RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Cole writes: "President Trump along with allies British prime minister Theresa May and French president Emannuel Macron struck Syria on Friday evening."

President Trump receiving a briefing on Monday from military leaders at the White House. (photo: Tom Brenner/NYT)
President Trump receiving a briefing on Monday from military leaders at the White House. (photo: Tom Brenner/NYT)

Reality Show Violence in the Age of Trump: Striking Syria

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

14 April 18


resident Trump along with allies British prime minister Theresa May and French president Emannuel Macron struck Syria on Friday evening.

It was not a piece of military strategy designed to win any war aims.

It will have no effect on the situation in Syria at all.

It was not authorized by Congress. The Republicans in Congress had threatened to impeach Barack Obama if he struck Syria in 2013 under similar circumstances.

It was not authorized by the UN. None of the three striking states had been attacked or harmed.

Then why?

In our age of politics as reality show, where we have hired the star of NBC’s “Apprentice” to play president (apparently in large part because he is both consistently awful and highly entertaining at once), even geopolitics is done for show.

The United States, France and the UK lost the Syrian War to Russia and Iran. It is all over but the shouting. They had hoped that the al-Assad regime, which had been a thorn in their sides for decades, would be overthrown. It isn’t an ignoble hope. It is a horrible, Stalinist regime with massive amounts of blood on its hands. But the reasons for which Washington, Paris and London wanted it gone were not necessarily noble ones. Syria is among the last states to reject Israel. Its secular elites reached out, isolated after the end of the Cold War, to Iran for support. Its system does not accommodate the Western corporate take-over of the country’s economy. Overthrowing countries that buck the neoliberal, barracuda capitalist Washington consensus and challenge the neocolonial order in the Middle East (with the assumption of Israeli hegemony in the Levant) is a no-brainer for the North Atlantic powers.

The Syrian revolution of 2011 was a homegrown revolt against a regime that had already largely abandoned its socialist policies in favor of the establishment of Alawite oligarchies, which imprisoned people for the slightest criticism of the regime, and under which the proportion of people living in absolute poverty was rapidly increasing. But when the regime cleverly maneuvered the revolutionaries into allying with Muslim extremists on the battlefield, even then the CIA went on supporting the rebels. Its officials would deny it, but they were one degree of separation away from al-Qaeda, just as they had been in Afghanistan in the 1980s. And even while the US FBI and right wingers in the Senate like Ted Cruz were darkly intimating that the Muslim Brotherhood and all its offshoots are terrorist organizations, the 40 vetted groups supported by the CIA were mostly Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.

No lesson of history is ever learned in Washington, D.C.

As I argued on Thursday, the Russo-Syrian military operation against the Saudi-backed Army of Islam in Douma, in the course of which chemical weapons appear to have been used, was a resounding success. Once the chem was released, the Army of Islam fighters, who had dug in their heels and inflicted substantial casualties on the elite Panther Brigade special ops forces of the Syrian Arab Army, abruptly surrendered. They turned over hundreds of their weapons, released dozens of captives, and agreed to exit north to Jarabulus in their thousands. It was one of the most ignominious defeats visited upon any guerrilla group in the course of the seven-year war.

If you had wanted to work against further such chemical use, the more effective method would have been to negotiate with Russia about it and apply pressure on Moscow.

The Tripartite missile attacks on Saturday will attrite some regime military capabilities in a small way. But since the Russian Federation’s Aerospace Forces are actually supplying the air power to defeat what is left of the rebels, the regime’s loss of some facilities won’t matter to the course of the war. I expect further Idlib and Deraa campaigns later this year, and I expect the regime over time to win them. I have to say that I’m surprised by the resiliency of the al-Assad clan. You wouldn’t have expected them easily to restore control over places like Homs (a largely Sunni Arab city with a strong Muslim Brotherhood movement). Security is no doubt fragile. But it appears that a reassertion of the regime is plausible in the short to medium term.

The missile attacks are for domestic politics, and perhaps to some extent a demonstration of political will to Russia and Iran. As military history they are a footnote.

Those who argue that they were necessary to show resistance to the use of chemical weapons are missing some things. The West backed Saddam Hussein’s use of chem in the Iraq-Iran War. It is hard to see why killing children with chlorine differs from the point of view of the children from killing them with bombs. Military action should be taken in accordance with international law. And, deploying missile strikes ineffectually renders them less effective politically down the road.

These strikes are like when a fistfight breaks out on the reality show Big Brother. The show will go on next week. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+3 # tedrey 2018-04-14 10:41
I notice that the U.S. military now claims that it already knew three places where Syrian poison gas was being produced right after destroying those places and whatever evidence they might have provided the U.N. if informed eatlier. Neat! Why didn't G.W.Bush think of that?
+5 # sweetbabbalou 2018-04-14 13:10
"The missile attacks are for domestic politics, and perhaps to some extent a demonstration of political will to Russia and Iran." Agreed. People killed/injured/ maimed are viewed as unimportant collateral damage by the the current kakistocracy. This strike was done solely to distract the citizens of the US so they don't pay attention to what's happening at home. It was not done out of any humanitarian concern for those gassed. "It will have no effect on the situation in Syria at all." Thank you, Juan Cole.
+3 # janie1893 2018-04-14 14:05
There is only one answer to the problem.
Get rid of the madman who calls himself POTUS!
+3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-04-14 14:14
Cole is right. This is reality TV and not politics. Trump and his staff of generals and chicken hawks needs a show for the masses. They even alerted some media in advance so they could send their star teleprompter readers -- David Muir -- to Beirut so he could appear to viewers as he were on scene.

Syrians and Russians are saying that there were no chemicals used at all. If you look at the videos released by the White Helmets, this is true. Kids are standing around with no symptoms at all until some frantic-acting adult grabs them, begins dousing their heads with water, and pumping something into their mouths and noses. Then they start acting sick and foaming at the mouth. This was all staged.

America has been played -- again. Trump and the Pentagon have murdered people for a show. And they will get away with it. This is what the Pentagon has been doing for its whole existence.
+2 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-04-14 14:35
& the attacks are also a catchy diversion from the Mueller & Stormy storms….
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-04-15 17:54
The military operation has now been named "Operation Desert Stormy." It took Stormy Daniels out of the news for a few days, "mission accomplished."
0 # Robbee 2018-04-14 18:03
bread and circuses for supporters of dickhead and putin
0 # Benign Observer 2018-04-16 16:31
And their pet monkeys.
+6 # Texas Aggie 2018-04-14 18:15
Further evidence that humanitarian reasons had absolutely nothing to do with the attack is that the US is on track to admit fewer than 100 Syrian refugees this year. As of this moment, the US has admitted a lot fewer Syrian refugees than it fired missiles at Syria, a grand total of around 11 (eleven). That drumpf won't let refugees into the country shows that his so-called concern for the lives of Syrian civilians is just as worthless as his promise to pay you for work you do for him.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.