RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Grijalva writes: "If you think the Clean Air Act needs updating, imagine keeping our air clean with a law written just after the Civil War."

A mine shaft. (photo: Gudella/iStock)
A mine shaft. (photo: Gudella/iStock)


Our Mining Laws Are More Than a Century Old - Time to Update Them

By Raúl M. Grijalva, Sierra Club

16 May 18

 

y Republican friends on Capitol Hill often complain that our nation’s bedrock environmental laws are out of date. Their argument, which I disagree with, is that laws written in the 1960s and 1970s aren’t relevant in the modern world.

Unfortunately, their concern about updating laws written in the 1970s doesn’t extend to at least one law from the 1870s. The General Mining Act of 1872 still governs all the mining for gold, silver, copper, and other metals that happens on our federal lands—and the law has hardly been touched since President Ulysses S. Grant signed it 146 years ago. If you think the Clean Air Act needs updating, imagine keeping our air clean with a law written just after the Civil War.

Unfortunately, Republicans don’t want to reform the most nonsensical provisions of this legal dinosaur. Paying $5 an acre for public land containing precious metals probably sounded reasonable in 1872; today, it’s a license to rip off the American people. During the pick-and-shovel prospector days, allowing hard rock mining on federal land without requiring miners to pay any royalties may have helped settle the West. But the idea outlived its usefulness a century ago.

Our antiquated mining laws have left us stuck giving away public assets at rock-bottom prices to profitable companies, many of which are foreign-owned, without providing any direct benefit to the taxpayers. Defenders of the 1872 law say we need to keep this broken system going because it creates jobs. But that doesn’t fly—Congress needs to set a higher bar. Federal policy must be about more than shoveling massive subsidies to industries that are, in many ways, already taking advantage of the public.

That’s why I just introduced the Hardrock Leasing and Reclamation Act of 2018 with my Democratic colleague Representative Alan Lowenthal of California. Mining is a major industry across our western states, and it’s long past time our mining laws caught up with reality. Among other measures, we propose creating a 12.5 percent royalty on new federal mining operations and an 8 percent royalty on existing operations. Those royalty rates are below what the federal government charges the oil and gas industry for fossil fuel extraction on public lands. If Exxon can afford such rates, then so can Barrick Gold, Rio Tinto, and other foreign mining conglomerates that take precious metals from U.S. public lands.

Under our plan, the additional federal revenue goes toward cleaning up abandoned hard rock mines around the country. For well over a century, companies have been able to mine a site until they didn’t think they could profit from it any longer, then declare bankruptcy and walk away, leaving taxpayers holding the bag for cleaning up toxic metals, polluted water supplies, and anything else they happened to leave behind. Hundreds of thousands of abandoned mines litter the American West, and at current funding levels it will take more than 500 years to clean up all of them. Our bill requires polluters to clean up these sites and ends the industry’s walkaway culture by establishing strong new reclamation standards and bonding requirements to make sure that mine abandonment never happens again.

Just as important, we give federal agencies the power to say “No” to a mining company’s demands. Right now, federal law puts mining on a pedestal when it comes to how we use our public lands. Under current laws and policies, federal agencies are expected to treat any new mining request as a sacred right, not as one option among many worth considering. In the 1870s that wasn’t much of a problem. But today’s Westerners have other things they’d like to do on public lands—camping, hiking, fishing, hunting, or simply appreciating their tremendous beauty. Our bill gives land managers the long overdue authority to consider mining in light of the broader uses of the land and approve or reject a proposal accordingly.

There’s no good reason Republicans should oppose these kinds of common sense reforms. The logic behind this bill is the same logic Republicans say they’re applying to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, and all the other environmental laws they say need updating—except in this case, the law we’re fixing is a century older than those bedrock environmental statutes. The General Mining Act has needed fixing for decades, but for many reasons, including the power of the industry’s lobbyists, it has never happened.

Our bill has something for just about everyone. It would mean fewer toxic mine sites, less wasted taxpayer money, stronger environmental protections in wild and sensitive areas, and some sanity in how government agencies manage our federal lands. What it would mean, in other words, is finally creating a modern mining system in this country that provides some real benefit for everyday Americans, not simply mining executives. It’s about time.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+8 # BetaTheta 2018-05-16 16:22
Unfortunately, we can't equate Republicans' professed desires to "update" environmental law to the very necessary reform of the 1872 Mining Law. Their sole desire is to grease the skids for dirty industries to have a free hand, which they already have in the mining law.
 
 
+3 # Texas Aggie 2018-05-17 06:40
"There’s no good reason Republicans should oppose these kinds of common sense reforms. "

Yes, there is. If they didn't oppose these kinds of reforms, then their patrons would have to work for a living instead of just collecting fruit as it falls off a tree. That is all the reason that the repubs need.
 
 
+3 # Bourbaki 2018-05-17 08:16
Texas Aggie, They don't just pick the fallen and low hanging fruit, they also build a fence around the "stolen" assets to keep the rest of the citizens from benefitting from the bounty.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN