RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Wasserman writes: "The Boston Red Sox have finally decided to atone for two of the most racist, self-destructive snubs in sports history. Like so many other bigoted decisions, the team - and the town - paid a fearsome price. And it did NOT come from the infamous 'Curse of the Bambino.'"

Willie Mays. (photo: Santiago Mejia/The Chronicle)
Willie Mays. (photo: Santiago Mejia/The Chronicle)


The REAL Bosox Curse Was Racism, NOT the Bambino

By Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

30 April 18

 

he Boston Red Sox have finally decided to atone for two of the most racist, self-destructive snubs in sports history. Like so many other bigoted decisions, the team � and the town � paid a fearsome price.

And it did NOT come from the infamous �Curse of the Bambino.�

That one happened in 1920, when my dad was a two-year-old living in the shadow of Fenway Park. It was about money, not race.

That year the shady Bosox owner sold the great Babe Ruth to the hated Yankees for $125,000. He used the cash to fund a musical.

Soon Ruth led New York to more championships than we can bear to count. We wouldn�t win again until 2004, a �Cursed� wait of 86 years.

But selling the Bambino was NOT the dumbest thing the club ever did.

Just after World War II, the team shunned not one but TWO players as great as Ruth. And it happened not just from stupidity, but also from explicitly stated racism.

The two passed-over African Americans both went to New York, one to the Dodgers, the other to the Giants. Their names are hard for a Sox fan to say, but here they are: Jackie Robinson and Willie Mays.

In part to atone for those two terrible shunnings, Red Sox ownership has decided to finally strip from a small street next to Fenway the name of Tom Yawkey, the man responsible.

A wealthy South Carolinian, Yawkey owned the Sox from 1933 until he died in 1976. He treated the club like a rich man�s toy. His widow hung on until she passed in 1992.

Yawkey did hire Ted Williams, maybe the game�s greatest natural hitter. His maternal grandparents were born in Mexico, which was not widely known. In 1941, his batting average was .406. No one has since come close.

When I was 15, my grandfather and I, seated near first base, saw Williams hit a looping line drive over a low right field fence the Sox had set up just for him. Then he spit at a fan.

In 1960 Ted slammed his final homer off the wall in deep centerfield. The crowd went wild. But Williams refused to come out to tip his hat.

That infamous moment was memorialized in John Updike�s �Hub Fans Bid Kid Adieu,� which forever changed sportswriting. It was a very sad departure.

Decades later, I saw David Ortiz hit one to pretty much the same spot. Born in Santo Domingo, the endlessly endearing Big Papi charmed us all. After a big hit like that one, he never failed to tip his hat and flash that wonderful smile. He also helped the Sox win the World Series three times (Williams won none) and holds the team�s single-season home run record (54).

Which brings us to Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays, and what might have been. Before he went to the Dodgers and broke baseball�s color line in 1947, Robinson had a tryout at Fenway. Yawkey and company said NO.

Around the same time, a Sox scout in Alabama saw Mays as a teenager, pegged him for super-stardom, and told the front office he could be signed for a song.

The Sox said NO again. There�s no doubt the reason was race. During a Fenway tryout, somebody from management shouted the �N� word loud and clear. Yawkey served on an owners� committee that wrote a long-suppressed memo rationalizing a whites-only league.

Boston�s basketball Celtics later won seventeen championships with Bill Russell, Jo Jo White, Robert Parish, Kevin Garnett and innumerable other black stars. But the Sox were the very last major league baseball team to integrate. Not until their lineup was thoroughly diversified did they win another World Series.

A lifelong member of Red Sox Nation, I still gasp at the scope of the loss. A lineup featuring Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays and Ted Williams might have been the greatest of all time. Certainly the Sox would�ve resumed winning championships in the late 1940s rather than the early 2000s. Imagine what that could have meant for a city full of baseball-crazy kids like me. Imagine the sadness we feel now.

Robinson and Mays both had legendary careers (Willie is now 86). Ted Williams passed in 2002, still remembered as one of baseball's greatest hitters � and most complex characters.

But Tom Yawkey deprived us all for the lowest of reasons: racism. Had the Sox been owned by the community � as all major sports teams should be � instead of some rich out-of-towner, things might have been very different.

My red and green Boston blood boils at what might have been. Remove his name from that street, by all means.

The Sox-Yankees rivalry still burns red hot, which is as it should be.

But no matter who you root for, let's never again let race sink the greatness of any team of any kind.



Harvey Wasserman hosts the California Solartopia Show on KPFK-Pacifica Los Angeles 90.7FM and the Green Power & Wellness Show on prn.fm. His America at the Brink of Rebirth: The Life & Death Spiral of US History, from Deganawidah to The Donald is at www.solartopia.org, along with Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+28 # Jayceecool 2016-06-30 09:11
A simple reminder: the November presidential election will be determined by voter turnout. With the exception of the passionate movement supporting Bernie Sanders, the Democrats are facing their low turnouts of recent elections...
 
 
+32 # Texas Aggie 2016-06-30 09:46
While it may be understandably very difficult for some progressives to vote for Hillary Clinton, it should be no problem at all to vote for progressives further down the ticket, even if you leave the president box blank or check the Green party.

And those progressives further down the ticket need a big turnout. Be there!
 
 
+4 # MainStreetMentor 2016-07-01 15:23
 
 
+10 # Patriot 2016-06-30 09:35
Since neither party (at the moment) is a running widely accepted candiate for the office of the President of the United States, I'll put my money on record low voter turnout, a tactic Americans somehow have deluded themselves into thinking effective at anything but turning the winner into the person whose party succeeded in dragooning the most voters to the polls.

I also think the election will wind up in the House. Bernie Sanders, the ONLY viable candidate in the election, will receive many write-in votes in states where they are permissible, but most of them will not count if the states require registration as a write-in candidate. Many of the candidates who did not last the entire primary course may also receive write-in votes. The Green Party and other parties will receive generous protest support.

People who alway have opposed Clinton's and Trump's candidacies are unlikely to vote for either of them. Trump my pick up some die-hard so-called Democratic voters who truly loathe Clinton, just as Clinton may win some of the disgusted Republican voters. Independents, having the same options, probably will make the same choices.

I do not think that any candidate will have 51% of the vote.

Any one want to place a very small wager? Say, five toothpicks?
 
 
+15 # lmorneweck 2016-06-30 10:49
You don't need 51% of the vote. (Bill Clinton never came close.) You just need to win enough electoral college votes, which, for better or worse, HRC can do and Trump probably can't.
 
 
-1 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:00
"Viable" in this context mean "able to win." That's not Bernie Sanders, not any more.

Sandersites need to wake up and smell the coffee. Hillary Clinton may not be their brand, but spitting her out because she doesn't taste just right might mean having to swallow the tainted stuff known as Donald Trump.
 
 
+5 # jimmyjames 2016-06-30 09:46
If Jill Stein can garner enough support across America, 15% required, she will be allowed to participate in the Presidential debates. The same goes for Gary Johnson. Currently, Jill is at 7% and Gary at 10%. If Bernie does not win the nomination, many of his supporters will flock to support Jill Stein, potentially carrying her support over the 15% threshold. And Gary may well do the same with disenchanted Republican voters.

Assuming this happens, there will be some of the greatest debates we've ever had in this nation. Should be quite a circus to watch!! My money is on Jill Stein to win the debates.
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:17
jimmy -- right on. that's what I am hoping for.
 
 
-1 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:02
Quoting jimmyjames:
If Jill Stein can garner enough support across America, 15% required, she will be allowed to participate in the Presidential debates. The same goes for Gary Johnson. Currently, Jill is at 7% and Gary at 10%. If Bernie does not win the nomination, many of his supporters will flock to support Jill Stein, potentially carrying her support over the 15% threshold. And Gary may well do the same with disenchanted Republican voters.

Assuming this happens, there will be some of the greatest debates we've ever had in this nation. Should be quite a circus to watch!! My money is on Jill Stein to win the debates.

You'd be throwing it away, even if she somehow actually does get to 15 percent. If Ms. Stein were that good, more voters would have heard of her by now. (Frankly, I'm surprised she's even at 7 percent.)
 
 
+10 # guomashi 2016-06-30 10:16
If the Republican party is shattered how can that be a bad thing?

Unfortunately, things like the recent supreme court decisions are more likely to motivate Republican voters than to discourage them.

Now we need to shatter the Democrat party. Both need to be actively destroyed. Nothing new can emerge absent a destruction of the structures at hand which are literally sucking up all the oxygen in the country.
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:18
guo -- right on. that's what I am hoping for.
 
 
+12 # BettyFaas 2016-06-30 11:39
I question the greatness of the trade agreements that are coming with the TTIP and the TPP. Canada oil is suing the U.S now. under NAFTA for their perceived loss of profit from the denied XL pipeline completion.The upcoming trade agreements will only strengthen the multi-national corporations' power over nations' laws. weakening nations and worker rights further.
 
 
+2 # Karlus58 2016-06-30 12:26
Dear Jesse Berney! I don't know you but, gosh darn it! You've put this all into incredible perspective. Thank you! Your thoughts need to be front and center of each newscast of each and every home in this country.
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2016-06-30 13:25
 
 
+4 # Jim Rocket 2016-06-30 14:36
You may be correct but it's quite a stretch to say that Trump supporters understand any of that. They got boned and they're angry...that's as deep as it goes. They like him and he's rich. What more do you need?
 
 
+2 # RMDC 2016-06-30 17:29
Rocket -- you may be right. I'm not sure any die-hard supporter of any presidential candidate thinks very hard about issues. Most of the posters on this board are 1000 times more thoughtful than the average voter. It is hard to know what Trump supporters think -- although I do know a few and they talk about imposing tariffs all the time. They are college educated. One is a lawyer who is pretty informed on trade agreements and is supporting Trump.

I don't know any progressives who talk about trade tariffs. To them, trade agreements are mostly about corporate power, environmental protection, worker rights, and the like. But tariff free trade is how corporations exploit workers.
 
 
-2 # ericlipps 2016-07-01 05:04
Well, that and using undocumented immigrants as serf labor to bring down U.S. workers' wages by weakening unions.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN