RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Klein writes: "The bold moral leadership of newly elected members of Congress like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has me feeling more optimistic about our collective chances of averting climate breakdown than I have in years."

Naomi Klein. (photo: Maclean's)
Naomi Klein. (photo: Maclean's)


My Interview With Bernie Sanders on Climate Change

By Naomi Klein, The Intercept

04 December 18

 

 

he bold moral leadership of newly elected members of Congress like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has me feeling more optimistic about our collective chances of averting climate breakdown than I have in years. But a whole lot of things need to happen very quickly if the political tide is going to shift in time — including finding new ways to engage the public in this fight. In this hopeful moment, I had the opportunity to sit down with one of the few politicians who has consistently focused on this issue — Sen. Bernie Sanders — at the Sanders Institute Gathering in Burlington, Vermont.

On December 3, Sanders hosted a town hall on climate change with guests, including Ocasio-Cortez, 350.org founder Bill McKibben, activist and “Big Little Lies” star Shailene Woodley, climate scientist Brenda Ekwurzel, activist and musician Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, and Mayor Dale Ross of deep-red Georgetown, Texas. The event was streamed live in partnership with progressive media outlets, including The Intercept.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # Inspired Citizen 2018-12-05 08:25
The time is NOW for a new, Climate or Bust movement to convey to the Democratic Party that their nominee doesn't deserve and will not be elected if he or she does not commit to climate preservation.

This late in the struggle for human survival on a badly engineered planet, cutting fossil fuel consumption is not enough. Capturing carbon for safe storage too is not enough.

Methane is melting NOW. We need solar radiation management to block some of the sun from hitting the Earth (actual chem trails, not the conspiracy theory) starting ASAP. In fact, some testing of stratosphere spraying is scheduled to begin next year. See "First sun-dimming experiment will test a way to cool Earth."

"The future rests with the success of grassroots activism." Bernie or Bust WAS a bust. #ClimateOrBust cannot be a bust, or else we'll truly be in the end times.
 
 
+1 # Questions, questions 2018-12-05 13:59
Chemtrails (the solar-dimming kind) or Bust??? Sorry - the reason folks react so vehemently to the concept is because it's so reckless, more tampering with nature's basic atmospheric chemistry, as well as another "techno-fix" to a problem borne of our stupidity in continuing to rely on fossil fuels long after knowing they're killing us.

YES - we need a HUGE effort ASAP to get off fossil fuels and build the sustainable energy system we need, and that begins with getting the fossil fools out of the public $$ trough - let's try actually putting more investment and tax breaks into renewables and efficiency than we still allow for fossil and nuclear.

If that doesn't work, we can always try more drastic and risky approaches - but let's not put the cart before the horse when it comes to the source of the problem!
 
 
-3 # stevb 2018-12-05 17:11
While supporting everything said in this interview I remain profoundly pessimistic because nuclear energy was not even mentioned. The next few generations will fault us for climate disaster of course but will also be bewildered as to why we did not prevent the catastrophe by ignoring the solution we had at hand. Not a single climate scientist thinks wind and solar can be deployed on a scale to stop using fossil fuel in time to prevent disaster. Just 2 years of the US military budget could build 500 nuclear plants. Leaving nuclear out of the discussion dooms us and we may as well stop referring to the climate problem because problems have solutions. We're ignoring ours.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN