, Donald Trump called for unity while taking many partisan shots. How do you determine the success of a speech like Trump’s?

Even looking at the 80-minute-plus laundry list from Trump’s point of view, the speech seems to have failed at every level.

If Trump’s number-one political goal was to get his wall built, he didn’t advance the cause but signaled his surrender. His incessantly repeated pre-speech threat that he might declare a “national emergency” to circumvent Congress and get his way evaporated entirely last night. Why? He’s a paper tiger. He’d only been blustering about declaring an emergency in the first place to drum up phony suspense that might draw viewers to tune in. Even he has figured out that too many Republicans in Congress are openly opposed to that legally dubious power grab for him to try it now. Nor will the GOP happily sign on to another politically self-immolating government shutdown. So when Trump declared “I’ll get it built” last night, that can be translated to mean: “I have surrendered and will claim that whatever compromise Congress puts forth by the February 15 deadline means ‘I got my wall.’” Nancy Pelosi has won.

If Trump’s biggest personal goal was to impede what he called “ridiculous partisan investigations,” he has no more chance of accomplishing that than Richard Nixon did when he made a similar pitch in the 1974 State of the Union, seven months before Watergate drove him out of office. If anything, the investigations are metastasizing: Witness the sprawling subpoena that descended on the Trump Inaugural Committee from the Southern District of New York just as Trump was preparing to give his speech. In addition to the ever-growing body of evidence that Trump is a witting Russian agent, there are more criminal investigations of him, his business, his family, and his crime syndicate of a Cabinet than we can easily count. Let’s not forget that in the end it was simple tax evasion, not capital crimes, that brought down Al Capone.

If Trump’s stylistic goal was to somehow reset his image two years into his nasty presidency, his efforts were risible. Having purported to deliver a “message of unity” in his 2017 address to Congress, and having called for summoning “the unity we need to deliver for the people” in 2018, this time he came out for “cooperation, compromise, and the common good.” It is hard to imagine that a single American — whether Trump supporter or foe — bought this bunk any more than they buy his annual promise of an infrastructure push. His efforts to milk the touching real-life stories of the White House’s invited spectators were also disingenuous. He called for a $500 million budget over ten years to fight childhood cancers — less than 10 percent of the $5.7 billion he wants to build his wall this year. His tender words about Holocaust survivors were outrageous coming from a man who refused to condemn Charlottesville neo-Nazis chanting “Jews will not replace us” and countenanced anti-Semitic iconography exploited by his campaign.

If Trump’s rock-bottom goal was to provide television entertainment, here too he failed. The most enjoyable aspect of the entire event was watching Pelosi. Her sarcastic applause when Trump issued his bogus call for compromise – instantly christened the “fuck you” clap by Patton Oswalt – went viral. No less delightful was the sight of her repeatedly thumbing through the pages of his speech on camera as if she were looking for something more substantive, or at least more amusing, to read. It was worthy of a Tina Fey SNL bit. It was also fun to watch the expanded ranks of women in the Democratic caucus seize Trump’s phony embrace of female empowerment and throw it back at him and his party in a spontaneous eruption of joyous victory.

This isn’t to say that Trump achieved nothing. He did drone on so long that he pushed Stacey Abrams’s response to the waning minutes of prime time, almost 11 p.m. in the East. And he did inspire unanimous cheerleading from the Murdoch contingent: Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham at Fox News, Michael Goodwin at the New York Post, and Peggy Noonan at the Wall Street Journal (“a deeply adept speech in terms of policy”). And occasionally those not on News Corp payrolls found bright spots too: On Morning Joe, David Ignatius of the Washington Post declared Trump’s invocation of World War II and the Holocaust “moving and powerful.” Less convinced was Ann Coulter, who tweeted that it was “the lamest, sappiest, most intentionally tear-jerking SOTU ever,” and urged Trump to fire whoever supplied him with such poetic flourishes as his invocation of the “golden beaches of California.” But surely he can’t fire Ivanka.

Prominent voices from both parties have called for Virginia governor Ralph Northam, a Democrat, to resign after he first admitted to, then denied posing in a racist photograph that has surfaced from his medical school yearbook (while unexpectedly volunteering a previously unknown blackface incident). Steve King and Mitch McConnell have recently been chased by similar incidents — if Northam leaves office, will it set a new standard for politicians of both parties?

Now he is considering resurrecting himself as an Independent, according to the Washington Post. Regardless of party affiliation, what’s beyond dispute is that he’s an idiot who has yet to settle on a plausible account of why his 1984 medical school yearbook page looked like a Ku Klux Klan recruitment flyer. Whether he resigns or not, his decision will have no effect on the double standard that’s already in place. Democrats believe that politicians with racist histories should be drummed out of their party. GOP leaders believe that such politicians should be tolerated as long as there might be some political advantage to be gained in keeping them in the tent.

It doesn’t pass the laugh test that Republicans are condemning Northam while embracing a Republican president who ran on birtherism and nativism, speaks of NFL players as if they are slaves, and routinely (as recently as last night) drums up hate against Latino immigrants and Muslims. It took years for GOP leaders to turn on King, the unabashed neo-Nazi congressman from Iowa, and even so, they stripped him of committee assignments only after he had been reelected in the 2018 midterms. The same GOP Establishment that purports to be outraged by Northam looks the other way as Republican governors routinely conduct bogus “voter fraud” initiatives and rewrite state election rules to disenfranchise minority voters. Nor did anyone at the top of the GOP complain when the last Republican governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, broke with recent precedent, and not only declared Confederate History Month in 2010 but left any mention of slavery out of his proclamation.

The notion that Virginia or any other swath of America with a racist past can overcome that history overnight is repeatedly proven a fantasy. Chief Justice John Roberts rationalized the maiming of the Voting Rights Act with a declaration that will sully his reputation forever: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” Today Virginia’s Democratic attorney general, Mark Herring, confessed that he also donned blackface in college. And by the way, what kind of establishment is Eastern Virginia Medical School, Northam’s alma mater? We’ve now learned that what it calls “troubling” neo-Confederate photos were appearing in its yearbook pages as recently as 2013. We can only hope that its doctors are out-of-network for all medical plans except the KKK’s.

According to a prolific White House leakernearly 60 percent of Donald Trump’s schedule is unstructured “executive time,” a euphemism for watching TV and responding to the news.  Is the leak a targeted subversion or more evidence of a disorganized White House?

Actually, it’s both. The White House remains in chaos, and we are entering the Night-of-the-Long-Knives stage in the bunker where it’s every dead-ender for him or herself. It’s hard to imagine in any case that anyone is shocked by this revelation. It would be far more shocking — and worse — news if a leaker told us that Trump had reclaimed this 60 percent of his day for work. The last thing we need is for him to increase the volume of havoc he’s inflicting upon the country and the world.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+55 # Porfiry 2019-02-07 14:16
The end cannot come soon enough.
+9 # Texas Aggie 2019-02-08 12:05
Depends on what the "end" turns out to be. With this jackass in office, that "end" might just be a nuclear holocaust.

On the other hand, the "end" just might be someone in law enforcement or the military remembering their oath about protecting the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."
+40 # HenryS1 2019-02-07 15:41
More preaching to the choir, while polls show most people who watched the speech approved of it. While the left is unwilling to accept the current reality where most of Trump supporters accept and believe anything he and Fox says, he will continue to consolidate the reach and success of his propaganda.

The Emperor may have no clothes, but it does not matter....Trump has control of the narrative and we follow Nazi Germany into history as a nation that succumbs to nationalist self-delusion.

Too many Americans believe Trump is always right, and his Presidency an act of the Christian God. They will continue to follow him as an act of faith. It is not clear what it would take to turn this country back to sanity. I know I can not make any headway with my own family, they are true believers. They fundamentally do not see the same reality as I do. And they are increasingly inoculated against any possibility of change.
+27 # dandevries 2019-02-07 18:54
Well, of course, the vast majority of those who actually watched the speech were predisposed to approve of it. Those of us with an ounce of self-respect were reading books, listening to music or, if we had to have the television on, watching Turner Classic Movies or our favorite basketball or hockey teams.
+27 # GRCS 2019-02-07 20:33
This is the intended result of very, very poor education standards that have been set by the GOP and corporations for the last few decades. Privatized education, no matter what form it takes, inevitably brainwashes the populace with whatever the privateers want them to “learn”. America feel for it and is now suffering the consequences.
+23 # dascher 2019-02-07 16:57
The continued discussion of Trump and his statements in the media as if he knows what he is saying or has said or as if he is a man who's word can be trusted normalizes him and his insanity. Krusty the Klown would have been a less dangerous choice for President of the country which is run as if its biggest problem is who to invade next and whether we should use that massive nuclear arsenal in a first strike against somebody before all the nukes turn to piles of rust.
+8 # pmargaret7 2019-02-08 13:23
Go Krusty! Poor, poor America...when people actually try to act as if "Agent Orange" is
our president! He knows absolutely nothing, yet he will not give it up! Why is he continuing as if he is president, he can barely read the trite and stale "thoughts" (?) that Stephen Miller wrote for him and the very continuing ludicrous referrals to WWII veterans, coming from Captain Heel Spurs, were an embarrassment to us all! GO AWAY MR. CHAOS, now, before all of the choice Federal prison spots are gone!
+7 # Diz 2019-02-08 15:31
Frank Rich asks what kind of establishment Ralph Northam's med school is. We should be asking what sort of medical school publishes a yearbook. Yearbooks are kidstuff that should be outgrown, at the latest, by the time one finishes undergraduate studies.
+10 # chapdrum 2019-02-08 16:32
It does not matter that the speech failed.
Not this one, not the next one.
Congress and the Courts are allowing him to remain in office. That's all that matters.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.