RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Engelhardt writes: "In reality, the costs of America's wars, still spreading in the Trump era, are incalculable."

US soldiers walk off a helicopter. (photo: Andrew Renneisen/Getty)
US soldiers walk off a helicopter. (photo: Andrew Renneisen/Getty)

An Empire of Nothing at All?

By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

16 May 18


Note to TomDispatch Readers: Today’s post is an excerpt from my newest book, A Nation Unmade by War, my personal portrait of our increasingly mad world. It’s just hitting the bookstores, so do support this site (and me) by picking up a copy. Pulitzer-Prize-winning historian John Dower says, “Since September 11th, no one has had a keener eye for American militarism, hypocrisy, and flat-out folly than Tom Engelhardt." For a donation of $100 ($125 if you live outside the U.S.), I’ll send you a signed, personalized copy of the book. Be the first on your block to get it! Check out our donation page for the details and my thanks in advance to all of you who help keep TomDispatch afloat in tough times.

-Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

An Empire of Nothing at All?

[This essay is the introduction to Tom Engelhardt’s new book, A Nation Unmade by War, a Dispatch Book published by Haymarket Books.]

s I was putting the finishing touches on my new book, the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute published an estimate of the taxpayer dollars that will have gone into America’s war on terror from September 12, 2001, through fiscal year 2018. That figure: a cool $5.6 trillion (including the future costs of caring for our war vets). On average, that’s at least $23,386 per taxpayer.

Keep in mind that such figures, however eye-popping, are only the dollar costs of our wars. They don’t, for instance, include the psychic costs to the Americans mangled in one way or another in those never-ending conflicts. They don’t include the costs to this country’s infrastructure, which has been crumbling while taxpayer dollars flow copiously and in a remarkably -- in these years, almost uniquely -- bipartisan fashion into what’s still laughably called “national security.” That’s not, of course, what would make most of us more secure, but what would make them -- the denizens of the national security state -- ever more secure in Washington and elsewhere. We’re talking about the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. nuclear complex, and the rest of that state-within-a-state, including its many intelligence agencies and the warrior corporations that have, by now, been fused into that vast and vastly profitable interlocking structure.

In reality, the costs of America’s wars, still spreading in the Trump era, are incalculable. Just look at photos of the cities of Ramadi or Mosul in Iraq, Raqqa or Aleppo in Syria, Sirte in Libya, or Marawi in the southern Philippines, all in ruins in the wake of the conflicts Washington set off in the post–9/11 years, and try to put a price on them. Those views of mile upon mile of rubble, often without a building still standing untouched, should take anyone’s breath away. Some of those cities may never be fully rebuilt.

And how could you even begin to put a dollars-and-cents value on the larger human costs of those wars: the hundreds of thousands of dead? The tens of millions of people displaced in their own countries or sent as refugees fleeing across any border in sight? How could you factor in the way those masses of uprooted peoples of the Greater Middle East and Africa are unsettling other parts of the planet? Their presence (or more accurately a growing fear of it) has, for instance, helped fuel an expanding set of right-wing “populist” movements that threaten to tear Europe apart. And who could forget the role that those refugees -- or at least fantasy versions of them -- played in Donald Trump’s full-throated, successful pitch for the presidency? What, in the end, might be the cost of that?

Opening the Gates of Hell

America’s never-ending twenty-first-century conflicts were triggered by the decision of George W. Bush and his top officials to instantly define their response to attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center by a tiny group of jihadis as a “war”; then to proclaim it nothing short of a “Global War on Terror”; and finally to invade and occupy first Afghanistan and then Iraq, with dreams of dominating the Greater Middle East -- and ultimately the planet -- as no other imperial power had ever done.

Their overwrought geopolitical fantasies and their sense that the U.S. military was a force capable of accomplishing anything they willed it to do launched a process that would cost this world of ours in ways that no one will ever be able to calculate. Who, for instance, could begin to put a price on the futures of the children whose lives, in the aftermath of those decisions, would be twisted and shrunk in ways frightening even to imagine? Who could tote up what it means for so many millions of this planet’s young to be deprived of homes, parents, educations -- of anything, in fact, approximating the sort of stability that might lead to a future worth imagining?

Though few may remember it, I’ve never forgotten the 2002 warning issued by Amr Moussa, then head of the Arab League. An invasion of Iraq would, he predicted that September, “open the gates of hell.” Two years later, in the wake of the actual invasion and the U.S. occupation of that country, he altered his comment slightly. “The gates of hell,” he said, “are open in Iraq.”

His assessment has proven unbearably prescient -- and one not only applicable to Iraq. Fourteen years after that invasion, we should all now be in some kind of mourning for a world that won’t ever be. It wasn’t just the US military that, in the spring of 2003, passed through those gates to hell. In our own way, we all did. Otherwise, Donald Trump wouldn’t have become president.

I don’t claim to be an expert on hell. I have no idea exactly what circle of it we’re now in, but I do know one thing: we are there.

The Infrastructure of a Garrison State

If I could bring my parents back from the dead right now, I know that this country in its present state would boggle their minds. They wouldn’t recognize it. If I were to tell them, for instance, that just three men -- Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Warren Buffett -- now possess as much wealth as the bottom half of the US population, of 160 million Americans, they would never believe me.

How, for instance, could I begin to explain to them the ways in which, in these years, money flowed ever upward into the pockets of the immensely wealthy and then down again into what became one-percent elections that would finally ensconce a billionaire and his family in the White House? How would I explain to them that, while leading congressional Democrats and Republicans couldn’t say often enough that this country was uniquely greater than any that ever existed, none of them could find the funds -- some $5.6 trillion for starters -- necessary for our roads, dams, bridges, tunnels, and other crucial infrastructure? This on a planet where what the news likes to call “extreme weather” is increasingly wreaking havoc on that same infrastructure.

My parents wouldn’t have thought such things possible. Not in America. And somehow I’d have to explain to them that they had returned to a nation which, though few Americans realize it, has increasingly been unmade by war -- by the conflicts Washington’s war on terror triggered that have now morphed into the wars of so many and have, in the process, changed us.

Such conflicts on the global frontiers have a tendency to come home in ways that can be hard to track or pin down. After all, unlike those cities in the Greater Middle East, ours aren’t yet in ruins -- though some of them may be heading in that direction, even if in slow motion. This country is, at least theoretically, still near the height of its imperial power, still the wealthiest nation on the planet. And yet it should be clear enough by now that we’ve crippled not just other nations but ourselves in ways that I suspect -- though I’ve tried over these years to absorb and record them as best I could -- we can still barely see or grasp.

In my new book, A Nation Unmade by War, the focus is on a country increasingly unsettled and transformed by spreading wars to which most of its citizens were, at best, only half paying attention. Certainly, Trump’s election was a sign of how an American sense of decline had already come home to roost in the era of the rise of the national security state (and little else).

Though it’s not something normally said here, to my mind President Trump should be considered part of the costs of those wars come home. Without the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and what followed, I doubt he would have been imaginable as anything but the host of a reality TV show or the owner of a series of failed casinos. Nor would the garrison-state version of Washington he now occupies be conceivable, nor the generals of our disastrous wars whom he’s surrounded himself with, nor the growth of a surveillance state that would have staggered George Orwell.

The Makings of a Blowback Machine

It took Donald Trump -- give him credit where it’s due -- to make us begin to grasp that we were living in a different and devolving world. And none of this would have been imaginable if, in the aftermath of 9/11, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney & Co. hadn’t felt the urge to launch the wars that led us through those gates of hell. Their soaring geopolitical dreams of global domination proved to be nightmares of the first order. They imagined a planet unlike any in the previous half millennium of imperial history, in which a single power would basically dominate everything until the end of time. They imagined, that is, the sort of world that, in Hollywood, had been associated only with the most malign of evil characters.

And here was the result of their conceptual overreach: never, it could be argued, has a great power still in its imperial prime proven quite so incapable of applying its military and political might in a way that would advance its aims. It’s a strange fact of this century that the U.S. military has been deployed across vast swaths of the planet and somehow, again and again, has found itself overmatched by underwhelming enemy forces and incapable of producing any results other than destruction and further fragmentation. And all of this occurred at the moment when the planet most needed a new kind of knitting together, at the moment when humanity’s future was at stake in ways previously unimaginable, thanks to its still-increasing use of fossil fuels.

In the end, the last empire may prove to be an empire of nothing at all -- a grim possibility which has been a focus of TomDispatch, the website I’ve run since November 2002. Of course, when you write pieces every couple of weeks for years on end, it would be surprising if you didn’t repeat yourself. The real repetitiousness, however, wasn’t at TomDispatch. It was in Washington. The only thing our leaders and generals have seemed capable of doing, starting from the day after the 9/11 attacks, is more or less the same thing with the same dismal results, again and again.

The U.S. military and the national security state that those wars emboldened have become, in effect -- and with a bow to the late Chalmers Johnson (a TomDispatch stalwart and a man who knew the gates of hell when he saw them) -- a staggeringly well-funded blowback machine. In all these years, while three administrations pursued the spreading war on terror, America’s conflicts in distant lands were largely afterthoughts to its citizenry. Despite the largest demonstrations in history aimed at stopping a war before it began, once the invasion of Iraq occurred, the protests died out and, ever since, Americans have generally ignored their country’s wars, even as the blowback began. Someday, they will have no choice but to pay attention.

Tom Engelhardt is a co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of The United States of Fear as well as a history of the Cold War, The End of Victory Culture. He is a fellow of the Nation Institute and runs His sixth and latest book, just published, is A Nation Unmade by War (Dispatch Books).

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, Tom Engelhardt's A Nation Unmade by War, as well as Alfred McCoy's In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power, John Dower's The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II, John Feffer's dystopian novel Splinterlands, and Nick Turse's Next Time They’ll Come to Count the Dead. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+36 # chrisconno 2018-05-16 17:48
I certainly haven't forgotten about the fact that we are bombing the piss out of countries that pose no threat what so ever to our security. That we are displacing, maiming, killing and destroying every vestige of a culture unlike our own. For what? OIL, and that means power. Thank you Tom Engehardt for putting so much information so vital to our recognition of our devastating war culture that every voter should be required to read. I have often said to people who ignorantly rant about the threat of terror and how dare those insurgents attack us, "How would you feel if an invading army were to bomb our schools, hospitals, weddings, and funerals, relentlessly in the name of their homeland?" Sadly, it just never seems to register.
+8 # economagic 2018-05-16 20:06
Yep, pretty much the image my scrambled brain conjured up on the afternoon of September 11, 2001, of the blinded Cyclops thrashing out all within his reach. Madness in ancient Greece, in the beginning of the "New American Century," and today. Funny (ha, ha) how the promoters of said "Century" failed to see even a year ahead, when the US military went thrashing through eastern Afghanistan looking for Osama Bin Laden, who by that time was already in the Witness Protection Program according to my wife, whose father was in the first class recruited by the CIA and who still bears the scars.
+6 # elizabethblock 2018-05-16 20:09
Some day someone with the breadth of knowledge and the depth of wisdom of the late Tony Judt will write a comparative history of nations that have lost their empires. The US may not be the worst, but then again it may be - its unacknowledged empire is the biggest, and the havoc it has wrought is in proportion. None of them, I think, will prove to have done well.
+13 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-17 07:28
THis is a good introduction to how empires die. Permanent war transforms the nation into a police state and into a sewer of corruption. War is a profit generating machine for those who make weapons or sell war materials to the government. They bribe politicians in order to get them to spend more on war. War causes the empire to collude with other corrupt empires. Right now, the US has a confederation with Israel and Saudi Arabia.

The legacy of the Bush/Cheney regime will be that it destroyed the US. The nation was in bad shape already, but the pushed it past the tipping point. There is no return now. An empire never gives up its power.
+3 # elkingo 2018-05-17 13:50
You boys are so right. Except Tom: "They imagined a planet unlike any in the previous half-millennium of imperial history, in which a single power would basically dominate everything until the end of time." Third Reich, anyone? And supra-Orwellian surveillance? Yup.
Average American photographed 100x per day by surveillance cameras. And NSA, CIA et al? Bush league. Facebook (their creature) tracks our emotional moods - in the service of carcinocapitali sm. Gerogie Orwell never saw the like.

The only way is to depose ALL of them, not just the American Imperium, but Pootie, Kimmy, Xi - ALL the nutjob terrididal leaders before it is too late. Don't care so much about the end of the American Empire, RR, but the end of the habitable world, no longer a baroque concern.
+4 # Allears 2018-05-17 14:41
'And here was the result of their conceptual overreach: never, it could be argued, has a great power still in its imperial prime proven quite so incapable of applying its military and political might in a way that would advance its aims.' Question is: what are its ulterior aims?-there is no common national aim as such,nor can there be any more if there ever was, but the aims of individual men who use military power to advance their individual agendas (get rich or richer/stay rich or richer)and in so doing have over the last century or more come to realize that war is not a means of defense of any means of making money(oil rights and production, e.g.), but is in itself, the primordial wealth maker. And that is why perpetual war is undertaken;it is a perpetual profit maker, with uncounted costs externalized to anyone but the weapons makers or the citizens who pay for it. The minds of the men who drive the perpetual war machine are so mesmerized by the mechanism, the machinery, the money of it, that they are incapable of seeing the planet at all-they exist in their own individual faux-planets bubbles. They can see into the bubbles of their ilk and this is all they use to measure their worth-my bubble is as big as his, or bigger. They are not men, they are mindless amoebas-evoluti on gone backwards, a waste of a neurobiome-amoe bas should be insulted if they could understand the metaphor.
+5 # PABLO DIABLO 2018-05-17 19:51
"The only thing our leaders and generals have seemed capable of doing, starting from the day after the 9/11 attacks, is more or less the same thing with the same dismal results, again and again."
I question "dismal results". The Military/indust ry has gotten enormously rich. That $ 5.6 TRILLION was spent on them. When they lose a war they just ask for/get more funding. Works well (not dismal) for them.
Huge military buildup=an Empire in decline.
+2 # janie1893 2018-05-18 00:13
Indeed, mankind is devolving. Other animals still recognise the ultimate raison d'etre is reproduction/ca re for one's kind. Man has moved on. Our ultimate 'reason for being' is to accumulate money. Screw the victims of our unjustified wars, we are getting rich!!!

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.