RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Boardman writes: "The politics of American imperialism are alive and well in Vermont, where elected officials are defending the military-industrial war-making machine against voters who reject ruling class priorities."

Opponents of the F-35 fighter jet slated for deployment to the Vermont Air National Guard base in South Burlington hold a news conference in Burlington. (photo: Glenn Russell/Free Press)
Opponents of the F-35 fighter jet slated for deployment to the Vermont Air National Guard base in South Burlington hold a news conference in Burlington. (photo: Glenn Russell/Free Press)

Vermont Congressional Delegation Opposes Vermont Voters

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

29 March 18

What happens when the lives of citizens get in the way of political egos?

he politics of American imperialism are alive and well in Vermont, where elected officials are defending the military-industrial war-making machine against voters who reject ruling class priorities. At the symbolic center of this democratic confrontation is the notorious F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the world’s most expensive weapons system, designed to kill in many ways, including a nuclear first strike. And the few times Vermonters have had the chance to vote, they’ve voted against basing this loud, health-harming, housing-destroying offensive war machine in the state’s most densely populated area. Now it’s coming to a head in a people versus career politicians face-off.

At a Town Meeting on March 6, Burlington voters chose, by a 55% majority, to ask the Air Force to base the F-35 in some other state. On March 26, the Burlington City Council, by a 9-3 vote, forwarded that request to Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson to “replace the planned basing of the F-35 with a basing of a low-noise-level plane with a proven high safety record….” For whatever reason, the council request left out the rest of the ballot resolution’s request: “… proven high safety record appropriate for a densely populated area” (perhaps because that densely populated area is NOT Burlington). The City Council asked Secretary Wilson to respond by May 1.

Vermont’s quisling Congressional delegation – Democratic senator Patrick Leahy, Independent senator Bernie Sanders, and Democratic congressman Peter Welch – made what looks like a cheap shot effort to influence the council vote at the last minute. Late on the afternoon of March 26, Vermont’s “representatives” issued a joint statement saying they stood by their years of pushing for the F-35 basing at the Burlington Airport, which is in South Burlington (which has no voice in the decision).

Unable to justify their decision, the Vermont delegation stonewalls

Consistent with the delegation’s past behavior, their pro-F-35 statement addressed none of the substantive issues, and none of the three would answer questions from the media. The imperious attitude of these three is also consistent with the rest of Vermont’s bi-partisan leadership for the past decade. They have all behaved with imperial detachment, refusing to ask sensible questions, refusing to listen to opponents in any field (medical, educational, social, even military). They continue to act as if this were an imperial polity, in which they announce their decision, refuse to explain it or justify it, but expect everyone else to accept it. For Vermont, this anti-democratic policy-making has worked surprisingly effectively for a surprisingly long time.

And it’s not over yet. Before the city council resolution can go to the Air Force, Burlington mayor Miro Weinberger has to sign off on it, and the notoriously weaselly Democrat continues to ponder what, if anything, he will do in accord with the clear wish of his voters. Although the F-35 issue is many years old, Weinberger hasn’t indicated what new concerns could possibly be troubling him. He has till April 16 to sign or veto the resolution. In the event of a veto, the city council’s 9-3 vote would be enough for an override, if the votes hold.

As Mayor, Weinberger is at the crossroads of powerful contending forces. As a Democrat, he is among those talked about as a possible successor to Senators Welch and Sanders as they age out of office. How he goes on the F-35 could alienate either the Vermont electorate or the Democratic establishment and its military-industrial base, especially the vocal and endlessly self-serving Vermont Air National Guard. The mayor also owes his office partly to the power brokers of real estate and development in Burlington (that overlap with the Leahy circle).

Say it ain’t so, Bernie!

For Bernie Sanders to be aligned with forces he has railed against on the campaign trail is especially odd. When Sanders was Mayor of Burlington in the 1980s the city was affectionately known as “the People’s Republic of Burlington.” That was exaggeration for effect, but also reflected a basic human decency of the time and place. Now, as one Burlington voter put it at an F-35 hearing: “People have had enough of putting the interests of rich white dudes over average citizens.”

Sanders, whose record on issues of war and military has never been strong, is up for re-election this year (with no apparent opposition). He recently led a futile effort to get the Senate to pay attention to US participation in the US-Saudi genocidal war on Yemen, though he didn’t frame it that strongly. Why he has been so timid and quiet about the F-35 for all these years is a mystery. Like Leahy, Sanders voted for the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF), the legislation that still serves as the legal basis for all the wars the US is waging today. Only Rep. Barbara Lee, a Democrat from Oakland, California, voted against that AUMF.

Like Sanders, Peter Welch is also up for re-election with a $2.1 million campaign fund already (he was unopposed in 2014). He hasn’t had serious opposition since 2006. This year Welch has two primary campaign opponents who have raised less than $30,000 between them. But Welch is also in the supposed line-of-succession for Vermont’s Senate seats, even though at 71 he is only slightly younger than Leahy, 77, and Sanders, 76. Welch’s official website says nothing whatsoever about the F-35, but he does have a 2013 story about his favoring regulation of private unmanned drones as a danger and a nuisance. Residents of South Burlington and Winooski might appreciate the irony of his unconcern for danger and nuisance that the F-35 will inflict on them.

All three members of Vermont’s Congressional delegation seem strangely unable or unwilling to challenge the political intimidation of the Vermont Air National Guard (VTANG). Their worshipful public adoration of VTANG is out of all proportion to any real-world accomplishments. VTANG, for reasons never satisfactorily explained, has fetishized the F-35, attempting to render it beyond criticism. But the Air Force never wanted to base the F-35 in South Burlington in the first place. Only the obsessive insistence of Leahy and guard leaders has brought it this close, and that requires considerable lying and disinformation along the way.

What did VTANG know and when did VTANG know it?

The city council’s March 26 resolution illustrates the dishonesty of the process that has surrounded the F-35 for years. The city council appends questions to its resolution that would not be questions at the end of a process that has any integrity. After years of supposed conscientious investigation by the Air Force and others, the city council still has no reliable information about how loud the F-35 is. The city council doesn’t know if there is an alternative mission for VTANG because VTANG says there’s not, but the Air Force has told the court there is (and common sense allows the obvious inference that the Air Force can make a new mission for VTANG any time it chooses). The city council doesn’t know what flying time the F-35 will have, what fuel it uses, or how dangerous its material components are to the environment. The city council is ignorant because the supporters of the F-35 have deliberately avoided objective, truthful answers to the hard questions. That’s the way it is in a corrupt system.

Have any of the responsible officials involved in the decision-making done due diligence on the F-35 over the past five years? Available evidence suggests not. They would rather force their totemic F-35 onto a community with no voice and take their chances with the consequences. Such political shuck and jive as the Vermont Congressional delegation, VTANG, the Pentagon, and others continue to peddle would be criminal negligence in any conscientious civil society.

William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+22 # ktony 2018-03-29 17:27
Basing decisions and manufacturing locations are just two of the levers the military has to manipulate politicians. The lure of even apocryphal "jobs" has a lot of clout. Activity at the base adds to the local economy, though frequently the trade-offs run to the benefit of the military, not pesky civilians who are in the way.
+24 # Wise woman 2018-03-29 20:21
I'm surprised at both Leahy and Sanders. Bernie's whole message has always been people centered. What has happened here? The people have spoken and no one is listening much less acting. Come on guys, you're breaking my heart.
+11 # Observer 47 2018-03-30 09:20
SHAME ON YOU, BERNIE SANDERS!! Are you a hypocrite, after all?
+18 # laborequalswealth 2018-03-30 11:11
Virtually EVERY Congressional district in the USA has some kind of "defense" pork barrel in it. It's the way the Military Death Machine has bought off representatives and the public - with OUR tax dollars.

How does it feel to be supporting our own destruction?

Disappointed in Sanders. Afraid no one is 100%, if they ever were. But he's still the best voice we've got.

Who is coming up the ranks? Are there ANY Democrats worth supporting anymore?
+6 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-03-31 07:24
The Pentagon has most states and communities by the balls - they bring a lot of money into localities with their bases and manufacturing. Prisons do the same thing. The people of Burlington are correct and courageous to tell the F-35 to get out of Vermont.

The US is facing a life and death situation. The new cold war will bankrupt the US. the F-35 will cost $2 trillion before it is finished. Another $1 trillion is being dumped in to renovating the nuclear arsenal. Another $1 trillion is going into expanding overseas military bases. On going wars are costing nearly $1 trilion dollars.

At some point, non-war spending will shrink to unsustainable levels as more and more of the wealth created by American workers is transferred to weapons contractors and their owners on Wall Street. The global war of the neo-cons is robbing the lives of Americans.

Every community should do what Vermont is doing -- throw the weapons makers out. There will be a short term economic loss, but a very great long term gain.
+1 # WBoardman 2018-04-01 18:37
Rodion writes:

"Every community should do what Vermont is doing -- throw the weapons makers out. "

Sadly, that's a little premature and optimistic.
Officially, the request has not yet gone to the Air Force,
because Mayor Weinberger is playing cat&mouse with a veto.

Even is the mayor signs it, the same power brokers who brought the F-35 to South Burlington will still be in office to keep it there. What Vermont needs to succeed here is some unexpected and amazing transformative consciousness that is more concerned about more people and less obsessed with their own power and importance.

Odds on that?
+2 # NAVYVET 2018-04-02 04:23
Listen up, Bernie, Pat and the others. The people are speaking. Turn your morals on.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.